English First Additional Language: Teachers’ written feedback practices in multi-grade classrooms in rural South African primary schools

Multi-grade teaching is a widely accepted phenomenon in both developing and developed countries. In this article I report on a phenomenological inquiry into written feedback practices of teachers in multi-grade classrooms and how they described and interpreted their feedback practices pertaining to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:South African journal of education 2022-11, Vol.42 (4), p.1-9
1. Verfasser: Taole, Matshidiso Joyce
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 9
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1
container_title South African journal of education
container_volume 42
creator Taole, Matshidiso Joyce
description Multi-grade teaching is a widely accepted phenomenon in both developing and developed countries. In this article I report on a phenomenological inquiry into written feedback practices of teachers in multi-grade classrooms and how they described and interpreted their feedback practices pertaining to learners’ writing activities in English First Additional Language. Written feedback is widely believed to be central to learners’ learning and achievement. Feedback is assumed to change learners’ thinking or behaviour towards their work and is regarded as a tool to focus their attention on improving their learning. Despite the benefits of written feedback, however, there is a widespread belief that many learners are disengaged from the feedback they receive. The population in this study comprised 4 English First Additional Language teachers from 4 multi-grade primary schools. Content analysis was used to analyse the data collected from the participants through semi-structured interviews. The findings indicate that participants differed in their understanding of what was involved in feedback, and that there was a shared view that feedback was a product and not viewed as a process that could be used towards developing learners’ learning. It was also shown that feedback practices used by the teachers of multi-grade classes included providing correct answers and providing delayed feedback to learners. This study adds to the ongoing debates on multi-grade teaching and attempts to shed some light on the nature and the type of feedback that could motivate and enhance learners’ learning in multi-grade classrooms.
doi_str_mv 10.15700/saje.v42n4a2145
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sciel</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scielo_journals_S0256_01002022000400003</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1373862</ericid><scielo_id>S0256_01002022000400003</scielo_id><sourcerecordid>2767463429</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-ad35c308d5cc732728c41e6b6a213bf500786256b5f8916a31fde3c903566cfc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFUbtuGzEQJAIbiPzo0wQgkPqU5VtyJxiyk0BACtv1gdrjSZRPR4XkOUjn2n_g38uXhLKMqCC2mJ3hzgwhnxiMmTIAX5PduPGT5L20nEn1gYw4GF0JKcQJGQFXugIG8JGcpbQB4IZJGJGXeb_qfFrTGx9TprOm8dmH3nZ0YfvVYFfuit47i2sX09_nV_o7-pxdT1vnmqXFR7qLFrNHl6jv6Xbosq9W0TaOYmdTiiFs35A4xKJ5F4a8prM2erR9ofqtjX9ownUIXbogp63tkrt8n-fk4WZ-f_2tWvy8_X49W1TIlcmVbYRCAZNGIRrBDZ-gZE4vdbEtlq0CMBNd3C5VO5kybQVrGydwCkJpjS2KczI-6Cb0rgv1JgyxGE713T6keh8SB84BQJYHohA-Hwiu3F2_X13PfzBhRPmq4F8O-C6GX4NL-SjJjTZSC8mnZQsOWxhDCca1_5UY1G8V1vsK62OF4h-g1o95</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2767463429</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>English First Additional Language: Teachers’ written feedback practices in multi-grade classrooms in rural South African primary schools</title><source>African Journals Online (Open Access)</source><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><source>Education Source</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Taole, Matshidiso Joyce</creator><creatorcontrib>Taole, Matshidiso Joyce</creatorcontrib><description>Multi-grade teaching is a widely accepted phenomenon in both developing and developed countries. In this article I report on a phenomenological inquiry into written feedback practices of teachers in multi-grade classrooms and how they described and interpreted their feedback practices pertaining to learners’ writing activities in English First Additional Language. Written feedback is widely believed to be central to learners’ learning and achievement. Feedback is assumed to change learners’ thinking or behaviour towards their work and is regarded as a tool to focus their attention on improving their learning. Despite the benefits of written feedback, however, there is a widespread belief that many learners are disengaged from the feedback they receive. The population in this study comprised 4 English First Additional Language teachers from 4 multi-grade primary schools. Content analysis was used to analyse the data collected from the participants through semi-structured interviews. The findings indicate that participants differed in their understanding of what was involved in feedback, and that there was a shared view that feedback was a product and not viewed as a process that could be used towards developing learners’ learning. It was also shown that feedback practices used by the teachers of multi-grade classes included providing correct answers and providing delayed feedback to learners. This study adds to the ongoing debates on multi-grade teaching and attempts to shed some light on the nature and the type of feedback that could motivate and enhance learners’ learning in multi-grade