Comparison of the structural properties of Zn-face and O-face single crystal homoepitaxial ZnO epilayers grown by RF-magnetron sputtering

Homoepitaxial ZnO growth is demonstrated from conventional RF-sputtering at 400 °C on both Zn and O polar faces of hydrothermally grown ZnO substrates. A minimum yield for the Rutherford backscattering and channeling spectrum, χmin , equal to ∼3% and ∼12% and a full width at half maximum of the 00.2...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied physics 2017-01, Vol.121 (1)
Hauptverfasser: Schifano, R., Riise, H. N., Domagala, J. Z., Azarov, A. Yu, Ratajczak, R., Monakhov, E. V., Venkatachalapathy, V., Vines, L., Chan, K. S., Wong-Leung, J., Svensson, B. G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title Journal of applied physics
container_volume 121
creator Schifano, R.
Riise, H. N.
Domagala, J. Z.
Azarov, A. Yu
Ratajczak, R.
Monakhov, E. V.
Venkatachalapathy, V.
Vines, L.
Chan, K. S.
Wong-Leung, J.
Svensson, B. G.
description Homoepitaxial ZnO growth is demonstrated from conventional RF-sputtering at 400 °C on both Zn and O polar faces of hydrothermally grown ZnO substrates. A minimum yield for the Rutherford backscattering and channeling spectrum, χmin , equal to ∼3% and ∼12% and a full width at half maximum of the 00.2 diffraction peak rocking curve of (70 ± 10) arc sec and (1400 ± 100) arc sec have been found for samples grown on the Zn and O face, respectively. The structural characteristics of the film deposited on the Zn face are comparable with those of epilayers grown by more complex techniques like molecular beam epitaxy. In contrast, the film simultaneously deposited on the O-face exhibits an inferior crystalline structure ∼0.7% strained in the c-direction and a higher atomic number contrast compared with the substrate, as revealed by high angle annular dark field imaging measurements. These differences between the Zn- and O-face films are discussed in detail and associated with the different growth mechanisms prevailing on the two surfaces.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/1.4973342
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_1_4973342</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2124693933</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-a569f08bf4bbf4beb13eb518e10308793d39d8a5af17ead6f0f29906aeb3aba93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFqGzEQQEVJoI6bQ7-ggpwSWFda7WpXx2DqNhAwlOTii5jdHdkbbGkjadv6E_rXkbHTHAo5DJpBjyfNDCGfOZtxJsVXPitUJUSRfyATzmqVVWXJzsiEsZxntarUR3IRwhNjnNdCTcjfudsN4PvgLHWGxg3SEP3YxtHDlg7eDehjj-FwubKZgRYp2I4uj2no7XqLtPX7EBO_cTuHQx_hT5-qlV3SVG1hjz7QtXe_LW329Oci28HaYvTpzTCMMaJPmk_k3MA24OXpnJLHxbeH-Y_sfvn9bn57n7VFmccMSqkMqxtTNIfAhgtsSl4jZ4LVlRKdUF0NJRheIXTSMJMrxSRgI6ABJabky9Hbpq5jb7V1HnSaVZlrKaSUibg6Eqn95xFD1E9u9DZ9Suc8L6QSSohEXb96XAgejR58vwO_Ty592IXm-rSLxN4c2dCm4cTe2X_wL-ffQD105j34f_MLWWqZTw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2124693933</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the structural properties of Zn-face and O-face single crystal homoepitaxial ZnO epilayers grown by RF-magnetron sputtering</title><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Schifano, R. ; Riise, H. N. ; Domagala, J. Z. ; Azarov, A. Yu ; Ratajczak, R. ; Monakhov, E. V. ; Venkatachalapathy, V. ; Vines, L. ; Chan, K. S. ; Wong-Leung, J. ; Svensson, B. G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schifano, R. ; Riise, H. N. ; Domagala, J. Z. ; Azarov, A. Yu ; Ratajczak, R. ; Monakhov, E. V. ; Venkatachalapathy, V. ; Vines, L. ; Chan, K. S. ; Wong-Leung, J. ; Svensson, B. G.</creatorcontrib><description>Homoepitaxial ZnO growth is demonstrated from conventional RF-sputtering at 400 °C on both Zn and O polar faces of hydrothermally grown ZnO substrates. A minimum yield for the Rutherford backscattering and channeling spectrum, χmin , equal to ∼3% and ∼12% and a full width at half maximum of the 00.2 diffraction peak rocking curve of (70 ± 10) arc sec and (1400 ± 100) arc sec have been found for samples grown on the Zn and O face, respectively. The structural characteristics of the film deposited on the Zn face are comparable with those of epilayers grown by more complex techniques like molecular beam epitaxy. In contrast, the film simultaneously deposited on the O-face exhibits an inferior crystalline structure ∼0.7% strained in the c-direction and a higher atomic number contrast compared with the substrate, as revealed by high angle annular dark field imaging measurements. These differences between the Zn- and O-face films are discussed in detail and associated with the different growth mechanisms prevailing on the two surfaces.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8979</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1089-7550</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/1.4973342</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAPIAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Applied physics ; Atomic properties ; Backscattering ; Channeling ; Crystal growth ; Crystal structure ; Epitaxial growth ; Magnetron sputtering ; Molecular beam epitaxy ; Single crystals ; Substrates ; Zinc oxide</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied physics, 2017-01, Vol.121 (1)</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2017 Author(s). Published by AIP Publishing.