Characterization of Sugars and Organic Acids in Commercial Varieties of Table Grapes

Flavor composition has been defined as a complex attribute of fruit quality, in which the mix of sugars, acids and volatiles play a primary role. In table grapes (Vitis vinifera L.), sweetness and sourness are the most important flavor attributes for fresh consumption. However, most of the studies a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chilean journal of agricultural research 2011-09, Vol.71 (3), p.452-458
Hauptverfasser: Muñoz-Robredo, Pablo, Robledo, Paula, Manríquez, Daniel, Molina, Rosa, Defilippi, Bruno G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 458
container_issue 3
container_start_page 452
container_title Chilean journal of agricultural research
container_volume 71
creator Muñoz-Robredo, Pablo
Robledo, Paula
Manríquez, Daniel
Molina, Rosa
Defilippi, Bruno G
description Flavor composition has been defined as a complex attribute of fruit quality, in which the mix of sugars, acids and volatiles play a primary role. In table grapes (Vitis vinifera L.), sweetness and sourness are the most important flavor attributes for fresh consumption. However, most of the studies available have been performed on wine grapes, which are grown, cultured and processed differently to table grapes. Therefore, the objective of this work was to characterize the changes in sugars and organic acids during the development of 'Thompson Seedless', 'Red Globe' and 'Crimson Seedless' grown under the same agroclimatic conditions. Each variety was sampled weekly from 2 wk before véraison until commercial harvest. Sugars and organic acids were quantified by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) equipped with an evaporative light scattering detector (ELSD) and ultra violet detector, respectively. The ranges of acid and sugars concentrations found in grapes were as follows: tartaric acid, 1.28-7.45 g L^sup -1^; malic acid, 0.38-29.92 g L^sup -1^, citric acid traces-1.03 g L^sup -1^; fructose, 0.15-8.74 g (sugar) 100 g(grape)^sup -1^; glucose, 0.19-8.71 g (sugar) 100 g(grape)^sup -1^ and sucrose 0.02-0.91 g (sugar) 100 g(grape)^sup -1^. Among sugars, glucose was the most abundant one in early stages and then it decreased until the harvest period, when the amount of fructose and glucose converged to an average of 47% for each sugar. Despite organic acids reaching steady levels 3-4 wk before commercial harvest, there were important differences in the organic acid profiles among varieties, with 'Thompson Seedless' showing the lowest tartaric/malic acid ratio of 1.19. These differences are an important aspect in terms of overall flavor. Total soluble solids (TSS) showed the largest increase between 7 and 4 wk before commercial harvest for all three varieties studied (Figure 1). 'Red Globe' and 'Crimson Seedless' showed the largest change in TSS (close to 13% TSS) and a continuous rise throughout the sampling period. However, 'Thompson Seedless' reached a plateau from 4 wk prior to harvest to the end of the sampling period. A reduction in titratable acidity (TA) close to 4% was observed during berry development in the three varieties. 'Red Globe' was the variety showing the largest decline (Δ = -4.0% of acidity), while 'Crimson Seedless' was the variety with the smallest drop in TA (Δ = -2.6% of acidity). From 4 wk before harvest (H-4), the TA levels remai
doi_str_mv 10.4067/S0718-58392011000300017
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sciel</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scielo_journals_S0718_58392011000300017</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S0718_58392011000300017</scielo_id><sourcerecordid>2861998521</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-3f5dcd779e18b90cbbe4c6f1232968c860f6b8c1d84cd8b83b47327025bfe1463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLAzEQhYMoWKu_wYDnrZlNNskey6JVKPTQ6nVJsklN2W5qsj3or7drRQXxMMzAvO89eAhdA5kwwsXtkgiQWSFpmRMAQgg9DIgTNPp-nP66z9FFShtCOBNAR2hVvaioTG-jf1e9Dx0ODi_3axUTVl2DF3GtOm_w1PgmYd_hKmy3NhqvWvysore9t2lgVkq3Fs-i2tl0ic6capO9-tpj9HR_t6oesvli9lhN55lhtOwz6orGNEKUFqQuidHaMsMd5DQvuTSSE8e1NNBIZhqpJdVM0FyQvNDOAuN0jCZH32S8bUO9CfvYHQLrz07qP50cgJsjsIvhdW9T_4NAziUIBsWgEkeViSGlaF29i36r4lsNpB46_9f_A47QcOk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1268174157</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterization of Sugars and Organic Acids in Commercial Varieties of Table Grapes</title><source>Bioline International Open Access</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Muñoz-Robredo, Pablo ; Robledo, Paula ; Manríquez, Daniel ; Molina, Rosa ; Defilippi, Bruno G</creator><creatorcontrib>Muñoz-Robredo, Pablo ; Robledo, Paula ; Manríquez, Daniel ; Molina, Rosa ; Defilippi, Bruno G</creatorcontrib><description>Flavor composition has been defined as a complex attribute of fruit quality, in which the mix of sugars, acids and volatiles play a primary role. In table grapes (Vitis vinifera L.), sweetness and sourness are the most important flavor attributes for fresh consumption. However, most of the studies available have been performed on wine grapes, which are grown, cultured and processed differently to table grapes. Therefore, the objective of this work was to characterize the changes in sugars and organic acids during the development of 'Thompson Seedless', 'Red Globe' and 'Crimson Seedless' grown under the same agroclimatic conditions. Each variety was sampled weekly from 2 wk before véraison until commercial harvest. Sugars and organic acids were quantified by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) equipped with an evaporative light scattering detector (ELSD) and ultra violet detector, respectively. The ranges of acid and sugars concentrations found in grapes were as follows: tartaric acid, 1.28-7.45 g L^sup -1^; malic acid, 0.38-29.92 g L^sup -1^, citric acid traces-1.03 g L^sup -1^; fructose, 0.15-8.74 g (sugar) 100 g(grape)^sup -1^; glucose, 0.19-8.71 g (sugar) 100 g(grape)^sup -1^ and sucrose 0.02-0.91 g (sugar) 100 g(grape)^sup -1^. Among sugars, glucose was the most abundant one in early stages and then it decreased until the harvest period, when the amount of fructose and glucose converged to an average of 47% for each sugar. Despite organic acids reaching steady levels 3-4 wk before commercial harvest, there were important differences in the organic acid profiles among varieties, with 'Thompson Seedless' showing the lowest tartaric/malic acid ratio of 1.19. These differences are an important aspect in terms of overall flavor. Total soluble solids (TSS) showed the largest increase between 7 and 4 wk before commercial harvest for all three varieties studied (Figure 1). 'Red Globe' and 'Crimson Seedless' showed the largest change in TSS (close to 13% TSS) and a continuous rise throughout the sampling period. However, 'Thompson Seedless' reached a plateau from 4 wk prior to harvest to the end of the sampling period. A reduction in titratable acidity (TA) close to 4% was observed during berry development in the three varieties. 'Red Globe' was the variety showing the largest decline (Δ = -4.0% of acidity), while 'Crimson Seedless' was the variety with the smallest drop in TA (Δ = -2.6% of acidity). From 4 wk before harvest (H-4), the TA levels remained constant in the three varieties studied. These results indicate that if TSS increases and TA decreases as berry development progresses, then the ratio between these values increases over time (Figure 1). According to Crisosto (2002), commercial harvest of table grapes is reached when the quotient TSS/TA has a value close to 20. This value has been defined as the lowest one for consumer preference (Jayasena and Cameron, 2009). Du Plessis (1977) suggested that the TSS/TA ratio is a good indicator of grape ripeness due to the changes in the concentration of sugars and organic acids from one year to another under similar conditions. In this study, the value was reached in 'Red Globe' between 4 and 3 wk before the commercial harvest (H-4 and H-3, respectively). However, the harvest was performed when the berry obtained the optimum red color requested by the consumers. For 'Crimson Seedless' and 'Thompson Seedless', this quotient was reached 1 wk prior to harvest. These results indicate the need to revise the maturity index through berry development for individual varieties according to the quality attributes considered for consumption and commercialization. Because TSS and TA levels showed no significant changes from 2 wk before harvest, we