An Integrated Strategy for the Proactive Management of Grapevine Trunk Disease Pathogen Infections in Grapevine Nurseries

The aim of this study was to compare 11 treatment regimes (TR) in grapevine nurseries in order to eradicate trunk pathogens. Grapevine propagation material was subjected to treatments before cold storage, before and after grafting, before planting and after uprooting. Isolations were made from roots...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture 2016-01, Vol.37 (2), p.104-114
Hauptverfasser: Halleen, F., Fourie, P.H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 114
container_issue 2
container_start_page 104
container_title South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture
container_volume 37
creator Halleen, F.
Fourie, P.H.
description The aim of this study was to compare 11 treatment regimes (TR) in grapevine nurseries in order to eradicate trunk pathogens. Grapevine propagation material was subjected to treatments before cold storage, before and after grafting, before planting and after uprooting. Isolations were made from roots, rootstocks and graft unions of uprooted vines. None of the treatments consistently affected the number of certifiable vines produced. TR 1 (benomyl), TR 3 (Sporekill) and TR 4 (Trichoflow) increased root mass. Phaeomoniella chlamydospora was the most frequently isolated pathogen from all plant parts. In general, TR 2, 7, 9 and 11 caused the lowest occurrence of Phaeomoniella. TR 9 consistently reduced the incidence of Phaeoacremonium. Pleurostomophora richardsiae occurred most frequently in graft unions, but treatments were too inconsistent to draw meaningful conclusions. TR 7 (hot water treatment (HWT) of uprooted grapevines) consistently reduced incidences of black foot disease (BFD) pathogens. The highest incidence of Botryosphaeriaceae occurred in graft unions, but all treatments significantly reduced infections. The colonisation of rootstocks and graft unions by Trichoderma was significantly better with TR 4 (Trichoflow). The other Trichoderma treatments (TR 9, 10 and 11) differed from the control treatment only in the graft unions. This is a first report of an integrated strategy covering all the phases of the propagation process, from the moment the nursery receives the propagation material until the dormant vines are removed. TR 9 is recommended for use in nurseries, although HWT of dormant vines is recommended to eradicate BFD pathogens. Benomyl can be replaced by carbendazim when benomyl is no longer available.
doi_str_mv 10.21548/37-2-825
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>scielo_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scielo_journals_S2224_79042016000200012</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S2224_79042016000200012</scielo_id><sourcerecordid>S2224_79042016000200012</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-118c131ce41800f6d1d5c621f13aa1a27fb27e8cac18942c750d2749a0320e6b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEtPQjEQhRujiQRZ-A-6dXGxnd4XS4KKJPhIwHVTeqdQhZa0hYR_773igsXkzOKcM5mPkHvOhsCLvH4UVQZZDcUV6QFAnlUjll9f7LdkEKNdMVHmrB7lokdOY0dnLuE6qIQNXaRO1ydqfKBpg_QzeKWTPSJ9U06tcYcuUW_oNKg9Hq1DugwH90OfbEQVW79KG7_GrtRgG_QuUusu7O-HEDFYjHfkxqhtxMG_9snXy_Ny8prNP6azyXieaSjrlHFeay64xpzXjJmy4U2hS-CGC6W4gsqsoMJaK83bj0BXBWugykeKCWBYrkSfDM-9UVvcevntD8G1B-WiwyI7LMB4yRiDdji0gYdzQAcfY0Aj98HuVDhJzuQfZykqCbLlLH4BplFuAg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Integrated Strategy for the Proactive Management of Grapevine Trunk Disease Pathogen Infections in Grapevine Nurseries</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Halleen, F. ; Fourie, P.H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Halleen, F. ; Fourie, P.H.