</rights><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-a569f08bf4bbf4beb13eb518e10308793d39d8a5af17ead6f0f29906aeb3aba93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-a569f08bf4bbf4beb13eb518e10308793d39d8a5af17ead6f0f29906aeb3aba93</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0602-9624 ; 0000-0001-8684-2185 ; 0000-0002-6465-8851 ; 0000-0002-5050-4202 ; 0000-0001-8596-2230</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/jap/article-lookup/doi/10.1063/1.4973342$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,790,881,4498,26544,27901,27902,76127</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schifano, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riise, H. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domagala, J. Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azarov, A. Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ratajczak, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monakhov, E. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venkatachalapathy, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vines, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, K. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong-Leung, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Svensson, B. G.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the structural properties of Zn-face and O-face single crystal homoepitaxial ZnO epilayers grown by RF-magnetron sputtering</title><title>Journal of applied physics</title><description>Homoepitaxial ZnO growth is demonstrated from conventional RF-sputtering at 400 °C on both Zn and O polar faces of hydrothermally grown ZnO substrates. A minimum yield for the Rutherford backscattering and channeling spectrum, χmin , equal to ∼3% and ∼12% and a full width at half maximum of the 00.2 diffraction peak rocking curve of (70 ± 10) arc sec and (1400 ± 100) arc sec have been found for samples grown on the Zn and O face, respectively. The structural characteristics of the film deposited on the Zn face are comparable with those of epilayers grown by more complex techniques like molecular beam epitaxy. In contrast, the film simultaneously deposited on the O-face exhibits an inferior crystalline structure ∼0.7% strained in the c-direction and a higher atomic number contrast compared with the substrate, as revealed by high angle annular dark field imaging measurements. These differences between the Zn- and O-face films are discussed in detail and associated with the different growth mechanisms prevailing on the two surfaces.</description><subject>Applied physics</subject><subject>Atomic properties</subject><subject>Backscattering</subject><subject>Channeling</subject><subject>Crystal growth</subject><subject>Crystal structure</subject><subject>Epitaxial growth</subject><subject>Magnetron sputtering</subject><subject>Molecular beam epitaxy</subject><subject>Single crystals</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>Zinc oxide</subject><issn>0021-8979</issn><issn>1089-7550</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFqGzEQQEVJoI6bQ7-ggpwSWFda7WpXx2DqNhAwlOTii5jdHdkbbGkjadv6E_rXkbHTHAo5DJpBjyfNDCGfOZtxJsVXPitUJUSRfyATzmqVVWXJzsiEsZxntarUR3IRwhNjnNdCTcjfudsN4PvgLHWGxg3SEP3YxtHDlg7eDehjj-FwubKZgRYp2I4uj2no7XqLtPX7EBO_cTuHQx_hT5-qlV3SVG1hjz7QtXe_LW329Oci28HaYvTpzTCMMaJPmk_k3MA24OXpnJLHxbeH-Y_sfvn9bn57n7VFmccMSqkMqxtTNIfAhgtsSl4jZ4LVlRKdUF0NJRheIXTSMJMrxSRgI6ABJabky9Hbpq5jb7V1HnSaVZlrKaSUibg6Eqn95xFD1E9u9DZ9Suc8L6QSSohEXb96XAgejR58vwO_Ty592IXm-rSLxN4c2dCm4cTe2X_wL-ffQD105j34f_MLWWqZTw</recordid><startdate>20170107</startdate><enddate>20170107</enddate><creator>Schifano, R.</creator><creator>Riise, H. N.</creator><creator>Domagala, J. Z.</creator><creator>Azarov, A. Yu</creator><creator>Ratajczak, R.</creator><creator>Monakhov, E. V.</creator><creator>Venkatachalapathy, V.</creator><creator>Vines, L.</creator><creator>Chan, K. S.</creator><creator>Wong-Leung, J.</creator><creator>Svensson, B. G.