Comparison and evaluation of two methods for the pesticide residue analysis of organophosphates in yerba mate
Microwave Assisted Extraction and a modified CEN-QuEChERS methodology were evaluated as extraction and clean up procedures for the simultaneous analysis of 42 organophosphate pesticides in yerba mate (Ilex paraguaiensis). The obtained extracts were analyzed by gas chromatography using a flame photom...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Revista brasileira de farmacognosia 2015-03, Vol.25 (2), p.98-104 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 104 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 98 |
container_title | Revista brasileira de farmacognosia |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Pareja, Lucía Niell, Silvina Vryzas, Zisis González, Joaquín Cesio, María Verónica Mourkidou, Euphemia P. Heinzen, Horacio |
description | Microwave Assisted Extraction and a modified CEN-QuEChERS methodology were evaluated as extraction and clean up procedures for the simultaneous analysis of 42 organophosphate pesticides in yerba mate (Ilex paraguaiensis). The obtained extracts were analyzed by gas chromatography using a flame photometric detector. Linearity, recovery percentages, relative standard deviations, detection and quantification limits and matrix effects were determined according to DG-SANCO guidelines for both methods. At 0.2 and 0.5mg/kg the evaluated methods showed percentages recoveries between 70 and 120% for most of the analytes. Using Microwave Assisted Extraction methodology, 33 pesticide residues could be properly analyzed whereas only 27 could be determined with the proposed modified QuEChERS. All relative standard deviation were below 18% except for omethoate and disulfoton sulfone when evaluated by the modified QuEChERS. The limits of detection in both methodologies were 0.2mg/kg for most of the analyzed compounds. The average detection limit for QuEChERS was 0.04mg/kg. For 19 of the analytes determined through Microwave Assisted Extraction the lowest validated level were 0.004mg/kg. Signal suppression/enhancement was observed for most of the pesticides, thus matrix-matched calibration curves were used for quantification. The Microwave Assisted Extraction and QuEChERS procedures studied could detect the organophosphate pesticides above the MRL fixed for “mate” by the European Union. They have been successfully applied for the determination of organophosphate pesticide residues in commercial samples and the positives were confirmed through GC–(ITD)-MS. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.bjp.2015.02.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>scielo_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scielo_journals_S0102_695X2015000200098</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S0102_695X2015000200098</scielo_id><els_id>S0102695X15000496</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0102_695X2015000200098</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-5b3f2acb4f03966b9885c0e30f3c1f4f842b04b506148e40e0da00d1f18145423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KxDAQgIMouK4-gLe8QOskTUuKJ1n8gwUPKngLaTqxKdumJF1l396UFbx5GIaB-ebnI-SaQc6AVTd93vRTzoGVOfAcgJ2QFasly0ouP07JChjwrKrLj3NyEWMPUFaSyxUZNn6YdHDRj1SPLcUvvdvr2aXSWzp_ezrg3Pk2UusDnTukE8bZGdciDRhdu8fE6d0hurgQPnzq0U-dj1OnZ4zUjfSAodF0SOUlObN6F_HqN6_J-8P92-Yp2748Pm_utpkRnM9Z2RSWa9MIC0VdVU0tZWkAC7CFYVZYKXgDoimhYkKiAIRWA7TMMslEKXixJvlxbjQOd171fh_SkVG9Lh7U4mFRBQA8RS0TwI6ACT7GgFZNwQ06HBQDtQhWvUqC1UKpNCEJTgz_XZJ6x08Mf2v-g26PEKb3v1yClhNHg60LaGbVevcP_QPCAZMh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison and evaluation of two methods for the pesticide residue analysis of organophosphates in yerba mate</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Pareja, Lucía ; Niell, Silvina ; Vryzas, Zisis ; González, Joaquín ; Cesio, María Verónica ; Mourkidou, Euphemia P. ; Heinzen, Horacio</creator><creatorcontrib>Pareja, Lucía ; Niell, Silvina ; Vryzas, Zisis ; González, Joaquín ; Cesio, María Verónica ; Mourkidou, Euphemia P. ; Heinzen, Horacio</creatorcontrib><description>Microwave Assisted Extraction and a modified CEN-QuEChERS methodology were evaluated as extraction and clean up procedures for the simultaneous analysis of 42 organophosphate pesticides in yerba mate (Ilex paraguaiensis). The obtained extracts were analyzed by gas chromatography using a flame photometric detector. Linearity, recovery percentages, relative standard deviations, detection and quantification limits and matrix effects were determined according to DG-SANCO guidelines for both methods. At 0.2 and 0.5mg/kg the evaluated methods showed percentages recoveries between 70 and 120% for most of the analytes. Using Microwave Assisted Extraction methodology, 33 pesticide residues could be properly analyzed whereas only 27 could be determined with the proposed modified QuEChERS. All relative standard deviation were below 18% except for omethoate and disulfoton sulfone when evaluated by the modified QuEChERS. The limits of detection in both methodologies were 0.2mg/kg for most of the analyzed compounds. The average detection limit for QuEChERS was 0.04mg/kg. For 19 of the analytes determined through Microwave Assisted Extraction the lowest validated level were 0.004mg/kg. Signal suppression/enhancement was observed for most of the pesticides, thus matrix-matched calibration curves were used for quantification. The Microwave Assisted Extraction and QuEChERS procedures studied could detect the organophosphate pesticides above the MRL fixed for “mate” by the European Union. They have been successfully applied for the determination of organophosphate pesticide residues in commercial samples and the positives were confirmed through GC–(ITD)-MS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0102-695X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1981-528X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1981-528X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bjp.2015.02.