Human rabies post-exposure prophylaxis relative to the disease epidemiological status
This study evaluated the prophylactic measures adopted after attacks by dogs and cats in the main city of Northwester São Paulo State, based on the technical manual for post-exposure treatment, considering the not controlled (1990-1996) and controlled (1997-2010) rabies status. A retrospective analy...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Ciência & saude coletiva 2019-01, Vol.24 (1), p.315-322 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 322 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 315 |
| container_title | Ciência & saude coletiva |
| container_volume | 24 |
| creator | Andrade, Bruno Fonseca Martins da Costa Andrade, Taísa Santos de Melo Queiroz, Luzia Helena |
| description | This study evaluated the prophylactic measures adopted after attacks by dogs and cats in the main city of Northwester São Paulo State, based on the technical manual for post-exposure treatment, considering the not controlled (1990-1996) and controlled (1997-2010) rabies status. A retrospective analysis was done using the data from the SINAN records (W64-CID10) between 1990 and 2010. In most cases, the accidents were mild (76.9%), and biting animals were healthy (75.4%); therefore, no treatment was needed in 53.3% of the cases. In 64.6% of cases, the prescribed PEP treatment was inappropriate. The most indicated PEP treatments consisted of vaccine and RIG (43.4%), and either three doses of mouse brain vaccine or two doses of cell culture vaccine (76.5%), during the not controlled and controlled rabies periods, respectively. The treatment was more appropriate and followed the technical recommendations during controlled rabies periods compared to not controlled (p < 0.0001) periods. However, excessive application of RIG and rabies vaccine was observed in both periods. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1590/1413-81232018241.32832016 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sciel</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scielo_journals_S1413_81232019000100315</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S1413_81232019000100315</scielo_id><sourcerecordid>2299501132</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-3145f3cc6efe0e91c6e9bbbcf348957d7a02dd4bbadc17d03b9b942ee1bbde003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUlPHDEQha0IFLb8hcgRFy49uGz34mOEEkBC4hA4W16qg1H3uGN3I_j38WhmEOJU7_C92h4hP4CtoFbsEiSIqgMuOIOOS1gJ3m1084UcQ9N2lawbOCh6zx2Rk5yfGeOtkPwrORKsUR1v5DF5vFlGs6bJ2ICZTjHPFb6WsiSkU4rT09tgXkOmCQczhxekc6TzE1IfMpqMFKfgcQxxiH-DMwPNs5mXfEYOezNk_Larp-Tx96-Hq5vq7v769urnXeWkqOdKgKx74VyDPTJUUISy1rpeyE7VrW8N495La4130HomrLJKckSw1iNj4pSstn2zCzhE_RyXtC4D9Z_N6Xr3IsUYg0JDXQwXW0O57d-CedZjyA6HwawxLllzaJVUqmuhoOef0PfunCtVMwDBC6W2lEsx54S9nlIYTXrTwPQmLP1xk01Yeh9W8X7fTVjsiP7duU9H_Ad7Do5o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2299501132</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Human rabies post-exposure prophylaxis relative to the disease epidemiological status</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Andrade, Bruno Fonseca Martins da Costa ; Andrade, Taísa Santos de Melo ; Queiroz, Luzia Helena</creator><creatorcontrib>Andrade, Bruno Fonseca Martins da Costa ; Andrade, Taísa Santos de Melo ; Queiroz, Luzia Helena</creatorcontrib><description>This study evaluated the prophylactic measures adopted after attacks by dogs and cats in the main city of Northwester São Paulo State, based on the technical manual for post-exposure treatment, considering the not controlled (1990-1996) and controlled (1997-2010) rabies status. A retrospective analysis was done using the data from the SINAN records (W64-CID10) between 1990 and 2010. In most cases, the accidents were mild (76.9%), and biting animals were healthy (75.4%); therefore, no treatment was needed in 53.3% of the cases. In 64.6% of cases, the prescribed PEP treatment was inappropriate. The most indicated PEP treatments consisted of vaccine and RIG (43.4%), and either three doses of mouse brain vaccine or two doses of cell culture vaccine (76.5%), during the not controlled and controlled rabies periods, respectively. The treatment was more appropriate and followed the technical recommendations during controlled rabies periods compared to not controlled (p < 0.0001) periods. However, excessive application of RIG and rabies vaccine was observed in both periods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1413-8123</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1678-4561</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1678-4561</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/1413-81232018241.32832016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30698264</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brazil: Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva</publisher><subject>Epidemiology ; Health Policy & Services ; Immunization ; Prophylaxis ; Rabies ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>Ciência & saude coletiva, 2019-01, Vol.24 (1), p.315-322</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2019. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-3145f3cc6efe0e91c6e9bbbcf348957d7a02dd4bbadc17d03b9b942ee1bbde003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-3145f3cc6efe0e91c6e9bbbcf348957d7a02dd4bbadc17d03b9b942ee1bbde003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30698264$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Andrade, Bruno Fonseca Martins da Costa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrade, Taísa Santos de Melo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Queiroz, Luzia Helena</creatorcontrib><title>Human rabies post-exposure prophylaxis relative to the disease epidemiological status</title><title>Ciência & saude coletiva</title><addtitle>Cien Saude Colet</addtitle><description>This study evaluated the prophylactic measures adopted after attacks by dogs and cats in the main city of Northwester São Paulo State, based on the technical manual for post-exposure treatment, considering the not controlled (1990-1996) and controlled (1997-2010) rabies status. A retrospective analysis was done using the data from the SINAN records (W64-CID10) between 1990 and 2010. In most cases, the accidents were mild (76.9%), and biting animals were healthy (75.4%); therefore, no treatment was needed in 53.3% of the cases. In 64.6% of cases, the prescribed PEP treatment was inappropriate. The most indicated PEP treatments consisted of vaccine and RIG (43.4%), and either three doses of mouse brain vaccine or two doses of cell culture vaccine (76.5%), during the not controlled and controlled rabies periods, respectively. The treatment was more appropriate and followed the technical recommendations during controlled rabies periods compared to not controlled (p < 0.0001) periods. However, excessive application of RIG and rabies vaccine was observed in both periods.</description><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Health Policy & Services</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Rabies</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>1413-8123</issn><issn>1678-4561</issn><issn>1678-4561</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUlPHDEQha0IFLb8hcgRFy49uGz34mOEEkBC4hA4W16qg1H3uGN3I_j38WhmEOJU7_C92h4hP4CtoFbsEiSIqgMuOIOOS1gJ3m1084UcQ9N2lawbOCh6zx2Rk5yfGeOtkPwrORKsUR1v5DF5vFlGs6bJ2ICZTjHPFb6WsiSkU4rT09tgXkOmCQczhxekc6TzE1IfMpqMFKfgcQxxiH-DMwPNs5mXfEYOezNk_Larp-Tx96-Hq5vq7v769urnXeWkqOdKgKx74VyDPTJUUISy1rpeyE7VrW8N495La4130HomrLJKckSw1iNj4pSstn2zCzhE_RyXtC4D9Z_N6Xr3IsUYg0JDXQwXW0O57d-CedZjyA6HwawxLllzaJVUqmuhoOef0PfunCtVMwDBC6W2lEsx54S9nlIYTXrTwPQmLP1xk01Yeh9W8X7fTVjsiP7duU9H_Ad7Do5o</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Andrade, Bruno Fonseca Martins da Costa</creator><creator>Andrade, Taísa Santos de Melo</creator><creator>Queiroz, Luzia Helena</creator><general>Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva</general><general>ABRASCO - Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>GPN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>Human rabies post-exposure prophylaxis relative to the disease epidemiological status</title><author>Andrade, Bruno Fonseca Martins da Costa ; Andrade, Taísa Santos de Melo ; Queiroz, Luzia Helena</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-3145f3cc6efe0e91c6e9bbbcf348957d7a02dd4bbadc17d03b9b942ee1bbde003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Health Policy & Services</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Rabies</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Andrade, Bruno Fonseca Martins da Costa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrade, Taísa Santos de Melo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Queiroz, Luzia Helena</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><jtitle>Ciência & saude coletiva</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Andrade, Bruno Fonseca Martins da Costa</au><au>Andrade, Taísa Santos de Melo</au><au>Queiroz, Luzia Helena</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Human rabies post-exposure prophylaxis relative to the disease epidemiological status</atitle><jtitle>Ciência & saude coletiva</jtitle><addtitle>Cien Saude Colet</addtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>315</spage><epage>322</epage><pages>315-322</pages><issn>1413-8123</issn><issn>1678-4561</issn><eissn>1678-4561</eissn><abstract>This study evaluated the prophylactic measures adopted after attacks by dogs and cats in the main city of Northwester São Paulo State, based on the technical manual for post-exposure treatment, considering the not controlled (1990-1996) and controlled (1997-2010) rabies status. A retrospective analysis was done using the data from the SINAN records (W64-CID10) between 1990 and 2010. In most cases, the accidents were mild (76.9%), and biting animals were healthy (75.4%); therefore, no treatment was needed in 53.3% of the cases. In 64.6% of cases, the prescribed PEP treatment was inappropriate. The most indicated PEP treatments consisted of vaccine and RIG (43.4%), and either three doses of mouse brain vaccine or two doses of cell culture vaccine (76.5%), during the not controlled and controlled rabies periods, respectively. The treatment was more appropriate and followed the technical recommendations during controlled rabies periods compared to not controlled (p < 0.0001) periods. However, excessive application of RIG and rabies vaccine was observed in both periods.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pub>Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva</pub><pmid>30698264</pmid><doi>10.1590/1413-81232018241.32832016</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1413-8123 |
| ispartof | Ciência & saude coletiva, 2019-01, Vol.24 (1), p.315-322 |
| issn | 1413-8123 1678-4561 1678-4561 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_scielo_journals_S1413_81232019000100315 |
| source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Epidemiology Health Policy & Services Immunization Prophylaxis Rabies Vaccines |
| title | Human rabies post-exposure prophylaxis relative to the disease epidemiological status |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T17%3A16%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sciel&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Human%20rabies%20post-exposure%20prophylaxis%20relative%20to%20the%20disease%20epidemiological%20status&rft.jtitle=Ci%C3%AAncia%20&%20saude%20coletiva&rft.au=Andrade,%20Bruno%20Fonseca%20Martins%20da%20Costa&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=315&rft.epage=322&rft.pages=315-322&rft.issn=1413-8123&rft.eissn=1678-4561&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/1413-81232018241.32832016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sciel%3E2299501132%3C/proquest_sciel%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2299501132&rft_id=info:pmid/30698264&rft_scielo_id=S1413_81232019000100315&rfr_iscdi=true |