Performance Evaluations of Technology Transfer Offices of Major US Research Universities
By analyzing the highlights of the major activities reported by the technology transfer offices (TTOs) of twenty US major universities, the performances of TTO activities are quantitatively assessed and the associated scores are compared with each other. The key performance indicators, which govern...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of technology management & innovation 2014-04, Vol.9 (1), p.93-102 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 102 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 93 |
container_title | Journal of technology management & innovation |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Tseng, Ampere A Raudensky, Miroslav |
description | By analyzing the highlights of the major activities reported by the technology transfer offices (TTOs) of twenty US major universities, the performances of TTO activities are quantitatively assessed and the associated scores are compared with each other. The key performance indicators, which govern the success of the university technology transfer, are specifically selected and examined. Two normalized metrics, overall performance metric (OPM) and patenting control ratio (PCR), which are the representing combined indicators for the TTO performance, are developed and demonstrated. The two metrics are evaluated for each university selected and compared to specifically provide a comprehensive overview of how good is the TTO of a university as compare to those of its peers. Finally, the factors for a successful TTO are described and the major unsolved issues are also discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4067/S0718-27242014000100008 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>scielo_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scielo_journals_S0718_27242014000100008</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S0718_27242014000100008</scielo_id><sourcerecordid>S0718_27242014000100008</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2608-2ee54985f0b8c6c1dba1cd242a1d2f77a23f8f82bb681e7961504704cef7b6663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kGFLwzAQhoMoOKe_wfyBzUvaJtlHGVMHk4lrwW8lTS8upWsk2Qb799ZNRBA_HHfw8ty99xJyy2CcgpB3K5BMjbjkKQeWAgDrC9QZGfwI57_mS3IVYwMgkoSrAXl7wWB92OjOIJ3tdbvTW-e7SL2lOZp151v_fqB50F20GOjSWmfwKD_rxgdarOgrRtTBrGnRuT2G6LYO4zW5sLqNePPdh6R4mOXTp9Fi-Tif3i9GhgvoLSFm6URlFiplhGF1pZmp-180q7mVUvPEKqt4VQnFUE4EyyCVkBq0shJCJEMyPu2NxmHry8bvQtcfLI-5lH9y6QF5AkzwMQa05UdwGx0OJYPyK9F_yU-b62bx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance Evaluations of Technology Transfer Offices of Major US Research Universities</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Tseng, Ampere A ; Raudensky, Miroslav</creator><creatorcontrib>Tseng, Ampere A ; Raudensky, Miroslav</creatorcontrib><description>By analyzing the highlights of the major activities reported by the technology transfer offices (TTOs) of twenty US major universities, the performances of TTO activities are quantitatively assessed and the associated scores are compared with each other. The key performance indicators, which govern the success of the university technology transfer, are specifically selected and examined. Two normalized metrics, overall performance metric (OPM) and patenting control ratio (PCR), which are the representing combined indicators for the TTO performance, are developed and demonstrated. The two metrics are evaluated for each university selected and compared to specifically provide a comprehensive overview of how good is the TTO of a university as compare to those of its peers. Finally, the factors for a successful TTO are described and the major unsolved issues are also discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0718-2724</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0718-2724</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4067/S0718-27242014000100008</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Universidad Alberto Hurtado. Facultad de Economía y Negocios</publisher><subject>ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY</subject><ispartof>Journal of technology management & innovation, 2014-04, Vol.9 (1), p.93-102</ispartof><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2608-2ee54985f0b8c6c1dba1cd242a1d2f77a23f8f82bb681e7961504704cef7b6663</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,864,885,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tseng, Ampere A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raudensky, Miroslav</creatorcontrib><title>Performance Evaluations of Technology Transfer Offices of Major US Research Universities</title><title>Journal of technology management & innovation</title><addtitle>Journal of Technology Management & Innovation</addtitle><description>By analyzing the highlights of the major activities reported by the technology transfer offices (TTOs) of twenty US major universities, the performances of TTO activities are quantitatively assessed and the associated scores are compared with each other. The key performance indicators, which govern the success of the university technology transfer, are specifically selected and examined. Two normalized metrics, overall performance metric (OPM) and patenting control ratio (PCR), which are the representing combined indicators for the TTO performance, are developed and demonstrated. The two metrics are evaluated for each university selected and compared to specifically provide a comprehensive overview of how good is the TTO of a university as compare to those of its peers. Finally, the factors for a successful TTO are described and the major unsolved issues are also discussed.</description><subject>ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY</subject><issn>0718-2724</issn><issn>0718-2724</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kGFLwzAQhoMoOKe_wfyBzUvaJtlHGVMHk4lrwW8lTS8upWsk2Qb799ZNRBA_HHfw8ty99xJyy2CcgpB3K5BMjbjkKQeWAgDrC9QZGfwI57_mS3IVYwMgkoSrAXl7wWB92OjOIJ3tdbvTW-e7SL2lOZp151v_fqB50F20GOjSWmfwKD_rxgdarOgrRtTBrGnRuT2G6LYO4zW5sLqNePPdh6R4mOXTp9Fi-Tif3i9GhgvoLSFm6URlFiplhGF1pZmp-180q7mVUvPEKqt4VQnFUE4EyyCVkBq0shJCJEMyPu2NxmHry8bvQtcfLI-5lH9y6QF5AkzwMQa05UdwGx0OJYPyK9F_yU-b62bx</recordid><startdate>20140401</startdate><enddate>20140401</enddate><creator>Tseng, Ampere A</creator><creator>Raudensky, Miroslav</creator><general>Universidad Alberto Hurtado. Facultad de Economía y Negocios</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>GPN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140401</creationdate><title>Performance Evaluations of Technology Transfer Offices of Major US Research Universities</title><author>Tseng, Ampere A ; Raudensky, Miroslav</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2608-2ee54985f0b8c6c1dba1cd242a1d2f77a23f8f82bb681e7961504704cef7b6663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tseng, Ampere A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raudensky, Miroslav</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><jtitle>Journal of technology management & innovation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tseng, Ampere A</au><au>Raudensky, Miroslav</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance Evaluations of Technology Transfer Offices of Major US Research Universities</atitle><jtitle>Journal of technology management & innovation</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Technology Management & Innovation</addtitle><date>2014-04-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>93</spage><epage>102</epage><pages>93-102</pages><issn>0718-2724</issn><eissn>0718-2724</eissn><abstract>By analyzing the highlights of the major activities reported by the technology transfer offices (TTOs) of twenty US major universities, the performances of TTO activities are quantitatively assessed and the associated scores are compared with each other. The key performance indicators, which govern the success of the university technology transfer, are specifically selected and examined. Two normalized metrics, overall performance metric (OPM) and patenting control ratio (PCR), which are the representing combined indicators for the TTO performance, are developed and demonstrated. The two metrics are evaluated for each university selected and compared to specifically provide a comprehensive overview of how good is the TTO of a university as compare to those of its peers. Finally, the factors for a successful TTO are described and the major unsolved issues are also discussed.</abstract><pub>Universidad Alberto Hurtado. Facultad de Economía y Negocios</pub><doi>10.4067/S0718-27242014000100008</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0718-2724 |
ispartof | Journal of technology management & innovation, 2014-04, Vol.9 (1), p.93-102 |
issn | 0718-2724 0718-2724 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_scielo_journals_S0718_27242014000100008 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY |
title | Performance Evaluations of Technology Transfer Offices of Major US Research Universities |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T03%3A33%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-scielo_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20Evaluations%20of%20Technology%20Transfer%20Offices%20of%20Major%20US%20Research%20Universities&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20technology%20management%20&%20innovation&rft.au=Tseng,%20Ampere%20A&rft.date=2014-04-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=93&rft.epage=102&rft.pages=93-102&rft.issn=0718-2724&rft.eissn=0718-2724&rft_id=info:doi/10.4067/S0718-27242014000100008&rft_dat=%3Cscielo_cross%3ES0718_27242014000100008%3C/scielo_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_scielo_id=S0718_27242014000100008&rfr_iscdi=true |