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Elsevier Editora Ltda</publisher><subject>GC–FPD ; MAE ; Original Article ; Pesticide residues ; PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY ; Pharmacy ; QuEChERS ; Yerba mate</subject><ispartof>Revista brasileira de farmacognosia, 2015-03, Vol.25 (2), p.98-104</ispartof><rights>2015 Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacognosia</rights><rights>Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacognosia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved. 2015</rights><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-5b3f2acb4f03966b9885c0e30f3c1f4f842b04b506148e40e0da00d1f18145423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-5b3f2acb4f03966b9885c0e30f3c1f4f842b04b506148e40e0da00d1f18145423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1016/j.bjp.2015.02.001$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1016/j.bjp.2015.02.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pareja, Lucía</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niell, Silvina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vryzas, Zisis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González, Joaquín</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cesio, María Verónica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mourkidou, Euphemia P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heinzen, Horacio</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison and evaluation of two methods for the pesticide residue analysis of organophosphates in yerba mate</title><title>Revista brasileira de farmacognosia</title><addtitle>Rev. Bras. Farmacogn</addtitle><addtitle>Rev. bras. farmacogn</addtitle><description>Microwave Assisted Extraction and a modified CEN-QuEChERS methodology were evaluated as extraction and clean up procedures for the simultaneous analysis of 42 organophosphate pesticides in yerba mate (Ilex paraguaiensis). The obtained extracts were analyzed by gas chromatography using a flame photometric detector. Linearity, recovery percentages, relative standard deviations, detection and quantification limits and matrix effects were determined according to DG-SANCO guidelines for both methods. At 0.2 and 0.5mg/kg the evaluated methods showed percentages recoveries between 70 and 120% for most of the analytes. Using Microwave Assisted Extraction methodology, 33 pesticide residues could be properly analyzed whereas only 27 could be determined with the proposed modified QuEChERS. All relative standard deviation were below 18% except for omethoate and disulfoton sulfone when evaluated by the modified QuEChERS. The limits of detection in both methodologies were 0.2mg/kg for most of the analyzed compounds. The average detection limit for QuEChERS was 0.04mg/kg. For 19 of the analytes determined through Microwave Assisted Extraction the lowest validated level were 0.004mg/kg. Signal suppression/enhancement was observed for most of the pesticides, thus matrix-matched calibration curves were used for quantification. The Microwave Assisted Extraction and QuEChERS procedures studied could detect the organophosphate pesticides above the MRL fixed for “mate” by the European Union. They have been successfully applied for the determination of organophosphate pesticide residues in commercial samples and the positives were confirmed through GC–(ITD)-MS.</description><subject>GC–FPD</subject><subject>MAE</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pesticide residues</subject><subject>PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY</subject><subject>Pharmacy</subject><subject>QuEChERS</subject><subject>Yerba mate</subject><issn>0102-695X</issn><issn>1981-528X</issn><issn>1981-528X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1KxDAQgIMouK4-gLe8QOskTUuKJ1n8gwUPKngLaTqxKdumJF1l396UFbx5GIaB-ebnI-SaQc6AVTd93vRTzoGVOfAcgJ2QFasly0ouP07JChjwrKrLj3NyEWMPUFaSyxUZNn6YdHDRj1SPLcUvvdvr2aXSWzp_ezrg3Pk2UusDnTukE8bZGdciDRhdu8fE6d0hurgQPnzq0U-dj1OnZ4zUjfSAodF0SOUlObN6F_HqN6_J-8P92-Yp2748Pm_utpkRnM9Z2RSWa9MIC0VdVU0tZWkAC7CFYVZYKXgDoimhYkKiAIRWA7TMMslEKXixJvlxbjQOd171fh_SkVG9Lh7U4mFRBQA8RS0TwI6ACT7GgFZNwQ06HBQDtQhWvUqC1UKpNCEJTgz_XZJ6x08Mf2v-g26PEKb3v1yClhNHg60LaGbVevcP_QPCAZMh</recordid><startdate>20150301</startdate><enddate>20150301</enddate><creator>Pareja, Lucía</creator><creator>Niell, Silvina</creator><creator>Vryzas, Zisis</creator><creator>González, Joaquín</creator><creator>Cesio, María Verónica</creator><creator>Mourkidou, Euphemia P.