classrooms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0256-0100</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2076-3433</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2076-3433</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15700/saje.v42n4a2145</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bloemfontein: Education Association of South Africa</publisher><subject>Behavior change ; Classrooms ; Content analysis ; Delayed ; Developed countries ; Developing Nations ; Education &amp; Educational Research ; Education, Scientific Disciplines ; Elementary education ; Elementary School Teachers ; Elementary schools ; English (Second Language) ; English language ; Feedback ; Feedback (Response) ; Foreign Countries ; Language Teachers ; Learning ; Learning Processes ; Motivation ; Multigraded Classes ; Phenomenological research ; Phenomenology ; Rural Schools ; Second Language Instruction ; Second Language Learning ; Teacher Attitudes ; Teachers ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods ; Writing instruction ; Written Language</subject><ispartof>South African journal of education, 2022-11, Vol.42 (4), p.1-9</ispartof><rights>Copyright Education Association of South Africa Nov 2022</rights><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-ad35c308d5cc732728c41e6b6a213bf500786256b5f8916a31fde3c903566cfc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1398-7946</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,687,776,780,860,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1373862$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Taole, Matshidiso Joyce</creatorcontrib><title>English First Additional Language: Teachers’ written feedback practices in multi-grade classrooms in rural South African primary schools</title><title>South African journal of education</title><addtitle>S. Afr. j. educ</addtitle><description>Multi-grade teaching is a widely accepted phenomenon in both developing and developed countries. In this article I report on a phenomenological inquiry into written feedback practices of teachers in multi-grade classrooms and how they described and interpreted their feedback practices pertaining to learners’ writing activities in English First Additional Language. Written feedback is widely believed to be central to learners’ learning and achievement. Feedback is assumed to change learners’ thinking or behaviour towards their work and is regarded as a tool to focus their attention on improving their learning. Despite the benefits of written feedback, however, there is a widespread belief that many learners are disengaged from the feedback they receive. The population in this study comprised 4 English First Additional Language teachers from 4 multi-grade primary schools. Content analysis was used to analyse the data collected from the participants through semi-structured interviews. The findings indicate that participants differed in their understanding of what was involved in feedback, and that there was a shared view that feedback was a product and not viewed as a process that could be used towards developing learners’ learning. It was also shown that feedback practices used by the teachers of multi-grade classes included providing correct answers and providing delayed feedback to learners. This study adds to the ongoing debates on multi-grade teaching and attempts to shed some light on the nature and the type of feedback that could motivate and enhance learners’ learning in multi-grade classrooms.</description><subject>Behavior change</subject><subject>Classrooms</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Delayed</subject><subject>Developed countries</subject><subject>Developing Nations</subject><subject>Education &amp; Educational Research</subject><subject>Education, Scientific Disciplines</subject><subject>Elementary education</subject><subject>Elementary School Teachers</subject><subject>Elementary schools</subject><subject>English (Second Language)</subject><subject>English language</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Language Teachers</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Multigraded Classes</subject><subject>Phenomenological research</subject><subject>Phenomenology</subject><subject>Rural Schools</subject><subject>Second Language Instruction</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Writing instruction</subject><subject>Written Language</subject><issn>0256-0100</issn><issn>2076-3433</issn><issn>2076-3433</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNpFUbtuGzEQJAIbiPzo0wQgkPqU5VtyJxiyk0BACtv1gdrjSZRPR4XkOUjn2n_g38uXhLKMqCC2mJ3hzgwhnxiMmTIAX5PduPGT5L20nEn1gYw4GF0JKcQJGQFXugIG8JGcpbQB4IZJGJGXeb_qfFrTGx9TprOm8dmH3nZ0YfvVYFfuit47i2sX09_nV_o7-pxdT1vnmqXFR7qLFrNHl6jv6Xbosq9W0TaOYmdTiiFs35A4xKJ5F4a8prM2erR9ofqtjX9ownUIXbogp63tkrt8n-fk4WZ-f_2tWvy8_X49W1TIlcmVbYRCAZNGIRrBDZ-gZE4vdbEtlq0CMBNd3C5VO5kybQVrGydwCkJpjS2KczI-6Cb0rgv1JgyxGE713T6keh8SB84BQJYHohA-Hwiu3F2_X13PfzBhRPmq4F8O-C6GX4NL-SjJjTZSC8mnZQsOWxhDCca1_5UY1G8V1vsK62OF4h-g1o95</recordid><startdate>20221101</startdate><enddate>20221101</enddate><creator>Taole, Matshidiso Joyce</creator><general>Education Association of South Africa</general><general>Education Association of South Africa (EASA)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope><scope>GPN</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1398-7946</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221101</creationdate><title>English First Additional Language: Teachers’ written feedback practices in multi-grade classrooms in rural South African primary schools</title><author>Taole, Matshidiso Joyce</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-ad35c308d5cc732728c41e6b6a213bf500786256b5f8916a31fde3c903566cfc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Behavior change</topic><topic>Classrooms</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Delayed</topic><topic>Developed countries</topic><topic>Developing Nations</topic><topic>Education &amp; Educational Research</topic><topic>Education, Scientific Disciplines</topic><topic>Elementary education</topic><topic>Elementary School Teachers</topic><topic>Elementary schools</topic><topic>English (Second Language)</topic><topic>English language</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Language Teachers</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Multigraded Classes</topic><topic>Phenomenological research</topic><topic>Phenomenology</topic><topic>Rural Schools</topic><topic>Second Language Instruction</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Writing instruction</topic><topic>Written Language</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Taole, Matshidiso Joyce</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><jtitle>South African journal of education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Taole, Matshidiso Joyce</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1373862</ericid><atitle>English First Additional Language: Teachers’ written feedback practices in multi-grade classrooms in rural South African primary schools</atitle><jtitle>South African journal of education</jtitle><addtitle>S. Afr. j. educ</addtitle><date>2022-11-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>1-9</pages><issn>0256-0100</issn><issn>2076-3433</issn><eissn>2076-3433</eissn><abstract>Multi-grade teaching is a widely accepted phenomenon in both developing and developed countries. In this article I report on a phenomenological inquiry into written feedback practices of teachers in multi-grade classrooms and how they described and interpreted their feedback practices pertaining to learners’ writing activities in English First Additional Language. Written feedback is widely believed to be central to learners’ learning and achievement. Feedback is assumed to change learners’ thinking or behaviour towards their work and is regarded as a tool to focus their attention on improving their learning. Despite the benefits of written feedback, however, there is a widespread belief that many learners are disengaged from the feedback they receive. The population in this study comprised 4 English First Additional Language teachers from 4 multi-grade primary schools. Content analysis was used to analyse the data collected from the participants through semi-structured interviews. The findings indicate that participants differed in their understanding of what was involved in feedback, and that there was a shared view that feedback was a product and not viewed as a process that could be used towards developing learners’ learning. It was also shown that feedback practices used by the teachers of multi-grade classes included providing correct answers and providing delayed feedback to learners. This study adds to the ongoing debates on multi-grade teaching and attempts to shed some light on the nature and the type of feedback that could motivate and enhance learners’ learning in multi-grade classrooms.</abstract><cop>Bloemfontein</cop><pub>Education Association of South Africa</pub><doi>10.15700/saje.v42n4a2145</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1398-7946</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0256-0100
ispartof South African journal of education, 2022-11, Vol.42 (4), p.1-9
issn 0256-0100
2076-3433
2076-3433
language eng
recordid cdi_scielo_journals_S0256_01002022000400003
source African Journals Online (Open Access); ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery); Education Source; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Behavior change
Classrooms
Content analysis
Delayed
Developed countries
Developing Nations
Education & Educational Research
Education, Scientific Disciplines
Elementary education
Elementary School Teachers
Elementary schools
English (Second Language)
English language
Feedback
Feedback (Response)
Foreign Countries
Language Teachers
Learning
Learning Processes
Motivation
Multigraded Classes
Phenomenological research
Phenomenology
Rural Schools
Second Language Instruction
Second Language Learning
Teacher Attitudes
Teachers
Teaching
Teaching Methods
Writing instruction
Written Language
title English First Additional Language: Teachers’ written feedback practices in multi-grade classrooms in rural South African primary schools
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T02%3A22%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sciel&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=English%20First%20Additional%20Language:%20Teachers%E2%80%99%20written%20feedback%20practices%20in%20multi-grade%20classrooms%20in%20rural%20South%20African%20primary%20schools&rft.jtitle=South%20African%20journal%20of%20education&rft.au=Taole,%20Matshidiso%20Joyce&rft.date=2022-11-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=1-9&rft.issn=0256-0100&rft.eissn=2076-3433&rft_id=info:doi/10.15700/saje.v42n4a2145&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sciel%3E2767463429%3C/proquest_sciel%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2767463429&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1373862&rft_scielo_id=S0256_01002022000400003&rfr_iscdi=true