did not include the measurements for sugars and organic acids from this point forward. As mentioned above, some PGRs could modify the chemical and physical characteristics of the berry. However, based on the PGRs used on the varieties in this study, no major differences are expected without their presence (Sato et al., 2004; [Peppi, M.C.] et al., 2006; [Rolle] et al., 2011). Caracterización de azúcares y ácidos orgánicos en variedades comerciales de uva de mesa. La composición del sabor ha sido definida como un atributo complejo de la calidad de la fruta, en el cual la mezcla de azúcares, ácidos y volátiles juega un rol determinante. En uva de mesa (Vitis vinifera L.), el dulzor y la acidez son los atributos primordiales para su consumo fresco. Sin embargo, la mayoría de los estudios realizados al respecto se han desarrollado en uva para la producción de vino, la cual crece, se cultiva y se procesa de manera diferente a la uva de mesa. Por lo tanto, el objetivo del presente trabajo se centró en caracterizar los cambios en azúcares y ácidos orgánicos a lo largo de su desarrollo en las variedades 'Thompson Seedless', 'Red Globe', y 'Crimson Seedless', producidas bajo las mismas condiciones agroclimáticas. Para cada variedad se realizaron muestreos semanales desde 2 semanas previas a pinta hasta la cosecha comercial. Los azúcares y ácidos orgánicos fueron cuantificados mediante cromatografía líquida de alto rendimiento (HPLC) equipados con detectores evaporativos de dispersión de la luz (ELSD) y ultra violeta, respectivamente. El rango de concentraciones de ácidos y azúcares encontrados en uva fueron los siguientes: ácido tartárico, 1,28-7,45 g L^sup -1^; ácido málico, 0,38-29,92 g L^sup -1^, ácido cítrico trazas-1,03 g L^sup -1^; fructosa, 0,15-8,74 g (azúcar) 100 g (uva)^sup -1^; glucosa, 0,19-8,71 g (azúcar) 100 g (uva)^sup -1^ and sacarosa 0,02-0,91 g (azúcar) 100 g (uva)^sup -1^. Entre los azúcares, glucosa fue la más abundante en etapas tempranas y luego disminuyó hasta el período de cosecha, cuando la cantidad de fructosa y glucosa converge en un promedio de 47% para cada azúcar. A pesar de que los ácidos orgánicos alcanzaron un nivel constante entre 3 a 4 semanas antes de su cosecha, existen diferencias importantes en el perfil de ácidos orgánicos entre las variedades, con 'Thompson Seedless' mostrando la más baja relación de ácidos tartárico/málico de 1,19. Estas diferencias son un punto importante al considerar el sabor general para cada variedad.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0718-5839</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0718-5820</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0718-5839</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4067/S0718-58392011000300017</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chillán: Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research</publisher><subject>Acids ; AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY ; AGRONOMY ; Calibration ; Chromatography ; Consumers ; Consumption ; Flavors ; Fruits ; Glucose ; Plant growth ; Quality ; Sensors ; Studies ; Sucrose ; Wineries &amp; vineyards</subject><ispartof>Chilean journal of agricultural research, 2011-09, Vol.71 (3), p.452-458</ispartof><rights>Copyright Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research Jul-Sep 2011</rights><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-3f5dcd779e18b90cbbe4c6f1232968c860f6b8c1d84cd8b83b47327025bfe1463</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Muñoz-Robredo, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robledo, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manríquez, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molina, Rosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Defilippi, Bruno G</creatorcontrib><title>Characterization of Sugars and Organic Acids in Commercial Varieties of Table Grapes</title><title>Chilean journal of agricultural research</title><addtitle>Chil. j. agric. res</addtitle><description>Flavor composition has been defined as a complex attribute of fruit quality, in which the mix of sugars, acids and volatiles play a primary role. In table grapes (Vitis vinifera L.), sweetness and sourness are the most important flavor attributes