</creator><creator>Heinzen, Horacio</creator><general>Elsevier Editora Ltda</general><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacognosia</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>GPN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150301</creationdate><title>Comparison and evaluation of two methods for the pesticide residue analysis of organophosphates in yerba mate</title><author>Pareja, Lucía ; Niell, Silvina ; Vryzas, Zisis ; González, Joaquín ; Cesio, María Verónica ; Mourkidou, Euphemia P. ; Heinzen, Horacio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-5b3f2acb4f03966b9885c0e30f3c1f4f842b04b506148e40e0da00d1f18145423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>GC–FPD</topic><topic>MAE</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pesticide residues</topic><topic>PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY</topic><topic>Pharmacy</topic><topic>QuEChERS</topic><topic>Yerba mate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pareja, Lucía</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niell, Silvina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vryzas, Zisis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González, Joaquín</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cesio, María Verónica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mourkidou, Euphemia P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heinzen, Horacio</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><jtitle>Revista brasileira de farmacognosia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pareja, Lucía</au><au>Niell, Silvina</au><au>Vryzas, Zisis</au><au>González, Joaquín</au><au>Cesio, María Verónica</au><au>Mourkidou, Euphemia P.</au><au>Heinzen, Horacio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison and evaluation of two methods for the pesticide residue analysis of organophosphates in yerba mate</atitle><jtitle>Revista brasileira de farmacognosia</jtitle><stitle>Rev. Bras. Farmacogn</stitle><addtitle>Rev. bras. farmacogn</addtitle><date>2015-03-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>98</spage><epage>104</epage><pages>98-104</pages><issn>0102-695X</issn><issn>1981-528X</issn><eissn>1981-528X</eissn><abstract>Microwave Assisted Extraction and a modified CEN-QuEChERS methodology were evaluated as extraction and clean up procedures for the simultaneous analysis of 42 organophosphate pesticides in yerba mate (Ilex paraguaiensis). The obtained extracts were analyzed by gas chromatography using a flame photometric detector. Linearity, recovery percentages, relative standard deviations, detection and quantification limits and matrix effects were determined according to DG-SANCO guidelines for both methods. At 0.2 and 0.5mg/kg the evaluated methods showed percentages recoveries between 70 and 120% for most of the analytes. Using Microwave Assisted Extraction methodology, 33 pesticide residues could be properly analyzed whereas only 27 could be determined with the proposed modified QuEChERS. All relative standard deviation were below 18% except for omethoate and disulfoton sulfone when evaluated by the modified QuEChERS. The limits of detection in both methodologies were 0.2mg/kg for most of the analyzed compounds. The average detection limit for QuEChERS was 0.04mg/kg. For 19 of the analytes determined through Microwave Assisted Extraction the lowest validated level were 0.004mg/kg. Signal suppression/enhancement was observed for most of the pesticides, thus matrix-matched calibration curves were used for quantification. The Microwave Assisted Extraction and QuEChERS procedures studied could detect the organophosphate pesticides above the MRL fixed for “mate” by the European Union. They have been successfully applied for the determination of organophosphate pesticide residues in commercial samples and the positives were confirmed through GC–(ITD)-MS.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Elsevier Editora Ltda</pub><doi>10.1016/j.bjp.2015.02.001</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0102-695X |
ispartof | Revista brasileira de farmacognosia, 2015-03, Vol.25 (2), p.98-104 |
issn | 0102-695X 1981-528X 1981-528X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_scielo_journals_S0102_695X2015000200098 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | GC–FPD MAE Original Article Pesticide residues PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmacy QuEChERS Yerba mate |
title | Comparison and evaluation of two methods for the pesticide residue analysis of organophosphates in yerba mate |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T10%3A35%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-scielo_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20and%20evaluation%20of%20two%20methods%20for%20the%20pesticide%20residue%20analysis%20of%20organophosphates%20in%20yerba%20mate&rft.jtitle=Revista%20brasileira%20de%20farmacognosia&rft.au=Pareja,%20Luc%C3%ADa&rft.date=2015-03-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=98&rft.epage=104&rft.pages=98-104&rft.issn=0102-695X&rft.eissn=1981-528X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bjp.2015.02.001&rft_dat=%3Cscielo_cross%3ES0102_695X2015000200098%3C/scielo_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_scielo_id=S0102_695X2015000200098&rft_els_id=S0102695X15000496&rfr_iscdi=true |