The Politics of Agribusiness in Brazil: Business Power and Political Success during the 55th Legislature (2015-2019)

This paper addresses two central issues during the 55th legislature (2015-2019). First, the relationship between the instrumental and structural power of agribusiness and different aspects of parliamentary behavior, namely membership in standing committees and the introduction of legislative bills....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Brazilian political science review 2024, Vol.18 (2), p.1-29
Hauptverfasser: Mancuso, Wagner Pralon, Resende, Ciro Antônio da Silva, Silva, Lucas Henrique Ribeiro da, Prado, João Felype Vieira, Santos, Ana Luiza Ormeni Almeida dos
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 29
container_issue 2
container_start_page 1
container_title Brazilian political science review
container_volume 18
creator Mancuso, Wagner Pralon
Resende, Ciro Antônio da Silva
Silva, Lucas Henrique Ribeiro da
Prado, João Felype Vieira
Santos, Ana Luiza Ormeni Almeida dos
description This paper addresses two central issues during the 55th legislature (2015-2019). First, the relationship between the instrumental and structural power of agribusiness and different aspects of parliamentary behavior, namely membership in standing committees and the introduction of legislative bills. Second, the level of success achieved by agribusiness in relation to the legislative production of the National Congress. Concerning the first question, we employed binary logistic regression to demonstrate that deputies who received the most campaign financing from agribusiness (an indicator of instrumental political power), and whose voters were highly dependent on agribusiness as a source of employment (an indicator of structural political power), were more likely to secure seats in the Committee on Agriculture, Livestock, Food Supply, and Rural Development (CAPADR). We also employed negative binomial regression to demonstrate that deputies whose constituents were more dependent on jobs created by the sector (structural political power) introduced a greater number of bills favorable to the sector, while introducing fewer bills contrary to its interests. Regarding the second issue, we utilized statistical techniques such as the chi-squared test and the analysis of adjusted residuals to compare the stance of the Agricultural Parliamentary Front (APF) with the decisions of the National Congress on bills concluded during the 55th Legislature. Our findings suggest that agribusiness attained success in the vast majority of decisions resulting in new laws, although many bills supported by the sector had different outcomes. In summary, the 55th Legislature demonstrated a high degree of receptiveness to the interests of agribusiness. However, while the interests of agribusiness wield considerable influence in the Brazilian Congress, this influence is far from all-encompassing.
doi_str_mv 10.1590/1981-3821202400020002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sciel</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scielo_journals_S1981_38212024000200202</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S1981_38212024000200202</scielo_id><sourcerecordid>3092894320</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1602-597314858a07f484fb6849a0a394979cfae9dfef3931df5a152727dc0f60a24e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUdtKw0AQXUTBWv0EYcEXfUidvSVZ39riDQoWWp_DdrPbbolJ3U0Q_XoTYr2AD3Nh5pwzcAahcwIjIiRcE5mSiKWUUKAcAGgXB2jwPT_81R-jkxC2ADGhjA1QvdwYPK8KVzsdcGXxeO3dqgmuNCFgV-KJVx-uuMGT_WxevRmPVZnvaarAi0brbpc33pVrXLeaQtQbPDNrFwpVN97gSwpERG2SV6foyKoimLOvOkTPd7fL6UM0e7p_nI5nkSYx0EjIhBGeilRBYnnK7SpOuVSgmOQykdoqI3NrLJOM5FYoImhCk1yDjUFRbtgQjXrdoJ0pqmxbNb5sD2aLzo7sr2Vt1xIuesLOV6-NCfUPhYGkqeSMQosSPUr7KgRvbLbz7kX594xA1n0k-0e-Vf8EZkZ4og</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3092894320</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Politics of Agribusiness in Brazil: Business Power and Political Success during the 55th Legislature (2015-2019)</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Mancuso, Wagner Pralon ; Resende, Ciro Antônio da Silva ; Silva, Lucas Henrique Ribeiro da ; Prado, João Felype Vieira ; Santos, Ana Luiza Ormeni Almeida dos</creator><creatorcontrib>Mancuso, Wagner Pralon ; Resende, Ciro Antônio da Silva ; Silva, Lucas Henrique Ribeiro da ; Prado, João Felype Vieira ; Santos, Ana Luiza Ormeni Almeida dos</creatorcontrib><description>This paper addresses two central issues during the 55th legislature (2015-2019). First, the relationship between the instrumental and structural power of agribusiness and different aspects of parliamentary behavior, namely membership in standing committees and the introduction of legislative bills. Second, the level of success achieved by agribusiness in relation to the legislative production of the National Congress. Concerning the first question, we employed binary logistic regression to demonstrate that deputies who received the most campaign financing from agribusiness (an indicator of instrumental political power), and whose voters were highly dependent on agribusiness as a source of employment (an indicator of structural political power), were more likely to secure seats in the Committee on Agriculture, Livestock, Food Supply, and Rural Development (CAPADR). We also employed negative binomial regression to demonstrate that deputies whose constituents were more dependent on jobs created by the sector (structural political power) introduced a greater number of bills favorable to the sector, while introducing fewer bills contrary to its interests. Regarding the second issue, we utilized statistical techniques such as