for fresh consumption. However, most of the studies available have been performed on wine grapes, which are grown, cultured and processed differently to table grapes. Therefore, the objective of this work was to characterize the changes in sugars and organic acids during the development of 'Thompson Seedless', 'Red Globe' and 'Crimson Seedless' grown under the same agroclimatic conditions. Each variety was sampled weekly from 2 wk before véraison until commercial harvest. Sugars and organic acids were quantified by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) equipped with an evaporative light scattering detector (ELSD) and ultra violet detector, respectively. The ranges of acid and sugars concentrations found in grapes were as follows: tartaric acid, 1.28-7.45 g L^sup -1^; malic acid, 0.38-29.92 g L^sup -1^, citric acid traces-1.03 g L^sup -1^; fructose, 0.15-8.74 g (sugar) 100 g(grape)^sup -1^; glucose, 0.19-8.71 g (sugar) 100 g(grape)^sup -1^ and sucrose 0.02-0.91 g (sugar) 100 g(grape)^sup -1^. Among sugars, glucose was the most abundant one in early stages and then it decreased until the harvest period, when the amount of fructose and glucose converged to an average of 47% for each sugar. Despite organic acids reaching steady levels 3-4 wk before commercial harvest, there were important differences in the organic acid profiles among varieties, with 'Thompson Seedless' showing the lowest tartaric/malic acid ratio of 1.19. These differences are an important aspect in terms of overall flavor. Total soluble solids (TSS) showed the largest increase between 7 and 4 wk before commercial harvest for all three varieties studied (Figure 1). 'Red Globe' and 'Crimson Seedless' showed the largest change in TSS (close to 13% TSS) and a continuous rise throughout the sampling period. However, 'Thompson Seedless' reached a plateau from 4 wk prior to harvest to the end of the sampling period. A reduction in titratable acidity (TA) close to 4% was observed during berry development in the three varieties. 'Red Globe' was the variety showing the largest decline (Δ = -4.0% of acidity), while 'Crimson Seedless' was the variety with the smallest drop in TA (Δ = -2.6% of acidity). From 4 wk before harvest (H-4), the TA levels remained constant in the three varieties studied. These results indicate that if TSS increases and TA decreases as berry development progresses, then the ratio between these values increases over time (Figure 1). According to Crisosto (2002), commercial harvest of table grapes is reached when the quotient TSS/TA has a value close to 20. This value has been defined as the lowest one for consumer preference (Jayasena and Cameron, 2009). Du Plessis (1977) suggested that the TSS/TA ratio is a good indicator of grape ripeness due to the changes in the concentration of sugars and organic acids from one year to another under similar conditions. In this study, the value was reached in 'Red Globe' between 4 and 3 wk before the commercial harvest (H-4 and H-3, respectively). However, the harvest was performed when the berry obtained the optimum red color requested by the consumers. For 'Crimson Seedless' and 'Thompson Seedless', this quotient was reached 1 wk prior to harvest. These results indicate the need to revise the maturity index through berry development for individual varieties according to the quality attributes considered for consumption and commercialization. Because TSS and TA levels showed no significant changes from 2 wk before harvest, we did not include the measurements for sugars and organic acids from this point forward. As mentioned above, some PGRs could modify the chemical and physical characteristics of the berry. However, based on the PGRs used on the varieties in this study, no major differences are expected without their presence (Sato et al., 2004; [Peppi, M.C.] et al., 2006; [Rolle] et al., 2011). Caracterización de azúcares y ácidos orgánicos en variedades comerciales de uva de mesa. La composición del sabor ha sido definida como un atributo complejo de la calidad de la fruta, en el cual la mezcla de azúcares, ácidos y volátiles juega un rol determinante. En uva de mesa (Vitis vinifera L.), el dulzor y la acidez son los atributos primordiales para su consumo fresco. Sin embargo, la