Performance Evaluations of Technology Transfer Offices of Major US Research Universities

By analyzing the highlights of the major activities reported by the technology transfer offices (TTOs) of twenty US major universities, the performances of TTO activities are quantitatively assessed and the associated scores are compared with each other. The key performance indicators, which govern...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of technology management & innovation 2014-04, Vol.9 (1), p.93-102
Hauptverfasser: Tseng, Ampere A, Raudensky, Miroslav
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 102
container_issue 1
container_start_page 93
container_title Journal of technology management & innovation
container_volume 9
creator Tseng, Ampere A
Raudensky, Miroslav
description By analyzing the highlights of the major activities reported by the technology transfer offices (TTOs) of twenty US major universities, the performances of TTO activities are quantitatively assessed and the associated scores are compared with each other. The key performance indicators, which govern the success of the university technology transfer, are specifically selected and examined. Two normalized metrics, overall performance metric (OPM) and patenting control ratio (PCR), which are the representing combined indicators for the TTO performance, are developed and demonstrated. The two metrics are evaluated for each university selected and compared to specifically provide a comprehensive overview of how good is the TTO of a university as compare to those of its peers. Finally, the factors for a successful TTO are described and the major unsolved issues are also discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.4067/S0718-27242014000100008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>scielo_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scielo_journals_S0718_27242014000100008</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S0718_27242014000100008</scielo_id><sourcerecordid>S0718_27242014000100008</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2608-2ee54985f0b8c6c1dba1cd242a1d2f77a23f8f82bb681e7961504704cef7b6663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kGFLwzAQhoMoOKe_wfyBzUvaJtlHGVMHk4lrwW8lTS8upWsk2Qb799ZNRBA_HHfw8ty99xJyy2CcgpB3K5BMjbjkKQeWAgDrC9QZGfwI57_mS3IVYwMgkoSrAXl7wWB92OjOIJ3tdbvTW-e7SL2lOZp151v_fqB50F20GOjSWmfwKD_rxgdarOgrRtTBrGnRuT2G6LYO4zW5sLqNePPdh6R4mOXTp9Fi-Tif3i9GhgvoLSFm6URlFiplhGF1pZmp-180q7mVUvPEKqt4VQnFUE4EyyCVkBq0shJCJEMyPu2NxmHry8bvQtcfLI-5lH9y6QF5AkzwMQa05UdwGx0OJYPyK9F_yU-b62bx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance Evaluations of Technology Transfer Offices of Major US Research Universities</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Tseng, Ampere A ; Raudensky, Miroslav</creator><creatorcontrib>Tseng, Ampere A ; Raudensky, Miroslav</creatorcontrib><description>By analyzing the highlights of the major activities reported by the technology transfer offices (TTOs) of twenty US major universities, the performances of TTO activities are quantitatively assessed and the associated scores are compared with each other. The key performance indicators, which govern the success of the university technology transfer, are specifically selected and examined. Two normalized metrics, overall performance metric (OPM) and patenting control ratio (PCR), which are the representing combined indicators for the TTO performance, are developed and demonstrated. The two metrics are evaluated for each university selected and compared to specifically provide a comprehensive overview of how good is the TTO of a university as compare to those of its peers. Finally, the factors for a successful TTO are described and the major unsolved issues are also discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0718-2724</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0718-2724</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4067/S0718-27242014000100008</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Universidad Alberto Hurtado. Facultad de Economía y Negocios</publisher><subject>ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY</subject><ispartof>Journal of technology management &amp; innovation, 2014-04, Vol.9 (1), p.93-102</ispartof><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2608-2ee54985f0b8c6c1dba1cd242a1d2f77a23f8f82bb681e7961504704cef7b6663</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,864,885,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tseng, Ampere A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raudensky, Miroslav</creatorcontrib><title>Performance Evaluations of Technology Transfer Offices of Major US Research Universities</title><title>Journal of technology management &amp; innovation</title><addtitle>Journal of Technology Management &amp; Innovation</addtitle><description>By analyzing the highlights of the major activities reported