Biharmonic versus bimodal AFM: Numerical and experimental study on soft matter
Bimodal atomic force microscopy (AFM) provides both topographical and material composition of a material with a single-pass experiment. Based on the rectangular beam theory, the cantilever's second to first eigenmode frequency is 6.27. Due to the fact that they are not multiple integers, there...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied physics 2019-09, Vol.126 (9) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of applied physics |
container_volume | 126 |
creator | Eslami, Babak Damircheli, Mehrnoosh |
description | Bimodal atomic force microscopy (AFM) provides both topographical and material composition of a material with a single-pass experiment. Based on the rectangular beam theory, the cantilever's second to first eigenmode frequency is 6.27. Due to the fact that they are not multiple integers, there are irregular taps over the surface during an experiment. This can cause nonlinear vibrations in the cantilever in addition to the fact that the probe does not interact with each pixel similarly. Therefore, exciting the cantilever with higher harmonics instead of the eigenmodes in multifrequency AFM mechanisms and its advantages are discussed. Based on this theoretical discussion, this study provides the guideline to select the correct harmonic. It is found that the ratio of second to first eigenmode frequency heavily depends on the geometry of the cantilever. Additionally, it is found that cantilevers with lower eigenmode frequency ratios, excited with the first eigenmode frequency and higher harmonic, can provide higher phase contrasts. Numerical studies are done on a polystyrene (PS) and gold (Au) sample system. Based on this study, first one needs to minimize
f
2
/
f
1. Second, the second excitation frequency should be the closest n-th harmonic to
f
2
/
f
1 (i.e., one needs to minimize
|
n
−
f
2
f
1
|). Experimentally, a bimodal AFM scheme with an external function generator is used to image PS and low-density polyethylene polymer blend. The highest 2nd eigenmode phase contrast is observed with a cantilever that has a lower
f
2
/
f
1 and is excited with its first eigenmode frequency and 6th harmonic (i.e., the nearest harmonic to the second eigenmode). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1063/1.5116794 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_1_5116794</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2285362655</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-35ccc8b804bc79d687c99f1ae1168383f1ce2ed858444851c45b382f3a8af98c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkMFLwzAYxYMoOKcH_4OAJ4XOpGnaL950OBXmvOg5pGmCHWtTk3S4_97IBt49Pd7jx_c9HkKXlMwoKdktnXFKy0oUR2hCCYis4pwcowkhOc1AVOIUnYWwJoRSYGKCVg_tp_Kd61uNt8aHMeC67VyjNvh-8XqHV2NnfKuTVX2DzfeQXGf6mIIQx2aHXY-DsxF3Kkbjz9GJVZtgLg46RR-Lx_f5c7Z8e3qZ3y8zzfIqZoxrraEGUtS6Ek0JlRbCUmVSd2DALNUmNw1wKIoCONUFrxnklilQVoBmU3S1vzt49zWaEOXajb5PL2WeA2dlXnKeqOs9pb0LwRsrh9Re-Z2kRP7OJak8zJXYmz0bdBtVbF3_P3jr_B8oh8ayH_vxeAk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2285362655</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biharmonic versus bimodal AFM: Numerical and experimental study on soft matter</title><source>American Institute of Physics (AIP) Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Eslami, Babak ; Damircheli, Mehrnoosh</creator><creatorcontrib>Eslami, Babak ; Damircheli, Mehrnoosh</creatorcontrib><description>Bimodal atomic force microscopy (AFM) provides both topographical and material composition of a material with a single-pass experiment. Based on the rectangular beam theory, the cantilever's second to first eigenmode frequency is 6.27. Due to the fact that they are not multiple integers, there are irregular taps over the surface during an experiment. This can cause nonlinear vibrations in the cantilever in addition to the fact that the probe does not interact with each pixel similarly. Therefore, exciting the cantilever with higher harmonics instead of the eigenmodes in multifrequency AFM mechanisms and its advantages are discussed. Based on this theoretical discussion, this study provides the guideline to select the correct harmonic. It is found that the ratio of second to first eigenmode frequency heavily depends on the geometry of the cantilever. Additionally, it is found that cantilevers with lower eigenmode frequency ratios, excited with the first eigenmode frequency and higher harmonic, can provide higher phase contrasts. Numerical studies are done on a polystyrene (PS) and gold (Au) sample system. Based on this study, first one needs to minimize
f
2
/
f
1. Second, the second excitation frequency should be the closest n-th harmonic to
