Crossflow transition control by upstream flow deformation using plasma actuators
Control of laminar-turbulent transition in a swept-wing-type boundary-layer flow, subject to primary crossflow instability, is investigated using direct numerical simulations. In our previous works, we explored a direct base-flow stabilization aimed at a spanwise homogenous flow manipulation or a di...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied physics 2017-02, Vol.121 (6) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of applied physics |
container_volume | 121 |
creator | Dörr, Philipp C. Kloker, Markus J. |
description | Control of laminar-turbulent transition in a swept-wing-type boundary-layer flow, subject to primary crossflow instability, is investigated using direct numerical simulations. In our previous works, we explored a direct base-flow stabilization aimed at a spanwise homogenous flow manipulation or a direct crossflow-vortex manipulation by plasma actuators. In this paper, the technique of upstream flow deformation (UFD) is applied, needing by far the least energy input. The actuators, modeled by local volume forcing, are set to excite amplified steady crossflow vortex (CFV) control modes with a higher spanwise wavenumber than the most amplified modes. The resulting nonlinear control CFVs are spaced narrower than the naturally occurring vortices and are less unstable with respect to secondary instability. They generate a beneficial mean-flow distortion attenuating the primary crossflow instability, and thus a delay of the transition to turbulence. Unlike roughness elements for UFD, the employed dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators allow to set the force direction: Forcing against the crossflow has a direct, fundamental stabilizing effect due to a reduction of the mean crossflow, whereas forcing in the crossflow direction locally invokes the opposite due to a local increase of the mean crossflow. The differences between these settings, also with respect to forcing in streamwise direction, are discussed in detail, and it is shown that a significant transition delay can be achieved indeed with both, however with a differing efficiency and robustness. Additionally, a comparison to a set-up with an excitation of the control modes by synthetic blowing and suction is performed to clarify the role of the direct effect on the base flow. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1063/1.4975791 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_1_4975791</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2124550355</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-4cf57f7231bf037675d92cd16be0371ddf5d9d3fcee1dffcbcf129e8fcad4f183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqd0MtKxDAUBuAgCo6XhW8QcKXQMadpJ81SBm8woAtdhzTJkQ5tU5NUmbe3cwH3rg45fCT5f0KugM2BLfgdzAspSiHhiMyAVTITZcmOyYyxHLJKCnlKzmJcMwZQcTkjb8vgY8TW_9AUdB-b1PieGt-n4Ftab-g4xBSc7ujOWIc-dHqHxtj0n3Rodew01SaNOvkQL8gJ6ja6y8M8Jx-PD-_L52z1-vSyvF9lhuciZYXBUqDIOdTIuFiI0srcWFjUbjqCtTgtLEfjHFhEUxuEXLoKjbYFTn8_J9f7e4fgv0YXk1r7MfTTkyqHvJhS87Kc1M1emW3M4FANoel02ChgaluYAnUobLK3extNk3YR_4e_ffiDarDIfwE2wXv5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2124550355</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Crossflow transition control by upstream flow deformation using plasma actuators</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Dörr, Philipp C. ; Kloker, Markus J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dörr, Philipp C. ; Kloker, Markus J.</creatorcontrib><description>Control of laminar-turbulent transition in a swept-wing-type boundary-layer flow, subject to primary crossflow instability, is investigated using direct numerical simulations. In our previous works, we explored a direct base-flow stabilization aimed at a spanwise homogenous flow manipulation or a direct crossflow-vortex manipulation by plasma actuators. In this paper, the technique of upstream flow deformation (UFD) is applied, needing by far the least energy input. The actuators, modeled by local volume forcing, are set to excite amplified steady crossflow vortex (CFV) control modes with a higher spanwise wavenumber than the most amplified modes. The resulting nonlinear control CFVs are spaced narrower than the naturally occurring vortices and are less unstable with respect to secondary instability. They generate a beneficial mean-flow distortion attenuating the primary crossflow instability, and thus a delay of the transition to turbulence. Unlike roughness elements for UFD, the employed dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators allow to set the force direction: Forcing against the crossflow has a direct, fundamental stabilizing effect due to a reduction of the mean crossflow, whereas forcing in the crossflow direction locally invokes the opposite due to a local increase of the mean crossflow. The differences between these settings, also with respect to forcing in streamwise direction, are discussed in detail, and it is shown that a significant transition delay can be achieved indeed with both, however with a differing efficiency and robustness. Additionally, a comparison to a set-up with an excitation of the control modes by synthetic blowing and suction is performed to clarify the role of the direct effect on the base flow.