</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><general>American Institute of Physics (AIP)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>3HK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0602-9624</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8684-2185</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6465-8851</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5050-4202</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8596-2230</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170107</creationdate><title>Comparison of the structural properties of Zn-face and O-face single crystal homoepitaxial ZnO epilayers grown by RF-magnetron sputtering</title><author>Schifano, R. ; Riise, H. N. ; Domagala, J. Z. ; Azarov, A. Yu ; Ratajczak, R. ; Monakhov, E. V. ; Venkatachalapathy, V. ; Vines, L. ; Chan, K. S. ; Wong-Leung, J. ; Svensson, B. G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-a569f08bf4bbf4beb13eb518e10308793d39d8a5af17ead6f0f29906aeb3aba93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Applied physics</topic><topic>Atomic properties</topic><topic>Backscattering</topic><topic>Channeling</topic><topic>Crystal growth</topic><topic>Crystal structure</topic><topic>Epitaxial growth</topic><topic>Magnetron sputtering</topic><topic>Molecular beam epitaxy</topic><topic>Single crystals</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>Zinc oxide</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schifano, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riise, H. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domagala, J. Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azarov, A. Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ratajczak, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monakhov, E. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venkatachalapathy, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vines, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, K. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong-Leung, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Svensson, B. G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schifano, R.</au><au>Riise, H. N.</au><au>Domagala, J. Z.</au><au>Azarov, A. Yu</au><au>Ratajczak, R.</au><au>Monakhov, E. V.</au><au>Venkatachalapathy, V.</au><au>Vines, L.</au><au>Chan, K. S.</au><au>Wong-Leung, J.</au><au>Svensson, B. G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the structural properties of Zn-face and O-face single crystal homoepitaxial ZnO epilayers grown by RF-magnetron sputtering</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied physics</jtitle><date>2017-01-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>121</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>0021-8979</issn><eissn>1089-7550</eissn><coden>JAPIAU</coden><abstract>Homoepitaxial ZnO growth is demonstrated from conventional RF-sputtering at 400 °C on both Zn and O polar faces of hydrothermally grown ZnO substrates. A minimum yield for the Rutherford backscattering and channeling spectrum, χmin , equal to ∼3% and ∼12% and a full width at half maximum of the 00.2 diffraction peak rocking curve of (70 ± 10) arc sec and (1400 ± 100) arc sec have been found for samples grown on the Zn and O face, respectively. The structural characteristics of the film deposited on the Zn face are comparable with those of epilayers grown by more complex techniques like molecular beam epitaxy. In contrast, the film simultaneously deposited on the O-face exhibits an inferior crystalline structure ∼0.7% strained in the c-direction and a higher atomic number contrast compared with the substrate, as revealed by high angle annular dark field imaging measurements. These differences between the Zn- and O-face films are discussed in detail and associated with the different growth mechanisms prevailing on the two surfaces.</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/1.4973342</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0602-9624</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8684-2185</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6465-8851</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5050-4202</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8596-2230</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8979
ispartof Journal of applied physics, 2017-01, Vol.121 (1)
issn 0021-8979
1089-7550
language eng
recordid cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_1_4973342
source NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives; AIP Journals Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Applied physics
Atomic properties
Backscattering
Channeling
Crystal growth
Crystal structure
Epitaxial growth
Magnetron sputtering
Molecular beam epitaxy
Single crystals
Substrates
Zinc oxide
title Comparison of the structural properties of Zn-face and O-face single crystal homoepitaxial ZnO epilayers grown by RF-magnetron sputtering
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T09%3A36%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20structural%20properties%20of%20Zn-face%20and%20O-face%20single%20crystal%20homoepitaxial%20ZnO%20epilayers%20grown%20by%20RF-magnetron%20sputtering&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20physics&rft.au=Schifano,%20R.&rft.date=2017-01-07&rft.volume=121&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=0021-8979&rft.eissn=1089-7550&rft.coden=JAPIAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/1.4973342&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E2124693933%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2124693933&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true