Does fragility of glass formation determine the strength of T g -nanoconfinement effects?
Nanoscale confinement has been shown to alter the glass transition and associated mechanical and transport properties of glass-forming materials. Inspired by expected interrelations between nanoconfinement effects, cooperative dynamics in supercooled liquids, and the “fragility” (or temperature-abru...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of chemical physics 2017-03, Vol.146 (10), p.104902 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 104902 |
container_title | The Journal of chemical physics |
container_volume | 146 |
creator | Mangalara, Jayachandra Hari Marvin, Michael D. Wiener, Nicholas R. Mackura, Mark E. Simmons, David S. |
description | Nanoscale confinement has been shown to alter the glass transition and associated mechanical and transport properties of glass-forming materials. Inspired by expected interrelations between nanoconfinement effects, cooperative dynamics in supercooled liquids, and the “fragility” (or temperature-abruptness) of the glass transition, it is commonly expected that nanoconfinement effects on T
g
should be more pronounced for more fragile glass formers. Here we employ molecular dynamics simulations of glass formation in the bulk and under nanoconfinement of model polymers in which we systematically tune fragility by several routes. Results indicate that a correlation between fragility and the strength of nanoconfinement effects is weak to modest at best when considering all systems but can appear to be stronger when considering a subset of systems. This outcome is consistent with a reanalysis of the Adam-Gibbs theory of glass formation indicating that fragility does not necessarily track in a universal way with the scale of cooperative motion in glass-forming liquids. Finally, we find that factors such as composition gradients or variability in measurement sensitivity to different parts of the dynamic gradient have the potential to significantly confound efforts to identify trends in T
g
-nanoconfinement effects with variables such as fragility, emphasizing the importance of employing diverse data sets and multiple metrologies in the study of this problem. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1063/1.4976521 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_1_4976521</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>28298103</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c217t-73184cd425335c8e1cfc7cd16127135e119d15f43d5847afa50cbe84523a1bfc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90M1KAzEUBeAgiq3VhS8g2SpMzU0mk5mVSP2Fgpu6cDWkmZvpSCcpSVz07Z3a6tLVhcvHgXMIuQQ2BVaIW5jmlSokhyMyBlZWmSoqdkzGjHHIqoIVI3IW4ydjDBTPT8mIl7wqgYkx-XjwGKkNuu3WXdpSb2m71nF4-dDr1HlHG0wY-s4hTSukMQV0bVrt5IK2NHPaeeOdHUCPLlG0Fk2Kd-fkxOp1xIvDnZD3p8fF7CWbvz2_zu7nmeGgUqYElLlpci6FkKZEMNYo00ABXIGQCFA1IG0uGlnmSlstmVlimUsuNCytERNyvc81wccY0Nab0PU6bGtg9W6eGurDPIO92tvN17LH5k_-7jGAmz2Ipks_9f9J-wa8fGzc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does fragility of glass formation determine the strength of T g -nanoconfinement effects?</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Mangalara, Jayachandra Hari ; Marvin, Michael D. ; Wiener, Nicholas R. ; Mackura, Mark E. ; Simmons, David S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mangalara, Jayachandra Hari ; Marvin, Michael D. ; Wiener, Nicholas R. ; Mackura, Mark E. ; Simmons, David S.</creatorcontrib><description>Nanoscale confinement has been shown to alter the glass transition and associated mechanical and transport properties of glass-forming materials. Inspired by expected interrelations between nanoconfinement effects, cooperative dynamics in supercooled liquids, and the “fragility” (or temperature-abruptness) of the glass transition, it is commonly expected that nanoconfinement effects on T
g
should be more pronounced for more fragile glass formers. Here we employ molecular dynamics simulations of glass formation in the bulk and under nanoconfinement of model polymers in which we systematically tune fragility by several routes. Results indicate that a correlation between fragility and the strength of nanoconfinement effects is weak to modest at best when considering all systems but can appear to be stronger when considering a subset of systems. This outcome is consistent with a reanalysis of the Adam-Gibbs theory of glass formation indicating that fragility does not necessarily track in a universal way with the scale of cooperative motion in glass-forming liquids. Finally, we find that factors such as composition gradients or variability in measurement sensitivity to different parts of the dynamic gradient have the potential to significantly confound efforts to identify trends in T
g
-nanoconfinement effects with variables such as fragility, emphasizing the importance of employing diverse data sets and multiple metrologies in the study of this problem.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9606</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1089-7690</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/1.4976521</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28298103</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCPSA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>The Journal of chemical physics, 2017-03, Vol.146 (10), p.104902</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c217t-73184cd425335c8e1cfc7cd16127135e119d15f43d5847afa50cbe84523a1bfc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c217t-73184cd425335c8e1cfc7cd16127135e119d15f43d5847afa50cbe84523a1bfc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1436-9269 ; 0000000214369269</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/jcp/article-lookup/doi/10.1063/1.4976521$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,794,4512,27924,27925,76384</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28298103$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mangalara, Jayachandra Hari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marvin, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiener, Nicholas R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackura, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simmons, David S.</creatorcontrib><title>Does fragility of glass formation determine the strength of T g -nanoconfinement effects?</title><title>The Journal of chemical physics</title><addtitle>J Chem Phys</addtitle><description>Nanoscale confinement has been shown to alter the glass transition and associated mechanical and transport properties of glass-forming materials. Inspired by expected interrelations between nanoconfinement effects, cooperative dynamics in supercooled liquids, and the “fragility” (or temperature-abruptness) of the glass transition, it is commonly expected that nanoconfinement effects on T
