The right to equality and access to courts for government employees in South Africa : time to amend the Government Employees Pension Law

This article comments on the South African Government Employees Pension Law by highlighting a constitutional defect arising out of the parallel pension regime in the country which has yet to be resolved. Since the 1996 amendments to the Pension Funds Act Law, members of pension funds governed by tha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:African Human Rights Law Journal 2019, Vol.19 (1), p.337-360
1. Verfasser: Mhango, Mtendeweka
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 360
container_issue 1
container_start_page 337
container_title African Human Rights Law Journal
container_volume 19
creator Mhango, Mtendeweka
description This article comments on the South African Government Employees Pension Law by highlighting a constitutional defect arising out of the parallel pension regime in the country which has yet to be resolved. Since the 1996 amendments to the Pension Funds Act Law, members of pension funds governed by that Act have enjoyed the advantage of access to a specialised pension tribunal known as the Office of the Pension Funds Adjudicator, whose functions are performed by the Pension Funds Adjudicator. The problem is that members of government funds do not have access to the Office of the Pension Funds Adjudicator nor does any legislation specific to government funds make provision for a similar advantage and benefit. While this article focuses its analysis on the impugned provisions of the Government Employees Pension Law, the arguments advanced against those provisions apply with equal force to legislation establishing other government funds. The article argues that the Government Employees Pension Law is unconstitutional to the extent that it does not afford members of the Government Employees Pension Fund the advantage of and access to the dispute resolution services at the Office of the Pension Funds Adjudicator or a similar tribunal. Although this article concerns itself with the position in South Africa, the constitutional argument is relevant to other countries (in Africa and elsewhere) that have comparable legal regimes in place.
doi_str_mv 10.17159/1996-2096/2019/v19n1a16
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sciel</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scielo_journals_S1996_20962019000100017</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sabinet_id>https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-1714e8fbfd</sabinet_id><scielo_id>S1996_20962019000100017</scielo_id><sourcerecordid>2275920470</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2776-21b412e4c6a42e1eb604711ece6d00b5200f535d5c6f6b1ca9c278291cac21033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkc1q3DAQx01poGmSdxD0vNmRbMurXkpYtmnLQgNJIDchy-NYwSs5kpywb9DHrtRNNwehYWZ-__kqCkLhkja0FksqBF8wEHzJgIrlCxWWKso_FKfHyMdkcxALaMqHT8XnEJ4AqrKp-Gnx525A4s3jEEl0BJ9nNZq4J8p2RGmNIWS3drOPgfTOk0f3gt7u0EaCu2l0e8RAjCW3bo4Dueq90Yp8JdHsMJMqZXYkphrX7-DmCN6gDcZZslWv58VJr8aAF2__WXH_fXO3_rHY_r7-ub7aLjRrmjQObSvKsNJcVQwpthyqhlLUyDuAtmYAfV3WXa15z1uqlUjciolkaUahLM-Ky4Nu0AZHJ5_SbDYVlLd5XTKvK-8RAGh-TQK-HIDJu-cZQ3xHGGtqwVIDkLJWhyztXQgeezl5s1N-LynIf4eSR32ZC8j_h0rot7eOVGssRhkUTnMrhxinIIdulEM6x4gyxyikEeXm1zqLVrjq274r_wKXlZw0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2275920470</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The right to equality and access to courts for government employees in South Africa : time to amend the Government Employees Pension Law</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Mhango, Mtendeweka</creator><creatorcontrib>Mhango, Mtendeweka</creatorcontrib><description>This article comments on the South African Government Employees Pension Law by highlighting a constitutional defect arising out of the parallel pension regime in the country which has yet to be resolved. Since the 1996 amendments to the Pension Funds Act Law, members of pension funds governed by that Act have enjoyed the advantage of access to a specialised pension tribunal known as the Office of the Pension Funds Adjudicator, whose functions are performed by the Pension Funds Adjudicator. The problem is that members of government funds do not have access to the Office of the Pension Funds Adjudicator nor does any legislation specific to government funds make provision for a similar advantage and benefit. While this article focuses its analysis on the impugned provisions of the Government Employees Pension Law, the arguments advanced against those provisions apply with equal force to legislation establishing other government funds. The article argues that the Government Employees Pension Law is unconstitutional to the extent that it does not afford members of the Government Employees Pension Fund the advantage of and access to the dispute resolution services at the Office of the Pension Funds Adjudicator or a similar tribunal. Although this article concerns itself with the position in South Africa, the constitutional argument is relevant to other countries (in Africa and elsewhere) that have comparable legal regimes in place.