DecanulAR. Predictors of Decannulation Difficulty: A Multicenter Cohort Study

Introduction: Tracheostomy (TQT) is perhaps the most common surgical intervention in the ICU. A prolonged use of a TQT cannula may subject patients to an increased risk of complications. Decannulation time in tracheostomies is becoming increasingly important during the recovery process after critica...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Revista americana de medicina respiratoria 2017-03, Vol.17 (1), p.25-37
Hauptverfasser: Diaz Ballve, Pablo, Villalba, Darío, Andreu, Mauro, Escobar, Miguel, Morel Vulliez, Gastón, Lebus, Janina, Rositi, Emilio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:por
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 37
container_issue 1
container_start_page 25
container_title Revista americana de medicina respiratoria
container_volume 17
creator Diaz Ballve, Pablo
Villalba, Darío
Andreu, Mauro
Escobar, Miguel
Morel Vulliez, Gastón
Lebus, Janina
Rositi, Emilio
description Introduction: Tracheostomy (TQT) is perhaps the most common surgical intervention in the ICU. A prolonged use of a TQT cannula may subject patients to an increased risk of complications. Decannulation time in tracheostomies is becoming increasingly important during the recovery process after critical illnesses. At present, there is no prospective, multicenter study in our country that assesses tracheostomized patients as the population of the study. In addition, factors associated with decannulation difficulty are not usually analyzed. Objective: To describe the epidemiological characteristics of the study population, to report the rate of decannulation failure, to analyze the existence of independent risk factors associated with the impossibility of decannulation and to evaluate time-related mortality while achieving decannulation. Method: A prospective, multicenter cohort study that included patients who were tracheostomized at Intensive Care Units (ICUs) and patients who were admitted to Mechanical Ventilation Weaning and Rehabilitation Centers (MVWRCs) with TQTs. Epidemiological variables were recorded prior and during their hospitalization. The total duration of the study was one year. A sample size of 200 patients was calculated in order to draw a 5% rate (expected value for decannulation failure), determining the possibility to incur in a 5% alpha error and in a 20% beta error. Results: Initially, 48 centers from different cities around the country were recruited, and 36 centers contributed patients (31 from ICUs and 5 from MVWRCs). Five hundred and seventy-six patients were included, of whom 238 were removed since they could not be weaned from mechanical ventilation. The average age was 55 years (SD± 18.3), with a median of 58 years (IQR 43-70). There were more male patients (59%; 95% CI 53.8 - 64.2). One hundred and ninety-three patients who were weaned could be decannulated (57%; 95% CI 51.7-62.2). Cumulative incidence regarding decannulation failure was 3.1% in 7 months (95% CI 1.4 - 6.6). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the age group of patients over 70 years old (OR 3.40; 95% CI 1.51-7.66) and TQTs connected to surgical procedures (OR 1.74; 95% CI 1.08-2.79) were found as independent predictors contraindicating decannulation. Additionally, being a patient from an ICU versus being a patient from a MVWRC acted as a protective factor (OR 0.29; 95% CI 0.15-0.56). Likewise, the 90-day mortality rate was assessed using the Kaplan-M
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>scielo</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scielo_journals_S1852_236X2017000100006</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S1852_236X2017000100006</scielo_id><sourcerecordid>S1852_236X2017000100006</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-scielo_journals_S1852_236X20170001000063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0tDA10jUyNotgQWJzMPAWF2cZGBgYmpsZG1tYcDL4uqQmJ-aV5jgG6SkEFKWmZCaX5BcVK-SnKYAlgDKJJZn5eQoumWlpmcmlOSWVVgqOCr5ARmZyal5JapGCc35GflGJQnBJaUolDwNrWmJOcSovlOZm0HNzDXH20C1OzkzNyY_Pyi8tygNKxAeDnBQPcpIR0C0gBwGxgZkxyRoAdRBDkQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>DecanulAR. Predictors of Decannulation Difficulty: A Multicenter Cohort Study</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Diaz Ballve, Pablo ; Villalba, Darío ; Andreu, Mauro ; Escobar, Miguel ; Morel Vulliez, Gastón ; Lebus, Janina ; Rositi, Emilio</creator><creatorcontrib>Diaz Ballve, Pablo ; Villalba, Darío ; Andreu, Mauro ; Escobar, Miguel ; Morel Vulliez, Gastón ; Lebus, Janina ; Rositi, Emilio</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Tracheostomy (TQT) is perhaps the most common surgical intervention in the ICU. A prolonged use of a TQT cannula may subject patients to an increased risk of complications. Decannulation time in tracheostomies