In-Situ monitoring and modeling of metal additive manufacturing powder bed fusion

One of the major challenges in metal additive manufacturing is developing in-situ sensing and feedback control capabilities to eliminate build errors and allow qualified part creation without the need for costly and destructive external testing. Previously, many groups have focused on high fidelity...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Alldredge, Jacob, Slotwinski, John, Storck, Steven, Kim, Sam, Goldberg, Arnold, Montalbano, Timothy
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume 1949
creator Alldredge, Jacob
Slotwinski, John
Storck, Steven
Kim, Sam
Goldberg, Arnold
Montalbano, Timothy
description One of the major challenges in metal additive manufacturing is developing in-situ sensing and feedback control capabilities to eliminate build errors and allow qualified part creation without the need for costly and destructive external testing. Previously, many groups have focused on high fidelity numerical modeling and true temperature thermal imaging systems. These approaches require large computational resources or costly hardware that requires complex calibration and are difficult to integrate into commercial systems. In addition, due to the rapid change in the state of the material as well as its surface properties, getting true temperature is complicated and difficult. Here, we describe a different approach where we implement a low cost thermal imaging solution allowing for relative temperature measurements sufficient for detecting unwanted process variability. We match this with a faster than real time qualitative model that allows the process to be rapidly modeled during the build. The hope is to combine these two, allowing for the detection of anomalies in real time, enabling corrective action to potentially be taken, or parts to be stopped immediately after the error, saving material and time. Here we describe our sensor setup, its costs and abilities. We also show the ability to detect in real time unwanted process deviations. We also show that the output of our high speed model agrees qualitatively with experimental results. These results lay the groundwork for our vision of an integrated feedback and control scheme that combines low cost, easy to use sensors and fast modeling for process deviation monitoring.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/1.5031504
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>scitation</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_1_5031504</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>acp</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-d402871f0877b353f9d0893b56e321a24b45c082c46c826bfde70896dd8c55293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAYRYMoWEcX_oOshYxf3ulSBh8DAyIquCtpHhLpY2jTEf-9HR1w5-py4HAvXIQuKSwpKH5NlxI4lSCOUEGlpEQrqo5RAVAKwgR_O0Vn4_gBwEqtTYGe1h15TnnCbd-l3A-pe8e28zP60Oyhj7gN2TbYep9y2gXc2m6K1uXpR972nz4MuA4ex2lMfXeOTqJtxnBxyAV6vbt9WT2QzeP9enWzIY4DZOIFMKNpBKN1zSWPpQdT8lqqwBm1TNRCOjDMCeUMU3X0Qc-C8t44KVnJF-jqt3d0Kds8L1fbIbV2-KooVPszKlodzvhP3vXDn1htfeTf-71f4w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Enrichment Source</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>In-Situ monitoring and modeling of metal additive manufacturing powder bed fusion</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><creator>Alldredge, Jacob ; Slotwinski, John ; Storck, Steven ; Kim, Sam ; Goldberg, Arnold ; Montalbano, Timothy</creator><contributor>Chimenti, Dale E. ; Bond, Leonard J.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Alldredge, Jacob ; Slotwinski, John ; Storck, Steven ; Kim, Sam ; Goldberg, Arnold ; Montalbano, Timothy ; Chimenti, Dale E. ; Bond, Leonard J.</creatorcontrib><description>One of the major challenges in metal additive manufacturing is developing in-situ sensing and feedback control capabilities to eliminate build errors and allow qualified part creation without the need for costly and destructive external testing. Previously, many groups have focused on high fidelity numerical modeling and true temperature thermal imaging systems. These approaches require large computational resources or costly hardware that requires complex calibration and are difficult to integrate into commercial systems. In addition, due to the rapid change in the state of the material as well as its surface properties, getting true temperature is complicated and difficult. Here, we describe a different approach where we implement a low cost thermal imaging solution allowing for relative temperature measurements sufficient for detecting unwanted process variability. We match this with a faster than real time qualitative model that allows the process to be rapidly modeled during the build. The hope is to combine these two, allowing for the detection of anomalies in real time, enabling corrective action to potentially be taken, or parts to be stopped immediately after the error, saving material and time. Here we describe our sensor setup, its costs and abilities. We also show the ability to detect in real time unwanted process deviations. We also show that the output of our high speed model agrees qualitatively with experimental results. These results lay the groundwork for our vision of an integrated feedback and control scheme that combines low cost, easy to use sensors and fast modeling for process deviation monitoring.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-243X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-7616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/1.5031504</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APCPCS</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>AIP conference proceedings, 2018, Vol.1949 (1)</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-d402871f0877b353f9d0893b56e321a24b45c082c46c826bfde70896dd8c55293</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/acp/article-lookup/doi/10.1063/1.5031504$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,794,4512,27924,27925,76384</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Chimenti, Dale E.</contributor><contributor>Bond, Leonard J.