f
2
/
f
1 (i.e., one needs to minimize
|
n
−
f
2
f
1
|). Experimentally, a bimodal AFM scheme with an external function generator is used to image PS and low-density polyethylene polymer blend. The highest 2nd eigenmode phase contrast is observed with a cantilever that has a lower
f
2
/
f
1 and is excited with its first eigenmode frequency and 6th harmonic (i.e., the nearest harmonic to the second eigenmode).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8979</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1089-7550</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/1.5116794</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAPIAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Applied physics ; Atomic force microscopy ; Beam theory (structures) ; Cantilever beams ; Function generators ; Gold ; Higher harmonics ; Low density polyethylenes ; Microscopes ; Phase contrast ; Polymer blends ; Polystyrene resins ; Rectangular beams</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied physics, 2019-09, Vol.126 (9)</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2019 Author(s). Published under license by AIP Publishing.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-35ccc8b804bc79d687c99f1ae1168383f1ce2ed858444851c45b382f3a8af98c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-35ccc8b804bc79d687c99f1ae1168383f1ce2ed858444851c45b382f3a8af98c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5720-3701 ; 0000-0001-5738-6766</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/jap/article-lookup/doi/10.1063/1.5116794$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,794,4512,27924,27925,76384</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eslami, Babak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damircheli, Mehrnoosh</creatorcontrib><title>Biharmonic versus bimodal AFM: Numerical and experimental study on soft matter</title><title>Journal of applied physics</title><description>Bimodal atomic force microscopy (AFM) provides both topographical and material composition of a material with a single-pass experiment. Based on the rectangular beam theory, the cantilever's second to first eigenmode frequency is 6.27. Due to the fact that they are not multiple integers, there are irregular taps over the surface during an experiment. This can cause nonlinear vibrations in the cantilever in addition to the fact that the probe does not interact with each pixel similarly. Therefore, exciting the cantilever with higher harmonics instead of the eigenmodes in multifrequency AFM mechanisms and its advantages are discussed. Based on this theoretical discussion, this study provides the guideline to select the correct harmonic. It is found that the ratio of second to first eigenmode frequency heavily depends on the geometry of the cantilever. Additionally, it is found that cantilevers with lower eigenmode frequency ratios, excited with the first eigenmode frequency and higher harmonic, can provide higher phase contrasts. Numerical studies are done on a polystyrene (PS) and gold (Au) sample system. Based on this study, first one needs to minimize
f
2
/
f
1. Second, the second excitation frequency should be the closest n-th harmonic to
f
2
/
f
1 (i.e., one needs to minimize
|
n
−
f
2
f
1
|). Experimentally, a bimodal AFM scheme with an external function generator is used to image PS and low-density polyethylene polymer blend. The highest 2nd eigenmode phase contrast is observed with a cantilever that has a lower
f
2
/
f
1 and is excited with its first eigenmode frequency and 6th harmonic (i.e., the nearest harmonic to the second eigenmode).</description><subject>Applied physics</subject><subject>Atomic force microscopy</subject><subject>Beam theory (structures)</subject><subject>Cantilever beams</subject><subject>Function generators</subject><subject>Gold</subject><subject>Higher harmonics</subject><subject>Low density polyethylenes</subject><subject>Microscopes</subject><subject>Phase contrast</subject><subject>Polymer blends</subject><subject>Polystyrene resins</subject><subject>Rectangular beams</subject><issn>0021-8979</issn><issn>1089-7550</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqdkMFLwzAYxYMoOKcH_4OAJ4XOpGnaL950OBXmvOg5pGmCHWtTk3S4_97IBt49Pd7jx_c9HkKXlMwoKdktnXFKy0oUR2hCCYis4pwcowkhOc1AVOIUnYWwJoRSYGKCVg_tp_Kd61uNt8aHMeC67VyjNvh-8XqHV2NnfKuTVX2DzfeQXGf6mIIQx2aHXY-DsxF3Kkbjz9GJVZtgLg46RR-Lx_f5c7Z8e3qZ3y8zzfIqZoxrraEGUtS6Ek0JlRbCUmVSd2DALNUmNw1wKIoCONUFrxnklilQVoBmU3S1vzt49zWaEOXajb5PL2WeA2dlXnKeqOs9pb0LwRsrh9Re-Z2kRP7OJak8zJXYmz0bdBtVbF3_P3jr_B8oh8ayH_vxeAk</recordid><startdate>20190907</startdate><enddate>20190907</enddate><creator>Eslami, Babak</creator><creator>Damircheli, Mehrnoosh</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5720-3701</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5738-6766</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190907</creationdate><title>Biharmonic