Does fragility of glass formation determine the strength of T g -nanoconfinement effects?

Nanoscale confinement has been shown to alter the glass transition and associated mechanical and transport properties of glass-forming materials. Inspired by expected interrelations between nanoconfinement effects, cooperative dynamics in supercooled liquids, and the “fragility” (or temperature-abru...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of chemical physics 2017-03, Vol.146 (10), p.104902
Hauptverfasser: Mangalara, Jayachandra Hari, Marvin, Michael D., Wiener, Nicholas R., Mackura, Mark E., Simmons, David S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 10
container_start_page 104902
container_title The Journal of chemical physics
container_volume 146
creator Mangalara, Jayachandra Hari
Marvin, Michael D.
Wiener, Nicholas R.
Mackura, Mark E.
Simmons, David S.
description Nanoscale confinement has been shown to alter the glass transition and associated mechanical and transport properties of glass-forming materials. Inspired by expected interrelations between nanoconfinement effects, cooperative dynamics in supercooled liquids, and the “fragility” (or temperature-abruptness) of the glass transition, it is commonly expected that nanoconfinement effects on T g should be more pronounced for more fragile glass formers. Here we employ molecular dynamics simulations of glass formation in the bulk and under nanoconfinement of model polymers in which we systematically tune fragility by several routes. Results indicate that a correlation between fragility and the strength of nanoconfinement effects is weak to modest at best when considering all systems but can appear to be stronger when considering a subset of systems. This outcome is consistent with a reanalysis of the Adam-Gibbs theory of glass formation indicating that fragility does not necessarily track in a universal way with the scale of cooperative motion in glass-forming liquids. Finally, we find that factors such as composition gradients or variability in measurement sensitivity to different parts of the dynamic gradient have the potential to significantly confound efforts to identify trends in T g -nanoconfinement effects with variables such as fragility, emphasizing the importance of employing diverse data sets and multiple metrologies in the study of this problem.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/1.4976521
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_1_4976521</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>28298103</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c217t-73184cd425335c8e1cfc7cd16127135e119d15f43d5847afa50cbe84523a1bfc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90M1KAzEUBeAgiq3VhS8g2SpMzU0mk5mVSP2Fgpu6cDWkmZvpSCcpSVz07Z3a6tLVhcvHgXMIuQQ2BVaIW5jmlSokhyMyBlZWmSoqdkzGjHHIqoIVI3IW4ydjDBTPT8mIl7wqgYkx-XjwGKkNuu3WXdpSb2m71nF4-dDr1HlHG0wY-s4hTSukMQV0bVrt5IK2NHPaeeOdHUCPLlG0Fk2Kd-fkxOp1xIvDnZD3p8fF7CWbvz2_zu7nmeGgUqYElLlpci6FkKZEMNYo00ABXIGQCFA1IG0uGlnmSlstmVlimUsuNCytERNyvc81wccY0Nab0PU6bGtg9W6eGurDPIO92tvN17LH5k_-7jGAmz2Ipks_9f9J-wa8fGzc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does fragility of glass formation determine the strength of T g -nanoconfinement effects?</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Mangalara, Jayachandra Hari ; Marvin, Michael D. ; Wiener, Nicholas R. ; Mackura, Mark E. ; Simmons, David S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mangalara, Jayachandra Hari ; Marvin, Michael D. ; Wiener, Nicholas R. ; Mackura, Mark E. ; Simmons, David S.</creatorcontrib><description>Nanoscale confinement has been shown to alter the glass transition and associated mechanical and transport properties of glass-forming materials. Inspired by expected interrelations between nanoconfinement effects, cooperative dynamics in supercooled liquids, and the “fragility” (or temperature-abruptness) of the glass transition, it is commonly expected that nanoconfinement effects on T g should be more pronounced for more fragile glass formers. Here we employ molecular dynamics simulations of glass formation in the bulk and under nanoconfinement of model polymers in which we systematically tune fragility by several routes. Results indicate that a correlation between fragility and the strength of nanoconfinement effects is weak to modest at best when considering all systems but can appear to be stronger when considering a subset of systems. This outcome is consistent with a reanalysis of the Adam-Gibbs theory of glass formation indicating that fragility does not necessarily track in a universal way with the scale of cooperative motion in glass-forming liquids. Finally, we find that factors such as composition gradients or variability in measurement sensitivity to different parts of the dynamic gradient have the potential to significantly confound efforts to identify trends in T g -nanoconfinement effects with variables such as fragility, emphasizing the importance of employing diverse data sets and multiple metrologies in the study of this problem.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9606</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1089-7690</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/1.4976521</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28298103</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCPSA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>The Journal of chemical physics, 2017-03, Vol.146 (10), p.104902</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c217t-73184cd425335c8e1cfc7cd16127135e119d15f43d5847afa50cbe84523a1bfc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c217t-73184cd425335c8e1cfc7cd16127135e119d15f43d5847afa50cbe84523a1bfc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1436-9269 ; 0000000214369269</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/jcp/article-lookup/doi/10.1063/1.4976521$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,794,4512,27924,27925,76384</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28298103$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mangalara, Jayachandra Hari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marvin, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiener, Nicholas R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackura, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simmons, David S.</creatorcontrib><title>Does fragility of glass formation determine the strength of T g -nanoconfinement effects?