Optimization and comparison of two different 3D culture methods to prepare cell aggregates as a bioink for organ printing
The ultimate goal of tissue engineering is to design and fabricate functional human tissues that are similar to natural cells and are capable of regeneration. Preparation of cell aggregates is one of the important steps in 3D tissue engineering technology, particularly in organ printing. Two simple...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biocell 2012-04, Vol.36 (1), p.37-45 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 45 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 37 |
container_title | Biocell |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Imani, Rana Hojjati Emami, Shahriar Fakhrzadeh, Hossein Baheiraei, Nafiseh Sharifi, Ali M |
description | The ultimate goal of tissue engineering is to design and fabricate functional human tissues that are similar to natural cells and are capable of regeneration. Preparation of cell aggregates is one of the important steps in 3D tissue engineering technology, particularly in organ printing. Two simple methods, hanging drop (HD) and conical tube (CT) were utilized to prepare cell aggregates. The size and viability of the aggregates obtained at different initial cell densities and pre-culture duration were compared. The proliferative ability of the cell aggregates and their ability to spread in culture plates were also investigated. In both methods, the optimum average size of the aggregates was less than 500 microm. CT aggregates were smaller than HD aggregates. 5,000 cells per drop HD aggregates showed a marked ability to attach and spread on the culture surface. The proliferative ability reduced when the initial cell density was increased. Comparing these methods, we found that the HD method having better size controlling ability as well as enhanced ability to maintain higher rates of viability, spreading, and proliferation. In conclusion, smaller HD aggregates might be a suitable choice as building blocks for making bioink particles in bioprinting technique. |
doi_str_mv | 10.32604/biocell.2012.36.037 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sciel</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scielo_journals_S0327_95452012000100003</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S0327_95452012000100003</scielo_id><sourcerecordid>2397254169</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-5d459470dd05ba787df68e55c604c22ba2755a84cabc5d7f0c37b12857fde063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUctu1TAU9AJES-EPELLEhs0Nx684WaLylCp1QfeW40dwSeyL7QiVr8fhXrpAsmVZmpkzZwahVwQ6Rnvg76aQjFuWjgKhHes7YPIJugRG5WEUXFyg56XcA3DgjDxDF5QRyRiwS_Rwe6xhDb91DSliHS02aT3qHEr7Jo_rr4Rt8N5lFytmH7DZlrplh1dXvydbcE34mF1jOLw7wHqes5t1dQXrdnBzFuIP7FPGKc86NnSINcT5BXrq9VLcy_N7he4-fby7_nK4uf389fr9zcFwCvUgLBcjl2AtiEnLQVrfD04I09Y2lE6aSiH0wI2ejLDSg2FyInQQ0lsHPbtC3Um2mOCWpO7TlmObp77t6ag9nT00ACDtAmuEtyfCMaefmytVraHsq-no0lYUIaPkg6B0h775D_qoTtkoqeCkHxuKn1Amp1Ky86pFsOr8oAiov_Wpc31qd6JYr1p9jfb6LL5Nq7OPpH_dsT_kY5gW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2397254169</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimization and comparison of two different 3D culture methods to prepare cell aggregates as a bioink for organ printing</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Tech Science Press</source><creator>Imani, Rana ; Hojjati Emami, Shahriar ; Fakhrzadeh, Hossein ; Baheiraei, Nafiseh ; Sharifi, Ali M</creator><creatorcontrib>Imani, Rana ; Hojjati Emami, Shahriar ; Fakhrzadeh, Hossein ; Baheiraei, Nafiseh ; Sharifi, Ali M</creatorcontrib><description>The ultimate goal of tissue engineering is to design and fabricate functional human tissues that are similar to natural cells and are capable of regeneration. Preparation of cell aggregates is one of the important steps in 3D tissue engineering technology, particularly in organ printing. Two simple methods, hanging drop (HD) and conical tube (CT) were utilized to prepare cell aggregates. The size and viability of the aggregates obtained at different initial cell densities and pre-culture duration were compared. The proliferative ability of the cell aggregates and their ability to spread in culture plates were also investigated. In both methods, the optimum average size of the aggregates was less than 500 microm. CT aggregates were smaller than HD aggregates. 5,000 cells per drop HD aggregates showed a marked ability to attach and spread on the culture surface. The proliferative ability reduced when the initial cell density was increased. Comparing these methods, we found that the HD method having better size controlling ability as well as enhanced ability to maintain higher rates of viability, spreading, and proliferation. In conclusion, smaller HD aggregates might be a suitable choice as building blocks for making bioink particles in bioprinting technique.