Validation study of a multi-method integrity test in a Peruvian sample
The present study summarizes the validity of a multi-method integrity test developed to measure integrity and counterproductive work behaviors (CWB) in personnel selection of a Peruvian sample. This instrument has been thoroughly studied in other cultural contexts, establishing its validity in predi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Revista de psicología (Lima, Perú) Perú), 2017, Vol.35 (1), p.347-370 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng ; por |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 370 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 347 |
| container_title | Revista de psicología (Lima, Perú) |
| container_volume | 35 |
| creator | Blumen, Sheyla Bayona, Hugo Givoli, Simon Pecker, Gabriela Fine, Saul |
| description | The present study summarizes the validity of a multi-method integrity test developed to measure integrity and counterproductive work behaviors (CWB) in personnel selection of a Peruvian sample. This instrument has been thoroughly studied in other cultural contexts, establishing its validity in predicting counter-productive behaviors. In order to study external validity, two criteria were used: (a) The Counterproductive Work Behavior Checklist (CWB-C) and (b) a supervisor evaluation questionnaire. The criterion validity of the Peruvian Spanish version was studied with a sample of 194 employed students, 86 male (44.3%) and 108 (55.7%) female. Participants were recruited from a large private Peruvian university. The instrument’s overall score correlated with self-reported CWB (r= -.62, p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.18800/psico.201701.012 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>scielo</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scielo_journals_S0254_92472017000100012</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S0254_92472017000100012</scielo_id><sourcerecordid>S0254_92472017000100012</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-s109t-2100c1214fb28e9eb813c697426bc4cfe8e6fbb571cf5cce320e6c25a1792b863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj91KxDAQhXOh4Lr6AN7lBVpn0jZJL2VxVVhQ8Oe2pOlEs7TN0qTCvr1d9eJwOHDODB9jNwg5ag1we4jehlwAKsAcUJyxFYiqzGpRqgt2GeMeoNJSlSu2_TC970zyYeQxzd2RB8cNH-Y--Wyg9BU67sdEn5NPR54opiUuhRea5m9vlpEZDj1dsXNn-kjX_75m79v7t81jtnt-eNrc7bKIUKdMIIBFgaVrhaaaWo2FlbUqhWxtaR1pkq5tK4XWVdZSIYCkFZVBVYtWy2LN8r-70XrqQ7MP8zQuD5vXE2BzAvzFBsCTRPEDgp5Opw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation study of a multi-method integrity test in a Peruvian sample</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Blumen, Sheyla ; Bayona, Hugo ; Givoli, Simon ; Pecker, Gabriela ; Fine, Saul</creator><creatorcontrib>Blumen, Sheyla ; Bayona, Hugo ; Givoli, Simon ; Pecker, Gabriela ; Fine, Saul</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[The present study summarizes the validity of a multi-method integrity test developed to measure integrity and counterproductive work behaviors (CWB) in personnel selection of a Peruvian sample. This instrument has been thoroughly studied in other cultural contexts, establishing its validity in predicting counter-productive behaviors. In order to study external validity, two criteria were used: (a) The Counterproductive Work Behavior Checklist (CWB-C) and (b) a supervisor evaluation questionnaire. The criterion validity of the Peruvian Spanish version was studied with a sample of 194 employed students, 86 male (44.3%) and 108 (55.7%) female. Participants were recruited from a large private Peruvian university. The instrument’s overall score correlated with self-reported CWB (r= -.62, p <.01). Regarding the other criterion, only the Ethical Dilemmas sub-scale showed a significant correlation with supervisor-rated CWB (r=.18, p< .05). Female participants reported higher scores than male participants on the Attitudes (U (193) = 3842.5, p<.05), Ethical Dilemmas (U (193) = 3619.5, p<.05), and Past Behaviors (U (193) = 3463.5, p<.01) dimensions of the integrity test ( r=.15-.22 ), as well as on the overall score (U (193) = 3395.5, p<.01). Results support the validity of the multi-method integrity measure to predict counterproductive work behaviors, without adverse gender impact.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0254-9247</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.18800/psico.201701.012</identifier><language>eng ; por</language><publisher>Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú</publisher><subject>BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES ; PSYCHOLOGY ; PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED ; PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL ; PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL ; PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL ; PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL ; PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL ; PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL ; PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY ; PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS ; PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL ; SOCIAL ISSUES ; SOCIAL WORK</subject><ispartof>Revista de psicología (Lima, Perú), 2017, Vol.35 (1), p.347-370</ispartof><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,860,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blumen, Sheyla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayona, Hugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Givoli, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pecker, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fine, Saul</creatorcontrib><title>Validation study of a multi-method integrity test in a Peruvian sample</title><title>Revista de psicología (Lima, Perú)</title><addtitle>Revista de Psicología</addtitle><description><![CDATA[The present study summarizes the validity of a multi-method integrity test developed to measure integrity and counterproductive work behaviors (CWB) in personnel selection of a Peruvian sample. This instrument has been thoroughly studied in other cultural contexts, establishing its validity in predicting counter-productive behaviors. In order to study external validity, two criteria were used: (a) The Counterproductive Work Behavior Checklist (CWB-C) and (b) a supervisor evaluation questionnaire. The criterion validity of the Peruvian Spanish version was studied with a sample of 194 employed students, 86 male (44.3%) and 108 (55.7%) female. Participants were recruited from a large private Peruvian university. The instrument’s overall score correlated with self-reported CWB (r= -.62, p <.01). Regarding the other criterion, only the Ethical Dilemmas sub-scale showed a significant correlation with supervisor-rated CWB (r=.18, p< .05). Female participants reported higher scores than male participants on the Attitudes (U (193) = 3842.5, p<.05), Ethical Dilemmas (U (193) = 3619.5, p<.05), and Past Behaviors (U (193) = 3463.5, p<.01) dimensions of the integrity test ( r=.15-.22 ), as well as on the overall score (U (193) = 3395.5, p<.01). Results support the validity of the multi-method integrity measure to predict counterproductive work behaviors, without adverse gender impact.]]