The structure of qualitative studies: a bibliometric pattern of biomedical literature
Abstract The lack of knowledge in the biomedical literature regarding the validity of qualitative studies might be related to the lower number of qualitative studies that have been published. The criticisms range from a lack of theoretical depth to the superficial discussions of empirical findings....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ciência & saude coletiva 2021-08, Vol.26 (8), p.3199-3208 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3208 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 3199 |
container_title | Ciência & saude coletiva |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Bastos, Rodrigo Almeida Alves, Vera Lucia Pereira Sena, Rômulo Magnus de Castro Jesus, Juliana Vasconcellos Freitas de Rodrigues, Larissa Surita, Fernanda Garanhani de Castro Turato, Egberto Ribeiro |
description | Abstract The lack of knowledge in the biomedical literature regarding the validity of qualitative studies might be related to the lower number of qualitative studies that have been published. The criticisms range from a lack of theoretical depth to the superficial discussions of empirical findings. The aim of this study was to explore the bibliometric entities and the trends in the structure of qualitative research in the biomedical literature. A bibliometric analysis and mapping of the biomedical literature were used. The number of studies selected was 1,725. The heath themes with the most publications included Health Management (12%) and Women’s Health (9.8%), while the authors of the studies had academic affiliation in 76 different countries. The sample sizes were between 11 and 20 participants (27.13%) and the Grounded Theory framework (9.04%) stood out. The improved structuring of a qualitative research extends the effective communication between health providers and researchers, and support in the management of clinical situations.
Resumo A dificuldade de entendimento na literatura biomédica sobre a validade dos estudos qualitativos pode estar relacionada ao menor número de estudos qualitativos publicados. As críticas também vão desde a falta de profundidade teórica até discussões pouco objetivas de descobertas empíricas. O objetivo deste estudo foi explorar padrões bibliométricos e as tendências na estrutura das pesquisas qualitativas na literatura biomédica. Utilizou-se análise bibliométrica e mapeamento da literatura biomédica. O número de estudos selecionados foi 1.725. Os temas de saúde com mais publicações incluíram Gestão em Saúde (12%) e Saúde da Mulher (9,8%), enquanto os autores dos estudos tiveram afiliação acadêmica em 76 países diferentes. O tamanho da amostra mais observado foi de 11 a 20 participantes (27,13%) e o referencial da Grounded Theory (9,04%) o mais utilizado. A estruturação aprimorada de uma pesquisa qualitativa amplia a comunicação eficaz entre profissionais de saúde e pesquisadores, além de apoiar o gerenciamento de situações clínicas. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1590/1413-81232021268.12922020 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sciel</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scielo_journals_S1413_81232021000803199</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S1413_81232021000803199</scielo_id><sourcerecordid>2560299072</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-c6430df20db08ba62852dc4517b541afab625772e7633d07634fed4bbb3ea1463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtPxCAUhRujiePjP9S4cdPxcqEU3BnjK5nEheOaAKUR05nOADXx30szjolu4Aa-c7iXUxQXBOaklnBNGKGVIEgRkCAXc4IScw0HxYzwRlSs5uQw13vuuDiJ8QMAG8pwVrwt310ZUxhtGoMrh67cjrr3SSf_OV2MrXfxptSl8ab3w8ql4G250Sm5sJ5wMx223uq-zDIX9ORzVhx1uo_u_Gc_Ld4e7pd3T9Xi5fH57nZRWVrzVFnOKLQdQmtAGM1R1NhaVpPG1IzoThuOddOgazilLeSVda5lxhjqNGGcnhbznW-03vWD-hjGsM4PqtdpXrX_FwAQQImUWXC1E2zCsB1dTGrlo3V9r9duGKPCmgNKCQ1m9PIf-uuOggghqZAiU3JH2TDEGFynNsGvdPhSBNSUkPrTSU5I7ROi37t7gP4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2818893898</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The structure of qualitative studies: a bibliometric pattern of biomedical literature</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Bastos, Rodrigo Almeida ; Alves, Vera Lucia Pereira ; Sena, Rômulo Magnus de Castro ; Jesus, Juliana Vasconcellos Freitas de ; Rodrigues, Larissa ; Surita, Fernanda Garanhani de Castro ; Turato, Egberto Ribeiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Bastos, Rodrigo Almeida ; Alves, Vera Lucia Pereira ; Sena, Rômulo Magnus de Castro ; Jesus, Juliana Vasconcellos Freitas de ; Rodrigues, Larissa ; Surita, Fernanda Garanhani de Castro ; Turato, Egberto Ribeiro</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The lack of knowledge in the biomedical literature