the chi-squared test and the analysis of adjusted residuals to compare the stance of the Agricultural Parliamentary Front (APF) with the decisions of the National Congress on bills concluded during the 55th Legislature. Our findings suggest that agribusiness attained success in the vast majority of decisions resulting in new laws, although many bills supported by the sector had different outcomes. In summary, the 55th Legislature demonstrated a high degree of receptiveness to the interests of agribusiness. However, while the interests of agribusiness wield considerable influence in the Brazilian Congress, this influence is far from all-encompassing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1981-3821</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1981-3821</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/1981-3821202400020002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Rio de Janeiro: Associacao Brasileira de Ciencia Politica</publisher><subject>Agribusiness ; Committees ; Employment ; Food supply ; Legislatures ; Livestock ; Political power ; POLITICAL SCIENCE ; Politics ; Rural development</subject><ispartof>Brazilian political science review, 2024, Vol.18 (2), p.1-29</ispartof><rights>2024. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1602-597314858a07f484fb6849a0a394979cfae9dfef3931df5a152727dc0f60a24e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2071-2270 ; 0009-0002-1223-6902 ; 0000-0002-6470-4782 ; 0000-0003-0296-2281 ; 0009-0009-1092-7815</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mancuso, Wagner Pralon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Resende, Ciro Antônio da Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Lucas Henrique Ribeiro da</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prado, João Felype Vieira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Ana Luiza Ormeni Almeida dos</creatorcontrib><title>The Politics of Agribusiness in Brazil: Business Power and Political Success during the 55th Legislature (2015-2019)</title><title>Brazilian political science review</title><addtitle>Bras. political sci. rev</addtitle><description>This paper addresses two central issues during the 55th legislature (2015-2019). First, the relationship between the instrumental and structural power of agribusiness and different aspects of parliamentary behavior, namely membership in standing committees and the introduction of legislative bills. Second, the level of success achieved by agribusiness in relation to the legislative production of the National Congress. Concerning the first question, we employed binary logistic regression to demonstrate that deputies who received the most campaign financing from agribusiness (an indicator of instrumental political power), and whose voters were highly dependent on agribusiness as a source of employment (an indicator of structural political power), were more likely to secure seats in the Committee on Agriculture, Livestock, Food Supply, and Rural Development (CAPADR). We also employed negative binomial regression to demonstrate that deputies whose constituents were more dependent on jobs created by the sector (structural political power) introduced a greater number of bills favorable to the sector, while introducing fewer bills contrary to its interests. Regarding the second issue, we utilized statistical techniques such as the chi-squared test and the analysis of adjusted residuals to compare the stance of the Agricultural Parliamentary Front (APF) with the decisions of the National Congress on bills concluded during the 55th Legislature. Our findings suggest that agribusiness attained success in the vast majority of decisions resulting in new laws, although many bills supported by the sector had different outcomes. In summary, the 55th Legislature demonstrated a high degree of receptiveness to the interests of agribusiness. However, while the interests of agribusiness wield considerable influence in the Brazilian Congress, this influence is far from all-encompassing.</description><subject>Agribusiness</subject><subject>Committees</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Food supply</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Political power</subject><subject>POLITICAL SCIENCE</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Rural development</subject><issn>1981-3821</issn><issn>1981-3821</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptUdtKw0AQXUTBWv0EYcEXfUidvSVZ39riDQoWWp_DdrPbbolJ3U0Q_XoTYr2AD3Nh5pwzcAahcwIjIiRcE5mSiKWUUKAcAGgXB2jwPT_81R-jkxC2ADGhjA1QvdwYPK8KVzsdcGXxeO3dqgmuNCFgV-KJVx-uuMGT_WxevRmPVZnvaarAi0brbpc33pVrXLeaQtQbPDNrFwpVN97gSwpERG2SV6foyKoimLOvOkTPd7fL6UM0e7p_nI5nkSYx0EjIhBGeilRBYnnK7SpOuVSgmOQykdoqI3NrLJOM5FYoImhCk1yDjUFRbtgQjXrdoJ0pqmxbNb5sD2aLzo7sr2Vt1xIuesLOV6-NCfUPhYGkqeSMQosSPUr7KgRvbLbz7kX594xA1n0k-0e-Vf8EZkZ4og</recordid><startdate>202401</startdate><enddate>202401</enddate><creator>Mancuso, Wagner Pralon</creator><creator>Resende, Ciro Antônio da Silva</creator><creator>Silva, Lucas Henrique Ribeiro da</creator><creator>Prado, João Felype Vieira</creator><creator>Santos, Ana Luiza Ormeni Almeida dos</creator><general>Associacao Brasileira de Ciencia Politica</general><general>Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CLZPN</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>GPN</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2071-2270</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1223-6902</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6470-4782</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0296-2281</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1092-7815</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202401</creationdate><title>The