</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to compare 11 treatment regimes (TR) in grapevine nurseries in order to eradicate trunk pathogens. Grapevine propagation material was subjected to treatments before cold storage, before and after grafting, before planting and after uprooting. Isolations were made from roots, rootstocks and graft unions of uprooted vines. None of the treatments consistently affected the number of certifiable vines produced. TR 1 (benomyl), TR 3 (Sporekill) and TR 4 (Trichoflow) increased root mass. Phaeomoniella chlamydospora was the most frequently isolated pathogen from all plant parts. In general, TR 2, 7, 9 and 11 caused the lowest occurrence of Phaeomoniella. TR 9 consistently reduced the incidence of Phaeoacremonium. Pleurostomophora richardsiae occurred most frequently in graft unions, but treatments were too inconsistent to draw meaningful conclusions. TR 7 (hot water treatment (HWT) of uprooted grapevines) consistently reduced incidences of black foot disease (BFD) pathogens. The highest incidence of Botryosphaeriaceae occurred in graft unions, but all treatments significantly reduced infections. The colonisation of rootstocks and graft unions by Trichoderma was significantly better with TR 4 (Trichoflow). The other Trichoderma treatments (TR 9, 10 and 11) differed from the control treatment only in the graft unions. This is a first report of an integrated strategy covering all the phases of the propagation process, from the moment the nursery receives the propagation material until the dormant vines are removed. TR 9 is recommended for use in nurseries, although HWT of dormant vines is recommended to eradicate BFD pathogens. Benomyl can be replaced by carbendazim when benomyl is no longer available.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2224-7904</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2224-7904</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21548/37-2-825</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Stellenbosch University</publisher><subject>Agriculture, Multidisciplinary</subject><ispartof>South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 2016-01, Vol.37 (2), p.104-114</ispartof><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-118c131ce41800f6d1d5c621f13aa1a27fb27e8cac18942c750d2749a0320e6b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Halleen, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fourie, P.H.</creatorcontrib><title>An Integrated Strategy for the Proactive Management of Grapevine Trunk Disease Pathogen Infections in Grapevine Nurseries</title><title>South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture</title><addtitle>S. Afr. J. Enol. Vitic</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to compare 11 treatment regimes (TR) in grapevine nurseries in order to eradicate trunk pathogens. Grapevine propagation material was subjected to treatments before cold storage, before and after grafting, before planting and after uprooting. Isolations were made from roots, rootstocks and graft unions of uprooted vines. None of the treatments consistently affected the number of certifiable vines produced. TR 1 (benomyl), TR 3 (Sporekill) and TR 4 (Trichoflow) increased root mass. Phaeomoniella chlamydospora was the most frequently isolated pathogen from all plant parts. In general, TR 2, 7, 9 and 11 caused the lowest occurrence of Phaeomoniella. TR 9 consistently reduced the incidence of Phaeoacremonium. Pleurostomophora richardsiae occurred most frequently in graft unions, but treatments were too inconsistent to draw meaningful conclusions. TR 7 (hot water treatment (HWT) of uprooted grapevines) consistently reduced incidences of black foot disease (BFD) pathogens. The highest incidence of Botryosphaeriaceae occurred in graft unions, but all treatments significantly reduced infections. The colonisation of rootstocks and graft unions by Trichoderma was significantly better with TR 4 (Trichoflow). The other Trichoderma treatments (TR 9, 10 and 11) differed from the control treatment only in the graft unions. This is a first report of an integrated strategy covering all the phases of the propagation process, from the moment the nursery receives the propagation material until the dormant vines are removed. TR 9 is recommended for use in nurseries, although HWT of dormant vines is recommended to eradicate BFD pathogens. Benomyl can be replaced by carbendazim when benomyl is no longer available.</description><subject>Agriculture, Multidisciplinary</subject><issn>2224-7904</issn><issn>2224-7904</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkEtPQjEQhRujiQRZ-A-6dXGxnd4XS4KKJPhIwHVTeqdQhZa0hYR_773igsXkzOKcM5mPkHvOhsCLvH4UVQZZDcUV6QFAnlUjll9f7LdkEKNdMVHmrB7lokdOY0dnLuE6qIQNXaRO1ydqfKBpg_QzeKWTPSJ9U06tcYcuUW_oNKg9Hq1DugwH90OfbEQVW79KG7_GrtRgG_QuUusu7O-HEDFYjHfkxqhtxMG_9snXy_Ny8prNP6azyXieaSjrlHFeay64xpzXjJmy4U2hS-CGC6W4gsqsoMJaK83bj0BXBWugykeKCWBYrkSfDM-9UVvcevntD8G1B-WiwyI7LMB4yRiDdji0gYdzQAcfY0Aj98HuVDhJzuQfZykqCbLlLH4BplFuAg</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Halleen, F.