regarding the validity of qualitative studies might be related to the lower number of qualitative studies that have been published. The criticisms range from a lack of theoretical depth to the superficial discussions of empirical findings. The aim of this study was to explore the bibliometric entities and the trends in the structure of qualitative research in the biomedical literature. A bibliometric analysis and mapping of the biomedical literature were used. The number of studies selected was 1,725. The heath themes with the most publications included Health Management (12%) and Women’s Health (9.8%), while the authors of the studies had academic affiliation in 76 different countries. The sample sizes were between 11 and 20 participants (27.13%) and the Grounded Theory framework (9.04%) stood out. The improved structuring of a qualitative research extends the effective communication between health providers and researchers, and support in the management of clinical situations.
Resumo A dificuldade de entendimento na literatura biomédica sobre a validade dos estudos qualitativos pode estar relacionada ao menor número de estudos qualitativos publicados. As críticas também vão desde a falta de profundidade teórica até discussões pouco objetivas de descobertas empíricas. O objetivo deste estudo foi explorar padrões bibliométricos e as tendências na estrutura das pesquisas qualitativas na literatura biomédica. Utilizou-se análise bibliométrica e mapeamento da literatura biomédica. O número de estudos selecionados foi 1.725. Os temas de saúde com mais publicações incluíram Gestão em Saúde (12%) e Saúde da Mulher (9,8%), enquanto os autores dos estudos tiveram afiliação acadêmica em 76 países diferentes. O tamanho da amostra mais observado foi de 11 a 20 participantes (27,13%) e o referencial da Grounded Theory (9,04%) o mais utilizado. A estruturação aprimorada de uma pesquisa qualitativa amplia a comunicação eficaz entre profissionais de saúde e pesquisadores, além de apoiar o gerenciamento de situações clínicas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1413-8123</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1678-4561</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1678-4561</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/1413-81232021268.12922020</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Rio de Janeiro: Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva</publisher><subject>Bibliometrics ; Empirical analysis ; Grounded theory ; PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH ; Qualitative analysis ; Qualitative research</subject><ispartof>Ciência & saude coletiva, 2021-08, Vol.26 (8), p.3199-3208</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-c6430df20db08ba62852dc4517b541afab625772e7633d07634fed4bbb3ea1463</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6159-8048 ; 0000-0001-9136-478X ; 0000-0001-8714-7010 ; 0000-0002-7857-1482 ; 0000-0001-6802-0786 ; 0000-0003-4293-1439 ; 0000-0003-4335-0337</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bastos, Rodrigo Almeida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Vera Lucia Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sena, Rômulo Magnus de Castro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jesus, Juliana Vasconcellos Freitas de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Larissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surita, Fernanda Garanhani de Castro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turato, Egberto Ribeiro</creatorcontrib><title>The structure of qualitative studies: a bibliometric pattern of biomedical literature</title><title>Ciência & saude coletiva</title><addtitle>Ciênc. saúde coletiva</addtitle><description>Abstract The lack of knowledge in the biomedical literature regarding the validity of qualitative studies might be related to the lower number of qualitative studies that have been published. The criticisms range from a lack of theoretical depth to the superficial discussions of empirical findings. The aim of this study was to explore the bibliometric entities and the trends in the structure of qualitative research in the biomedical literature. A bibliometric analysis and mapping of the biomedical literature were used. The number of studies selected was 1,725. The heath themes with the most publications included Health Management (12%) and Women’s Health (9.8%), while the authors of the studies had academic affiliation in 76 different countries. The sample sizes were between 11 and 20 participants (27.13%) and the Grounded Theory framework (9.04%) stood out. The improved structuring of a qualitative research extends the effective communication between health providers and researchers, and support in the management of clinical situations.
