Headspace analysis and characterisation of South African propolis volatile compounds using GCxGC–ToF–MS

[Display omitted] Propolis also known as “bee glue or bee resin” is a resinous mixture of bee saliva or bee wax and exudate from tree trunks and flowers, produced by honeybees. The composition of propolis varies depending on the vegetation the bees can access. It is therefore expected that propolis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Revista brasileira de farmacognosia 2019-05, Vol.29 (3), p.351-357
Hauptverfasser: Kamatou, Guy, Sandasi, Maxleene, Tankeu, Sidonie, Vuuren, Sandy van, Viljoen, Alvaro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 357
container_issue 3
container_start_page 351
container_title Revista brasileira de farmacognosia
container_volume 29
creator Kamatou, Guy
Sandasi, Maxleene
Tankeu, Sidonie
Vuuren, Sandy van
Viljoen, Alvaro
description [Display omitted] Propolis also known as “bee glue or bee resin” is a resinous mixture of bee saliva or bee wax and exudate from tree trunks and flowers, produced by honeybees. The composition of propolis varies depending on the vegetation the bees can access. It is therefore expected that propolis obtained from various localities may have different chemical profiles. In this study, the headspace volatiles of propolis (n=39) collected from various locations in South Africa (Gauteng, Northern Cape and Western Cape Provinces) were explored for the first time using GCxGC–ToF–MS. Several GCxGC parameters were optimised including; incubation time, temperature and modulation period. Multivariate data analysis techniques (principal component and hierarchical cluster analyses) were applied on the GCxGC–ToF–MS data to investigate trends and clustering patterns within propolis samples. The results demonstrated that headspace volatiles of propolis varied between locations. The volatile profiles were dominated by monoterpenes such as α-pinene (1.2–46.5%), β-pinene (2.0–21.8%), dihydrosabinene (trace-17.8%), limonene (trace-11.6%), p-cymene (0.1–5.3%), 1,8-cineole (0.1–11.0%), 2,7-dimethyl-3-octen-5-yne (trace-11.7%), E-β-ocimene (trace-17.8%), octanal (trace-12.9%), styrene (trace-13.5%) and α-thujene (trace-11.0%). Principal component analysis revealed chemical variation within propolis from the various locations. The heatmap of the averages revealed dehydrosabinene, isopropentyltoluene, p-cymene, acetophenone and α-thujene as chemical markers for the Northern Cape propolis, while λ-terpinene, propanoic acid, furfural, 2-methoxy benzyl alcohol and hexanoic acid methylester were filtered out as markers for Gauteng propolis. The propolis samples originating from the Western Cape Province were dominated by prenal, cinnamaldehyde styrene, 1,8-cineole, decanal, prenyl acetate and butanoic acid. Using GCxGC–ToF–MS in combination with chemometrics, it was possible to profile headspace volatile constituents of propolis and further identify marker compounds that differentiate propolis from various provinces in South Africa.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.bjp.2018.12.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>scielo_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scielo_journals_S0102_695X2019000300351</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S0102_695X2019000300351</scielo_id><els_id>S0102695X18305647</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0102_695X2019000300351</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-ec1f816b0e6b232e992b4c4166d9c23e2e0470a83a2e5213f14722f1e3052d233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1O5DAQRq0RI00Dc4DZ-QIJVZUfErFCLWhGArFokNhZbqcCzoQ4stOI3nEHbjgnwVEjsUOy7Fp8z1X1hPiDkCJgedKlm25MCbBKkVIA-iEWWFeYFFQ9HIgFIFBS1sXDL3EYQgdQlBVVC_HvinUTRm1Y6kH3u2BDLBppnrTXZmJvg56sG6Rr5dptpyd53npr9CBH70bXx_iL62OkZ2nc8-i2QxPkNtjhUa6Wr6vl_7f3O3cZ75v1sfjZ6j7w78_3SNxfXtwtr5Lr29Xf5fl1YnKiKWGDbYXlBrjcUEZc17TJTY5l2dSGMiaG_BR0lWnigjBrMT8lapEzKKihLDsS6f7fYCz3TnVu6-NuQa1nC2q2EEXVAJDFU2AEcA8Y70Lw3KrR22ftdwpBzXpVp6JeNetVSCrqjQx9NonZ4ZH9V5vvoLM9xHH9FxuhecTBcGM9m0k1zn5DfwCuUJNf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Headspace analysis and characterisation of South African propolis volatile compounds using GCxGC–ToF–MS</title><source>SpringerLink</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Kamatou, Guy ; Sandasi, Maxleene ; Tankeu, Sidonie ; Vuuren, Sandy van ; Viljoen, Alvaro</creator><creatorcontrib>Kamatou, Guy ; Sandasi, Maxleene ; Tankeu, Sidonie ; Vuuren, Sandy van ; Viljoen, Alvaro</creatorcontrib><description>[Display omitted] Propolis also known as “bee glue or bee resin” is a resinous mixture of bee saliva or bee wax and exudate from tree trunks and flowers, produced by honeybees. The composition of propolis varies depending on the vegetation the bees can access. It is therefore expected that propolis obtained from various localities may have different chemical profiles. In this study, the headspace volatiles of propolis (n=39) collected from various locations in South Africa (Gauteng, Northern Cape and Western Cape Provinces) were explored for the first time using GCxGC–ToF–MS. Several GCxGC parameters were optimised including; incubation time, temperature and modulation period. Multivariate data analysis techniques (principal component and hierarchical cluster analyses) were applied on the GCxGC–ToF–MS data to investigate trends and clustering patterns within propolis samples. The results demonstrated that headspace volatiles of propolis varied between locations. The volatile profiles were dominated by monoterpenes such as α-pinene (1.2–46.5%), β-pinene (2.0–21.8%), dihydrosabinene (trace-17.8%), limonene (trace-11.6%), p-cymene (0.1–5.3%), 1,8-cineole (0.1–11.0%), 2,7-dimethyl-3-octen-5-yne (trace-11.7%), E-β-ocimene (trace-17.8%), octanal (trace-12.9%), styrene (trace-13.5%) and α-thujene (trace-11.0%). Principal component analysis revealed chemical variation within propolis from the various locations. The heatmap of the averages revealed dehydrosabinene, isopropentyltoluene, p-cymene, acetophenone and α-thujene as chemical markers for the Northern Cape propolis, while λ-terpinene, propanoic acid, furfural, 2-methoxy benzyl alcohol and hexanoic acid methylester were filtered out as markers for Gauteng propolis. The propolis samples originating from the Western Cape Province were dominated by prenal, cinnamaldehyde styrene, 1,8-cineole, decanal, prenyl acetate and butanoic acid. Using GCxGC–ToF–MS in combination with chemometrics, it was possible to profile headspace volatile constituents of propolis and further identify marker compounds that differentiate propolis from various provinces in South Africa.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0102-695X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1981-528X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1981-528X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bjp.2018.12.002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Elsevier Editora Ltda</publisher><subject>Chemometrics ; GCxGC–ToF–MS ; Headspace ; Original Article ; PHARMACOLOGY &amp; PHARMACY ; Pharmacy ; Propolis ; South Africa</subject><ispartof>Revista brasileira de farmacognosia, 2019-05, Vol.29 (3), p.351-357</ispartof><rights>2019 Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacognosia</rights><rights>Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacognosia 2019</rights><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-ec1f816b0e6b232e992b4c4166d9c23e2e0470a83a2e5213f14722f1e3052d233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-ec1f816b0e6b232e992b4c4166d9c23e2e0470a83a2e5213f14722f1e3052d233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1016/j.bjp.2018.12.002$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1016/j.bjp.2018.12.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kamatou, Guy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandasi, Maxleene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tankeu, Sidonie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vuuren, Sandy van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viljoen, Alvaro</creatorcontrib><title>Headspace analysis and characterisation of South African propolis volatile compounds using GCxGC–ToF–MS</title><title>Revista brasileira de farmacognosia</title><addtitle>Rev. Bras. Farmacogn</addtitle><addtitle>Rev. bras. farmacogn</addtitle><description>[Display omitted] Propolis also known as “bee glue or bee resin” is a resinous mixture of bee saliva or bee wax and exudate from tree trunks and flowers, produced by