Assessment of alternative forest road routes and landslide susceptibility mapping using machine learning

ABSTRACT Background: Forest roads are among the most basic infrastructure used for forestry activities and services. To facilitate the increased amount of biomass harvesting adequately, the existing road network may require modifications to allow forest transportation within harvesting units that ar...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:CERNE 2022, Vol.28
Hauptverfasser: Buğday, Ender, Akay, Abdullah Emin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title CERNE
container_volume 28
creator Buğday, Ender
Akay, Abdullah Emin
description ABSTRACT Background: Forest roads are among the most basic infrastructure used for forestry activities and services. To facilitate the increased amount of biomass harvesting adequately, the existing road network may require modifications to allow forest transportation within harvesting units that are not yet accessed by the roads. The construction of a forest road can trigger landslides, so the necessary constraints should be considered when the road is being planned to preclude such problems. Landslide Susceptibility Mapping (LSM) has become an integral part of the growing process of machine learning (ML), providing a more effective platform for practitioners, planners, and decision-makers. This study aims to reveal the most suitable alternative routes for a forest road, especially in areas susceptible to landslides, and to provide an effective tool for decision-makers. Results: For this purpose, two models were developed through ML: Logistic Regression (LR) and Random Forest (RF). Elevation, slope, aspect, curvature, Topographic Wetness Index (TWI), Stream Power Index (SPI), distance from the fault, the road, and the stream, and lithology were considered as the main landslide susceptibility factors in these models. The best model was obtained by the RF approach with an Area Under ROC Curve (AUC) value of 81.9%, while the LR model was 78.2%. LSM data was used as a base, and alternative routes were obtained through CostPath analysis. Conclusion: It has been shown that the ML methods used in this study can positively contribute to decision-making by providing more effective LSM calculations in studies to determine alternative routes in a forest road network.
doi_str_mv 10.1590/01047760202228012976
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>scielo_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scielo_journals_S0104_77602022000100300</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S0104_77602022000100300</scielo_id><sourcerecordid>S0104_77602022000100300</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-658a8527a5aa62d56dbeb2b94b09526c564df33907276b46dfdbbbfa83fad39b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkNtKxDAQhoMouK6-gRd5ga45NGl7uSyeYMEL9TokTeJmSQ9kUmHf3pbVO2H4hxn--WE-hO4p2VDRkAdCSVlVkjDCGKsJZU0lL9CKcVoVkpfsEq0WS7F4rtENwJGQktKGrtBhC-AAOtdnPHisY3ap1zl8O-yH5CDjNGg7y5QdYN1bHGeBGKzDMEHrxhxMiCGfcKfHMfRfeIJFO90eQu9wdDr18-IWXXkdwd399jX6fHr82L0U-7fn1912X7SMilxIUetasEoLrSWzQlrjDDNNaUgjmGyFLK3nvCEVq6QppfXWGON1zb22vDF8jTbnXGiDi4M6DtP8UAT1viBQf5gImUfC51qj8nzQpgEgOa_GFDqdTooSteBV_-HlP91ibWk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of alternative forest road routes and landslide susceptibility mapping using machine learning</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Buğday, Ender ; Akay, Abdullah Emin</creator><creatorcontrib>Buğday, Ender ; Akay, Abdullah Emin</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Background: Forest roads are among the most basic infrastructure used for forestry activities and services. To facilitate the increased amount of biomass harvesting adequately, the existing road network may require modifications to allow forest transportation within harvesting units that are not yet accessed by the roads. The construction of a forest road can trigger landslides, so the necessary constraints should be considered when the road is being planned to preclude such problems. Landslide Susceptibility Mapping (LSM) has become an integral part of the growing process of machine learning (ML), providing a more effective platform for practitioners, planners, and decision-makers. This study aims to reveal the most suitable alternative routes for a forest road, especially in areas susceptible to landslides, and to provide an effective tool for decision-makers. Results: For this purpose, two models were developed through ML: Logistic Regression (LR) and Random Forest (RF). Elevation, slope, aspect, curvature, Topographic Wetness Index (TWI), Stream Power Index (SPI), distance from the fault, the road, and the stream, and lithology were considered as the main landslide susceptibility factors in these models. The best model was obtained by the RF approach with an Area Under ROC Curve (AUC) value of 81.9%, while the LR model was 78.2%. LSM data was used as a base, and alternative routes were obtained through CostPath analysis. Conclusion: It has been shown that the ML methods used in this study can positively contribute to decision-making by providing more effective LSM calculations in studies to determine alternative routes in a forest road network.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0104-7760</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2317-6342</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2317-6342</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/01047760202228012976</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>UFLA - Universidade Federal de Lavras</publisher><subject>FORESTRY</subject><ispartof>CERNE, 2022, Vol.28</ispartof><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-658a8527a5aa62d56dbeb2b94b09526c564df33907276b46dfdbbbfa83fad39b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3054-1516 ; 0000-0001-6558-9029</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,864,885,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buğday, Ender</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akay, Abdullah Emin</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of alternative forest road routes and landslide susceptibility mapping using machine learning</title><title>CERNE</title><addtitle>CERNE</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Background: Forest roads are among the most basic infrastructure used for forestry activities and services. To facilitate the increased amount of biomass harvesting adequately, the existing road network may require modifications to allow forest transportation within harvesting units that are not yet accessed by the roads. The construction of a forest road can trigger landslides, so the necessary constraints should be considered when the road is being planned to preclude such problems. Landslide Susceptibility Mapping (LSM) has become an integral part of the growing process of machine learning (ML), providing a more effective platform for practitioners, planners, and decision-makers. This study aims to reveal the most suitable alternative routes for a forest road, especially in areas susceptible to landslides, and to provide an effective tool for decision-makers. Results: For this purpose, two models were developed through ML: Logistic Regression (LR) and Random Forest (RF). Elevation, slope, aspect, curvature, Topographic Wetness Index (TWI), Stream Power Index (SPI), distance from the fault, the road, and the stream, and lithology were considered as the main landslide susceptibility factors in these models. The best model was obtained by the RF approach with an Area Under ROC Curve (AUC) value of 81.9%, while the LR model was 78.2%. LSM data was used as a base, and alternative routes were obtained through CostPath analysis. Conclusion: It has been shown that the ML methods used in this study can positively contribute to decision-making by providing more effective LSM calculations in studies to determine alternative routes in a forest road network.</description><subject>FORESTRY</subject><issn>0104-7760</issn><issn>2317-6342</issn><issn>2317-6342</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkNtKxDAQhoMouK6-gRd5ga45NGl7uSyeYMEL9TokTeJmSQ9kUmHf3pbVO2H4hxn--WE-hO4p2VDRkAdCSVlVkjDCGKsJZU0lL9CKcVoVkpfsEq0WS7F4rtENwJGQktKGrtBhC-AAOtdnPHisY3ap1zl8O-yH5CDjNGg7y5QdYN1bHGeBGKzDMEHrxhxMiCGfcKfHMfRfeIJFO90eQu9wdDr18-IWXXkdwd399jX6fHr82L0U-7fn1912X7SMilxIUetasEoLrSWzQlrjDDNNaUgjmGyFLK3nvCEVq6QppfXWGON1zb22vDF8jTbnXGiDi4M6DtP8UAT1viBQf5gImUfC51qj8nzQpgEgOa_GFDqdTooSteBV_-HlP91ibWk</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Buğday, Ender</creator><creator>Akay, Abdullah Emin</creator><general>UFLA - Universidade Federal de Lavras</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>GPN</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3054-1516</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6558-9029</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Assessment of alternative forest road routes and landslide susceptibility mapping using machine learning</title><author>Buğday, Ender ; Akay, Abdullah Emin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-658a8527a5aa62d56dbeb2b94b09526c564df33907276b46dfdbbbfa83fad39b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>FORESTRY</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buğday, Ender</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akay, Abdullah Emin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><jtitle>CERNE</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buğday, Ender</au><au>Akay, Abdullah Emin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of alternative forest road routes and landslide susceptibility mapping using machine learning</atitle><jtitle>CERNE</jtitle><addtitle>CERNE</addtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>28</volume><issn>0104-7760</issn><issn>2317-6342</issn><eissn>2317-6342</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT Background: Forest roads are among the most basic infrastructure used for forestry activities and services. To facilitate the increased amount of biomass harvesting adequately, the existing road network may require modifications to allow forest transportation within harvesting units that are not yet accessed by the roads. The construction of a forest road can trigger landslides, so the necessary constraints should be considered when the road is being planned to preclude such problems. Landslide Susceptibility Mapping (LSM) has become an integral part of the growing process of machine learning (ML), providing a more effective platform for practitioners, planners, and decision-makers. This study aims to reveal the most suitable alternative routes for a forest road, especially in areas susceptible to landslides, and to provide an effective tool for decision-makers. Results: For this purpose, two models were developed through ML: Logistic Regression (LR) and Random Forest (RF). Elevation, slope, aspect, curvature, Topographic Wetness Index (TWI), Stream Power Index (SPI), distance from the fault, the road, and the stream, and lithology were considered as the main landslide susceptibility factors in these models. The best model was obtained by the RF approach with an Area Under ROC Curve (AUC) value of 81.9%, while the LR model was 78.2%. LSM data was used as a base, and alternative routes were obtained through CostPath analysis. Conclusion: It has been shown that the ML methods used in this study can positively contribute to decision-making by providing more effective LSM calculations in studies to determine alternative routes in a forest road network.</abstract><pub>UFLA - Universidade Federal de Lavras</pub><doi>10.1590/01047760202228012976</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3054-1516</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6558-9029</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0104-7760
ispartof CERNE, 2022, Vol.28
issn 0104-7760
2317-6342
2317-6342
language eng
recordid cdi_scielo_journals_S0104_77602022000100300
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects FORESTRY
title Assessment of alternative forest road routes and landslide susceptibility mapping using machine learning
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T09%3A10%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-scielo_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20alternative%20forest%20road%20routes%20and%20landslide%20susceptibility%20mapping%20using%20machine%20learning&rft.jtitle=CERNE&rft.au=Bu%C4%9Fday,%20Ender&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=28&rft.issn=0104-7760&rft.eissn=2317-6342&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/01047760202228012976&rft_dat=%3Cscielo_cross%3ES0104_77602022000100300%3C/scielo_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_scielo_id=S0104_77602022000100300&rfr_iscdi=true