Resumo A dificuldade de entendimento na literatura biomédica sobre a validade dos estudos qualitativos pode estar relacionada ao menor número de estudos qualitativos publicados. As críticas também vão desde a falta de profundidade teórica até discussões pouco objetivas de descobertas empíricas. O objetivo deste estudo foi explorar padrões bibliométricos e as tendências na estrutura das pesquisas qualitativas na literatura biomédica. Utilizou-se análise bibliométrica e mapeamento da literatura biomédica. O número de estudos selecionados foi 1.725. Os temas de saúde com mais publicações incluíram Gestão em Saúde (12%) e Saúde da Mulher (9,8%), enquanto os autores dos estudos tiveram afiliação acadêmica em 76 países diferentes. O tamanho da amostra mais observado foi de 11 a 20 participantes (27,13%) e o referencial da Grounded Theory (9,04%) o mais utilizado. A estruturação aprimorada de uma pesquisa qualitativa amplia a comunicação eficaz entre profissionais de saúde e pesquisadores, além de apoiar o gerenciamento de situações clínicas.</description><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Grounded theory</subject><subject>PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><issn>1413-8123</issn><issn>1678-4561</issn><issn>1678-4561</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUtPxCAUhRujiePjP9S4cdPxcqEU3BnjK5nEheOaAKUR05nOADXx30szjolu4Aa-c7iXUxQXBOaklnBNGKGVIEgRkCAXc4IScw0HxYzwRlSs5uQw13vuuDiJ8QMAG8pwVrwt310ZUxhtGoMrh67cjrr3SSf_OV2MrXfxptSl8ab3w8ql4G250Sm5sJ5wMx223uq-zDIX9ORzVhx1uo_u_Gc_Ld4e7pd3T9Xi5fH57nZRWVrzVFnOKLQdQmtAGM1R1NhaVpPG1IzoThuOddOgazilLeSVda5lxhjqNGGcnhbznW-03vWD-hjGsM4PqtdpXrX_FwAQQImUWXC1E2zCsB1dTGrlo3V9r9duGKPCmgNKCQ1m9PIf-uuOggghqZAiU3JH2TDEGFynNsGvdPhSBNSUkPrTSU5I7ROi37t7gP4</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Bastos, Rodrigo Almeida</creator><creator>Alves, Vera Lucia Pereira</creator><creator>Sena, Rômulo Magnus de Castro</creator><creator>Jesus, Juliana Vasconcellos Freitas de</creator><creator>Rodrigues, Larissa</creator><creator>Surita, Fernanda Garanhani de Castro</creator><creator>Turato, Egberto Ribeiro</creator><general>Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva</general><general>ABRASCO - Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>GPN</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6159-8048</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9136-478X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8714-7010</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7857-1482</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6802-0786</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4293-1439</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4335-0337</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>The structure of qualitative studies: a bibliometric pattern of biomedical literature</title><author>Bastos, Rodrigo Almeida ; Alves, Vera Lucia Pereira ; Sena, Rômulo Magnus de Castro ; Jesus, Juliana Vasconcellos Freitas de ; Rodrigues, Larissa ; Surita, Fernanda Garanhani de Castro ; Turato, Egberto Ribeiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-c6430df20db08ba62852dc4517b541afab625772e7633d07634fed4bbb3ea1463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Grounded theory</topic><topic>PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bastos, Rodrigo Almeida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Vera Lucia Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sena, Rômulo Magnus de Castro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jesus, Juliana Vasconcellos Freitas de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Larissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surita, Fernanda Garanhani de Castro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turato, Egberto Ribeiro</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><jtitle>Ciência & saude coletiva</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bastos, Rodrigo Almeida</au><au>Alves, Vera Lucia Pereira</au><au>Sena, Rômulo Magnus de Castro</au><au>Jesus, Juliana Vasconcellos Freitas de</au><au>Rodrigues, Larissa</au><au>Surita, Fernanda Garanhani de Castro</au><au>Turato, Egberto Ribeiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The structure of qualitative studies: a bibliometric pattern of biomedical literature</atitle><jtitle>Ciência & saude coletiva</jtitle><addtitle>Ciênc. saúde coletiva</addtitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>3199</spage><epage>3208</epage><pages>3199-3208</pages><issn>1413-8123</issn><issn>1678-4561</issn><eissn>1678-4561</eissn><abstract>Abstract The lack of knowledge in the biomedical literature regarding the validity of qualitative studies might be related to the lower number of qualitative studies that have been published. The criticisms range from a lack of theoretical depth to the superficial discussions of empirical findings. The aim of this study was to explore the bibliometric entities and the trends in the structure of qualitative research in the biomedical literature. A bibliometric analysis and mapping of the biomedical literature were used. The number of studies selected was 1,725. The heath themes with the most publications included Health Management (12%) and Women’s Health (9.8%), while the authors of the studies had academic affiliation in 76 different countries. The sample sizes were between 11 and 20 participants (27.13%) and the Grounded Theory framework (9.04%) stood out. The improved structuring of a qualitative research extends the effective communication between health providers and researchers, and support in the management of clinical situations.
Resumo A dificuldade de entendimento na literatura biomédica sobre a validade dos estudos qualitativos pode estar relacionada ao menor número de estudos qualitativos publicados. As críticas também vão desde a falta de profundidade teórica até discussões pouco objetivas de descobertas empíricas. O objetivo deste estudo foi explorar padrões bibliométricos e as tendências na estrutura das pesquisas qualitativas na literatura biomédica. Utilizou-se análise bibliométrica e mapeamento da literatura biomédica. O número de estudos selecionados foi 1.725. Os temas de saúde com mais publicações incluíram Gestão em Saúde (12%) e Saúde da Mulher (9,8%), enquanto os autores dos estudos tiveram afiliação acadêmica em 76 países diferentes. O tamanho da amostra mais observado foi de 11 a 20 participantes (27,13%) e o referencial da Grounded Theory (9,04%) o mais utilizado. A estruturação aprimorada de uma pesquisa qualitativa amplia a comunicação eficaz entre profissionais de saúde e pesquisadores, além de apoiar o gerenciamento de situações clínicas.</abstract><cop>Rio de Janeiro</cop><pub>Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva</pub><doi>10.1590/1413-81232021268.12922020</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6159-8048</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9136-478X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8714-7010</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7857-1482</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6802-0786</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4293-1439</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4335-0337</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1413-8123 |
ispartof | Ciência & saude coletiva, 2021-08, Vol.26 (8), p.3199-3208 |
issn | 1413-8123 1678-4561 1678-4561 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_scielo_journals_S1413_81232021000803199 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Bibliometrics Empirical analysis Grounded theory PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Qualitative analysis Qualitative research |
title | The structure of qualitative studies: a bibliometric pattern of biomedical literature |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T04%3A45%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sciel&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20structure%20of%20qualitative%20studies:%20a%20bibliometric%20pattern%20of%20biomedical%20literature&rft.jtitle=Ci%C3%AAncia%20&%20saude%20coletiva&rft.au=Bastos,%20Rodrigo%20Almeida&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=3199&rft.epage=3208&rft.pages=3199-3208&rft.issn=1413-8123&rft.eissn=1678-4561&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/1413-81232021268.12922020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sciel%3E2560299072%3C/proquest_sciel%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2818893898&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_scielo_id=S1413_81232021000803199&rfr_iscdi=true |