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8979</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1089-7550</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/1.4975791</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAPIAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Amplification ; Applied physics ; Base flow ; Boundary layer transition ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Computer simulation ; Cross flow ; Deformation ; Delay ; Dielectric barrier discharge ; Flow distortion ; Flow stability ; Fluid flow ; Mathematical models ; Noise control ; Nonlinear control ; Plasma actuators ; Robustness (mathematics) ; Suction ; Swept wings ; Turbulence ; Upstream ; Wavelengths</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied physics, 2017-02, Vol.121 (6)</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2017 Author(s). Published by AIP Publishing.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-4cf57f7231bf037675d92cd16be0371ddf5d9d3fcee1dffcbcf129e8fcad4f183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-4cf57f7231bf037675d92cd16be0371ddf5d9d3fcee1dffcbcf129e8fcad4f183</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5352-7442</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/jap/article-lookup/doi/10.1063/1.4975791$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,794,4512,27924,27925,76384</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dörr, Philipp C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kloker, Markus J.</creatorcontrib><title>Crossflow transition control by upstream flow deformation using plasma actuators</title><title>Journal of applied physics</title><description>Control of laminar-turbulent transition in a swept-wing-type boundary-layer flow, subject to primary crossflow instability, is investigated using direct numerical simulations. In our previous works, we explored a direct base-flow stabilization aimed at a spanwise homogenous flow manipulation or a direct crossflow-vortex manipulation by plasma actuators. In this paper, the technique of upstream flow deformation (UFD) is applied, needing by far the least energy input. The actuators, modeled by local volume forcing, are set to excite amplified steady crossflow vortex (CFV) control modes with a higher spanwise wavenumber than the most amplified modes. The resulting nonlinear control CFVs are spaced narrower than the naturally occurring vortices and are less unstable with respect to secondary instability. They generate a beneficial mean-flow distortion attenuating the primary crossflow instability, and thus a delay of the transition to turbulence. Unlike roughness elements for UFD, the employed dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators allow to set the force direction: Forcing against the crossflow has a direct, fundamental stabilizing effect due to a reduction of the mean crossflow, whereas forcing in the crossflow direction locally invokes the opposite due to a local increase of the mean crossflow. The differences between these settings, also with respect to forcing in streamwise direction, are discussed in detail, and it is shown that a significant transition delay can be achieved indeed with both, however with a differing efficiency and robustness. Additionally, a comparison to a set-up with an excitation of the control modes by synthetic blowing and suction is performed to clarify the role of the direct effect on the base flow.</description><subject>Amplification</subject><subject>Applied physics</subject><subject>Base flow</subject><subject>Boundary layer transition</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Cross flow</subject><subject>Deformation</subject><subject>Delay</subject><subject>Dielectric barrier discharge</subject><subject>Flow distortion</subject><subject>Flow stability</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Noise control</subject><subject>Nonlinear control</subject><subject>Plasma actuators</subject><subject>Robustness (mathematics)</subject><subject>Suction</subject><subject>Swept wings</subject><subject>Turbulence</subject><subject>Upstream</subject><subject>Wavelengths</subject><issn>0021-8979</issn><issn>1089-7550</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqd0MtKxDAUBuAgCo6XhW8QcKXQMadpJ81SBm8woAtdhzTJkQ5tU5NUmbe3cwH3rg45fCT5f0KugM2BLfgdzAspSiHhiMyAVTITZcmOyYyxHLJKCnlKzmJcMwZQcTkjb8vgY8TW_9AUdB-b1PieGt-n4Ftab-g4xBSc7ujOWIc-dHqHxtj0n3Rodew01SaNOvkQL8gJ6ja6y8M8Jx-PD-_L52z1-vSyvF9lhuciZYXBUqDIOdTIuFiI0srcWFjUbjqCtTgtLEfjHFhEUxuEXLoKjbYFTn8_J9f7e4fgv0YXk1r7MfTTkyqHvJhS87Kc1M1emW3M4FANoel02ChgaluYAnUobLK3extNk3YR_4e_ffiDarDIfwE2wXv5</recordid><startdate>20170214</startdate><enddate>20170214</enddate><creator>Dörr, Philipp C.