Politics of Agribusiness in Brazil: Business Power and Political Success during the 55th Legislature (2015-2019)</title><author>Mancuso, Wagner Pralon ; Resende, Ciro Antônio da Silva ; Silva, Lucas Henrique Ribeiro da ; Prado, João Felype Vieira ; Santos, Ana Luiza Ormeni Almeida dos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1602-597314858a07f484fb6849a0a394979cfae9dfef3931df5a152727dc0f60a24e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Agribusiness</topic><topic>Committees</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Food supply</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Political power</topic><topic>POLITICAL SCIENCE</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Rural development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mancuso, Wagner Pralon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Resende, Ciro Antônio da Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Lucas Henrique Ribeiro da</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prado, João Felype Vieira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Ana Luiza Ormeni Almeida dos</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Latin America &amp; Iberia Database</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><jtitle>Brazilian political science review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mancuso, Wagner Pralon</au><au>Resende, Ciro Antônio da Silva</au><au>Silva, Lucas Henrique Ribeiro da</au><au>Prado, João Felype Vieira</au><au>Santos, Ana Luiza Ormeni Almeida dos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Politics of Agribusiness in Brazil: Business Power and Political Success during the 55th Legislature (2015-2019)</atitle><jtitle>Brazilian political science review</jtitle><addtitle>Bras. political sci. rev</addtitle><date>2024-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>1-29</pages><issn>1981-3821</issn><eissn>1981-3821</eissn><abstract>This paper addresses two central issues during the 55th legislature (2015-2019). First, the relationship between the instrumental and structural power of agribusiness and different aspects of parliamentary behavior, namely membership in standing committees and the introduction of legislative bills. Second, the level of success achieved by agribusiness in relation to the legislative production of the National Congress. Concerning the first question, we employed binary logistic regression to demonstrate that deputies who received the most campaign financing from agribusiness (an indicator of instrumental political power), and whose voters were highly dependent on agribusiness as a source of employment (an indicator of structural political power), were more likely to secure seats in the Committee on Agriculture, Livestock, Food Supply, and Rural Development (CAPADR). We also employed negative binomial regression to demonstrate that deputies whose constituents were more dependent on jobs created by the sector (structural political power) introduced a greater number of bills favorable to the sector, while introducing fewer bills contrary to its interests. Regarding the second issue, we utilized statistical techniques such as the chi-squared test and the analysis of adjusted residuals to compare the stance of the Agricultural Parliamentary Front (APF) with the decisions of the National Congress on bills concluded during the 55th Legislature. Our findings suggest that agribusiness attained success in the vast majority of decisions resulting in new laws, although many bills supported by the sector had different outcomes. In summary, the 55th Legislature demonstrated a high degree of receptiveness to the interests of agribusiness. However, while the interests of agribusiness wield considerable influence in the Brazilian Congress, this influence is far from all-encompassing.</abstract><cop>Rio de Janeiro</cop><pub>Associacao Brasileira de Ciencia Politica</pub><doi>10.1590/1981-3821202400020002</doi><tpages>29</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2071-2270</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1223-6902</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6470-4782</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0296-2281</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1092-7815</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1981-3821
ispartof Brazilian political science review, 2024, Vol.18 (2), p.1-29
issn 1981-3821
1981-3821
language eng
recordid cdi_scielo_journals_S1981_38212024000200202
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Agribusiness
Committees
Employment
Food supply
Legislatures
Livestock
Political power
POLITICAL SCIENCE
Politics
Rural development
title The Politics of Agribusiness in Brazil: Business Power and Political Success during the 55th Legislature (2015-2019)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T22%3A34%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sciel&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Politics%20of%20Agribusiness%20in%20Brazil:%20Business%20Power%20and%20Political%20Success%20during%20the%2055th%20Legislature%20(2015-2019)&rft.jtitle=Brazilian%20political%20science%20review&rft.au=Mancuso,%20Wagner%20Pralon&rft.date=2024-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=1-29&rft.issn=1981-3821&rft.eissn=1981-3821&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/1981-3821202400020002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sciel%3E3092894320%3C/proquest_sciel%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3092894320&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_scielo_id=S1981_38212024000200202&rfr_iscdi=true