</creator><creator>Fourie, P.H.</creator><general>Stellenbosch University</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>GPN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>An Integrated Strategy for the Proactive Management of Grapevine Trunk Disease Pathogen Infections in Grapevine Nurseries</title><author>Halleen, F. ; Fourie, P.H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-118c131ce41800f6d1d5c621f13aa1a27fb27e8cac18942c750d2749a0320e6b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Agriculture, Multidisciplinary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Halleen, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fourie, P.H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><jtitle>South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Halleen, F.</au><au>Fourie, P.H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Integrated Strategy for the Proactive Management of Grapevine Trunk Disease Pathogen Infections in Grapevine Nurseries</atitle><jtitle>South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture</jtitle><addtitle>S. Afr. J. Enol. Vitic</addtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>104</spage><epage>114</epage><pages>104-114</pages><issn>2224-7904</issn><eissn>2224-7904</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to compare 11 treatment regimes (TR) in grapevine nurseries in order to eradicate trunk pathogens. Grapevine propagation material was subjected to treatments before cold storage, before and after grafting, before planting and after uprooting. Isolations were made from roots, rootstocks and graft unions of uprooted vines. None of the treatments consistently affected the number of certifiable vines produced. TR 1 (benomyl), TR 3 (Sporekill) and TR 4 (Trichoflow) increased root mass. Phaeomoniella chlamydospora was the most frequently isolated pathogen from all plant parts. In general, TR 2, 7, 9 and 11 caused the lowest occurrence of Phaeomoniella. TR 9 consistently reduced the incidence of Phaeoacremonium. Pleurostomophora richardsiae occurred most frequently in graft unions, but treatments were too inconsistent to draw meaningful conclusions. TR 7 (hot water treatment (HWT) of uprooted grapevines) consistently reduced incidences of black foot disease (BFD) pathogens. The highest incidence of Botryosphaeriaceae occurred in graft unions, but all treatments significantly reduced infections. The colonisation of rootstocks and graft unions by Trichoderma was significantly better with TR 4 (Trichoflow). The other Trichoderma treatments (TR 9, 10 and 11) differed from the control treatment only in the graft unions. This is a first report of an integrated strategy covering all the phases of the propagation process, from the moment the nursery receives the propagation material until the dormant vines are removed. TR 9 is recommended for use in nurseries, although HWT of dormant vines is recommended to eradicate BFD pathogens. Benomyl can be replaced by carbendazim when benomyl is no longer available.</abstract><pub>Stellenbosch University</pub><doi>10.21548/37-2-825</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2224-7904
ispartof South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 2016-01, Vol.37 (2), p.104-114
issn 2224-7904
2224-7904
language eng
recordid cdi_scielo_journals_S2224_79042016000200012
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Agriculture, Multidisciplinary
title An Integrated Strategy for the Proactive Management of Grapevine Trunk Disease Pathogen Infections in Grapevine Nurseries
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T06%3A02%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-scielo_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Integrated%20Strategy%20for%20the%20Proactive%20Management%20of%20Grapevine%20Trunk%20Disease%20Pathogen%20Infections%20in%20Grapevine%20Nurseries&rft.jtitle=South%20African%20Journal%20of%20Enology%20and%20Viticulture&rft.au=Halleen,%20F.&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=104&rft.epage=114&rft.pages=104-114&rft.issn=2224-7904&rft.eissn=2224-7904&rft_id=info:doi/10.21548/37-2-825&rft_dat=%3Cscielo_cross%3ES2224_79042016000200012%3C/scielo_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_scielo_id=S2224_79042016000200012&rfr_iscdi=true