Financial indicators to evaluate the economic performance of feedlot steers with different slaughter weights
The objective of this study was to evaluate various financial indicators, estimated deterministically (considering historical quotes twelve consecutive years - 2003 to 2014), on the economic feasibility of finishing steers commercialized with different weights, using the simulation technique. Perfor...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Ciência rural 2017, Vol.47 (3) |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | Ciência rural |
| container_volume | 47 |
| creator | Fabricio, Edom de Avila Pacheco, Paulo Santana Vaz, Fabiano Nunes Lemes, Daniel Batista Camera, Angelina Machado, Gabriella Ibarra Ocaña |
| description | The objective of this study was to evaluate various financial indicators, estimated deterministically (considering historical quotes twelve consecutive years - 2003 to 2014), on the economic feasibility of finishing steers commercialized with different weights, using the simulation technique. Performance data steers were simulated with average initial weight of 350kg, fed in feedlot and slaughtered with 410, 440, 470, 500, 530, 560 and 590kg. The feeding period varies from 46 to 185 days, respectively. Based in various economic indicators, the viability of the investment decreased linearly according to the increase in slaughter weight. The coefficient of simple linear regression and means from lowest to highest slaughter weight were, respectively: net present value (-0.538 and R$ 67.37, R$ 65.28, R$ 32.14, R$ -7.34, R$ 8.01, R$ -12.38, R$ -23.41); index benefit: cost (-0.0003 and R$ 1.042, R$ 1.039, R$ 1.014, R$ 1.006, R$ 1.003, R$ 0.995, R$ 0.991); additional return on investment (-0.009 and 1.38, 1.29, 0.35, 0.11, 0.05, -0.08, -0.13% per month); internal rate of return (-0.009 and 2.21, 2.10, 1.28, 0.80, 0.93, 0.78, 0.73% per month). Feedlot use as termination option to obtain the direct benefits of this technology is an alternative investment with low economic return.
RESUMO: O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar diversos indicadores financeiros estimados de forma determinística (considerando cotações históricas de doze anos consecutivos - 2003 a 2014) na viabilidade econômica da terminação de novilhos em confinamento, comercializados em diferentes pesos, utilizando a técnica de simulação. Foram simulados dados de desempenho de novilhos com peso médio inicial de 350kg, alimentados em confinamento para serem abatidos com 410, 440, 470, 500, 530, 560 e 590kg. O período de alimentação variou de 46 a 185 dias, respectivamente. Baseada em vários indicadores, a viabilidade do investimento diminuiu linearmente de acordo com o aumento do peso. O coeficiente de regressão linear simples e as médias do menor para o maior peso de abate foram, respectivamente: valor presente líquido (-0,538 e R$ 67,37, R$ 65,28, R$ 32,14, R$ -7,34, R$ 8,01, R$ -12,38, R$ -23,41); índice benefício: custo (-0,0003 e R$ 1,042, R$ 1.039, R$ 1,014, R$ 1,006, R$ 1,003, R$ 0,995, R$ 0,991); retorno adicional sobre o investimento (-0,009 e 1,38, 1,29, 0,35, 0,11, 0,05, -0,08, -0,13% a.m.); taxa interna de retorno (-0,009 e 2,21, 2,10, 1,28, 0,80, 0,93, 0,78, 0,73% a.m.). O uso do confinamento |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1590/0103-8478cr20160516 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scielo_journals_S0103_84782017000300931</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S0103_84782017000300931</scielo_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_af06ea23316247f4b3ee7fee9ebd9927</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2492272070</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-df077fd8eb5bfb8e81862d9df49f4644d5efa02564d66821d15d884f0a6ebf33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkU9rGzEQxUVooanbT9CLoGenoz8raY8hNE0g0ENzF1ppFMusV44kN_TbV46L09MMj_k9Zt4Q8oXBFRtG-AYMxNpIbXzhwBQMTF2Qy7P67r_-A_lY6xaAayHlJZlv0-IWn9xM0xKSdy2XSlum-NvNB9eQtg1S9HnJu-TpHkvMZdcJpDnSiBjm3GhtiB17SW1DQ4oRCy5dnd3hadOw0BdMvamfyPvo5oqf_9UVebz9_nhzt374-eP-5vph7SXXbR0iaB2DwWmY4mTQMKN4GEOUY5RKyjBgdMAHJYNShrPAhmCMjOAUTlGIFbk_2YbstnZf0s6VPza7ZF-FXJ6sKy35Ga2LoNBxIZjiUkc5CUTdrxpxCuPYM1qRq5NX9QnnbLf5UJa-u_11TNQeE-2JawAQAKNgHfh6AvYlPx-wtjeEy5FzzUFDnxKnKV9yrQXjeU0G9vhSe7Z_e6n4C9uDk-Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2492272070</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Financial