honeybees. The composition of propolis varies depending on the vegetation the bees can access. It is therefore expected that propolis obtained from various localities may have different chemical profiles. In this study, the headspace volatiles of propolis (n=39) collected from various locations in South Africa (Gauteng, Northern Cape and Western Cape Provinces) were explored for the first time using GCxGC–ToF–MS. Several GCxGC parameters were optimised including; incubation time, temperature and modulation period. Multivariate data analysis techniques (principal component and hierarchical cluster analyses) were applied on the GCxGC–ToF–MS data to investigate trends and clustering patterns within propolis samples. The results demonstrated that headspace volatiles of propolis varied between locations. The volatile profiles were dominated by monoterpenes such as α-pinene (1.2–46.5%), β-pinene (2.0–21.8%), dihydrosabinene (trace-17.8%), limonene (trace-11.6%), p-cymene (0.1–5.3%), 1,8-cineole (0.1–11.0%), 2,7-dimethyl-3-octen-5-yne (trace-11.7%), E-β-ocimene (trace-17.8%), octanal (trace-12.9%), styrene (trace-13.5%) and α-thujene (trace-11.0%). Principal component analysis revealed chemical variation within propolis from the various locations. The heatmap of the averages revealed dehydrosabinene, isopropentyltoluene, p-cymene, acetophenone and α-thujene as chemical markers for the Northern Cape propolis, while λ-terpinene, propanoic acid, furfural, 2-methoxy benzyl alcohol and hexanoic acid methylester were filtered out as markers for Gauteng propolis. The propolis samples originating from the Western Cape Province were dominated by prenal, cinnamaldehyde styrene, 1,8-cineole, decanal, prenyl acetate and butanoic acid. Using GCxGC–ToF–MS in combination with chemometrics, it was possible to profile headspace volatile constituents of propolis and further identify marker compounds that differentiate propolis from various provinces in South Africa.</description><subject>Chemometrics</subject><subject>GCxGC–ToF–MS</subject><subject>Headspace</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>PHARMACOLOGY &amp; PHARMACY</subject><subject>Pharmacy</subject><subject>Propolis</subject><subject>South Africa</subject><issn>0102-695X</issn><issn>1981-528X</issn><issn>1981-528X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1O5DAQRq0RI00Dc4DZ-QIJVZUfErFCLWhGArFokNhZbqcCzoQ4stOI3nEHbjgnwVEjsUOy7Fp8z1X1hPiDkCJgedKlm25MCbBKkVIA-iEWWFeYFFQ9HIgFIFBS1sXDL3EYQgdQlBVVC_HvinUTRm1Y6kH3u2BDLBppnrTXZmJvg56sG6Rr5dptpyd53npr9CBH70bXx_iL62OkZ2nc8-i2QxPkNtjhUa6Wr6vl_7f3O3cZ75v1sfjZ6j7w78_3SNxfXtwtr5Lr29Xf5fl1YnKiKWGDbYXlBrjcUEZc17TJTY5l2dSGMiaG_BR0lWnigjBrMT8lapEzKKihLDsS6f7fYCz3TnVu6-NuQa1nC2q2EEXVAJDFU2AEcA8Y70Lw3KrR22ftdwpBzXpVp6JeNetVSCrqjQx9NonZ4ZH9V5vvoLM9xHH9FxuhecTBcGM9m0k1zn5DfwCuUJNf</recordid><startdate>20190501</startdate><enddate>20190501</enddate><creator>Kamatou, Guy</creator><creator>Sandasi, Maxleene</creator><creator>Tankeu, Sidonie</creator><creator>Vuuren, Sandy van</creator><creator>Viljoen, Alvaro</creator><general>Elsevier Editora Ltda</general><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacognosia</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>GPN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190501</creationdate><title>Headspace analysis and characterisation of South African propolis volatile compounds using GCxGC–ToF–MS</title><author>Kamatou, Guy ; Sandasi, Maxleene ; Tankeu, Sidonie ; Vuuren, Sandy van ; Viljoen, Alvaro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-ec1f816b0e6b232e992b4c4166d9c23e2e0470a83a2e5213f14722f1e3052d233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Chemometrics</topic><topic>GCxGC–ToF–MS</topic><topic>Headspace</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>PHARMACOLOGY &amp; PHARMACY</topic><topic>Pharmacy</topic><topic>Propolis</topic><topic>South Africa</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kamatou, Guy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandasi, Maxleene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tankeu, Sidonie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vuuren, Sandy van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viljoen, Alvaro</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><jtitle>Revista