is becoming increasingly important during the recovery process after critical illnesses. At present, there is no prospective, multicenter study in our country that assesses tracheostomized patients as the population of the study. In addition, factors associated with decannulation difficulty are not usually analyzed. Objective: To describe the epidemiological characteristics of the study population, to report the rate of decannulation failure, to analyze the existence of independent risk factors associated with the impossibility of decannulation and to evaluate time-related mortality while achieving decannulation. Method: A prospective, multicenter cohort study that included patients who were tracheostomized at Intensive Care Units (ICUs) and patients who were admitted to Mechanical Ventilation Weaning and Rehabilitation Centers (MVWRCs) with TQTs. Epidemiological variables were recorded prior and during their hospitalization. The total duration of the study was one year. A sample size of 200 patients was calculated in order to draw a 5% rate (expected value for decannulation failure), determining the possibility to incur in a 5% alpha error and in a 20% beta error. Results: Initially, 48 centers from different cities around the country were recruited, and 36 centers contributed patients (31 from ICUs and 5 from MVWRCs). Five hundred and seventy-six patients were included, of whom 238 were removed since they could not be weaned from mechanical ventilation. The average age was 55 years (SD± 18.3), with a median of 58 years (IQR 43-70). There were more male patients (59%; 95% CI 53.8 - 64.2). One hundred and ninety-three patients who were weaned could be decannulated (57%; 95% CI 51.7-62.2). Cumulative incidence regarding decannulation failure was 3.1% in 7 months (95% CI 1.4 - 6.6). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the age group of patients over 70 years old (OR 3.40; 95% CI 1.51-7.66) and TQTs connected to surgical procedures (OR 1.74; 95% CI 1.08-2.79) were found as independent predictors contraindicating decannulation. Additionally, being a patient from an ICU versus being a patient from a MVWRC acted as a protective factor (OR 0.29; 95% CI 0.15-0.56). Likewise, the 90-day mortality rate was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier survival curve and a significant difference was observed (log-rank p&lt;0.05) in the group of patients who were not decannulated compared to those who could be decannulated. Conclusion: The number of patients who achieved decannulation is similar to that described in the bibliography and the same happened with recannulation. Age was a predictor contraindicating decannulation, which is potentially connected with a worse general condition of the patient. There were no comorbidities linked to contraindications for decannulation. It is important to remove the tracheostomy cannula since decannulated patients are more likely to be discharged home than those who did not undergo decannulation. Although it is not possible to confirm that decannulation is a key factor for discharges or if it is part of a better general condition of the patient, it constitutes a relevant milestone in the patient’s prognosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1852-236X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1852-236X</identifier><language>por</language><publisher>Asociación Argentina de Medicina Respiratoria</publisher><subject>NEUROSCIENCES</subject><ispartof>Revista americana de medicina respiratoria, 2017-03, Vol.17 (1), p.25-37</ispartof><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Diaz Ballve, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villalba, Darío</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andreu, Mauro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Escobar, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morel Vulliez, Gastón</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebus, Janina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rositi, Emilio</creatorcontrib><title>DecanulAR. Predictors of Decannulation Difficulty: A Multicenter Cohort Study</title><title>Revista americana de medicina respiratoria</title><addtitle>Rev. am. med. respir</addtitle><description>Introduction: Tracheostomy (TQT) is perhaps the most common surgical intervention in the ICU. A prolonged use of a TQT cannula may subject patients to an increased risk of complications. Decannulation time in tracheostomies is becoming increasingly important during the recovery process after critical illnesses. At present, there is no prospective, multicenter study in our country that assesses tracheostomized patients as the population of the study. In addition, factors associated with decannulation difficulty are not usually analyzed. Objective: To describe the epidemiological characteristics of the study population, to report