English First Additional Language: Teachers’ written feedback practices in multi-grade classrooms in rural South African primary schools
Multi-grade teaching is a widely accepted phenomenon in both developing and developed countries. In this article I report on a phenomenological inquiry into written feedback practices of teachers in multi-grade classrooms and how they described and interpreted their feedback practices pertaining to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | South African journal of education 2022-11, Vol.42 (4), p.1-9 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 9 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | South African journal of education |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Taole, Matshidiso Joyce |
description | Multi-grade teaching is a widely accepted phenomenon in both developing and developed countries. In this article I report on a phenomenological inquiry into written feedback practices of teachers in multi-grade classrooms and how they described and interpreted their feedback practices pertaining to learners’ writing activities in English First Additional Language. Written feedback is widely believed to be central to learners’ learning and achievement. Feedback is assumed to change learners’ thinking or behaviour towards their work and is regarded as a tool to focus their attention on improving their learning. Despite the benefits of written feedback, however, there is a widespread belief that many learners are disengaged from the feedback they receive. The population in this study comprised 4 English First Additional Language teachers from 4 multi-grade primary schools. Content analysis was used to analyse the data collected from the participants through semi-structured interviews. The findings indicate that participants differed in their understanding of what was involved in feedback, and that there was a shared view that feedback was a product and not viewed as a process that could be used towards developing learners’ learning. It was also shown that feedback practices used by the teachers of multi-grade classes included providing correct answers and providing delayed feedback to learners. This study adds to the ongoing debates on multi-grade teaching and attempts to shed some light on the nature and the type of feedback that could motivate and enhance learners’ learning in multi-grade classrooms. |
doi_str_mv | 10.15700/saje.v42n4a2145 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sciel</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scielo_journals_S0256_01002022000400003</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1373862</ericid><scielo_id>S0256_01002022000400003</scielo_id><sourcerecordid>2767463429</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-ad35c308d5cc732728c41e6b6a213bf500786256b5f8916a31fde3c903566cfc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFUbtuGzEQJAIbiPzo0wQgkPqU5VtyJxiyk0BACtv1gdrjSZRPR4XkOUjn2n_g38uXhLKMqCC2mJ3hzgwhnxiMmTIAX5PduPGT5L20nEn1gYw4GF0JKcQJGQFXugIG8JGcpbQB4IZJGJGXeb_qfFrTGx9TprOm8dmH3nZ0YfvVYFfuit47i2sX09_nV_o7-pxdT1vnmqXFR7qLFrNHl6jv6Xbosq9W0TaOYmdTiiFs35A4xKJ5F4a8prM2erR9ofqtjX9ownUIXbogp63tkrt8n-fk4WZ-f_2tWvy8_X49W1TIlcmVbYRCAZNGIRrBDZ-gZE4vdbEtlq0CMBNd3C5VO5kybQVrGydwCkJpjS2KczI-6Cb0rgv1JgyxGE713T6keh8SB84BQJYHohA-Hwiu3F2_X13PfzBhRPmq4F8O-C6GX4NL-SjJjTZSC8mnZQsOWxhDCca1_5UY1G8V1vsK62OF4h-g1o95</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2767463429</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>English First Additional Language: Teachers’ written feedback practices in multi-grade classrooms in rural South African primary schools</title><source>African Journals Online (Open Access)</source><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><source>Education Source</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Taole, Matshidiso Joyce</creator><creatorcontrib>Taole, Matshidiso Joyce</creatorcontrib><description>Multi-grade teaching is a widely accepted phenomenon in both developing and developed countries. In this article I report on a phenomenological inquiry into written feedback practices of teachers in multi-grade classrooms and how they described and interpreted their feedback practices pertaining to learners’ writing activities in English First Additional Language. Written feedback is widely believed to be central to learners’ learning and achievement. Feedback is assumed to change learners’ thinking or behaviour towards their work and is regarded as a tool to focus their attention on improving their learning. Despite the benefits of written feedback, however, there is a widespread belief that many learners are disengaged from the feedback they receive. The population in this study comprised 4 English First Additional Language teachers from 4 multi-grade primary schools. Content analysis was used to analyse the data collected from the participants through semi-structured interviews. The findings indicate that participants differed in their understanding of what was involved in feedback, and that there was a shared view that feedback was a product and not viewed as a process that could be used towards developing learners’ learning. It was also shown that feedback practices used by the teachers of multi-grade classes included providing correct answers and providing delayed feedback to learners. This study adds to the ongoing debates on multi-grade teaching and attempts to shed some light on the nature and the type of feedback that could motivate and enhance learners’ learning in multi-grade