></description><subject>BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES</subject><subject>PSYCHOLOGY</subject><subject>PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED</subject><subject>PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL</subject><subject>PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL</subject><subject>PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL</subject><subject>PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL</subject><subject>PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL</subject><subject>PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL</subject><subject>PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY</subject><subject>PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS</subject><subject>PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL</subject><subject>SOCIAL ISSUES</subject><subject>SOCIAL WORK</subject><issn>0254-9247</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotj91KxDAQhXOh4Lr6AN7lBVpn0jZJL2VxVVhQ8Oe2pOlEs7TN0qTCvr1d9eJwOHDODB9jNwg5ag1we4jehlwAKsAcUJyxFYiqzGpRqgt2GeMeoNJSlSu2_TC970zyYeQxzd2RB8cNH-Y--Wyg9BU67sdEn5NPR54opiUuhRea5m9vlpEZDj1dsXNn-kjX_75m79v7t81jtnt-eNrc7bKIUKdMIIBFgaVrhaaaWo2FlbUqhWxtaR1pkq5tK4XWVdZSIYCkFZVBVYtWy2LN8r-70XrqQ7MP8zQuD5vXE2BzAvzFBsCTRPEDgp5Opw</recordid><startdate>201701</startdate><enddate>201701</enddate><creator>Blumen, Sheyla</creator><creator>Bayona, Hugo</creator><creator>Givoli, Simon</creator><creator>Pecker, Gabriela</creator><creator>Fine, Saul</creator><general>Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú</general><scope>GPN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201701</creationdate><title>Validation study of a multi-method integrity test in a Peruvian sample</title><author>Blumen, Sheyla ; Bayona, Hugo ; Givoli, Simon ; Pecker, Gabriela ; Fine, Saul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-s109t-2100c1214fb28e9eb813c697426bc4cfe8e6fbb571cf5cce320e6c25a1792b863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; por</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES</topic><topic>PSYCHOLOGY</topic><topic>PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED</topic><topic>PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL</topic><topic>PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL</topic><topic>PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL</topic><topic>PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL</topic><topic>PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL</topic><topic>PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL</topic><topic>PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY</topic><topic>PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS</topic><topic>PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL</topic><topic>SOCIAL ISSUES</topic><topic>SOCIAL WORK</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blumen, Sheyla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayona, Hugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Givoli, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pecker, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fine, Saul</creatorcontrib><collection>SciELO</collection><jtitle>Revista de psicología (Lima, Perú)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blumen, Sheyla</au><au>Bayona, Hugo</au><au>Givoli, Simon</au><au>Pecker, Gabriela</au><au>Fine, Saul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation study of a multi-method integrity test in a Peruvian sample</atitle><jtitle>Revista de psicología (Lima, Perú)</jtitle><addtitle>Revista de Psicología</addtitle><date>2017-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>347</spage><epage>370</epage><pages>347-370</pages><issn>0254-9247</issn><abstract><![CDATA[The present study summarizes the validity of a multi-method integrity test developed to measure integrity and counterproductive work behaviors (CWB) in personnel selection of a Peruvian sample. This instrument has been thoroughly studied in other cultural contexts, establishing its validity in predicting counter-productive behaviors. In order to study external validity, two criteria were used: (a) The Counterproductive Work Behavior Checklist (CWB-C) and (b) a supervisor evaluation questionnaire. The criterion validity of the Peruvian Spanish version was studied with a sample of 194 employed students, 86 male (44.3%) and 108 (55.7%) female. Participants were recruited from a large private Peruvian university. The instrument’s overall score correlated with self-reported CWB (r= -.62, p <.01). Regarding the other criterion, only the Ethical Dilemmas sub-scale showed a significant correlation with supervisor-rated CWB (r=.18, p< .05). Female participants reported higher scores than male participants on the Attitudes (U (193) = 3842.5, p<.05), Ethical Dilemmas (U (193) = 3619.5, p<.05), and Past Behaviors (U (193) = 3463.5, p<.01) dimensions of the integrity test ( r=.15-.22 ), as well as on the overall score (U (193) = 3395.5, p<.01). Results support the validity of the multi-method integrity measure to predict counterproductive work behaviors, without adverse gender impact.]]></abstract><pub>Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú</pub><doi>10.18800/psico.201701.012</doi><tpages>24</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0254-9247 |
| ispartof | Revista de psicología (Lima, Perú), 2017, Vol.35 (1), p.347-370 |
| issn | 0254-9247 |
| language | eng ; por |
| recordid | cdi_scielo_journals_S0254_92472017000100012 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| subjects | BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES PSYCHOLOGY PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL SOCIAL ISSUES SOCIAL WORK |
| title | Validation study of a multi-method integrity test in a Peruvian sample |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T22%3A28%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-scielo&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20study%20of%20a%20multi-method%20integrity%20test%20in%20a%20Peruvian%20sample&rft.jtitle=Revista%20de%20psicolog%C3%ADa%20(Lima,%20Per%C3%BA)&rft.au=Blumen,%20Sheyla&rft.date=2017-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=347&rft.epage=370&rft.pages=347-370&rft.issn=0254-9247&rft_id=info:doi/10.18800/psico.201701.012&rft_dat=%3Cscielo%3ES0254_92472017000100012%3C/scielo%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_scielo_id=S0254_92472017000100012&rfr_iscdi=true |