Optimization and comparison of two different 3D culture methods to prepare cell aggregates as a bioink for organ printing

The ultimate goal of tissue engineering is to design and fabricate functional human tissues that are similar to natural cells and are capable of regeneration. Preparation of cell aggregates is one of the important steps in 3D tissue engineering technology, particularly in organ printing. Two simple...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biocell 2012-04, Vol.36 (1), p.37-45
Hauptverfasser: Imani, Rana, Hojjati Emami, Shahriar, Fakhrzadeh, Hossein, Baheiraei, Nafiseh, Sharifi, Ali M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 45
container_issue 1
container_start_page 37
container_title Biocell
container_volume 36
creator Imani, Rana
Hojjati Emami, Shahriar
Fakhrzadeh, Hossein
Baheiraei, Nafiseh
Sharifi, Ali M
description The ultimate goal of tissue engineering is to design and fabricate functional human tissues that are similar to natural cells and are capable of regeneration. Preparation of cell aggregates is one of the important steps in 3D tissue engineering technology, particularly in organ printing. Two simple methods, hanging drop (HD) and conical tube (CT) were utilized to prepare cell aggregates. The size and viability of the aggregates obtained at different initial cell densities and pre-culture duration were compared. The proliferative ability of the cell aggregates and their ability to spread in culture plates were also investigated. In both methods, the optimum average size of the aggregates was less than 500 microm. CT aggregates were smaller than HD aggregates. 5,000 cells per drop HD aggregates showed a marked ability to attach and spread on the culture surface. The proliferative ability reduced when the initial cell density was increased. Comparing these methods, we found that the HD method having better size controlling ability as well as enhanced ability to maintain higher rates of viability, spreading, and proliferation. In conclusion, smaller HD aggregates might be a suitable choice as building blocks for making bioink particles in bioprinting technique.
doi_str_mv 10.32604/biocell.2012.36.037
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sciel</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scielo_journals_S0327_95452012000100003</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S0327_95452012000100003</scielo_id><sourcerecordid>2397254169</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-5d459470dd05ba787df68e55c604c22ba2755a84cabc5d7f0c37b12857fde063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUctu1TAU9AJES-EPELLEhs0Nx684WaLylCp1QfeW40dwSeyL7QiVr8fhXrpAsmVZmpkzZwahVwQ6Rnvg76aQjFuWjgKhHes7YPIJugRG5WEUXFyg56XcA3DgjDxDF5QRyRiwS_Rwe6xhDb91DSliHS02aT3qHEr7Jo_rr4Rt8N5lFytmH7DZlrplh1dXvydbcE34mF1jOLw7wHqes5t1dQXrdnBzFuIP7FPGKc86NnSINcT5BXrq9VLcy_N7he4-fby7_nK4uf389fr9zcFwCvUgLBcjl2AtiEnLQVrfD04I09Y2lE6aSiH0wI2ejLDSg2FyInQQ0lsHPbtC3Um2mOCWpO7TlmObp77t6ag9nT00ACDtAmuEtyfCMaefmytVraHsq-no0lYUIaPkg6B0h775D_qoTtkoqeCkHxuKn1Amp1Ky86pFsOr8oAiov_Wpc31qd6JYr1p9jfb6LL5Nq7OPpH_dsT_kY5gW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2397254169</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimization and comparison of two different 3D culture methods to prepare cell aggregates as a bioink for organ printing</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Tech Science Press</source><creator>Imani, Rana ; Hojjati Emami, Shahriar ; Fakhrzadeh, Hossein ; Baheiraei, Nafiseh ; Sharifi, Ali M</creator><creatorcontrib>Imani, Rana ; Hojjati Emami, Shahriar ; Fakhrzadeh, Hossein ; Baheiraei, Nafiseh ; Sharifi, Ali M</creatorcontrib><description>The ultimate goal of tissue engineering is to design and fabricate functional human tissues that are similar to natural cells and are capable of regeneration. Preparation of cell aggregates is one of the important steps in 3D tissue engineering technology, particularly in organ printing. Two simple methods, hanging drop (HD) and conical tube (CT) were utilized to prepare cell aggregates. The size and viability of the aggregates obtained at different initial cell densities and pre-culture duration were compared. The proliferative ability of the cell aggregates and their ability to spread in culture plates were also investigated. In both methods, the optimum average size of the aggregates was less than 500 microm. CT aggregates were smaller than HD aggregates. 5,000 cells per drop HD aggregates showed a marked ability to attach and spread on the culture surface. The proliferative ability reduced when the initial cell density was increased. Comparing these methods, we found that the HD method having better size controlling ability as well as enhanced ability to maintain higher rates of viability, spreading, and proliferation. In conclusion, smaller HD aggregates might be a suitable choice as building blocks for making bioink particles in bioprinting technique.