Knee ligament injuries: biomechanics comparative study of two suturetechnique in tendon – analysis “in vitro” tendon of bovine

To evaluate and compare the biomechanical behavior of two different suture configurations:“X”and“Loop”in the preparation of tendons for knee ligament reconstruction. We used common digital extensor tendons of bovine that can replace the human flexor tendons in experimental studies of traction. In th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Revista brasileira de ortopedia 2013-01, Vol.48 (1), p.80-86
Hauptverfasser: Silva, Elias Marcelo Batista da, Albano, Mauro Batista, Alberti, Hermes Augusto Agottani, Pereira Filho, Francisco Assis, Namba, Mario Massatomo, Silva, João Luiz Viera da, Cunha, Luiz Antônio Munhoz da
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 86
container_issue 1
container_start_page 80
container_title Revista brasileira de ortopedia
container_volume 48
creator Silva, Elias Marcelo Batista da
Albano, Mauro Batista
Alberti, Hermes Augusto Agottani
Pereira Filho, Francisco Assis
Namba, Mario Massatomo
Silva, João Luiz Viera da
Cunha, Luiz Antônio Munhoz da
description To evaluate and compare the biomechanical behavior of two different suture configurations:“X”and“Loop”in the preparation of tendons for knee ligament reconstruction. We used common digital extensor tendons of bovine that can replace the human flexor tendons in experimental studies of traction. In the first group, point “X” suture with Ethibond ® No. 5 began in the distal graft points transfixing, with spacing of 7.5mm points to reach 03cm distal to the beginning of the suture, returning suture in the same manner, transfixing the tendon in open spaces across the suture configuration “X”. The second group, the point “Loop” was prepared with the same type Ethibond ® No. 5 of the needle wire was removed for use only of the wire was mounted in a twofold manner in a single piece forming a needle loop. Started the suture 3cm from the end of the graft through loops and transfixing points throughout the tendon substance, with spacing between dots of 7.5mm. The Maximum Force of Rupture suture in “Loop” was 444.45N and the suture in “X” was 407.59N with statistical significance (p = 0.030). The average Tension obtained at the suture in “Loop” was 27.67MPa and at the suture in “X” was 25.73MPa with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.036). The stiffness showed no statistical differences (p = 0.350) at 11.804N / mm at the point where “Loop” and 11.570N / mm at the suture “X”. The suture in “Loop” had a higher biomechanical behavior to the suture “X”, considering the Maximum Force and Tension.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.rboe.2012.07.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sciel</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scielo_journals_S0102_36162013000100080</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S0102_36162013000100080</scielo_id><els_id>S2255497113000165</els_id><sourcerecordid>2258152227</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3391-bd526166afec34ebf7f0cb8c9646828949d205baf7f163c1df46ba874683f643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uctu1TAUjBCIVqU_wAJ5yeYGP2InFyEkVPESlVjQveU4J62jxL7YTtDddcEfsIWf65dwottWZcPCso_PzPh4piieM1oyytSroYxtgJJTxktal5SyR8Ux51Juqm3NHj84HxWnKQ0UEUpWildPiyPBBK0Yk8fFzy8egIzu0kzgM3F-mKOD9Jq0Lkxgr4x3NhEbpp2JJrsFSMpztyehJ_lHIGnOc4SMQO--z4B8ksF3wZOb61_EeDPuk0tY_MbO4nIMN9d_7iCo0YbFeXhWPOnNmOD0dj8pLj68vzj7tDn_-vHz2bvzjRViyzZtJ7liSpkerKig7eue2raxW1WphjfbattxKluD90wJy7q-Uq1pauyKXlXipCgPssk6GIMewhxxwqS_UUa5FqiNdorVKVwNRcLbA2E3txN0Fh2KZtS76CYT9zoYp__teHelL8OilVSykRwFXt4KxID2pKwnlyyMo_EQ5qQxo4ZJznmNUH6A2hhSitDfP8OoXhPXg14T12vimtYap0TSi4cD3lPu8kXAmwMA0NbFQdTr372FzkWwWXfB_U__L9Y_wEU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2258152227</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Knee ligament injuries: biomechanics comparative study of two suturetechnique in tendon – analysis “in vitro” tendon of bovine</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Silva, Elias Marcelo Batista da ; Albano, Mauro Batista ; Alberti, Hermes Augusto Agottani ; Pereira Filho, Francisco Assis ; Namba, Mario Massatomo ; Silva, João Luiz Viera da ; Cunha, Luiz Antônio Munhoz da</creator><creatorcontrib>Silva, Elias Marcelo Batista da ; Albano, Mauro Batista ; Alberti, Hermes Augusto Agottani ; Pereira Filho, Francisco Assis ; Namba, Mario Massatomo ; Silva, João Luiz Viera da ; Cunha, Luiz Antônio Munhoz da</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate and compare the biomechanical behavior of two different suture configurations:“X”and“Loop”in the preparation of tendons for knee ligament reconstruction. We used common digital extensor tendons of bovine that can replace the human flexor tendons in experimental studies of traction. In the first group, point “X” suture with Ethibond ® No. 5 began in the distal graft points transfixing, with spacing of 7.5mm points to reach 03cm distal to the beginning of the suture, returning suture in the same manner, transfixing the tendon in open spaces across the suture configuration “X”. The second group, the point “Loop” was prepared with the same type Ethibond ® No. 5 of the needle wire was removed for use only of the wire was mounted in a twofold manner in a single piece forming a needle loop. Started the suture 3cm from the end of the graft through loops and transfixing points throughout the tendon substance, with spacing between dots of 7.5mm. The Maximum Force of Rupture suture in “Loop” was 444.45N and the suture in “X” was 407.59N with statistical significance (p = 0.030). The average Tension obtained at the suture in “Loop” was 27.67MPa and at the suture in “X” was 25.73MPa with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.036). The stiffness showed no statistical differences (p = 0.350) at 11.804N / mm at the point where “Loop” and 11.570N / mm at the suture “X”. The suture in “Loop” had a higher biomechanical behavior to the suture “X”, considering the Maximum Force and Tension.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2255-4971</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1982-4378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2255-4971</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.rboe.2012.07.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31304115</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brazil: Elsevier Editora Ltda</publisher><subject>Anterior cruciate ligament ; Biomechanics ; Original ; ORTHOPEDICS ; Suture techniques ; Transplants</subject><ispartof>Revista brasileira de ortopedia, 2013-01, Vol.48 (1), p.80-86</ispartof><rights>2013 Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia</rights><rights>2013 Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. 2013 Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia</rights><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3391-bd526166afec34ebf7f0cb8c9646828949d205baf7f163c1df46ba874683f643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3391-bd526166afec34ebf7f0cb8c9646828949d205baf7f163c1df46ba874683f643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6565852/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6565852/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31304115$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Silva, Elias Marcelo Batista da</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albano, Mauro Batista</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alberti, Hermes Augusto Agottani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira Filho, Francisco Assis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Namba, Mario Massatomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, João Luiz Viera da</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunha, Luiz Antônio Munhoz da</creatorcontrib><title>Knee ligament injuries: biomechanics comparative study of two suturetechnique in tendon – analysis “in vitro” tendon of bovine</title><title>Revista brasileira de ortopedia</title><addtitle>Rev Bras Ortop</addtitle><description>To evaluate and compare the biomechanical behavior of two different suture configurations:“X”and“Loop”in the preparation of tendons for knee ligament reconstruction. We used common digital extensor tendons of bovine that can replace the human flexor tendons in experimental studies of traction. In the first group, point “X” suture with Ethibond ® No. 5 began in the distal graft points transfixing, with spacing of 7.5mm points to reach 03cm distal to the beginning of the suture, returning suture in the same manner, transfixing the tendon in open spaces across the suture configuration “X”. The second group, the point “Loop” was prepared with the same type Ethibond ® No. 5 of the needle wire was removed for use only of the wire was mounted in a twofold manner in a single piece forming a needle loop. Started the suture 3cm from the end of the graft through loops and transfixing points throughout the tendon substance, with spacing between dots of 7.5mm. The Maximum Force of Rupture suture in “Loop” was 444.45N and the suture in “X” was 407.59N with statistical significance (p = 0.030). The average Tension obtained at the suture in “Loop” was 27.67MPa and at the suture in “X” was 25.73MPa with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.036). The stiffness showed no statistical differences (p = 0.350) at 11.804N / mm at the point where “Loop” and 11.570N / mm at the suture “X”. The suture in “Loop” had a higher biomechanical behavior to the suture “X”, considering the Maximum Force and Tension.