brasileira de farmacognosia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kamatou, Guy</au><au>Sandasi, Maxleene</au><au>Tankeu, Sidonie</au><au>Vuuren, Sandy van</au><au>Viljoen, Alvaro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Headspace analysis and characterisation of South African propolis volatile compounds using GCxGC–ToF–MS</atitle><jtitle>Revista brasileira de farmacognosia</jtitle><stitle>Rev. Bras. Farmacogn</stitle><addtitle>Rev. bras. farmacogn</addtitle><date>2019-05-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>351</spage><epage>357</epage><pages>351-357</pages><issn>0102-695X</issn><issn>1981-528X</issn><eissn>1981-528X</eissn><abstract>[Display omitted] Propolis also known as “bee glue or bee resin” is a resinous mixture of bee saliva or bee wax and exudate from tree trunks and flowers, produced by honeybees. The composition of propolis varies depending on the vegetation the bees can access. It is therefore expected that propolis obtained from various localities may have different chemical profiles. In this study, the headspace volatiles of propolis (n=39) collected from various locations in South Africa (Gauteng, Northern Cape and Western Cape Provinces) were explored for the first time using GCxGC–ToF–MS. Several GCxGC parameters were optimised including; incubation time, temperature and modulation period. Multivariate data analysis techniques (principal component and hierarchical cluster analyses) were applied on the GCxGC–ToF–MS data to investigate trends and clustering patterns within propolis samples. The results demonstrated that headspace volatiles of propolis varied between locations. The volatile profiles were dominated by monoterpenes such as α-pinene (1.2–46.5%), β-pinene (2.0–21.8%), dihydrosabinene (trace-17.8%), limonene (trace-11.6%), p-cymene (0.1–5.3%), 1,8-cineole (0.1–11.0%), 2,7-dimethyl-3-octen-5-yne (trace-11.7%), E-β-ocimene (trace-17.8%), octanal (trace-12.9%), styrene (trace-13.5%) and α-thujene (trace-11.0%). Principal component analysis revealed chemical variation within propolis from the various locations. The heatmap of the averages revealed dehydrosabinene, isopropentyltoluene, p-cymene, acetophenone and α-thujene as chemical markers for the Northern Cape propolis, while λ-terpinene, propanoic acid, furfural, 2-methoxy benzyl alcohol and hexanoic acid methylester were filtered out as markers for Gauteng propolis. The propolis samples originating from the Western Cape Province were dominated by prenal, cinnamaldehyde styrene, 1,8-cineole, decanal, prenyl acetate and butanoic acid. Using GCxGC–ToF–MS in combination with chemometrics, it was possible to profile headspace volatile constituents of propolis and further identify marker compounds that differentiate propolis from various provinces in South Africa.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Elsevier Editora Ltda</pub><doi>10.1016/j.bjp.2018.12.002</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0102-695X
ispartof Revista brasileira de farmacognosia, 2019-05, Vol.29 (3), p.351-357
issn 0102-695X
1981-528X
1981-528X
language eng
recordid cdi_scielo_journals_S0102_695X2019000300351
source SpringerLink; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Chemometrics
GCxGC–ToF–MS
Headspace
Original Article
PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pharmacy
Propolis
South Africa
title Headspace analysis and characterisation of South African propolis volatile compounds using GCxGC–ToF–MS
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T14%3A05%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-scielo_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Headspace%20analysis%20and%20characterisation%20of%20South%20African%20propolis%20volatile%20compounds%20using%20GCxGC%E2%80%93ToF%E2%80%93MS&rft.jtitle=Revista%20brasileira%20de%20farmacognosia&rft.au=Kamatou,%20Guy&rft.date=2019-05-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=351&rft.epage=357&rft.pages=351-357&rft.issn=0102-695X&rft.eissn=1981-528X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bjp.2018.12.002&rft_dat=%3Cscielo_cross%3ES0102_695X2019000300351%3C/scielo_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_scielo_id=S0102_695X2019000300351&rft_els_id=S0102695X18305647&rfr_iscdi=true