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0327-9545</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1667-5746</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.32604/biocell.2012.36.037</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23173303</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Argentina: Tech Science Press</publisher><subject>Animals ; BIOLOGY ; Bioprinting - instrumentation ; Bioprinting - methods ; Cell Aggregation - physiology ; Cell culture ; Cell Culture Techniques - methods ; Cell density ; Cell Proliferation ; Cell Size ; Cell Survival ; Cells, Cultured ; CHO Cells ; Cricetinae ; Humans ; Tissue engineering ; Tissue Engineering - instrumentation ; Tissue Engineering - methods</subject><ispartof>Biocell, 2012-04, Vol.36 (1), p.37-45</ispartof><rights>2012. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-5d459470dd05ba787df68e55c604c22ba2755a84cabc5d7f0c37b12857fde063</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23173303$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Imani, Rana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hojjati Emami, Shahriar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fakhrzadeh, Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baheiraei, Nafiseh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharifi, Ali M</creatorcontrib><title>Optimization and comparison of two different 3D culture methods to prepare cell aggregates as a bioink for organ printing</title><title>Biocell</title><addtitle>Biocell</addtitle><description>The ultimate goal of tissue engineering is to design and fabricate functional human tissues that are similar to natural cells and are capable of regeneration. Preparation of cell aggregates is one of the important steps in 3D tissue engineering technology, particularly in organ printing. Two simple methods, hanging drop (HD) and conical tube (CT) were utilized to prepare cell aggregates. The size and viability of the aggregates obtained at different initial cell densities and pre-culture duration were compared. The proliferative ability of the cell aggregates and their ability to spread in culture plates were also investigated. In both methods, the optimum average size of the aggregates was less than 500 microm. CT aggregates were smaller than HD aggregates. 5,000 cells per drop HD aggregates showed a marked ability to attach and spread on the culture surface. The proliferative ability reduced when the initial cell density was increased. Comparing these methods, we found that the HD method having better size controlling ability as well as enhanced ability to maintain higher rates of viability, spreading, and proliferation. In conclusion, smaller HD aggregates might be a suitable choice as building blocks for making bioink particles in bioprinting technique.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>BIOLOGY</subject><subject>Bioprinting - instrumentation</subject><subject>Bioprinting - methods</subject><subject>Cell Aggregation - physiology</subject><subject>Cell culture</subject><subject>Cell Culture Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Cell density</subject><subject>Cell Proliferation</subject><subject>Cell Size</subject><subject>Cell Survival</subject><subject>Cells, Cultured</subject><subject>CHO Cells</subject><subject>Cricetinae</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Tissue engineering</subject><subject>Tissue Engineering - instrumentation</subject><subject>Tissue Engineering - methods</subject><issn>0327-9545</issn><issn>1667-5746</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUctu1TAU9AJES-EPELLEhs0Nx684WaLylCp1QfeW40dwSeyL7QiVr8fhXrpAsmVZmpkzZwahVwQ6Rnvg76aQjFuWjgKhHes7YPIJugRG5WEUXFyg56XcA3DgjDxDF5QRyRiwS_Rwe6xhDb91DSliHS02aT3qHEr7Jo_rr4Rt8N5lFytmH7DZlrplh1dXvydbcE34mF1jOLw7wHqes5t1dQXrdnBzFuIP7FPGKc86NnSINcT5BXrq9VLcy_N7he4-fby7_nK4uf389fr9zcFwCvUgLBcjl2AtiEnLQVrfD04I09Y2lE6aSiH0wI2ejLDSg2FyInQQ0lsHPbtC3Um2mOCWpO7TlmObp77t6ag9nT00ACDtAmuEtyfCMaefmytVraHsq-no0lYUIaPkg6B0h775D_qoTtkoqeCkHxuKn1Amp1Ky86pFsOr8oAiov_Wpc31qd6JYr1p9jfb6LL5Nq7OPpH_dsT_kY5gW</recordid><startdate>20120401</startdate><enddate>20120401</enddate><creator>Imani, Rana</creator><creator>Hojjati Emami, Shahriar</creator><creator>Fakhrzadeh, Hossein</creator><creator>Baheiraei, Nafiseh</creator><creator>Sharifi, Ali M</creator><general>Tech Science Press</general><general>Sociedad Latinoamericana de Microscopía Electrónica.; Centro Regional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (Mendoza, Argentina)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>GPN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120401</creationdate><title>Optimization and comparison of two different 3D culture methods to prepare cell aggregates as a bioink for organ printing</title><author>Imani, Rana ; Hojjati Emami, Shahriar ; Fakhrzadeh, Hossein ; Baheiraei, Nafiseh ; Sharifi, Ali M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-5d459470dd05ba787df68e55c604c22ba2755a84cabc5d7f0c37b12857fde063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>BIOLOGY</topic><topic>Bioprinting - instrumentation</topic><topic>Bioprinting - methods</topic><topic>Cell Aggregation - physiology</topic><topic>Cell culture</topic><topic>Cell Culture Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Cell density</topic><topic>Cell Proliferation</topic><topic>Cell Size</topic><topic>Cell Survival</topic><topic>Cells, Cultured</topic><topic>CHO Cells</topic><topic>Cricetinae</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Tissue engineering</topic><topic>Tissue Engineering - instrumentation</topic><topic>Tissue Engineering - methods</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Imani, Rana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hojjati Emami, Shahriar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fakhrzadeh, Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baheiraei, Nafiseh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharifi, Ali M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><jtitle>Biocell</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Imani, Rana</au><au>Hojjati Emami, Shahriar</au><au>Fakhrzadeh, Hossein</au><au>Baheiraei, Nafiseh</au><au>Sharifi, Ali M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimization and comparison of two different 3D culture methods to prepare cell aggregates as a bioink for organ printing</atitle><jtitle>Biocell</jtitle><addtitle>Biocell</addtitle><date>2012-04-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>45</epage><pages>37-45</pages><issn>0327-9545</issn><issn>1667-5746</issn><abstract>The ultimate goal of tissue engineering is to design and fabricate functional human tissues that are similar to natural cells and are capable of regeneration. Preparation of cell aggregates is one of the important steps in 3D tissue engineering technology, particularly in organ printing. Two simple methods, hanging drop (HD) and conical tube (CT) were utilized to prepare cell aggregates. The size and viability of the aggregates obtained at different initial cell densities and pre-culture duration were compared. The proliferative ability of the cell aggregates and their ability to spread in culture plates were also investigated. In both methods, the optimum average size of the aggregates was less than 500 microm. CT aggregates were smaller than HD aggregates. 5,000 cells per drop HD aggregates showed a marked ability to attach and spread on the culture surface. The proliferative ability reduced when the initial cell density was increased. Comparing these methods, we found that the HD method having better size controlling ability as well as enhanced ability to maintain higher rates of viability, spreading, and proliferation. In conclusion, smaller HD aggregates might be a suitable choice as building blocks for making bioink particles in bioprinting technique.</abstract><cop>Argentina</cop><pub>Tech Science Press</pub><pmid>23173303</pmid><doi>10.32604/biocell.2012.36.037</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0327-9545
ispartof Biocell, 2012-04, Vol.36 (1), p.37-45
issn 0327-9545
1667-5746
language eng
recordid cdi_scielo_journals_S0327_95452012000100003
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Tech Science Press
subjects Animals
BIOLOGY
Bioprinting - instrumentation
Bioprinting - methods
Cell Aggregation - physiology
Cell culture
Cell Culture Techniques - methods
Cell density
Cell Proliferation
Cell Size
Cell Survival
Cells, Cultured
CHO Cells
Cricetinae
Humans
Tissue engineering
Tissue Engineering - instrumentation
Tissue Engineering - methods
title Optimization and comparison of two different 3D culture methods to prepare cell aggregates as a bioink for organ printing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T09%3A29%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sciel&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimization%20and%20comparison%20of%20two%20different%203D%20culture%20methods%20to%20prepare%20cell%20aggregates%20as%20a%20bioink%20for%20organ%20printing&rft.jtitle=Biocell&rft.au=Imani,%20Rana&rft.date=2012-04-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=45&rft.pages=37-45&rft.issn=0327-9545&rft_id=info:doi/10.32604/biocell.2012.36.037&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sciel%3E2397254169%3C/proquest_sciel%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2397254169&rft_id=info:pmid/23173303&rft_scielo_id=S0327_95452012000100003&rfr_iscdi=true