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Alldredge, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slotwinski, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storck, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, Arnold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montalbano, Timothy</creatorcontrib><title>In-Situ monitoring and modeling of metal additive manufacturing powder bed fusion</title><title>AIP conference proceedings</title><description>One of the major challenges in metal additive manufacturing is developing in-situ sensing and feedback control capabilities to eliminate build errors and allow qualified part creation without the need for costly and destructive external testing. Previously, many groups have focused on high fidelity numerical modeling and true temperature thermal imaging systems. These approaches require large computational resources or costly hardware that requires complex calibration and are difficult to integrate into commercial systems. In addition, due to the rapid change in the state of the material as well as its surface properties, getting true temperature is complicated and difficult. Here, we describe a different approach where we implement a low cost thermal imaging solution allowing for relative temperature measurements sufficient for detecting unwanted process variability. We match this with a faster than real time qualitative model that allows the process to be rapidly modeled during the build. The hope is to combine these two, allowing for the detection of anomalies in real time, enabling corrective action to potentially be taken, or parts to be stopped immediately after the error, saving material and time. Here we describe our sensor setup, its costs and abilities. We also show the ability to detect in real time unwanted process deviations. We also show that the output of our high speed model agrees qualitatively with experimental results. These results lay the groundwork for our vision of an integrated feedback and control scheme that combines low cost, easy to use sensors and fast modeling for process deviation monitoring.</description><issn>0094-243X</issn><issn>1551-7616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAYRYMoWEcX_oOshYxf3ulSBh8DAyIquCtpHhLpY2jTEf-9HR1w5-py4HAvXIQuKSwpKH5NlxI4lSCOUEGlpEQrqo5RAVAKwgR_O0Vn4_gBwEqtTYGe1h15TnnCbd-l3A-pe8e28zP60Oyhj7gN2TbYep9y2gXc2m6K1uXpR972nz4MuA4ex2lMfXeOTqJtxnBxyAV6vbt9WT2QzeP9enWzIY4DZOIFMKNpBKN1zSWPpQdT8lqqwBm1TNRCOjDMCeUMU3X0Qc-C8t44KVnJF-jqt3d0Kds8L1fbIbV2-KooVPszKlodzvhP3vXDn1htfeTf-71f4w</recordid><startdate>20180420</startdate><enddate>20180420</enddate><creator>Alldredge, Jacob</creator><creator>Slotwinski, John</creator><creator>Storck, Steven</creator><creator>Kim, Sam</creator><creator>Goldberg, Arnold</creator><creator>Montalbano, Timothy</creator><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20180420</creationdate><title>In-Situ monitoring and modeling of metal additive manufacturing powder bed fusion</title><author>Alldredge, Jacob ; Slotwinski, John ; Storck, Steven ; Kim, Sam ; Goldberg, Arnold ; Montalbano, Timothy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-d402871f0877b353f9d0893b56e321a24b45c082c46c826bfde70896dd8c55293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alldredge, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slotwinski, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storck, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, Arnold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montalbano, Timothy</creatorcontrib></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alldredge, Jacob</au><au>Slotwinski, John</au><au>Storck, Steven</au><au>Kim, Sam</au><au>Goldberg, Arnold</au><au>Montalbano, Timothy</au><au>Chimenti, Dale E.</au><au>Bond, Leonard J.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>In-Situ monitoring and modeling of metal additive manufacturing powder bed fusion</atitle><btitle>AIP conference proceedings</btitle><date>2018-04-20</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>1949</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>0094-243X</issn><eissn>1551-7616</eissn><coden>APCPCS</coden><abstract>One of the major challenges in metal additive manufacturing is developing in-situ sensing and feedback control capabilities to eliminate build errors and allow qualified part creation without the need for costly and destructive external testing. Previously, many groups have focused on high fidelity numerical modeling and true temperature thermal imaging systems. These approaches require large computational resources or costly hardware that requires complex calibration and are difficult to integrate into commercial systems. In addition, due to the rapid change in the state of the material as well as its surface properties, getting true temperature is complicated and difficult. Here, we describe a different approach where we implement a low cost thermal imaging solution allowing for relative temperature measurements sufficient for detecting unwanted process variability. We match this with a faster than real time qualitative model that allows the process to be rapidly modeled during the build. The hope is to combine these two, allowing for the detection of anomalies in real time, enabling corrective action to potentially be taken, or parts to be stopped immediately after the error, saving material and time. Here we describe our sensor setup, its costs and abilities. We also show the ability to detect in real time unwanted process deviations. We also show that the output of our high speed model agrees qualitatively with experimental results. These results lay the groundwork for our vision of an integrated feedback and control scheme that combines low cost, easy to use sensors and fast modeling for process deviation monitoring.</abstract><doi>10.1063/1.5031504</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-243X
ispartof AIP conference proceedings, 2018, Vol.1949 (1)
issn 0094-243X
1551-7616
language eng
recordid cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_1_5031504
source AIP Journals Complete
title In-Situ monitoring and modeling of metal additive manufacturing powder bed fusion
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T02%3A40%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-scitation&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=In-Situ%20monitoring%20and%20modeling%20of%20metal%20additive%20manufacturing%20powder%20bed%20fusion&rft.btitle=AIP%20conference%20proceedings&rft.au=Alldredge,%20Jacob&rft.date=2018-04-20&rft.volume=1949&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=0094-243X&rft.eissn=1551-7616&rft.coden=APCPCS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/1.5031504&rft_dat=%3Cscitation%3Eacp%3C/scitation%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true