indicators to evaluate the economic performance of feedlot steers with different slaughter weights</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Fabricio, Edom de Avila ; Pacheco, Paulo Santana ; Vaz, Fabiano Nunes ; Lemes, Daniel Batista ; Camera, Angelina ; Machado, Gabriella Ibarra Ocaña</creator><creatorcontrib>Fabricio, Edom de Avila ; Pacheco, Paulo Santana ; Vaz, Fabiano Nunes ; Lemes, Daniel Batista ; Camera, Angelina ; Machado, Gabriella Ibarra Ocaña</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study was to evaluate various financial indicators, estimated deterministically (considering historical quotes twelve consecutive years - 2003 to 2014), on the economic feasibility of finishing steers commercialized with different weights, using the simulation technique. Performance data steers were simulated with average initial weight of 350kg, fed in feedlot and slaughtered with 410, 440, 470, 500, 530, 560 and 590kg. The feeding period varies from 46 to 185 days, respectively. Based in various economic indicators, the viability of the investment decreased linearly according to the increase in slaughter weight. The coefficient of simple linear regression and means from lowest to highest slaughter weight were, respectively: net present value (-0.538 and R$ 67.37, R$ 65.28, R$ 32.14, R$ -7.34, R$ 8.01, R$ -12.38, R$ -23.41); index benefit: cost (-0.0003 and R$ 1.042, R$ 1.039, R$ 1.014, R$ 1.006, R$ 1.003, R$ 0.995, R$ 0.991); additional return on investment (-0.009 and 1.38, 1.29, 0.35, 0.11, 0.05, -0.08, -0.13% per month); internal rate of return (-0.009 and 2.21, 2.10, 1.28, 0.80, 0.93, 0.78, 0.73% per month). Feedlot use as termination option to obtain the direct benefits of this technology is an alternative investment with low economic return.
RESUMO: O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar diversos indicadores financeiros estimados de forma determinística (considerando cotações históricas de doze anos consecutivos - 2003 a 2014) na viabilidade econômica da terminação de novilhos em confinamento, comercializados em diferentes pesos, utilizando a técnica de simulação. Foram simulados dados de desempenho de novilhos com peso médio inicial de 350kg, alimentados em confinamento para serem abatidos com 410, 440, 470, 500, 530, 560 e 590kg. O período de alimentação variou de 46 a 185 dias, respectivamente. Baseada em vários indicadores, a viabilidade do investimento diminuiu linearmente de acordo com o aumento do peso. O coeficiente de regressão linear simples e as médias do menor para o maior peso de abate foram, respectivamente: valor presente líquido (-0,538 e R$ 67,37, R$ 65,28, R$ 32,14, R$ -7,34, R$ 8,01, R$ -12,38, R$ -23,41); índice benefício: custo (-0,0003 e R$ 1,042, R$ 1.039, R$ 1,014, R$ 1,006, R$ 1,003, R$ 0,995, R$ 0,991); retorno adicional sobre o investimento (-0,009 e 1,38, 1,29, 0,35, 0,11, 0,05, -0,08, -0,13% a.m.); taxa interna de retorno (-0,009 e 2,21, 2,10, 1,28, 0,80, 0,93, 0,78, 0,73% a.m.). O uso do confinamento como opção de terminação, visando obter os benefícios diretos desta tecnologia, representa a alternativa de investimento com baixo retorno econômico.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0103-8478</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1678-4596</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0103-8478</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1678-4596</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/0103-8478cr20160516</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Santa Maria: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Centro de Ciencias Rurais</publisher><subject>AGRONOMY ; Animal behavior ; análise econômica ; bovinos de corte ; Cattle ; Commercialization ; Cost estimates ; Decision making ; Economics ; Feedlots ; Feeds ; Indicators ; microeconomia ; Opportunity costs ; Payback periods ; Performance evaluation ; projetos de investimento ; Return on investment ; sistemas intensivos ; Slaughter ; Software ; Weight</subject><ispartof>Ciência rural, 2017, Vol.47 (3)</ispartof><rights>2017. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-df077fd8eb5bfb8e81862d9df49f4644d5efa02564d66821d15d884f0a6ebf33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-df077fd8eb5bfb8e81862d9df49f4644d5efa02564d66821d15d884f0a6ebf33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,864,885,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fabricio, Edom de Avila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pacheco, Paulo Santana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaz, Fabiano Nunes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemes, Daniel Batista</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camera, Angelina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machado, Gabriella Ibarra Ocaña</creatorcontrib><title>Financial indicators to evaluate the economic performance of feedlot steers with different slaughter weights</title><title>Ciência rural</title><addtitle>Cienc. Rural</addtitle><description>The objective of this study was to evaluate various financial indicators, estimated deterministically (considering historical quotes twelve consecutive years - 2003 to 2014), on the economic feasibility of finishing steers commercialized with different weights, using the simulation technique. Performance data steers were simulated with average initial weight of 350kg, fed in feedlot and slaughtered with 410, 440, 470, 500, 530, 560 and 590kg. The feeding period varies from 46 to 185 days, respectively. Based in various economic indicators, the viability of the investment decreased linearly according to the increase in slaughter weight. The coefficient of simple linear regression and means from lowest to highest slaughter weight were, respectively: net present value (-0.538 and R$ 67.37, R$ 65.28, R$ 32.14, R$ -7.34, R$ 8.01, R$ -12.38, R$ -23.41); index benefit: cost (-0.0003 and R$ 1.042, R$ 1.039, R$ 1.014, R$ 1.006, R$ 1.003, R$ 0.995, R$ 0.991); additional return on investment (-0.009 and 1.38, 1.29, 0.35, 0.11, 0.05, -0.08, -0.13% per month); internal rate of return (-0.009 and 2.21, 2.10, 1.28, 0.80, 0.93, 0.78, 0.73% per month). Feedlot use as termination option to obtain the direct benefits of this technology is an alternative investment with low economic return.
RESUMO: O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar diversos indicadores financeiros estimados de forma determinística (considerando cotações históricas de doze anos consecutivos - 2003 a 2014) na viabilidade econômica da terminação de novilhos em confinamento, comercializados em diferentes pesos, utilizando a técnica de simulação. Foram simulados dados de desempenho de novilhos com peso médio inicial de 350kg, alimentados em confinamento para serem abatidos com 410, 440, 470, 500, 530, 560 e 590kg. O período de alimentação variou de 46 a 185 dias, respectivamente. Baseada em vários indicadores, a viabilidade do investimento diminuiu linearmente de acordo com o aumento do peso. O coeficiente de regressão linear simples e as médias do menor para o maior peso de abate foram, respectivamente: valor presente líquido (-0,538 e R$ 67,37, R$ 65,28, R$ 32,14, R$ -7,34, R$ 8,01, R$ -12,38, R$ -23,41); índice benefício: custo (-0,0003 e R$ 1,042, R$ 1.039, R$ 1,014, R$ 1,006, R$ 1,003, R$ 0,995, R$ 0,991); retorno adicional sobre o investimento (-0,009 e 1,38, 1,29, 0,35, 0,11, 0,05, -0,08, -0,13% a.m.); taxa interna de retorno (-0,009 e 2,21, 2,10, 1,28, 0,80, 0,93, 0,78, 0,73% a.m.). O uso do confinamento como opção de terminação, visando obter os benefícios diretos desta tecnologia, representa a alternativa de investimento com baixo retorno econômico.</description><subject>AGRONOMY</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>análise econômica</subject><subject>bovinos de corte</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Commercialization</subject><subject>Cost estimates</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Feedlots</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>microeconomia</subject><subject>Opportunity costs</subject><subject>Payback periods</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>projetos de investimento</subject><subject>Return on investment</subject><subject>sistemas