the rate of decannulation failure, to analyze the existence of independent risk factors associated with the impossibility of decannulation and to evaluate time-related mortality while achieving decannulation. Method: A prospective, multicenter cohort study that included patients who were tracheostomized at Intensive Care Units (ICUs) and patients who were admitted to Mechanical Ventilation Weaning and Rehabilitation Centers (MVWRCs) with TQTs. Epidemiological variables were recorded prior and during their hospitalization. The total duration of the study was one year. A sample size of 200 patients was calculated in order to draw a 5% rate (expected value for decannulation failure), determining the possibility to incur in a 5% alpha error and in a 20% beta error. Results: Initially, 48 centers from different cities around the country were recruited, and 36 centers contributed patients (31 from ICUs and 5 from MVWRCs). Five hundred and seventy-six patients were included, of whom 238 were removed since they could not be weaned from mechanical ventilation. The average age was 55 years (SD± 18.3), with a median of 58 years (IQR 43-70). There were more male patients (59%; 95% CI 53.8 - 64.2). One hundred and ninety-three patients who were weaned could be decannulated (57%; 95% CI 51.7-62.2). Cumulative incidence regarding decannulation failure was 3.1% in 7 months (95% CI 1.4 - 6.6). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the age group of patients over 70 years old (OR 3.40; 95% CI 1.51-7.66) and TQTs connected to surgical procedures (OR 1.74; 95% CI 1.08-2.79) were found as independent predictors contraindicating decannulation. Additionally, being a patient from an ICU versus being a patient from a MVWRC acted as a protective factor (OR 0.29; 95% CI 0.15-0.56). Likewise, the 90-day mortality rate was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier survival curve and a significant difference was observed (log-rank p&lt;0.05) in the group of patients who were not decannulated compared to those who could be decannulated. Conclusion: The number of patients who achieved decannulation is similar to that described in the bibliography and the same happened with recannulation. Age was a predictor contraindicating decannulation, which is potentially connected with a worse general condition of the patient. There were no comorbidities linked to contraindications for decannulation. It is important to remove the tracheostomy cannula since decannulated patients are more likely to be discharged home than those who did not undergo decannulation. Although it is not possible to confirm that decannulation is a key factor for discharges or if it is part of a better general condition of the patient, it constitutes a relevant milestone in the patient’s prognosis.</description><subject>NEUROSCIENCES</subject><issn>1852-236X</issn><issn>1852-236X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpjYuA0tDA10jUyNotgQWJzMPAWF2cZGBgYmpsZG1tYcDL4uqQmJ-aV5jgG6SkEFKWmZCaX5BcVK-SnKYAlgDKJJZn5eQoumWlpmcmlOSWVVgqOCr5ARmZyal5JapGCc35GflGJQnBJaUolDwNrWmJOcSovlOZm0HNzDXH20C1OzkzNyY_Pyi8tygNKxAeDnBQPcpIR0C0gBwGxgZkxyRoAdRBDkQ</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Diaz Ballve, Pablo</creator><creator>Villalba, Darío</creator><creator>Andreu, Mauro</creator><creator>Escobar, Miguel</creator><creator>Morel Vulliez, Gastón</creator><creator>Lebus, Janina</creator><creator>Rositi, Emilio</creator><general>Asociación Argentina de Medicina Respiratoria</general><scope>GPN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>DecanulAR. Predictors of Decannulation Difficulty: A Multicenter Cohort Study</title><author>Diaz Ballve, Pablo ; Villalba, Darío ; Andreu, Mauro ; Escobar, Miguel ; Morel Vulliez, Gastón ; Lebus, Janina ; Rositi, Emilio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-scielo_journals_S1852_236X20170001000063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>por</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>NEUROSCIENCES</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Diaz Ballve, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villalba, Darío</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andreu, Mauro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Escobar, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morel Vulliez, Gastón</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebus, Janina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rositi, Emilio</creatorcontrib><collection>SciELO</collection><jtitle>Revista americana de medicina respiratoria</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Diaz Ballve, Pablo</au><au>Villalba, Darío</au><au>Andreu, Mauro</au><au>Escobar, Miguel</au><au>Morel Vulliez, Gastón</au><au>Lebus, Janina</au><au>Rositi, Emilio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>DecanulAR. Predictors of Decannulation