by the technology transfer offices (TTOs) of twenty US major universities, the performances of TTO activities are quantitatively assessed and the associated scores are compared with each other. The key performance indicators, which govern the success of the university technology transfer, are specifically selected and examined. Two normalized metrics, overall performance metric (OPM) and patenting control ratio (PCR), which are the representing combined indicators for the TTO performance, are developed and demonstrated. The two metrics are evaluated for each university selected and compared to specifically provide a comprehensive overview of how good is the TTO of a university as compare to those of its peers. Finally, the factors for a successful TTO are described and the major unsolved issues are also discussed.</description><subject>ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY</subject><issn>0718-2724</issn><issn>0718-2724</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kGFLwzAQhoMoOKe_wfyBzUvaJtlHGVMHk4lrwW8lTS8upWsk2Qb799ZNRBA_HHfw8ty99xJyy2CcgpB3K5BMjbjkKQeWAgDrC9QZGfwI57_mS3IVYwMgkoSrAXl7wWB92OjOIJ3tdbvTW-e7SL2lOZp151v_fqB50F20GOjSWmfwKD_rxgdarOgrRtTBrGnRuT2G6LYO4zW5sLqNePPdh6R4mOXTp9Fi-Tif3i9GhgvoLSFm6URlFiplhGF1pZmp-180q7mVUvPEKqt4VQnFUE4EyyCVkBq0shJCJEMyPu2NxmHry8bvQtcfLI-5lH9y6QF5AkzwMQa05UdwGx0OJYPyK9F_yU-b62bx</recordid><startdate>20140401</startdate><enddate>20140401</enddate><creator>Tseng, Ampere A</creator><creator>Raudensky, Miroslav</creator><general>Universidad Alberto Hurtado. Facultad de Economía y Negocios</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>GPN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140401</creationdate><title>Performance Evaluations of Technology Transfer Offices of Major US Research Universities</title><author>Tseng, Ampere A ; Raudensky, Miroslav</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2608-2ee54985f0b8c6c1dba1cd242a1d2f77a23f8f82bb681e7961504704cef7b6663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tseng, Ampere A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raudensky, Miroslav</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><jtitle>Journal of technology management &amp; innovation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tseng, Ampere A</au><au>Raudensky, Miroslav</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance Evaluations of Technology Transfer Offices of Major US Research Universities</atitle><jtitle>Journal of technology management &amp; innovation</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Technology Management &amp; Innovation</addtitle><date>2014-04-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>93</spage><epage>102</epage><pages>93-102</pages><issn>0718-2724</issn><eissn>0718-2724</eissn><abstract>By analyzing the highlights of the major activities reported by the technology transfer offices (TTOs) of twenty US major universities, the performances of TTO activities are quantitatively assessed and the associated scores are compared with each other. The key performance indicators, which govern the success of the university technology transfer, are specifically selected and examined. Two normalized metrics, overall performance metric (OPM) and patenting control ratio (PCR), which are the representing combined indicators for the TTO performance, are developed and demonstrated. The two metrics are evaluated for each university selected and compared to specifically provide a comprehensive overview of how good is the TTO of a university as compare to those of its peers. Finally, the factors for a successful TTO are described and the major unsolved issues are also discussed.</abstract><pub>Universidad Alberto Hurtado. Facultad de Economía y Negocios</pub><doi>10.4067/S0718-27242014000100008</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0718-2724
ispartof Journal of technology management & innovation, 2014-04, Vol.9 (1), p.93-102
issn 0718-2724
0718-2724
language eng
recordid cdi_scielo_journals_S0718_27242014000100008
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
title Performance Evaluations of Technology Transfer Offices of Major US Research Universities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T03%3A33%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-scielo_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20Evaluations%20of%20Technology%20Transfer%20Offices%20of%20Major%20US%20Research%20Universities&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20technology%20management%20&%20innovation&rft.au=Tseng,%20Ampere%20A&rft.date=2014-04-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=93&rft.epage=102&rft.pages=93-102&rft.issn=0718-2724&rft.eissn=0718-2724&rft_id=info:doi/10.4067/S0718-27242014000100008&rft_dat=%3Cscielo_cross%3ES0718_27242014000100008%3C/scielo_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_scielo_id=S0718_27242014000100008&rfr_iscdi=true