Critical evaluation of wind speed frequency distribution functions

Over the past few years a number of new mathematical functions have been proposed for wind speed probability density distributions. The most commonly used function that has been cited in literature has been the two-parameter Weibull function. However, in recent years studies have shown that the two-...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of renewable and sustainable energy 2010-01, Vol.2 (1), p.013102-013102-16
Hauptverfasser: Celik, A. N., Makkawi, A., Muneer, T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 013102-16
container_issue 1
container_start_page 013102
container_title Journal of renewable and sustainable energy
container_volume 2
creator Celik, A. N.
Makkawi, A.
Muneer, T.
description Over the past few years a number of new mathematical functions have been proposed for wind speed probability density distributions. The most commonly used function that has been cited in literature has been the two-parameter Weibull function. However, in recent years studies have shown that the two-parameter Weibull function might be inadequate in modeling the wind speed probability density distributions or independent of whether the distribution is of unimodal or bimodal nature. For the unimodal distributions, the inadequacy may be due to the intricate behavior of the distribution, which prevents it to be satisfyingly modeled by a two-parameter model. For the bimodal behavior, the two-parameter Weibull function, which produces only a unimodal distribution, is simply inadequate to model it appropriately. Therefore, in recent years, alternative functions have been suggested for both unimodal and bimodal distributions, seeking more involved functions to better model these distributions. This article involves the modeling of observed wind speed probability density distributions using the main body of models found in the literature, namely, Rayleigh, Lognormal, two-parameter Weibull, three-parameter Weibull, and bimodal Weibull probability distribution functions. One of the important steps in the evaluation of different functions is the interpretation of the statistical parameters, namely, slope, R 2 , mean bias error, and root mean squared error, as are presently used in this article. A novel statistical tool is developed in the present article using these four statistical parameters. The novel tool can be used to evaluate the relative performance of models when more than one model is involved or to determine the overall accuracy of a particular model for a specific site. The calculations are made based on the long term wind speed data collected at 4-s interval at the experimental site at Edinburgh Napier University.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/1.3294127
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>scitation_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_1_3294127Critical_evaluation</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>jrse</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-6eb051e44989f44c980993934cd7e8ea06b03a2fab92d41b99016e73afd03623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLw0AUhQdRsFYX_oNsFVLvPDLJLFxoqA8ouOl-mMwDRmISZ5JK_73pQypIXd2z-M7hnoPQNYYZBk7v8IwSwTDJT9AEjyLNAZPTX_ocXcT4DsAJZGSCHsvge69VndiVqgfV-7ZJWpd8-cYksbPWJC7Yz8E2ep0YH_vgq2ELuaHRGxEv0ZlTdbRX-ztFy6f5snxJF2_Pr-XDItU0o33KbQUZtoyJQjjGtChACCoo0ya3hVXAK6CKOFUJYhiuhADMbU6VM0A5oVN0s4vVoY0xWCe74D9UWEsMctNdYrnvPrL3OzZq3287HYd_BpCHAUb_7TH_qg0Hr-yM-w_--9k3lFx9VA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Critical evaluation of wind speed frequency distribution functions</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><creator>Celik, A. N. ; Makkawi, A. ; Muneer, T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Celik, A. N. ; Makkawi, A. ; Muneer, T.</creatorcontrib><description>Over the past few years a number of new mathematical functions have been proposed for wind speed probability density distributions. The most commonly used function that has been cited in literature has been the two-parameter Weibull function. However, in recent years studies have shown that the two-parameter Weibull function might be inadequate in modeling the wind speed probability density distributions or independent of whether the distribution is of unimodal or bimodal nature. For the unimodal distributions, the inadequacy may be due to the intricate behavior of the distribution, which prevents it to be satisfyingly modeled by a two-parameter model. For the bimodal behavior, the two-parameter Weibull function, which produces only a unimodal distribution, is simply inadequate to model it appropriately. Therefore, in recent years, alternative functions have been suggested for both unimodal and bimodal distributions, seeking more involved functions to better model these distributions. This article involves the modeling of observed wind speed probability density distributions using the main body of models found in the literature, namely, Rayleigh, Lognormal, two-parameter Weibull, three-parameter Weibull, and bimodal Weibull probability distribution functions. One of the important steps in the evaluation of different functions is the interpretation of the statistical parameters, namely, slope, R 2 , mean bias error, and root mean squared error, as are presently used in this article. A novel statistical tool is developed in the present article using these four statistical parameters. The novel tool can be used to evaluate the relative performance of models when more than one model is involved or to determine the overall accuracy of a particular model for a specific site. The calculations are made based on the long term wind speed data collected at 4-s interval at the experimental site at Edinburgh Napier University.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1941-7012</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-7012</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/1.3294127</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JRSEBH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Institute of Physics</publisher><ispartof>Journal of renewable and sustainable energy, 2010-01, Vol.2 (1), p.013102-013102-16</ispartof><rights>American Institute of Physics</rights><rights>2010 American Institute of Physics</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-6eb051e44989f44c980993934cd7e8ea06b03a2fab92d41b99016e73afd03623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-6eb051e44989f44c980993934cd7e8ea06b03a2fab92d41b99016e73afd03623</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/jrse/article-lookup/doi/10.1063/1.3294127$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,791,4498,27905,27906,76133</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Celik, A. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makkawi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muneer, T.