Difficulty: A Multicenter Cohort Study</atitle><jtitle>Revista americana de medicina respiratoria</jtitle><addtitle>Rev. am. med. respir</addtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>25</spage><epage>37</epage><pages>25-37</pages><issn>1852-236X</issn><eissn>1852-236X</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Tracheostomy (TQT) is perhaps the most common surgical intervention in the ICU. A prolonged use of a TQT cannula may subject patients to an increased risk of complications. Decannulation time in tracheostomies is becoming increasingly important during the recovery process after critical illnesses. At present, there is no prospective, multicenter study in our country that assesses tracheostomized patients as the population of the study. In addition, factors associated with decannulation difficulty are not usually analyzed. Objective: To describe the epidemiological characteristics of the study population, to report the rate of decannulation failure, to analyze the existence of independent risk factors associated with the impossibility of decannulation and to evaluate time-related mortality while achieving decannulation. Method: A prospective, multicenter cohort study that included patients who were tracheostomized at Intensive Care Units (ICUs) and patients who were admitted to Mechanical Ventilation Weaning and Rehabilitation Centers (MVWRCs) with TQTs. Epidemiological variables were recorded prior and during their hospitalization. The total duration of the study was one year. A sample size of 200 patients was calculated in order to draw a 5% rate (expected value for decannulation failure), determining the possibility to incur in a 5% alpha error and in a 20% beta error. Results: Initially, 48 centers from different cities around the country were recruited, and 36 centers contributed patients (31 from ICUs and 5 from MVWRCs). Five hundred and seventy-six patients were included, of whom 238 were removed since they could not be weaned from mechanical ventilation. The average age was 55 years (SD± 18.3), with a median of 58 years (IQR 43-70). There were more male patients (59%; 95% CI 53.8 - 64.2). One hundred and ninety-three patients who were weaned could be decannulated (57%; 95% CI 51.7-62.2). Cumulative incidence regarding decannulation failure was 3.1% in 7 months (95% CI 1.4 - 6.6). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the age group of patients over 70 years old (OR 3.40; 95% CI 1.51-7.66) and TQTs connected to surgical procedures (OR 1.74; 95% CI 1.08-2.79) were found as independent predictors contraindicating decannulation. Additionally, being a patient from an ICU versus being a patient from a MVWRC acted as a protective factor (OR 0.29; 95% CI 0.15-0.56). Likewise, the 90-day mortality rate was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier survival curve and a significant difference was observed (log-rank p&lt;0.05) in the group of patients who were not decannulated compared to those who could be decannulated. Conclusion: The number of patients who achieved decannulation is similar to that described in the bibliography and the same happened with recannulation. Age was a predictor contraindicating decannulation, which is potentially connected with a worse general condition of the patient. There were no comorbidities linked to contraindications for decannulation. It is important to remove the tracheostomy cannula since decannulated patients are more likely to be discharged home than those who did not undergo decannulation. Although it is not possible to confirm that decannulation is a key factor for discharges or if it is part of a better general condition of the patient, it constitutes a relevant milestone in the patient’s prognosis.</abstract><pub>Asociación Argentina de Medicina Respiratoria</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1852-236X
ispartof Revista americana de medicina respiratoria, 2017-03, Vol.17 (1), p.25-37
issn 1852-236X
1852-236X
language por
recordid cdi_scielo_journals_S1852_236X2017000100006
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects NEUROSCIENCES
title DecanulAR. Predictors of Decannulation Difficulty: A Multicenter Cohort Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T11%3A25%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-scielo&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=DecanulAR.%20Predictors%20of%20Decannulation%20Difficulty:%20A%20Multicenter%20Cohort%20Study&rft.jtitle=Revista%20americana%20de%20medicina%20respiratoria&rft.au=Diaz%20Ballve,%20Pablo&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=25&rft.epage=37&rft.pages=25-37&rft.issn=1852-236X&rft.eissn=1852-236X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cscielo%3ES1852_236X2017000100006%3C/scielo%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_scielo_id=S1852_236X2017000100006&rfr_iscdi=true