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1609-073X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1996-2096</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-2096</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.17159/1996-2096/2019/v19n1a16</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hatfield: Pretoria University Law Press (PULP)</publisher><subject>Access ; Adjudicators ; Advantages ; Constitutional law ; Courts ; Criminology &amp; Penology ; Dispute resolution ; Employees ; Equality ; Fair trial ; Government employees ; Law ; Legislation ; Pension benefits ; Pension fund ; Pension funds</subject><ispartof>African Human Rights Law Journal, 2019, Vol.19 (1), p.337-360</ispartof><rights>Copyright University of Pretoria 2019</rights><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2776-21b412e4c6a42e1eb604711ece6d00b5200f535d5c6f6b1ca9c278291cac21033</citedby><orcidid>0000-0001-7976-4473</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,860,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mhango, Mtendeweka</creatorcontrib><title>The right to equality and access to courts for government employees in South Africa : time to amend the Government Employees Pension Law</title><title>African Human Rights Law Journal</title><addtitle>Afr. hum. rights law j</addtitle><description>This article comments on the South African Government Employees Pension Law by highlighting a constitutional defect arising out of the parallel pension regime in the country which has yet to be resolved. Since the 1996 amendments to the Pension Funds Act Law, members of pension funds governed by that Act have enjoyed the advantage of access to a specialised pension tribunal known as the Office of the Pension Funds Adjudicator, whose functions are performed by the Pension Funds Adjudicator. The problem is that members of government funds do not have access to the Office of the Pension Funds Adjudicator nor does any legislation specific to government funds make provision for a similar advantage and benefit. While this article focuses its analysis on the impugned provisions of the Government Employees Pension Law, the arguments advanced against those provisions apply with equal force to legislation establishing other government funds. The article argues that the Government Employees Pension Law is unconstitutional to the extent that it does not afford members of the Government Employees Pension Fund the advantage of and access to the dispute resolution services at the Office of the Pension Funds Adjudicator or a similar tribunal. Although this article concerns itself with the position in South Africa, the constitutional argument is relevant to other countries (in Africa and elsewhere) that have comparable legal regimes in place.</description><subject>Access</subject><subject>Adjudicators</subject><subject>Advantages</subject><subject>Constitutional law</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Criminology &amp; Penology</subject><subject>Dispute resolution</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Fair trial</subject><subject>Government employees</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Pension benefits</subject><subject>Pension fund</subject><subject>Pension funds</subject><issn>1609-073X</issn><issn>1996-2096</issn><issn>1996-2096</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkc1q3DAQx01poGmSdxD0vNmRbMurXkpYtmnLQgNJIDchy-NYwSs5kpywb9DHrtRNNwehYWZ-__kqCkLhkja0FksqBF8wEHzJgIrlCxWWKso_FKfHyMdkcxALaMqHT8XnEJ4AqrKp-Gnx525A4s3jEEl0BJ9nNZq4J8p2RGmNIWS3drOPgfTOk0f3gt7u0EaCu2l0e8RAjCW3bo4Dueq90Yp8JdHsMJMqZXYkphrX7-DmCN6gDcZZslWv58VJr8aAF2__WXH_fXO3_rHY_r7-ub7aLjRrmjQObSvKsNJcVQwpthyqhlLUyDuAtmYAfV3WXa15z1uqlUjciolkaUahLM-Ky4Nu0AZHJ5_SbDYVlLd5XTKvK-8RAGh-TQK-HIDJu-cZQ3xHGGtqwVIDkLJWhyztXQgeezl5s1N-LynIf4eSR32ZC8j_h0rot7eOVGssRhkUTnMrhxinIIdulEM6x4gyxyikEeXm1zqLVrjq274r_wKXlZw0</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Mhango, Mtendeweka</creator><general>Pretoria University Law Press (PULP)</general><general>University of Pretoria</general><general>Centre of Human Rights, Faculty of Law, University of Pretoria</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>GPN</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7976-4473</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>The