versus bimodal AFM: Numerical and experimental study on soft matter</title><author>Eslami, Babak ; Damircheli, Mehrnoosh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-35ccc8b804bc79d687c99f1ae1168383f1ce2ed858444851c45b382f3a8af98c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Applied physics</topic><topic>Atomic force microscopy</topic><topic>Beam theory (structures)</topic><topic>Cantilever beams</topic><topic>Function generators</topic><topic>Gold</topic><topic>Higher harmonics</topic><topic>Low density polyethylenes</topic><topic>Microscopes</topic><topic>Phase contrast</topic><topic>Polymer blends</topic><topic>Polystyrene resins</topic><topic>Rectangular beams</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eslami, Babak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damircheli, Mehrnoosh</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eslami, Babak</au><au>Damircheli, Mehrnoosh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biharmonic versus bimodal AFM: Numerical and experimental study on soft matter</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied physics</jtitle><date>2019-09-07</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>9</issue><issn>0021-8979</issn><eissn>1089-7550</eissn><coden>JAPIAU</coden><abstract>Bimodal atomic force microscopy (AFM) provides both topographical and material composition of a material with a single-pass experiment. Based on the rectangular beam theory, the cantilever's second to first eigenmode frequency is 6.27. Due to the fact that they are not multiple integers, there are irregular taps over the surface during an experiment. This can cause nonlinear vibrations in the cantilever in addition to the fact that the probe does not interact with each pixel similarly. Therefore, exciting the cantilever with higher harmonics instead of the eigenmodes in multifrequency AFM mechanisms and its advantages are discussed. Based on this theoretical discussion, this study provides the guideline to select the correct harmonic. It is found that the ratio of second to first eigenmode frequency heavily depends on the geometry of the cantilever. Additionally, it is found that cantilevers with lower eigenmode frequency ratios, excited with the first eigenmode frequency and higher harmonic, can provide higher phase contrasts. Numerical studies are done on a polystyrene (PS) and gold (Au) sample system. Based on this study, first one needs to minimize
f
2
/
f
1. Second, the second excitation frequency should be the closest n-th harmonic to
f
2
/
f
1 (i.e., one needs to minimize
|
n
−
f
2
f
1
|). Experimentally, a bimodal AFM scheme with an external function generator is used to image PS and low-density polyethylene polymer blend. The highest 2nd eigenmode phase contrast is observed with a cantilever that has a lower
f
2
/
f
1 and is excited with its first eigenmode frequency and 6th harmonic (i.e., the nearest harmonic to the second eigenmode).</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/1.5116794</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5720-3701</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5738-6766</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8979 |
ispartof | Journal of applied physics, 2019-09, Vol.126 (9) |
issn | 0021-8979 1089-7550 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_1_5116794 |
source | American Institute of Physics (AIP) Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Applied physics Atomic force microscopy Beam theory (structures) Cantilever beams Function generators Gold Higher harmonics Low density polyethylenes Microscopes Phase contrast Polymer blends Polystyrene resins Rectangular beams |
title | Biharmonic versus bimodal AFM: Numerical and experimental study on soft matter |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T09%3A51%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biharmonic%20versus%20bimodal%20AFM:%20Numerical%20and%20experimental%20study%20on%20soft%20matter&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20physics&rft.au=Eslami,%20Babak&rft.date=2019-09-07&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=9&rft.issn=0021-8979&rft.eissn=1089-7550&rft.coden=JAPIAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/1.5116794&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E2285362655%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2285362655&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |