Bioeconomic model for the evaluation of a backyard aquaculture system for tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)
Backyard aquaculture is gaining importance as a source of food and economic input for rural families in Mexico. The profitability of this system needs to be determined. Bioeconomic tools allow for making profit projections of any production system. A bioeconomic model composed of biological, product...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Latin american journal of aquatic research 2023-05, Vol.51 (2), p.282-294 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 294 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 282 |
container_title | Latin american journal of aquatic research |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Dorantes-De-La-O, Juan Carlos R Maeda-Martinez, Alfonso N |
description | Backyard aquaculture is gaining importance as a source of food and economic input for rural families in Mexico. The profitability of this system needs to be determined. Bioeconomic tools allow for making profit projections of any production system. A bioeconomic model composed of biological, production, and economic sub-models was developed to evaluate a low-cost backyard aquaculture system (BAS) appropriate for rural communities, considering theoretical productive parameters at certain environmental conditions. The BAS consisted of a 2800 L water reservoir stocked with 168 masculinized 1 g fingerlings of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) at 60 ind m-3 density and aerated with two ventury-type submerged pumps of 0.046 hp at a rate of 1400 L h-1 each. Two culture cycles of 25 weeks each were analysed. The initial investment was USD 1200 (USD 775 equipment + USD 425 operation cost yr-1). Results from the model indicate the production of 303 fishes of 614 g, equivalent to 186 kg yr-1, considering 10% mortality. Selling at USD 3.62 kg-1, net profits varied from USD 184 to 16 at 0 and 25% self-consumption. The payback period was three and four years at 0 and 10% self-consumption but was longer than five years at 25%. A response surface plot of profitability indicators (cost-benefit, net present value, and internal rate of return) was constructed at different self-consumption percentages, sale prices, and temperatures. In conclusion, BAS is a viable self-sustainable alternative for tilapia production at a low scale in rural areas of Mexico and other Latin American countries. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3856/vol51-issue2-fulltext-2999 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_sciel</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scielo_journals_S0718_560X2023000200282</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A749549362</galeid><scielo_id>S0718_560X2023000200282</scielo_id><sourcerecordid>A749549362</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-5a0c936091b3c1f5e00c5e0706d21cdd11db9d9f92b9601e87d5905c485c19133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUl1rFDEUHUTBUvsfgr4oOG0-JjMT32qxVSj0QQXfQiZzZzc1O9nmJsX99806ynaTcBPCOffjcKrqLaPnopftxWPwktUOMQOvp-x9gj-p5kqpF9UJ7Vhfy5b-evns_bo6Q7ynZUnBWi5PKvfZBbBhDhtnySaM4MkUIklrIPBofDbJhZmEiRgyGPt7Z-JIzEM2NvuUIxDcYYLNwnHebJ0h7-8iBLuOJSWS2fmQnM344U31ajIe4ezffVr9vP7y4-prfXt38-3q8ra2outSLQ21SrRUsUFYNkmg1JbQ0XbkzI4jY-OgRjUpPqiWMui7USoqbdNLyxQT4rQ6X_KideCDvg85zqWg_r6XQe9l4JSLogEvp-eF8G4hbGN4yIDpQOE9a1TfyLY9oFbGg3bzFFI0toxo9WXXKNmUpvmh-BGq7BGKwGGGyZX_I8LHZ4Qho5sBS0C3WidcmYx4DP-0wG0MiBEmvY1uY-JOM6r3ptB_TaEXU-j_ptB7U4gn8gWt2g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2814984566</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bioeconomic model for the evaluation of a backyard aquaculture system for tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Dorantes-De-La-O, Juan Carlos R ; Maeda-Martinez, Alfonso N</creator><creatorcontrib>Dorantes-De-La-O, Juan Carlos R ; Maeda-Martinez, Alfonso N</creatorcontrib><description>Backyard aquaculture is gaining importance as a source of food and economic input for rural families in Mexico. The profitability of this system needs to be determined. Bioeconomic tools allow for making profit projections of any production system. A bioeconomic model composed of biological, production, and economic sub-models was developed to evaluate a low-cost backyard aquaculture system (BAS) appropriate for rural communities, considering theoretical productive parameters at certain environmental conditions. The BAS consisted of a 2800 L water reservoir stocked with 168 masculinized 1 g fingerlings of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) at 60 ind m-3 density and aerated with two ventury-type submerged pumps of 0.046 hp at a rate of 1400 L h-1 each. Two culture cycles of 25 weeks each were analysed. The initial investment was USD 1200 (USD 775 equipment + USD 425 operation cost yr-1). Results from the model indicate the production of 303 fishes of 614 g, equivalent to 186 kg yr-1, considering 10% mortality. Selling at USD 3.62 kg-1, net profits varied from USD 184 to 16 at 0 and 25% self-consumption. The payback period was three and four years at 0 and 10% self-consumption but was longer than five years at 25%. A response surface plot of profitability indicators (cost-benefit, net present value, and internal rate of return) was constructed at different self-consumption percentages, sale prices, and temperatures. In conclusion, BAS is a viable self-sustainable alternative for tilapia production at a low scale in rural areas of Mexico and other Latin American countries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0718-560X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0718-560X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3856/vol51-issue2-fulltext-2999</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Valparaiso: Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Valparaiso, Escuela de Ciencias del Mar</publisher><subject>Aeration ; Aquaculture ; Cost control ; Economic models ; Economics ; Energy consumption ; Environmental conditions ; Equipment costs ; Fingerlings ; Fish ; FISHERIES ; Food ; Food sources ; Freshwater fishes ; MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY ; Marine fishes ; OCEANOGRAPHY ; Oreochromis niloticus ; Payback periods ; Polyculture (aquaculture) ; Profit ; Profitability ; Profits ; Rural areas ; Rural communities ; Rural environments ; Tilapia ; Water reservoirs ; Water temperature ; Whitefish</subject><ispartof>Latin american journal of aquatic research, 2023-05, Vol.51 (2), p.282-294</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Valparaiso, Escuela de Ciencias del Mar</rights><rights>2023. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0003-4185-4902 ; 0000-0002-3426-4659</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,315,782,786,887,27931,27932</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dorantes-De-La-O, Juan Carlos R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maeda-Martinez, Alfonso N</creatorcontrib><title>Bioeconomic model for the evaluation of a backyard aquaculture system for tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)</title><title>Latin american journal of aquatic research</title><addtitle>Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res</addtitle><description>Backyard aquaculture is gaining importance as a source of food and economic input for rural families in Mexico. The profitability of this system needs to be determined. Bioeconomic tools allow for making profit projections of any production system. A bioeconomic model composed of biological, production, and economic sub-models was developed to evaluate a low-cost backyard aquaculture system (BAS) appropriate for rural communities, considering theoretical productive parameters at certain environmental conditions. The BAS consisted of a 2800 L water reservoir stocked with 168 masculinized 1 g fingerlings of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) at 60 ind m-3 density and aerated with two ventury-type submerged pumps of 0.046 hp at a rate of 1400 L h-1 each. Two culture cycles of 25 weeks each were analysed. The initial investment was USD 1200 (USD 775 equipment + USD 425 operation cost yr-1). Results from the model indicate the production of 303 fishes of 614 g, equivalent to 186 kg yr-1, considering 10% mortality. Selling at USD 3.62 kg-1, net profits varied from USD 184 to 16 at 0 and 25% self-consumption. The payback period was three and four years at 0 and 10% self-consumption but was longer than five years at 25%. A response surface plot of profitability indicators (cost-benefit, net present value, and internal rate of return) was constructed at different self-consumption percentages, sale prices, and temperatures. In conclusion, BAS is a viable self-sustainable alternative for tilapia production at a low scale in rural areas of Mexico and other Latin American countries.</description><subject>Aeration</subject><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Equipment costs</subject><subject>Fingerlings</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>FISHERIES</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food sources</subject><subject>Freshwater fishes</subject><subject>MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY</subject><subject>Marine fishes</subject><subject>OCEANOGRAPHY</subject><subject>Oreochromis niloticus</subject><subject>Payback periods</subject><subject>Polyculture (aquaculture)</subject><subject>Profit</subject><subject>Profitability</subject><subject>Profits</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>Rural environments</subject><subject>Tilapia</subject><subject>Water reservoirs</subject><subject>Water temperature</subject><subject>Whitefish</subject><issn>0718-560X</issn><issn>0718-560X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUl1rFDEUHUTBUvsfgr4oOG0-JjMT32qxVSj0QQXfQiZzZzc1O9nmJsX99806ynaTcBPCOffjcKrqLaPnopftxWPwktUOMQOvp-x9gj-p5kqpF9UJ7Vhfy5b-evns_bo6Q7ynZUnBWi5PKvfZBbBhDhtnySaM4MkUIklrIPBofDbJhZmEiRgyGPt7Z-JIzEM2NvuUIxDcYYLNwnHebJ0h7-8iBLuOJSWS2fmQnM344U31ajIe4ezffVr9vP7y4-prfXt38-3q8ra2outSLQ21SrRUsUFYNkmg1JbQ0XbkzI4jY-OgRjUpPqiWMui7USoqbdNLyxQT4rQ6X_KideCDvg85zqWg_r6XQe9l4JSLogEvp-eF8G4hbGN4yIDpQOE9a1TfyLY9oFbGg3bzFFI0toxo9WXXKNmUpvmh-BGq7BGKwGGGyZX_I8LHZ4Qho5sBS0C3WidcmYx4DP-0wG0MiBEmvY1uY-JOM6r3ptB_TaEXU-j_ptB7U4gn8gWt2g</recordid><startdate>20230501</startdate><enddate>20230501</enddate><creator>Dorantes-De-La-O, Juan Carlos R</creator><creator>Maeda-Martinez, Alfonso N</creator><general>Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Valparaiso, Escuela de Ciencias del Mar</general><general>Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Valparaiso</general><general>Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso. Facultad de Recursos Naturales. Escuela de Ciencias del Mar</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>INF</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CLZPN</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>GPN</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4185-4902</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3426-4659</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230501</creationdate><title>Bioeconomic model for the evaluation of a backyard aquaculture system for tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)</title><author>Dorantes-De-La-O, Juan Carlos R ; Maeda-Martinez, Alfonso N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-5a0c936091b3c1f5e00c5e0706d21cdd11db9d9f92b9601e87d5905c485c19133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aeration</topic><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Equipment costs</topic><topic>Fingerlings</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>FISHERIES</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food sources</topic><topic>Freshwater fishes</topic><topic>MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY</topic><topic>Marine fishes</topic><topic>OCEANOGRAPHY</topic><topic>Oreochromis niloticus</topic><topic>Payback periods</topic><topic>Polyculture (aquaculture)</topic><topic>Profit</topic><topic>Profitability</topic><topic>Profits</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>Rural environments</topic><topic>Tilapia</topic><topic>Water reservoirs</topic><topic>Water temperature</topic><topic>Whitefish</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dorantes-De-La-O, Juan Carlos R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maeda-Martinez, Alfonso N</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Gale OneFile: Informe Academico</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Latin America & Iberia Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><jtitle>Latin american journal of aquatic research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dorantes-De-La-O, Juan Carlos R</au><au>Maeda-Martinez, Alfonso N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bioeconomic model for the evaluation of a backyard aquaculture system for tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)</atitle><jtitle>Latin american journal of aquatic research</jtitle><addtitle>Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res</addtitle><date>2023-05-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>282</spage><epage>294</epage><pages>282-294</pages><issn>0718-560X</issn><eissn>0718-560X</eissn><abstract>Backyard aquaculture is gaining importance as a source of food and economic input for rural families in Mexico. The profitability of this system needs to be determined. Bioeconomic tools allow for making profit projections of any production system. A bioeconomic model composed of biological, production, and economic sub-models was developed to evaluate a low-cost backyard aquaculture system (BAS) appropriate for rural communities, considering theoretical productive parameters at certain environmental conditions. The BAS consisted of a 2800 L water reservoir stocked with 168 masculinized 1 g fingerlings of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) at 60 ind m-3 density and aerated with two ventury-type submerged pumps of 0.046 hp at a rate of 1400 L h-1 each. Two culture cycles of 25 weeks each were analysed. The initial investment was USD 1200 (USD 775 equipment + USD 425 operation cost yr-1). Results from the model indicate the production of 303 fishes of 614 g, equivalent to 186 kg yr-1, considering 10% mortality. Selling at USD 3.62 kg-1, net profits varied from USD 184 to 16 at 0 and 25% self-consumption. The payback period was three and four years at 0 and 10% self-consumption but was longer than five years at 25%. A response surface plot of profitability indicators (cost-benefit, net present value, and internal rate of return) was constructed at different self-consumption percentages, sale prices, and temperatures. In conclusion, BAS is a viable self-sustainable alternative for tilapia production at a low scale in rural areas of Mexico and other Latin American countries.</abstract><cop>Valparaiso</cop><pub>Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Valparaiso, Escuela de Ciencias del Mar</pub><doi>10.3856/vol51-issue2-fulltext-2999</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4185-4902</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3426-4659</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0718-560X |
ispartof | Latin american journal of aquatic research, 2023-05, Vol.51 (2), p.282-294 |
issn | 0718-560X 0718-560X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_scielo_journals_S0718_560X2023000200282 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Aeration Aquaculture Cost control Economic models Economics Energy consumption Environmental conditions Equipment costs Fingerlings Fish FISHERIES Food Food sources Freshwater fishes MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY Marine fishes OCEANOGRAPHY Oreochromis niloticus Payback periods Polyculture (aquaculture) Profit Profitability Profits Rural areas Rural communities Rural environments Tilapia Water reservoirs Water temperature Whitefish |
title | Bioeconomic model for the evaluation of a backyard aquaculture system for tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T22%3A08%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_sciel&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bioeconomic%20model%20for%20the%20evaluation%20of%20a%20backyard%20aquaculture%20system%20for%20tilapia%20(Oreochromis%20niloticus)&rft.jtitle=Latin%20american%20journal%20of%20aquatic%20research&rft.au=Dorantes-De-La-O,%20Juan%20Carlos%20R&rft.date=2023-05-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=282&rft.epage=294&rft.pages=282-294&rft.issn=0718-560X&rft.eissn=0718-560X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3856/vol51-issue2-fulltext-2999&rft_dat=%3Cgale_sciel%3EA749549362%3C/gale_sciel%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2814984566&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A749549362&rft_scielo_id=S0718_560X2023000200282&rfr_iscdi=true |