classrooms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0256-0100</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2076-3433</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2076-3433</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15700/saje.v42n4a2145</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bloemfontein: Education Association of South Africa</publisher><subject>Behavior change ; Classrooms ; Content analysis ; Delayed ; Developed countries ; Developing Nations ; Education & Educational Research ; Education, Scientific Disciplines ; Elementary education ; Elementary School Teachers ; Elementary schools ; English (Second Language) ; English language ; Feedback ; Feedback (Response) ; Foreign Countries ; Language Teachers ; Learning ; Learning Processes ; Motivation ; Multigraded Classes ; Phenomenological research ; Phenomenology ; Rural Schools ; Second Language Instruction ; Second Language Learning ; Teacher Attitudes ; Teachers ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods ; Writing instruction ; Written Language</subject><ispartof>South African journal of education, 2022-11, Vol.42 (4), p.1-9</ispartof><rights>Copyright Education Association of South Africa Nov 2022</rights><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-ad35c308d5cc732728c41e6b6a213bf500786256b5f8916a31fde3c903566cfc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1398-7946</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,687,776,780,860,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1373862$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Taole, Matshidiso Joyce</creatorcontrib><title>English First Additional Language: Teachers’ written feedback practices in multi-grade classrooms in rural South African primary schools</title><title>South African journal of education</title><addtitle>S. Afr. j. educ</addtitle><description>Multi-grade teaching is a widely accepted phenomenon in both developing and developed countries. In this article I report on a phenomenological inquiry into written feedback practices of teachers in multi-grade classrooms and how they described and interpreted their feedback practices pertaining to learners’ writing activities in English First Additional Language. Written feedback is widely believed to be central to learners’ learning and achievement. Feedback is assumed to change learners’ thinking or behaviour towards their work and is regarded as a tool to focus their attention on improving their learning. Despite the benefits of written feedback, however, there is a widespread belief that many learners are disengaged from the feedback they receive. The population in this study comprised 4 English First Additional Language teachers from 4 multi-grade primary schools. Content analysis was used to analyse the data collected from the participants through semi-structured interviews. The findings indicate that participants differed in their understanding of what was involved in feedback, and that there was a shared view that feedback was a product and not viewed as a process that could be used towards developing learners’ learning. It was also shown that feedback practices used by the teachers of multi-grade classes included providing correct answers and providing delayed feedback to learners. This study adds to the ongoing debates on multi-grade teaching and attempts to shed some light on the nature and the type of feedback that could motivate and enhance learners’ learning in multi-grade classrooms.</description><subject>Behavior change</subject><subject>Classrooms</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Delayed</subject><subject>Developed countries</subject><subject>Developing Nations</subject><subject>Education & Educational Research</subject><subject>Education, Scientific Disciplines</subject><subject>Elementary education</subject><subject>Elementary School Teachers</subject><subject>Elementary schools</subject><subject>English (Second Language)</subject><subject>English language</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Language Teachers</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Multigraded Classes</subject><subject>Phenomenological research</subject><subject>Phenomenology</subject><subject>Rural Schools</subject><subject>Second Language Instruction</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Writing instruction</subject><subject>Written Language</subject><issn>0256-0100</issn><issn>2076-3433</issn><issn>2076-3433</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNpFUbtuGzEQJAIbiPzo0wQgkPqU5VtyJxiyk0BACtv1gdrjSZRPR4XkOUjn2n_g38uXhLKMqCC2mJ3hzgwhnxiMmTIAX5PduPGT5L20nEn1gYw4GF0JKcQJGQFXugIG8JGcpbQB4IZJGJGXeb_qfFrTGx9TprOm8dmH3nZ0YfvVYFfuit47i2sX09_nV_o7-pxdT1vnmqXFR7qLFrNHl6jv6Xbosq9W0TaOYmdTiiFs35A4xKJ5F4a8prM2erR9ofqtjX9ownUIXbogp63tkrt8n-fk4WZ-f_2tWvy8_X49W1TIlcmVbYRCAZNGIRrBDZ-gZE4vdbEtlq0CMBNd3C5VO5kybQVrGydwCkJpjS2KczI-6Cb0rgv1JgyxGE713T6keh8SB84BQJYHohA-Hwiu3F2_X13PfzBhRPmq4F8O-C6GX4NL-SjJjTZSC8mnZQsOWxhDCca1_5UY1G8V1vsK62OF4h-g1o95</recordid><startdate>20221101</startdate><enddate>20221101</enddate><creator>Taole, Matshidiso Joyce</creator><general>Education Association of South Africa</general><general>Education Association of South Africa (EASA)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope><scope>GPN</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1398-7946</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221101</creationdate><title>English First Additional Language: Teachers’ written feedback practices in multi-grade classrooms in rural South African primary schools</title><author>Taole, Matshidiso