right to equality and access to courts for government employees in South Africa : time to amend the Government Employees Pension Law</title><author>Mhango, Mtendeweka</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2776-21b412e4c6a42e1eb604711ece6d00b5200f535d5c6f6b1ca9c278291cac21033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Access</topic><topic>Adjudicators</topic><topic>Advantages</topic><topic>Constitutional law</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Criminology &amp; Penology</topic><topic>Dispute resolution</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Fair trial</topic><topic>Government employees</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Pension benefits</topic><topic>Pension fund</topic><topic>Pension funds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mhango, Mtendeweka</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><jtitle>African Human Rights Law Journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mhango, Mtendeweka</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The right to equality and access to courts for government employees in South Africa : time to amend the Government Employees Pension Law</atitle><jtitle>African Human Rights Law Journal</jtitle><addtitle>Afr. hum. rights law j</addtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>337</spage><epage>360</epage><pages>337-360</pages><issn>1609-073X</issn><issn>1996-2096</issn><eissn>1996-2096</eissn><abstract>This article comments on the South African Government Employees Pension Law by highlighting a constitutional defect arising out of the parallel pension regime in the country which has yet to be resolved. Since the 1996 amendments to the Pension Funds Act Law, members of pension funds governed by that Act have enjoyed the advantage of access to a specialised pension tribunal known as the Office of the Pension Funds Adjudicator, whose functions are performed by the Pension Funds Adjudicator. The problem is that members of government funds do not have access to the Office of the Pension Funds Adjudicator nor does any legislation specific to government funds make provision for a similar advantage and benefit. While this article focuses its analysis on the impugned provisions of the Government Employees Pension Law, the arguments advanced against those provisions apply with equal force to legislation establishing other government funds. The article argues that the Government Employees Pension Law is unconstitutional to the extent that it does not afford members of the Government Employees Pension Fund the advantage of and access to the dispute resolution services at the Office of the Pension Funds Adjudicator or a similar tribunal. Although this article concerns itself with the position in South Africa, the constitutional argument is relevant to other countries (in Africa and elsewhere) that have comparable legal regimes in place.</abstract><cop>Hatfield</cop><pub>Pretoria University Law Press (PULP)</pub><doi>10.17159/1996-2096/2019/v19n1a16</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7976-4473</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1609-073X
ispartof African Human Rights Law Journal, 2019, Vol.19 (1), p.337-360
issn 1609-073X
1996-2096
1996-2096
language eng
recordid cdi_scielo_journals_S1996_20962019000100017
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Access
Adjudicators
Advantages
Constitutional law
Courts
Criminology & Penology
Dispute resolution
Employees
Equality
Fair trial
Government employees
Law
Legislation
Pension benefits
Pension fund
Pension funds
title The right to equality and access to courts for government employees in South Africa : time to amend the Government Employees Pension Law
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T06%3A07%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sciel&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20right%20to%20equality%20and%20access%20to%20courts%20for%20government%20employees%20in%20South%20Africa%20:%20time%20to%20amend%20the%20Government%20Employees%20Pension%20Law&rft.jtitle=African%20Human%20Rights%20Law%20Journal&rft.au=Mhango,%20Mtendeweka&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=337&rft.epage=360&rft.pages=337-360&rft.issn=1609-073X&rft.eissn=1996-2096&rft_id=info:doi/10.17159/1996-2096/2019/v19n1a16&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sciel%3E2275920470%3C/proquest_sciel%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2275920470&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sabinet_id=https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-1714e8fbfd&rft_scielo_id=S1996_20962019000100017&rfr_iscdi=true