mayoría de los estudios realizados al respecto se han desarrollado en uva para la producción de vino, la cual crece, se cultiva y se procesa de manera diferente a la uva de mesa. Por lo tanto, el objetivo del presente trabajo se centró en caracterizar los cambios en azúcares y ácidos orgánicos a lo largo de su desarrollo en las variedades 'Thompson Seedless', 'Red Globe', y 'Crimson Seedless', producidas bajo las mismas condiciones agroclimáticas. Para cada variedad se realizaron muestreos semanales desde 2 semanas previas a pinta hasta la cosecha comercial. Los azúcares y ácidos orgánicos fueron cuantificados mediante cromatografía líquida de alto rendimiento (HPLC) equipados con detectores evaporativos de dispersión de la luz (ELSD) y ultra violeta, respectivamente. El rango de concentraciones de ácidos y azúcares encontrados en uva fueron los siguientes: ácido tartárico, 1,28-7,45 g L^sup -1^; ácido málico, 0,38-29,92 g L^sup -1^, ácido cítrico trazas-1,03 g L^sup -1^; fructosa, 0,15-8,74 g (azúcar) 100 g (uva)^sup -1^; glucosa, 0,19-8,71 g (azúcar) 100 g (uva)^sup -1^ and sacarosa 0,02-0,91 g (azúcar) 100 g (uva)^sup -1^. Entre los azúcares, glucosa fue la más abundante en etapas tempranas y luego disminuyó hasta el período de cosecha, cuando la cantidad de fructosa y glucosa converge en un promedio de 47% para cada azúcar. A pesar de que los ácidos orgánicos alcanzaron un nivel constante entre 3 a 4 semanas antes de su cosecha, existen diferencias importantes en el perfil de ácidos orgánicos entre las variedades, con 'Thompson Seedless' mostrando la más baja relación de ácidos tartárico/málico de 1,19. Estas diferencias son un punto importante al considerar el sabor general para cada variedad.</description><subject>Acids</subject><subject>AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY</subject><subject>AGRONOMY</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Chromatography</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Flavors</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Sucrose</subject><subject>Wineries &amp; vineyards</subject><issn>0718-5839</issn><issn>0718-5820</issn><issn>0718-5839</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFLAzEQhYMoWKu_wYDnrZlNNskey6JVKPTQ6nVJsklN2W5qsj3or7drRQXxMMzAvO89eAhdA5kwwsXtkgiQWSFpmRMAQgg9DIgTNPp-nP66z9FFShtCOBNAR2hVvaioTG-jf1e9Dx0ODi_3axUTVl2DF3GtOm_w1PgmYd_hKmy3NhqvWvysore9t2lgVkq3Fs-i2tl0ic6capO9-tpj9HR_t6oesvli9lhN55lhtOwz6orGNEKUFqQuidHaMsMd5DQvuTSSE8e1NNBIZhqpJdVM0FyQvNDOAuN0jCZH32S8bUO9CfvYHQLrz07qP50cgJsjsIvhdW9T_4NAziUIBsWgEkeViSGlaF29i36r4lsNpB46_9f_A47QcOk</recordid><startdate>20110901</startdate><enddate>20110901</enddate><creator>Muñoz-Robredo, Pablo</creator><creator>Robledo, Paula</creator><creator>Manríquez, Daniel</creator><creator>Molina, Rosa</creator><creator>Defilippi, Bruno G</creator><general>Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research</general><general>Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, INIA</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CLZPN</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>GPN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110901</creationdate><title>Characterization of Sugars and Organic Acids in Commercial Varieties of Table Grapes</title><author>Muñoz-Robredo, Pablo ; Robledo, Paula ; Manríquez, Daniel ; Molina, Rosa ; Defilippi, Bruno G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-3f5dcd779e18b90cbbe4c6f1232968c860f6b8c1d84cd8b83b47327025bfe1463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Acids</topic><topic>AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY</topic><topic>AGRONOMY</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Chromatography</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Flavors</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Sucrose</topic><topic>Wineries &amp; vineyards</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Muñoz-Robredo, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robledo, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manríquez, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molina, Rosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Defilippi, Bruno G</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Latin America &amp; Iberia Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><jtitle>Chilean journal of agricultural research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Muñoz-Robredo, Pablo</au><au>Robledo, Paula</au><au>Manríquez, Daniel</au><au>Molina, Rosa</au><au>Defilippi, Bruno G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterization of Sugars and Organic Acids in Commercial Varieties of Table Grapes</atitle><jtitle>Chilean journal of agricultural research</jtitle><addtitle>Chil. j. agric. res</addtitle><date>2011-09-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>452</spage><epage>458</epage><pages>452-458</pages><issn>0718-5839</issn><issn>0718-5820</issn><eissn>0718-5839</eissn><abstract>Flavor composition has been defined as a complex attribute of fruit quality, in which the mix of sugars, acids and volatiles play a primary role. In table grapes (Vitis vinifera L.), sweetness and sourness are the most important flavor attributes for fresh consumption. However, most of the studies available have been performed on wine grapes, which are grown, cultured and processed differently to table grapes. Therefore, the objective of this work was to characterize the changes in sugars and organic acids during the development of 'Thompson Seedless', 'Red Globe' and 'Crimson Seedless' grown under the same agroclimatic conditions. Each variety was sampled weekly from 2 wk before véraison until commercial harvest. Sugars and organic acids were quantified by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) equipped with an evaporative light scattering detector (ELSD) and ultra violet detector, respectively. The ranges of acid and sugars concentrations found in grapes were as follows: tartaric acid, 1.28-7.45 g L^sup -1^; malic acid, 0.38-29.92 g L^sup -1^, citric acid traces-1.03 g L^sup -1^; fructose, 0.15-8.74 g (sugar) 100 g(grape)^sup -1^; glucose, 0.19-8.71 g (sugar) 100 g(grape)^sup -1^ and sucrose 0.02-0.91 g (sugar) 100 g(grape)^sup -1^. Among sugars, glucose was the most abundant one in early stages and then it decreased until the harvest period, when the amount of fructose and glucose converged to an average of 47% for each sugar. Despite organic acids reaching steady levels 3-4 wk before commercial harvest, there were important differences in the organic acid profiles among varieties, with 'Thompson Seedless' showing the lowest tartaric/malic acid ratio of 1.19. These differences are an important aspect in terms of overall flavor. Total soluble solids (TSS) showed the largest increase between 7 and 4 wk before commercial harvest for all three varieties studied (Figure 1). 'Red Globe' and 'Crimson Seedless' showed the largest change in TSS (close to 13% TSS) and a continuous rise throughout the sampling period. However, 'Thompson Seedless' reached a plateau from 4 wk prior to harvest to the end of the sampling period. A reduction in titratable acidity (TA) close to 4% was observed during berry development in the three varieties. 'Red Globe' was the variety showing the largest decline (Δ = -4.0% of acidity), while 'Crimson Seedless' was the variety with the smallest drop in TA (Δ = -2.6% of acidity). From 4 wk before harvest (H-4), the TA levels remained constant in the three varieties studied. These results indicate that if TSS increases and TA decreases as berry development progresses, then the ratio between these values increases over time (Figure 1). According to Crisosto (2002), commercial harvest of table grapes is reached when the quotient TSS/TA has a value close to 20. This value has been defined as the lowest one for consumer preference (Jayasena and Cameron, 2009). Du Plessis (1977) suggested that the TSS/TA ratio is a good indicator of grape ripeness due to the changes in the concentration of sugars and organic acids from one year to another under similar conditions. In this study, the value was reached in 'Red Globe' between 4 and 3 wk before the commercial harvest (H-4 and H-3, respectively). However, the harvest was performed when the berry obtained the optimum red color requested by the consumers. For 'Crimson Seedless' and 'Thompson Seedless', this quotient was reached 1 wk prior to harvest. These results indicate the need to revise the maturity index through berry development for