Joyce</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-ad35c308d5cc732728c41e6b6a213bf500786256b5f8916a31fde3c903566cfc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Behavior change</topic><topic>Classrooms</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Delayed</topic><topic>Developed countries</topic><topic>Developing Nations</topic><topic>Education & Educational Research</topic><topic>Education, Scientific Disciplines</topic><topic>Elementary education</topic><topic>Elementary School Teachers</topic><topic>Elementary schools</topic><topic>English (Second Language)</topic><topic>English language</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Language Teachers</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Multigraded Classes</topic><topic>Phenomenological research</topic><topic>Phenomenology</topic><topic>Rural Schools</topic><topic>Second Language Instruction</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Writing instruction</topic><topic>Written Language</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Taole, Matshidiso Joyce</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><jtitle>South African journal of education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Taole, Matshidiso Joyce</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1373862</ericid><atitle>English First Additional Language: Teachers’ written feedback practices in multi-grade classrooms in rural South African primary schools</atitle><jtitle>South African journal of education</jtitle><addtitle>S. Afr. j. educ</addtitle><date>2022-11-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>1-9</pages><issn>0256-0100</issn><issn>2076-3433</issn><eissn>2076-3433</eissn><abstract>Multi-grade teaching is a widely accepted phenomenon in both developing and developed countries. In this article I report on a phenomenological inquiry into written feedback practices of teachers in multi-grade classrooms and how they described and interpreted their feedback practices pertaining to learners’ writing activities in English First Additional Language. Written feedback is widely believed to be central to learners’ learning and achievement. Feedback is assumed to change learners’ thinking or behaviour towards their work and is regarded as a tool to focus their attention on improving their learning. Despite the benefits of written feedback, however, there is a widespread belief that many learners are disengaged from the feedback they receive. The population in this study comprised 4 English First Additional Language teachers from 4 multi-grade primary schools. Content analysis was used to analyse the data collected from the participants through semi-structured interviews. The findings indicate that participants differed in their understanding of what was involved in feedback, and that there was a shared view that feedback was a product and not viewed as a process that could be used towards developing learners’ learning. It was also shown that feedback practices used by the teachers of multi-grade classes included providing correct answers and providing delayed feedback to learners. This study adds to the ongoing debates on multi-grade teaching and attempts to shed some light on the nature and the type of feedback that could motivate and enhance learners’ learning in multi-grade classrooms.</abstract><cop>Bloemfontein</cop><pub>Education Association of South Africa</pub><doi>10.15700/saje.v42n4a2145</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1398-7946</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0256-0100 |
ispartof | South African journal of education, 2022-11, Vol.42 (4), p.1-9 |
issn | 0256-0100 2076-3433 2076-3433 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_scielo_journals_S0256_01002022000400003 |
source | African Journals Online (Open Access); ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery); Education Source; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Behavior change Classrooms Content analysis Delayed Developed countries Developing Nations Education & Educational Research Education, Scientific Disciplines Elementary education Elementary School Teachers Elementary schools English (Second Language) English language Feedback Feedback (Response) Foreign Countries Language Teachers Learning Learning Processes Motivation Multigraded Classes Phenomenological research Phenomenology Rural Schools Second Language Instruction Second Language Learning Teacher Attitudes Teachers Teaching Teaching Methods Writing instruction Written Language |
title | English First Additional Language: Teachers’ written feedback practices in multi-grade classrooms in rural South African primary schools |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T02%3A22%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sciel&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=English%20First%20Additional%20Language:%20Teachers%E2%80%99%20written%20feedback%20practices%20in%20multi-grade%20classrooms%20in%20rural%20South%20African%20primary%20schools&rft.jtitle=South%20African%20journal%20of%20education&rft.au=Taole,%20Matshidiso%20Joyce&rft.date=2022-11-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=1-9&rft.issn=0256-0100&rft.eissn=2076-3433&rft_id=info:doi/10.15700/saje.v42n4a2145&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sciel%3E2767463429%3C/proquest_sciel%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2767463429&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1373862&rft_scielo_id=S0256_01002022000400003&rfr_iscdi=true |