intensivos</subject><subject>Slaughter</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Weight</subject><issn>0103-8478</issn><issn>1678-4596</issn><issn>0103-8478</issn><issn>1678-4596</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkU9rGzEQxUVooanbT9CLoGenoz8raY8hNE0g0ENzF1ppFMusV44kN_TbV46L09MMj_k9Zt4Q8oXBFRtG-AYMxNpIbXzhwBQMTF2Qy7P67r_-A_lY6xaAayHlJZlv0-IWn9xM0xKSdy2XSlum-NvNB9eQtg1S9HnJu-TpHkvMZdcJpDnSiBjm3GhtiB17SW1DQ4oRCy5dnd3hadOw0BdMvamfyPvo5oqf_9UVebz9_nhzt374-eP-5vph7SXXbR0iaB2DwWmY4mTQMKN4GEOUY5RKyjBgdMAHJYNShrPAhmCMjOAUTlGIFbk_2YbstnZf0s6VPza7ZF-FXJ6sKy35Ga2LoNBxIZjiUkc5CUTdrxpxCuPYM1qRq5NX9QnnbLf5UJa-u_11TNQeE-2JawAQAKNgHfh6AvYlPx-wtjeEy5FzzUFDnxKnKV9yrQXjeU0G9vhSe7Z_e6n4C9uDk-Y</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Fabricio, Edom de Avila</creator><creator>Pacheco, Paulo Santana</creator><creator>Vaz, Fabiano Nunes</creator><creator>Lemes, Daniel Batista</creator><creator>Camera, Angelina</creator><creator>Machado, Gabriella Ibarra Ocaña</creator><general>Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Centro de Ciencias Rurais</general><general>Universidade Federal de Santa Maria</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>GPN</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>Financial indicators to evaluate the economic performance of feedlot steers with different slaughter weights</title><author>Fabricio, Edom de Avila ; Pacheco, Paulo Santana ; Vaz, Fabiano Nunes ; Lemes, Daniel Batista ; Camera, Angelina ; Machado, Gabriella Ibarra Ocaña</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-df077fd8eb5bfb8e81862d9df49f4644d5efa02564d66821d15d884f0a6ebf33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>AGRONOMY</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>análise econômica</topic><topic>bovinos de corte</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Commercialization</topic><topic>Cost estimates</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Feedlots</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>microeconomia</topic><topic>Opportunity costs</topic><topic>Payback periods</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>projetos de investimento</topic><topic>Return on investment</topic><topic>sistemas intensivos</topic><topic>Slaughter</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Weight</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fabricio, Edom de Avila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pacheco, Paulo Santana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaz, Fabiano Nunes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemes, Daniel Batista</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camera, Angelina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machado, Gabriella Ibarra Ocaña</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Ciência rural</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fabricio, Edom de Avila</au><au>Pacheco, Paulo Santana</au><au>Vaz, Fabiano Nunes</au><au>Lemes, Daniel Batista</au><au>Camera, Angelina</au><au>Machado, Gabriella Ibarra Ocaña</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Financial indicators to evaluate the economic performance of feedlot steers with different slaughter weights</atitle><jtitle>Ciência rural</jtitle><addtitle>Cienc. Rural</addtitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>3</issue><issn>0103-8478</issn><issn>1678-4596</issn><eissn>0103-8478</eissn><eissn>1678-4596</eissn><abstract>The objective of this study was to evaluate various financial indicators, estimated deterministically (considering historical quotes twelve consecutive years - 2003 to 2014), on the economic feasibility of finishing steers commercialized with different weights, using the simulation technique. Performance data steers were simulated with average initial weight of 350kg, fed in feedlot and slaughtered with 410, 440, 470, 500, 530, 560 and 590kg. The feeding period varies from 46 to 185 days, respectively. Based in various economic indicators, the viability of the investment decreased linearly according to the increase in slaughter weight. The coefficient of simple linear regression and means from lowest to highest slaughter weight were, respectively: net present value (-0.538 and R$ 67.37, R$ 65.28, R$ 32.14, R$ -7.34, R$ 8.01, R$ -12.38, R$ -23.41); index benefit: cost (-0.0003 and R$ 1.042, R$ 1.039, R$ 1.014, R$ 1.006, R$ 1.003, R$ 0.995, R$ 0.991); additional return on investment (-0.009 and 1.38, 1.29, 0.35, 0.11, 0.05, -0.08, -0.13% per month); internal rate of return (-0.009 and 2.21, 2.10, 1.28, 0.80, 0.93, 0.78, 0.73% per month). Feedlot use as termination option to obtain the direct benefits of this technology is an alternative investment with low economic return.