g
should be more pronounced for more fragile glass formers. Here we employ molecular dynamics simulations of glass formation in the bulk and under nanoconfinement of model polymers in which we systematically tune fragility by several routes. Results indicate that a correlation between fragility and the strength of nanoconfinement effects is weak to modest at best when considering all systems but can appear to be stronger when considering a subset of systems. This outcome is consistent with a reanalysis of the Adam-Gibbs theory of glass formation indicating that fragility does not necessarily track in a universal way with the scale of cooperative motion in glass-forming liquids. Finally, we find that factors such as composition gradients or variability in measurement sensitivity to different parts of the dynamic gradient have the potential to significantly confound efforts to identify trends in T
g
-nanoconfinement effects with variables such as fragility, emphasizing the importance of employing diverse data sets and multiple metrologies in the study of this problem.</description><issn>0021-9606</issn><issn>1089-7690</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90M1KAzEUBeAgiq3VhS8g2SpMzU0mk5mVSP2Fgpu6cDWkmZvpSCcpSVz07Z3a6tLVhcvHgXMIuQQ2BVaIW5jmlSokhyMyBlZWmSoqdkzGjHHIqoIVI3IW4ydjDBTPT8mIl7wqgYkx-XjwGKkNuu3WXdpSb2m71nF4-dDr1HlHG0wY-s4hTSukMQV0bVrt5IK2NHPaeeOdHUCPLlG0Fk2Kd-fkxOp1xIvDnZD3p8fF7CWbvz2_zu7nmeGgUqYElLlpci6FkKZEMNYo00ABXIGQCFA1IG0uGlnmSlstmVlimUsuNCytERNyvc81wccY0Nab0PU6bGtg9W6eGurDPIO92tvN17LH5k_-7jGAmz2Ipks_9f9J-wa8fGzc</recordid><startdate>20170314</startdate><enddate>20170314</enddate><creator>Mangalara, Jayachandra Hari</creator><creator>Marvin, Michael D.</creator><creator>Wiener, Nicholas R.</creator><creator>Mackura, Mark E.</creator><creator>Simmons, David S.</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1436-9269</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000214369269</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170314</creationdate><title>Does fragility of glass formation determine the strength of T g -nanoconfinement effects?</title><author>Mangalara, Jayachandra Hari ; Marvin, Michael D. ; Wiener, Nicholas R. ; Mackura, Mark E. ; Simmons, David S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c217t-73184cd425335c8e1cfc7cd16127135e119d15f43d5847afa50cbe84523a1bfc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mangalara, Jayachandra Hari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marvin, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiener, Nicholas R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackura, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simmons, David S.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of chemical physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mangalara, Jayachandra Hari</au><au>Marvin, Michael D.</au><au>Wiener, Nicholas R.</au><au>Mackura, Mark E.</au><au>Simmons, David S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does fragility of glass formation determine the strength of T g -nanoconfinement effects?</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of chemical physics</jtitle><addtitle>J Chem Phys</addtitle><date>2017-03-14</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>146</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>104902</spage><pages>104902-</pages><issn>0021-9606</issn><eissn>1089-7690</eissn><coden>JCPSA6</coden><abstract>Nanoscale confinement has been shown to alter the glass transition and associated mechanical and transport properties of glass-forming materials. Inspired by expected interrelations between nanoconfinement effects, cooperative dynamics in supercooled liquids, and the “fragility” (or temperature-abruptness) of the glass transition, it is commonly expected that nanoconfinement effects on T
g
should be more pronounced for more fragile glass formers. Here we employ molecular dynamics simulations of glass formation in the bulk and under nanoconfinement of model polymers in which we systematically tune fragility by several routes. Results indicate that a correlation between fragility and the strength of nanoconfinement effects is weak to modest at best when considering all systems but can appear to be stronger when considering a subset of systems. This outcome is consistent with a reanalysis of the Adam-Gibbs theory of glass formation indicating that fragility does not necessarily track in a universal way with the scale of cooperative motion in glass-forming liquids. Finally, we find that factors such as composition gradients or variability in measurement sensitivity to different parts of the dynamic gradient have the potential to significantly confound efforts to identify trends in T
g
-nanoconfinement effects with variables such as fragility, emphasizing the importance of employing diverse data sets and multiple metrologies in the study of this problem.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>28298103</pmid><doi>10.1063/1.4976521</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1436-9269</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000214369269</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9606 |
ispartof | The Journal of chemical physics, 2017-03, Vol.146 (10), p.104902 |
issn | 0021-9606 1089-7690 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_1_4976521 |
source | AIP Journals Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | Does fragility of glass formation determine the strength of T g -nanoconfinement effects? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T23%3A32%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20fragility%20of%20glass%20formation%20determine%20the%20strength%20of%20T%20g%20-nanoconfinement%20effects?&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20chemical%20physics&rft.au=Mangalara,%20Jayachandra%20Hari&rft.date=2017-03-14&rft.volume=146&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=104902&rft.pages=104902-&rft.issn=0021-9606&rft.eissn=1089-7690&rft.coden=JCPSA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/1.4976521&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_scita%3E28298103%3C/pubmed_scita%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/28298103&rfr_iscdi=true |