</creatorcontrib><title>Critical evaluation of wind speed frequency distribution functions</title><title>Journal of renewable and sustainable energy</title><description>Over the past few years a number of new mathematical functions have been proposed for wind speed probability density distributions. The most commonly used function that has been cited in literature has been the two-parameter Weibull function. However, in recent years studies have shown that the two-parameter Weibull function might be inadequate in modeling the wind speed probability density distributions or independent of whether the distribution is of unimodal or bimodal nature. For the unimodal distributions, the inadequacy may be due to the intricate behavior of the distribution, which prevents it to be satisfyingly modeled by a two-parameter model. For the bimodal behavior, the two-parameter Weibull function, which produces only a unimodal distribution, is simply inadequate to model it appropriately. Therefore, in recent years, alternative functions have been suggested for both unimodal and bimodal distributions, seeking more involved functions to better model these distributions. This article involves the modeling of observed wind speed probability density distributions using the main body of models found in the literature, namely, Rayleigh, Lognormal, two-parameter Weibull, three-parameter Weibull, and bimodal Weibull probability distribution functions. One of the important steps in the evaluation of different functions is the interpretation of the statistical parameters, namely, slope, R 2 , mean bias error, and root mean squared error, as are presently used in this article. A novel statistical tool is developed in the present article using these four statistical parameters. The novel tool can be used to evaluate the relative performance of models when more than one model is involved or to determine the overall accuracy of a particular model for a specific site. The calculations are made based on the long term wind speed data collected at 4-s interval at the experimental site at Edinburgh Napier University.</description><issn>1941-7012</issn><issn>1941-7012</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLw0AUhQdRsFYX_oNsFVLvPDLJLFxoqA8ouOl-mMwDRmISZ5JK_73pQypIXd2z-M7hnoPQNYYZBk7v8IwSwTDJT9AEjyLNAZPTX_ocXcT4DsAJZGSCHsvge69VndiVqgfV-7ZJWpd8-cYksbPWJC7Yz8E2ep0YH_vgq2ELuaHRGxEv0ZlTdbRX-ztFy6f5snxJF2_Pr-XDItU0o33KbQUZtoyJQjjGtChACCoo0ya3hVXAK6CKOFUJYhiuhADMbU6VM0A5oVN0s4vVoY0xWCe74D9UWEsMctNdYrnvPrL3OzZq3287HYd_BpCHAUb_7TH_qg0Hr-yM-w_--9k3lFx9VA</recordid><startdate>20100101</startdate><enddate>20100101</enddate><creator>Celik, A. N.</creator><creator>Makkawi, A.</creator><creator>Muneer, T.</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100101</creationdate><title>Critical evaluation of wind speed frequency distribution functions</title><author>Celik, A. N. ; Makkawi, A. ; Muneer, T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-6eb051e44989f44c980993934cd7e8ea06b03a2fab92d41b99016e73afd03623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Celik, A. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makkawi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muneer, T.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of renewable and sustainable energy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Celik, A. N.</au><au>Makkawi, A.</au><au>Muneer, T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Critical evaluation of wind speed frequency distribution functions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of renewable and sustainable energy</jtitle><date>2010-01-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>013102</spage><epage>013102-16</epage><pages>013102-013102-16</pages><issn>1941-7012</issn><eissn>1941-7012</eissn><coden>JRSEBH</coden><abstract>Over the past few years a number of new mathematical functions have been proposed for wind speed probability density distributions. The most commonly used function that has been cited in literature has been the two-parameter Weibull function. However, in recent years studies have shown that the two-parameter Weibull function might be inadequate in modeling the wind speed probability density distributions or independent of whether the distribution is of unimodal or bimodal nature. For the unimodal distributions, the inadequacy may be due to the intricate behavior of the distribution, which prevents it to be satisfyingly modeled by a two-parameter model. For the bimodal behavior, the two-parameter Weibull function, which produces only a unimodal distribution, is simply inadequate to model it appropriately. Therefore, in recent years, alternative functions have been suggested for both unimodal and bimodal distributions, seeking more involved functions to better model these distributions. This article involves the modeling of observed wind speed probability density distributions using the main body of models found in the literature, namely, Rayleigh, Lognormal, two-parameter Weibull, three-parameter Weibull, and bimodal Weibull probability distribution functions. One of the important steps in the evaluation of different functions is the interpretation of the statistical parameters, namely, slope, R 2 , mean bias error, and root mean squared error, as are presently used in this article. A novel statistical tool is developed in the present article using these four statistical parameters. The novel tool can be used to evaluate the relative performance of models when more than one model is involved or to determine the overall accuracy of a particular model for a specific site. The calculations are made based on the long term wind speed data collected at 4-s interval at the experimental site at Edinburgh Napier University.</abstract><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/1.3294127</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1941-7012
ispartof Journal of renewable and sustainable energy, 2010-01, Vol.2 (1), p.013102-013102-16
issn 1941-7012
1941-7012
language eng
recordid cdi_scitation_primary_10_1063_1_3294127Critical_evaluation
source AIP Journals Complete
title Critical evaluation of wind speed frequency distribution functions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T20%3A39%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-scitation_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Critical%20evaluation%20of%20wind%20speed%20frequency%20distribution%20functions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20renewable%20and%20sustainable%20energy&rft.au=Celik,%20A.%20N.&rft.date=2010-01-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=013102&rft.epage=013102-16&rft.pages=013102-013102-16&rft.issn=1941-7012&rft.eissn=1941-7012&rft.coden=JRSEBH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/1.3294127&rft_dat=%3Cscitation_cross%3Ejrse%3C/scitation_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true