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0327-9545</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1667-5746</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.32604/biocell.2012.36.037</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23173303</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Argentina: Tech Science Press</publisher><subject>Animals ; BIOLOGY ; Bioprinting - instrumentation ; Bioprinting - methods ; Cell Aggregation - physiology ; Cell culture ; Cell Culture Techniques - methods ; Cell density ; Cell Proliferation ; Cell Size ; Cell Survival ; Cells, Cultured ; CHO Cells ; Cricetinae ; Humans ; Tissue engineering ; Tissue Engineering - instrumentation ; Tissue Engineering - methods</subject><ispartof>Biocell, 2012-04, Vol.36 (1), p.37-45</ispartof><rights>2012. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-5d459470dd05ba787df68e55c604c22ba2755a84cabc5d7f0c37b12857fde063</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23173303$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Imani, Rana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hojjati Emami, Shahriar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fakhrzadeh, Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baheiraei, Nafiseh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharifi, Ali M</creatorcontrib><title>Optimization and comparison of two different 3D culture methods to prepare cell aggregates as a bioink for organ printing</title><title>Biocell</title><addtitle>Biocell</addtitle><description>The ultimate goal of tissue engineering is to design and fabricate functional human tissues that are similar to natural cells and are capable of regeneration. Preparation of cell aggregates is one of the important steps in 3D tissue engineering technology, particularly in organ printing. Two simple methods, hanging drop (HD) and conical tube (CT) were utilized to prepare cell aggregates. The size and viability of the aggregates obtained at different initial cell densities and pre-culture duration were compared. The proliferative ability of the cell aggregates and their ability to spread in culture plates were also investigated. In both methods, the optimum average size of the aggregates was less than 500 microm. CT aggregates were smaller than HD aggregates. 5,000 cells per drop HD aggregates showed a marked ability to attach and spread on the culture surface. The proliferative ability reduced when the initial cell density was increased. Comparing these methods, we found that the HD method having better size controlling ability as well as enhanced ability to maintain higher rates of viability, spreading, and proliferation. In conclusion, smaller HD aggregates might be a suitable choice as building blocks for making bioink particles in bioprinting technique.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>BIOLOGY</subject><subject>Bioprinting - instrumentation</subject><subject>Bioprinting - methods</subject><subject>Cell Aggregation - physiology</subject><subject>Cell culture</subject><subject>Cell Culture Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Cell density</subject><subject>Cell Proliferation</subject><subject>Cell Size</subject><subject>Cell Survival</subject><subject>Cells, Cultured</subject><subject>CHO Cells</subject><subject>Cricetinae</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Tissue engineering</subject><subject>Tissue Engineering - instrumentation</subject><subject>Tissue Engineering - methods</subject><issn>0327-9545</issn><issn>1667-5746</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUctu1TAU9AJES-EPELLEhs0Nx684WaLylCp1QfeW40dwSeyL7QiVr8fhXrpAsmVZmpkzZwahVwQ6Rnvg76aQjFuWjgKhHes7YPIJugRG5WEUXFyg56XcA3DgjDxDF5QRyRiwS_Rwe6xhDb91DSliHS02aT3qHEr7Jo_rr4Rt8N5lFytmH7DZlrplh1dXvydbcE34mF1jOLw7wHqes5t1dQXrdnBzFuIP7FPGKc86NnSINcT5BXrq9VLcy_N7he4-fby7_nK4uf389fr9zcFwCvUgLBcjl2AtiEnLQVrfD04I09Y2lE6aSiH0wI2ejLDSg2FyInQQ0lsHPbtC3Um2mOCWpO7TlmObp77t6ag9nT00ACDtAmuEtyfCMaefmytVraHsq-no0lYUIaPkg6B0h775D_qoTtkoqeCkHxuKn1Amp1Ky86pFsOr8oAiov_Wpc31qd6JYr1p9jfb6LL5Nq7OPpH_dsT_kY5gW</recordid><startdate>20120401</startdate><enddate>20120401</enddate><creator>Imani, Rana</creator><creator>Hojjati Emami, Shahriar</creator><creator>Fakhrzadeh, Hossein</creator><creator>Baheiraei, Nafiseh</creator><creator>Sharifi, Ali M</creator><general>Tech Science Press</general><general>Sociedad Latinoamericana de Microscopía Electrónica.; Centro Regional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (Mendoza, Argentina)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>GPN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120401</creationdate><title>Optimization and comparison of two different 3D culture methods to prepare cell aggregates as a bioink for organ printing</title><author>Imani, Rana ; Hojjati Emami, Shahriar ; Fakhrzadeh, Hossein ; Baheiraei, Nafiseh ; Sharifi, Ali M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-5d459470dd05ba787df68e55c604c22ba2755a84cabc5d7f0c37b12857fde063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>BIOLOGY</topic><topic>Bioprinting - instrumentation</topic><topic>Bioprinting - methods</topic><topic>Cell Aggregation - physiology</topic><topic>Cell culture</topic><topic>Cell Culture Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Cell density</topic><topic>Cell Proliferation</topic><topic>Cell Size</topic><topic>Cell Survival</topic><topic>Cells, Cultured</topic><topic>CHO Cells</topic><topic>Cricetinae</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Tissue engineering</topic><topic>Tissue Engineering - instrumentation</topic><topic>Tissue Engineering - methods</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Imani, Rana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hojjati Emami, Shahriar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fakhrzadeh, Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baheiraei, Nafiseh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharifi, Ali M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><jtitle>Biocell</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Imani, Rana</au><au>Hojjati Emami, Shahriar</au><au>Fakhrzadeh, Hossein</au><au>Baheiraei, Nafiseh</au><au>Sharifi, Ali M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimization and comparison of two different 3D culture methods to prepare cell aggregates as a bioink for organ printing</atitle><jtitle>Biocell</jtitle><addtitle>Biocell</addtitle><date>2012-04-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>45</epage><pages>37-45</pages><issn>0327-9545</issn><issn>1667-5746</issn><abstract>The ultimate goal of tissue engineering is to design and fabricate functional human tissues that are similar to natural cells and are capable of regeneration. Preparation of cell aggregates is one of the important steps in 3D tissue engineering technology, particularly in organ printing. Two simple methods, hanging drop (HD) and conical tube (CT) were utilized to prepare cell aggregates. The size and viability of the aggregates obtained at different initial cell densities and pre-culture duration were compared. The proliferative ability of the cell aggregates and their ability to spread in culture plates were also investigated. In both methods, the optimum average size of the aggregates was less than 500 microm. CT aggregates were smaller than HD aggregates. 5,000 cells per drop HD aggregates showed a marked ability to attach and spread on the culture surface. The proliferative ability reduced when the initial cell density was increased. Comparing these methods, we found that the HD method having better size controlling ability as well as enhanced ability to maintain higher rates of viability, spreading, and proliferation. In conclusion, smaller HD aggregates might be a suitable choice as building blocks for making bioink particles in bioprinting technique.</abstract><cop>Argentina</cop><pub>Tech Science Press</pub><pmid>23173303</pmid><doi>10.32604/biocell.2012.36.037</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0327-9545 |
ispartof | Biocell, 2012-04, Vol.36 (1), p.37-45 |
issn | 0327-9545 1667-5746 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_scielo_journals_S0327_95452012000100003 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Tech Science Press |
subjects | Animals BIOLOGY Bioprinting - instrumentation Bioprinting - methods Cell Aggregation - physiology Cell culture Cell Culture Techniques - methods Cell density Cell Proliferation Cell Size Cell Survival Cells, Cultured CHO Cells Cricetinae Humans Tissue engineering Tissue Engineering - instrumentation Tissue Engineering - methods |
title | Optimization and comparison of two different 3D culture methods to prepare cell aggregates as a bioink for organ printing |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T09%3A29%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sciel&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimization%20and%20comparison%20of%20two%20different%203D%20culture%20methods%20to%20prepare%20cell%20aggregates%20as%20a%20bioink%20for%20organ%20printing&rft.jtitle=Biocell&rft.au=Imani,%20Rana&rft.date=2012-04-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=45&rft.pages=37-45&rft.issn=0327-9545&rft_id=info:doi/10.32604/biocell.2012.36.037&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sciel%3E2397254169%3C/proquest_sciel%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2397254169&rft_id=info:pmid/23173303&rft_scielo_id=S0327_95452012000100003&rfr_iscdi=true |