</creator><creator>Kloker, Markus J.</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5352-7442</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170214</creationdate><title>Crossflow transition control by upstream flow deformation using plasma actuators</title><author>Dörr, Philipp C. ; Kloker, Markus J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-4cf57f7231bf037675d92cd16be0371ddf5d9d3fcee1dffcbcf129e8fcad4f183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Amplification</topic><topic>Applied physics</topic><topic>Base flow</topic><topic>Boundary layer transition</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Cross flow</topic><topic>Deformation</topic><topic>Delay</topic><topic>Dielectric barrier discharge</topic><topic>Flow distortion</topic><topic>Flow stability</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Noise control</topic><topic>Nonlinear control</topic><topic>Plasma actuators</topic><topic>Robustness (mathematics)</topic><topic>Suction</topic><topic>Swept wings</topic><topic>Turbulence</topic><topic>Upstream</topic><topic>Wavelengths</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dörr, Philipp C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kloker, Markus J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dörr, Philipp C.</au><au>Kloker, Markus J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Crossflow transition control by upstream flow deformation using plasma actuators</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied physics</jtitle><date>2017-02-14</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>121</volume><issue>6</issue><issn>0021-8979</issn><eissn>1089-7550</eissn><coden>JAPIAU</coden><abstract>Control of laminar-turbulent transition in a swept-wing-type boundary-layer flow, subject to primary crossflow instability, is investigated using direct numerical simulations. In our previous works, we explored a direct base-flow stabilization aimed at a spanwise homogenous flow manipulation or a direct crossflow-vortex manipulation by plasma actuators. In this paper, the technique of upstream flow deformation (UFD) is applied, needing by far the least energy input. The actuators, modeled by local volume forcing, are set to excite amplified steady crossflow vortex (CFV) control modes with a higher spanwise wavenumber than the most amplified modes. The resulting nonlinear control CFVs are spaced narrower than the naturally occurring vortices and are less unstable with respect to secondary instability. They generate a beneficial mean-flow distortion attenuating the primary crossflow instability, and thus a delay of the transition to turbulence. Unlike roughness elements for UFD, the employed dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators allow to set the force direction: Forcing against the crossflow has a direct, fundamental stabilizing effect due to a reduction of the mean crossflow, whereas forcing in the crossflow direction locally invokes the opposite due to a local increase of the mean crossflow. The differences between these settings, also with respect to forcing in streamwise direction, are discussed in detail, and it is shown that a significant transition delay can be achieved indeed with both, however with a differing efficiency and robustness. Additionally, a comparison to a set-up with an excitation of the control modes by synthetic blowing and suction is performed to clarify the role of the direct effect on the base flow.</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/1.4975791</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5352-7442</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8979 |
ispartof | Journal of applied physics, 2017-02, Vol.121 (6) |
issn | 0021-8979 1089-7550 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_1_4975791 |
source | AIP Journals Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Amplification Applied physics Base flow Boundary layer transition Computational fluid dynamics Computer simulation Cross flow Deformation Delay Dielectric barrier discharge Flow distortion Flow stability Fluid flow Mathematical models Noise control Nonlinear control Plasma actuators Robustness (mathematics) Suction Swept wings Turbulence Upstream Wavelengths |
title | Crossflow transition control by upstream flow deformation using plasma actuators |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T09%3A33%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Crossflow%20transition%20control%20by%20upstream%20flow%20deformation%20using%20plasma%20actuators&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20physics&rft.au=D%C3%B6rr,%20Philipp%20C.&rft.date=2017-02-14&rft.volume=121&rft.issue=6&rft.issn=0021-8979&rft.eissn=1089-7550&rft.coden=JAPIAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/1.4975791&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E2124550355%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2124550355&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |