Polyculture of crayfish (Procambarus acanthophorus) and Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) as a strategy for sustainable water use
Background The crayfish Procambarus acanthophorus has a high potential for cultivation; however, it is necessary to evaluate its performance in polyculture with tilapia as a strategy for sustainable production in the rural sector where re sources are limited. Goals Assess the effect of polyculture o...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Hidrobiológica 2018-01, Vol.28 (1), p.11-15 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 15 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 11 |
| container_title | Hidrobiológica |
| container_volume | 28 |
| creator | Hernández Vergara, Martha Patricia |
| description | Background The crayfish Procambarus acanthophorus has a high potential for cultivation; however, it is necessary to evaluate its performance in polyculture with tilapia as a strategy for sustainable production in the rural sector where re sources are limited. Goals Assess the effect of polyculture of the crayfish and tilapia by measuring survival and growth. Methods Three methods of cultivation with three replicates were evaluated: T1) crayfish monoculture, T2) polyculture crayfish/tilapia and T3) tilapia monoculture. Nine high-density polyethylene tanks (3 m diameter x 1.2 m deep) were used during the trial. The tilapia were fed commercial feed, 32/5% protein / lipids, while the crayfish were given commercial shrimp feed with 35/7% protein / lipids. The productive efficiency of mono- and biculture was determined based on survival feeding efficiency and growth performance. Results Contrary to what was expected, interspecific competition, space, food availability, and weight gain of crayfish were similar in all treatments, whereas survival was influenced by the treatment, particularly during polyculture, where it was observed that tilapia affected the survival of crayfish. Unlike crayfish, tilapia maintained similar growth and survival in all treatments. Conclusions The results indicate that polyculture of crayfish/tilapia in a recirculation system is possible and promotes the use of the water column. However, it is necessary to consider the antagonistic effect between species. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.24275/uam/izt/dcbi/hidro/2017v28n1/HernandezV |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sciel</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scielo_journals_S0188_88972018000100011</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S0188_88972018000100011</scielo_id><sourcerecordid>2186666709</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-eb51cea0b58389d2f4554dba5b3ca6a1605b4145e2fff0df06d1c4082d2529173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkV9L6zAYh4N4wOnxOwS8mRddk7Rp00sRdYKocP7chrdpYjO6ZiapMq_PBz_ZJhoIIeH3vIHfgxChZMFKVvN8gnVuP2Leqdbmve28yxmh9RsTI82X2o8wdvrj7xGasbIUWV0UxTGaESpEJkRTn6DTEFaE8KapyAz9e3bDVk1DnLzGzmDlYWts6PH82TsF6xb8FDAoGGPvNr1Lt0ucfsCPdtA42gE2FvD8yWuneu_WNuDRDi5atQ8mFIfoIeqXLTbO4zCFCHaENtHv6dnjKeif6IeBIejzz_MM_bm9-X29zB6e7u6vrx4yxUQdM91yqjSQlotCNB0zJedl1wJvCwUV0IrwtqQl18wYQzpDqo6qkgjWMc4aWhdnaHGYG5TVg5MrN6W6hiB_7eqRu3pSlYKQ1HbaNAEXB2Dj3eukQ_xGGBVVWjVpUmp5SCnvQvDayI23a_BbSYncS5NJmkzS5E6a3EuTX9Lkt7TiP0qFlss</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2186666709</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Polyculture of crayfish (Procambarus acanthophorus) and Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) as a strategy for sustainable water use</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Hernández Vergara, Martha Patricia</creator><creatorcontrib>Hernández Vergara, Martha Patricia ; Instituto Tecnológico de Boca del Río (ITBOCA), Boca del Río, Veracruz, México</creatorcontrib><description>Background The crayfish Procambarus acanthophorus has a high potential for cultivation; however, it is necessary to evaluate its performance in polyculture with tilapia as a strategy for sustainable production in the rural sector where re sources are limited. Goals Assess the effect of polyculture of the crayfish and tilapia by measuring survival and growth. Methods Three methods of cultivation with three replicates were evaluated: T1) crayfish monoculture, T2) polyculture crayfish/tilapia and T3) tilapia monoculture. Nine high-density polyethylene tanks (3 m diameter x 1.2 m deep) were used during the trial. The tilapia were fed commercial feed, 32/5% protein / lipids, while the crayfish were given commercial shrimp feed with 35/7% protein / lipids. The productive efficiency of mono- and biculture was determined based on survival feeding efficiency and growth performance. Results Contrary to what was expected, interspecific competition, space, food availability, and weight gain of crayfish were similar in all treatments, whereas survival was influenced by the treatment, particularly during polyculture, where it was observed that tilapia affected the survival of crayfish. Unlike crayfish, tilapia maintained similar growth and survival in all treatments. Conclusions The results indicate that polyculture of crayfish/tilapia in a recirculation system is possible and promotes the use of the water column. However, it is necessary to consider the antagonistic effect between species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0188-8897</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2448-7333</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.24275/uam/izt/dcbi/hidro/2017v28n1/HernandezV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Mexico City: Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana, Iztapalapa, Departmento de Hidrobiologia</publisher><subject>Aquaculture ; Body weight gain ; Crayfish ; Cultivation ; Culture techniques ; Farmers ; Feeds ; Fish ; Food ; Food availability ; Food supply ; Freshwater crustaceans ; Freshwater fishes ; Growth ; High density polyethylenes ; Interspecific ; Lipids ; Marine & Freshwater Biology ; Marine fishes ; Methods ; Monoculture ; Monoculture (aquaculture) ; Oreochromis niloticus ; Polyculture ; Polyculture (aquaculture) ; Polyethylene ; Ponds ; Procambarus acanthophorus ; Proteins ; Recirculating aquaculture systems ; Rural areas ; Survival ; Sustainability ; Sustainable production ; Sustainable use ; Tanks ; Tilapia ; Water column ; Water use</subject><ispartof>Hidrobiológica, 2018-01, Vol.28 (1), p.11-15</ispartof><rights>Copyright Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana, Iztapalapa, Departmento de Hidrobiologia 2018</rights><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hernández Vergara, Martha Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Instituto Tecnológico de Boca del Río (ITBOCA), Boca del Río, Veracruz, México</creatorcontrib><title>Polyculture of crayfish (Procambarus acanthophorus) and Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) as a strategy for sustainable water use</title><title>Hidrobiológica</title><addtitle>Hidrobiológica</addtitle><description>Background The crayfish Procambarus acanthophorus has a high potential for cultivation; however, it is necessary to evaluate its performance in polyculture with tilapia as a strategy for sustainable production in the rural sector where re sources are limited. Goals Assess the effect of polyculture of the crayfish and tilapia by measuring survival and growth. Methods Three methods of cultivation with three replicates were evaluated: T1) crayfish monoculture, T2) polyculture crayfish/tilapia and T3) tilapia monoculture. Nine high-density polyethylene tanks (3 m diameter x 1.2 m deep) were used during the trial. The tilapia were fed commercial feed, 32/5% protein / lipids, while the crayfish were given commercial shrimp feed with 35/7% protein / lipids. The productive efficiency of mono- and biculture was determined based on survival feeding efficiency and growth performance. Results Contrary to what was expected, interspecific competition, space, food availability, and weight gain of crayfish were similar in all treatments, whereas survival was influenced by the treatment, particularly during polyculture, where it was observed that tilapia affected the survival of crayfish. Unlike crayfish, tilapia maintained similar growth and survival in all treatments. Conclusions The results indicate that polyculture of crayfish/tilapia in a recirculation system is possible and promotes the use of the water column. However, it is necessary to consider the antagonistic effect between species.</description><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Body weight gain</subject><subject>Crayfish</subject><subject>Cultivation</subject><subject>Culture techniques</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food availability</subject><subject>Food supply</subject><subject>Freshwater crustaceans</subject><subject>Freshwater fishes</subject><subject>Growth</subject><subject>High density polyethylenes</subject><subject>Interspecific</subject><subject>Lipids</subject><subject>Marine & Freshwater Biology</subject><subject>Marine fishes</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Monoculture</subject><subject>Monoculture (aquaculture)</subject><subject>Oreochromis niloticus</subject><subject>Polyculture</subject><subject>Polyculture (aquaculture)</subject><subject>Polyethylene</subject><subject>Ponds</subject><subject>Procambarus acanthophorus</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Recirculating aquaculture systems</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable production</subject><subject>Sustainable use</subject><subject>Tanks</subject><subject>Tilapia</subject><subject>Water column</subject><subject>Water use</subject><issn>0188-8897</issn><issn>2448-7333</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkV9L6zAYh4N4wOnxOwS8mRddk7Rp00sRdYKocP7chrdpYjO6ZiapMq_PBz_ZJhoIIeH3vIHfgxChZMFKVvN8gnVuP2Leqdbmve28yxmh9RsTI82X2o8wdvrj7xGasbIUWV0UxTGaESpEJkRTn6DTEFaE8KapyAz9e3bDVk1DnLzGzmDlYWts6PH82TsF6xb8FDAoGGPvNr1Lt0ucfsCPdtA42gE2FvD8yWuneu_WNuDRDi5atQ8mFIfoIeqXLTbO4zCFCHaENtHv6dnjKeif6IeBIejzz_MM_bm9-X29zB6e7u6vrx4yxUQdM91yqjSQlotCNB0zJedl1wJvCwUV0IrwtqQl18wYQzpDqo6qkgjWMc4aWhdnaHGYG5TVg5MrN6W6hiB_7eqRu3pSlYKQ1HbaNAEXB2Dj3eukQ_xGGBVVWjVpUmp5SCnvQvDayI23a_BbSYncS5NJmkzS5E6a3EuTX9Lkt7TiP0qFlss</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Hernández Vergara, Martha Patricia</creator><general>Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana, Iztapalapa, Departmento de Hidrobiologia</general><general>UAM, Unidad Iztapalapa</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>GPN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Polyculture of crayfish (Procambarus acanthophorus) and Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) as a strategy for sustainable water use</title><author>Hernández Vergara, Martha Patricia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-eb51cea0b58389d2f4554dba5b3ca6a1605b4145e2fff0df06d1c4082d2529173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Body weight gain</topic><topic>Crayfish</topic><topic>Cultivation</topic><topic>Culture techniques</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food availability</topic><topic>Food supply</topic><topic>Freshwater crustaceans</topic><topic>Freshwater fishes</topic><topic>Growth</topic><topic>High density polyethylenes</topic><topic>Interspecific</topic><topic>Lipids</topic><topic>Marine & Freshwater Biology</topic><topic>Marine fishes</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Monoculture</topic><topic>Monoculture (aquaculture)</topic><topic>Oreochromis niloticus</topic><topic>Polyculture</topic><topic>Polyculture (aquaculture)</topic><topic>Polyethylene</topic><topic>Ponds</topic><topic>Procambarus acanthophorus</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Recirculating aquaculture systems</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable production</topic><topic>Sustainable use</topic><topic>Tanks</topic><topic>Tilapia</topic><topic>Water column</topic><topic>Water use</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hernández Vergara, Martha Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Instituto Tecnológico de Boca del Río (ITBOCA), Boca del Río, Veracruz, México</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><jtitle>Hidrobiológica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hernández Vergara, Martha Patricia</au><aucorp>Instituto Tecnológico de Boca del Río (ITBOCA), Boca del Río, Veracruz, México</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Polyculture of crayfish (Procambarus acanthophorus) and Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) as a strategy for sustainable water use</atitle><jtitle>Hidrobiológica</jtitle><addtitle>Hidrobiológica</addtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>11</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>11-15</pages><issn>0188-8897</issn><eissn>2448-7333</eissn><abstract>Background The crayfish Procambarus acanthophorus has a high potential for cultivation; however, it is necessary to evaluate its performance in polyculture with tilapia as a strategy for sustainable production in the rural sector where re sources are limited. Goals Assess the effect of polyculture of the crayfish and tilapia by measuring survival and growth. Methods Three methods of cultivation with three replicates were evaluated: T1) crayfish monoculture, T2) polyculture crayfish/tilapia and T3) tilapia monoculture. Nine high-density polyethylene tanks (3 m diameter x 1.2 m deep) were used during the trial. The tilapia were fed commercial feed, 32/5% protein / lipids, while the crayfish were given commercial shrimp feed with 35/7% protein / lipids. The productive efficiency of mono- and biculture was determined based on survival feeding efficiency and growth performance. Results Contrary to what was expected, interspecific competition, space, food availability, and weight gain of crayfish were similar in all treatments, whereas survival was influenced by the treatment, particularly during polyculture, where it was observed that tilapia affected the survival of crayfish. Unlike crayfish, tilapia maintained similar growth and survival in all treatments. Conclusions The results indicate that polyculture of crayfish/tilapia in a recirculation system is possible and promotes the use of the water column. However, it is necessary to consider the antagonistic effect between species.</abstract><cop>Mexico City</cop><pub>Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana, Iztapalapa, Departmento de Hidrobiologia</pub><doi>10.24275/uam/izt/dcbi/hidro/2017v28n1/HernandezV</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0188-8897 |
| ispartof | Hidrobiológica, 2018-01, Vol.28 (1), p.11-15 |
| issn | 0188-8897 2448-7333 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_scielo_journals_S0188_88972018000100011 |
| source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Aquaculture Body weight gain Crayfish Cultivation Culture techniques Farmers Feeds Fish Food Food availability Food supply Freshwater crustaceans Freshwater fishes Growth High density polyethylenes Interspecific Lipids Marine & Freshwater Biology Marine fishes Methods Monoculture Monoculture (aquaculture) Oreochromis niloticus Polyculture Polyculture (aquaculture) Polyethylene Ponds Procambarus acanthophorus Proteins Recirculating aquaculture systems Rural areas Survival Sustainability Sustainable production Sustainable use Tanks Tilapia Water column Water use |
| title | Polyculture of crayfish (Procambarus acanthophorus) and Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) as a strategy for sustainable water use |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T12%3A41%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sciel&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Polyculture%20of%20crayfish%20(Procambarus%20acanthophorus)%20and%20Nile%20tilapia%20(Oreochromis%20niloticus)%20as%20a%20strategy%20for%20sustainable%20water%20use&rft.jtitle=Hidrobiol%C3%B3gica&rft.au=Hern%C3%A1ndez%20Vergara,%20Martha%20Patricia&rft.aucorp=Instituto%20Tecnol%C3%B3gico%20de%20Boca%20del%20R%C3%ADo%20(ITBOCA),%20Boca%20del%20R%C3%ADo,%20Veracruz,%20M%C3%A9xico&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=11-15&rft.issn=0188-8897&rft.eissn=2448-7333&rft_id=info:doi/10.24275/uam/izt/dcbi/hidro/2017v28n1/HernandezV&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sciel%3E2186666709%3C/proquest_sciel%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2186666709&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_scielo_id=S0188_88972018000100011&rfr_iscdi=true |