RESUMO: O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar diversos indicadores financeiros estimados de forma determinística (considerando cotações históricas de doze anos consecutivos - 2003 a 2014) na viabilidade econômica da terminação de novilhos em confinamento, comercializados em diferentes pesos, utilizando a técnica de simulação. Foram simulados dados de desempenho de novilhos com peso médio inicial de 350kg, alimentados em confinamento para serem abatidos com 410, 440, 470, 500, 530, 560 e 590kg. O período de alimentação variou de 46 a 185 dias, respectivamente. Baseada em vários indicadores, a viabilidade do investimento diminuiu linearmente de acordo com o aumento do peso. O coeficiente de regressão linear simples e as médias do menor para o maior peso de abate foram, respectivamente: valor presente líquido (-0,538 e R$ 67,37, R$ 65,28, R$ 32,14, R$ -7,34, R$ 8,01, R$ -12,38, R$ -23,41); índice benefício: custo (-0,0003 e R$ 1,042, R$ 1.039, R$ 1,014, R$ 1,006, R$ 1,003, R$ 0,995, R$ 0,991); retorno adicional sobre o investimento (-0,009 e 1,38, 1,29, 0,35, 0,11, 0,05, -0,08, -0,13% a.m.); taxa interna de retorno (-0,009 e 2,21, 2,10, 1,28, 0,80, 0,93, 0,78, 0,73% a.m.). O uso do confinamento como opção de terminação, visando obter os benefícios diretos desta tecnologia, representa a alternativa de investimento com baixo retorno econômico.</abstract><cop>Santa Maria</cop><pub>Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Centro de Ciencias Rurais</pub><doi>10.1590/0103-8478cr20160516</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0103-8478 |
| ispartof | Ciência rural, 2017, Vol.47 (3) |
| issn | 0103-8478 1678-4596 0103-8478 1678-4596 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_scielo_journals_S0103_84782017000300931 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | AGRONOMY Animal behavior análise econômica bovinos de corte Cattle Commercialization Cost estimates Decision making Economics Feedlots Feeds Indicators microeconomia Opportunity costs Payback periods Performance evaluation projetos de investimento Return on investment sistemas intensivos Slaughter Software Weight |
| title | Financial indicators to evaluate the economic performance of feedlot steers with different slaughter weights |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T09%3A37%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Financial%20indicators%20to%20evaluate%20the%20economic%20performance%20of%20feedlot%20steers%20with%20different%20slaughter%20weights&rft.jtitle=Ci%C3%AAncia%20rural&rft.au=Fabricio,%20Edom%20de%20Avila&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=3&rft.issn=0103-8478&rft.eissn=0103-8478&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/0103-8478cr20160516&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2492272070%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2492272070&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_scielo_id=S0103_84782017000300931&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_af06ea23316247f4b3ee7fee9ebd9927&rfr_iscdi=true |