individual varieties according to the quality attributes considered for consumption and commercialization. Because TSS and TA levels showed no significant changes from 2 wk before harvest, we did not include the measurements for sugars and organic acids from this point forward. As mentioned above, some PGRs could modify the chemical and physical characteristics of the berry. However, based on the PGRs used on the varieties in this study, no major differences are expected without their presence (Sato et al., 2004; [Peppi, M.C.] et al., 2006; [Rolle] et al., 2011). Caracterización de azúcares y ácidos orgánicos en variedades comerciales de uva de mesa. La composición del sabor ha sido definida como un atributo complejo de la calidad de la fruta, en el cual la mezcla de azúcares, ácidos y volátiles juega un rol determinante. En uva de mesa (Vitis vinifera L.), el dulzor y la acidez son los atributos primordiales para su consumo fresco. Sin embargo, la mayoría de los estudios realizados al respecto se han desarrollado en uva para la producción de vino, la cual crece, se cultiva y se procesa de manera diferente a la uva de mesa. Por lo tanto, el objetivo del presente trabajo se centró en caracterizar los cambios en azúcares y ácidos orgánicos a lo largo de su desarrollo en las variedades 'Thompson Seedless', 'Red Globe', y 'Crimson Seedless', producidas bajo las mismas condiciones agroclimáticas. Para cada variedad se realizaron muestreos semanales desde 2 semanas previas a pinta hasta la cosecha comercial. Los azúcares y ácidos orgánicos fueron cuantificados mediante cromatografía líquida de alto rendimiento (HPLC) equipados con detectores evaporativos de dispersión de la luz (ELSD) y ultra violeta, respectivamente. El rango de concentraciones de ácidos y azúcares encontrados en uva fueron los siguientes: ácido tartárico, 1,28-7,45 g L^sup -1^; ácido málico, 0,38-29,92 g L^sup -1^, ácido cítrico trazas-1,03 g L^sup -1^; fructosa, 0,15-8,74 g (azúcar) 100 g (uva)^sup -1^; glucosa, 0,19-8,71 g (azúcar) 100 g (uva)^sup -1^ and sacarosa 0,02-0,91 g (azúcar) 100 g (uva)^sup -1^. Entre los azúcares, glucosa fue la más abundante en etapas tempranas y luego disminuyó hasta el período de cosecha, cuando la cantidad de fructosa y glucosa converge en un promedio de 47% para cada azúcar. A pesar de que los ácidos orgánicos alcanzaron un nivel constante entre 3 a 4 semanas antes de su cosecha, existen diferencias importantes en el perfil de ácidos orgánicos entre las variedades, con 'Thompson Seedless' mostrando la más baja relación de ácidos tartárico/málico de 1,19. Estas diferencias son un punto importante al considerar el sabor general para cada variedad.</abstract><cop>Chillán</cop><pub>Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research</pub><doi>10.4067/S0718-58392011000300017</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0718-5839
ispartof Chilean journal of agricultural research, 2011-09, Vol.71 (3), p.452-458
issn 0718-5839
0718-5820
0718-5839
language eng
recordid cdi_scielo_journals_S0718_58392011000300017
source Bioline International Open Access; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Acids
AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
AGRONOMY
Calibration
Chromatography
Consumers
Consumption
Flavors
Fruits
Glucose
Plant growth
Quality
Sensors
Studies
Sucrose
Wineries & vineyards
title Characterization of Sugars and Organic Acids in Commercial Varieties of Table Grapes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T18%3A45%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sciel&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterization%20of%20Sugars%20and%20Organic%20Acids%20in%20Commercial%20Varieties%20of%20Table%20Grapes&rft.jtitle=Chilean%20journal%20of%20agricultural%20research&rft.au=Mu%C3%B1oz-Robredo,%20Pablo&rft.date=2011-09-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=452&rft.epage=458&rft.pages=452-458&rft.issn=0718-5839&rft.eissn=0718-5839&rft_id=info:doi/10.4067/S0718-58392011000300017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sciel%3E2861998521%3C/proquest_sciel%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1268174157&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_scielo_id=S0718_58392011000300017&rfr_iscdi=true