</title><title>The Journal of chemical physics</title><addtitle>J Chem Phys</addtitle><description>Nanoscale confinement has been shown to alter the glass transition and associated mechanical and transport properties of glass-forming materials. Inspired by expected interrelations between nanoconfinement effects, cooperative dynamics in supercooled liquids, and the “fragility” (or temperature-abruptness) of the glass transition, it is commonly expected that nanoconfinement effects on T g should be more pronounced for more fragile glass formers. Here we employ molecular dynamics simulations of glass formation in the bulk and under nanoconfinement of model polymers in which we systematically tune fragility by several routes. Results indicate that a correlation between fragility and the strength of nanoconfinement effects is weak to modest at best when considering all systems but can appear to be stronger when considering a subset of systems. This outcome is consistent with a reanalysis of the Adam-Gibbs theory of glass formation indicating that fragility does not necessarily track in a universal way with the scale of cooperative motion in glass-forming liquids. Finally, we find that factors such as composition gradients or variability in measurement sensitivity to different parts of the dynamic gradient have the potential to significantly confound efforts to identify trends in T g -nanoconfinement effects with variables such as fragility, emphasizing the importance of employing diverse data sets and multiple metrologies in the study of this problem.</description><issn>0021-9606</issn><issn>1089-7690</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90M1KAzEUBeAgiq3VhS8g2SpMzU0mk5mVSP2Fgpu6cDWkmZvpSCcpSVz07Z3a6tLVhcvHgXMIuQQ2BVaIW5jmlSokhyMyBlZWmSoqdkzGjHHIqoIVI3IW4ydjDBTPT8mIl7wqgYkx-XjwGKkNuu3WXdpSb2m71nF4-dDr1HlHG0wY-s4hTSukMQV0bVrt5IK2NHPaeeOdHUCPLlG0Fk2Kd-fkxOp1xIvDnZD3p8fF7CWbvz2_zu7nmeGgUqYElLlpci6FkKZEMNYo00ABXIGQCFA1IG0uGlnmSlstmVlimUsuNCytERNyvc81wccY0Nab0PU6bGtg9W6eGurDPIO92tvN17LH5k_-7jGAmz2Ipks_9f9J-wa8fGzc</recordid><startdate>20170314</startdate><enddate>20170314</enddate><creator>Mangalara, Jayachandra Hari</creator><creator>Marvin, Michael D.</creator><creator>Wiener, Nicholas R.</creator><creator>Mackura, Mark E.</creator><creator>Simmons, David S.</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1436-9269</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000214369269</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170314</creationdate><title>Does fragility of glass formation determine the strength of T g -nanoconfinement effects?</title><author>Mangalara, Jayachandra Hari ; Marvin, Michael D. ; Wiener, Nicholas R. ; Mackura, Mark E. ; Simmons, David S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c217t-73184cd425335c8e1cfc7cd16127135e119d15f43d5847afa50cbe84523a1bfc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mangalara, Jayachandra Hari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marvin, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiener, Nicholas R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackura, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simmons, David S.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of chemical physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mangalara, Jayachandra Hari</au><au>Marvin, Michael D.</au><au>Wiener, Nicholas R.</au><au>Mackura, Mark E.</au><au>Simmons, David S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does fragility of glass formation determine the strength of T g -nanoconfinement effects?</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of chemical physics</jtitle><addtitle>J Chem Phys</addtitle><date>2017-03-14</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>146</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>104902</spage><pages>104902-</pages><issn>0021-9606</issn><eissn>1089-7690</eissn><coden>JCPSA6</coden><abstract>Nanoscale confinement has been shown to alter the glass transition and associated mechanical and transport properties of glass-forming materials. Inspired by expected interrelations between nanoconfinement effects, cooperative dynamics in supercooled liquids, and the “fragility” (or temperature-abruptness) of the glass transition, it is commonly expected that nanoconfinement effects on T g should be more pronounced for more fragile glass formers. Here we employ molecular dynamics simulations of glass formation in the bulk and under nanoconfinement of model polymers in which we systematically tune fragility by several routes. Results indicate that a correlation between fragility and the strength of nanoconfinement effects is weak to modest at best when considering all systems but can appear to be stronger when considering a subset of systems. This outcome is consistent with a reanalysis of the Adam-Gibbs theory of glass formation indicating that fragility does not necessarily track in a universal way with the scale of cooperative motion in glass-forming liquids. Finally, we find that factors such as composition gradients or variability in measurement sensitivity to different parts of the dynamic gradient have the potential to significantly confound efforts to identify trends in T g -nanoconfinement effects with variables such as fragility, emphasizing the importance of employing diverse data sets and multiple metrologies in the study of this problem.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>28298103</pmid><doi>10.1063/1.4976521</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1436-9269</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000214369269</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9606
ispartof The Journal of chemical physics, 2017-03, Vol.146 (10), p.104902
issn 0021-9606
1089-7690
language eng
recordid cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_1_4976521
source AIP Journals Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Does fragility of glass formation determine the strength of T g -nanoconfinement effects?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T23%3A32%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20fragility%20of%20glass%20formation%20determine%20the%20strength%20of%20T%20g%20-nanoconfinement%20effects?&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20chemical%20physics&rft.au=Mangalara,%20Jayachandra%20Hari&rft.date=2017-03-14&rft.volume=146&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=104902&rft.pages=104902-&rft.issn=0021-9606&rft.eissn=1089-7690&rft.coden=JCPSA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/1.4976521&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_scita%3E28298103%3C/pubmed_scita%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/28298103&rfr_iscdi=true