</description><subject>Anterior cruciate ligament</subject><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>ORTHOPEDICS</subject><subject>Suture techniques</subject><subject>Transplants</subject><issn>2255-4971</issn><issn>1982-4378</issn><issn>2255-4971</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9Uctu1TAUjBCIVqU_wAJ5yeYGP2InFyEkVPESlVjQveU4J62jxL7YTtDddcEfsIWf65dwottWZcPCso_PzPh4piieM1oyytSroYxtgJJTxktal5SyR8Ux51Juqm3NHj84HxWnKQ0UEUpWildPiyPBBK0Yk8fFzy8egIzu0kzgM3F-mKOD9Jq0Lkxgr4x3NhEbpp2JJrsFSMpztyehJ_lHIGnOc4SMQO--z4B8ksF3wZOb61_EeDPuk0tY_MbO4nIMN9d_7iCo0YbFeXhWPOnNmOD0dj8pLj68vzj7tDn_-vHz2bvzjRViyzZtJ7liSpkerKig7eue2raxW1WphjfbattxKluD90wJy7q-Uq1pauyKXlXipCgPssk6GIMewhxxwqS_UUa5FqiNdorVKVwNRcLbA2E3txN0Fh2KZtS76CYT9zoYp__teHelL8OilVSykRwFXt4KxID2pKwnlyyMo_EQ5qQxo4ZJznmNUH6A2hhSitDfP8OoXhPXg14T12vimtYap0TSi4cD3lPu8kXAmwMA0NbFQdTr372FzkWwWXfB_U__L9Y_wEU</recordid><startdate>20130101</startdate><enddate>20130101</enddate><creator>Silva, Elias Marcelo Batista da</creator><creator>Albano, Mauro Batista</creator><creator>Alberti, Hermes Augusto Agottani</creator><creator>Pereira Filho, Francisco Assis</creator><creator>Namba, Mario Massatomo</creator><creator>Silva, João Luiz Viera da</creator><creator>Cunha, Luiz Antônio Munhoz da</creator><general>Elsevier Editora Ltda</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>GPN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130101</creationdate><title>Knee ligament injuries: biomechanics comparative study of two suturetechnique in tendon – analysis “in vitro” tendon of bovine</title><author>Silva, Elias Marcelo Batista da ; Albano, Mauro Batista ; Alberti, Hermes Augusto Agottani ; Pereira Filho, Francisco Assis ; Namba, Mario Massatomo ; Silva, João Luiz Viera da ; Cunha, Luiz Antônio Munhoz da</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3391-bd526166afec34ebf7f0cb8c9646828949d205baf7f163c1df46ba874683f643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Anterior cruciate ligament</topic><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>ORTHOPEDICS</topic><topic>Suture techniques</topic><topic>Transplants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Silva, Elias Marcelo Batista da</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albano, Mauro Batista</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alberti, Hermes Augusto Agottani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira Filho, Francisco Assis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Namba, Mario Massatomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, João Luiz Viera da</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunha, Luiz Antônio Munhoz da</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><jtitle>Revista brasileira de ortopedia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Silva, Elias Marcelo Batista da</au><au>Albano, Mauro Batista</au><au>Alberti, Hermes Augusto Agottani</au><au>Pereira Filho, Francisco Assis</au><au>Namba, Mario Massatomo</au><au>Silva, João Luiz Viera da</au><au>Cunha, Luiz Antônio Munhoz da</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Knee ligament injuries: biomechanics comparative study of two suturetechnique in tendon – analysis “in vitro” tendon of bovine</atitle><jtitle>Revista brasileira de ortopedia</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Bras Ortop</addtitle><date>2013-01-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>80</spage><epage>86</epage><pages>80-86</pages><issn>2255-4971</issn><issn>1982-4378</issn><eissn>2255-4971</eissn><abstract>To evaluate and compare the biomechanical behavior of two different suture configurations:“X”and“Loop”in the preparation of tendons for knee ligament reconstruction. We used common digital extensor tendons of bovine that can replace the human flexor tendons in experimental studies of traction. In the first group, point “X” suture with Ethibond ® No. 5 began in the distal graft points transfixing, with spacing of 7.5mm points to reach 03cm distal to the beginning of the suture, returning suture in the same manner, transfixing the tendon in open spaces across the suture configuration “X”. The second group, the point “Loop” was prepared with the same type Ethibond ® No. 5 of the needle wire was removed for use only of the wire was mounted in a twofold manner in a single piece forming a needle loop. Started the suture 3cm from the end of the graft through loops and transfixing points throughout the tendon substance, with spacing between dots of 7.5mm. The Maximum Force of Rupture suture in “Loop” was 444.45N and the suture in “X” was 407.59N with statistical significance (p = 0.030). The average Tension obtained at the suture in “Loop” was 27.67MPa and at the suture in “X” was 25.73MPa with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.036). The stiffness showed no statistical differences (p = 0.350) at 11.804N / mm at the point where “Loop” and 11.570N / mm at the suture “X”. The suture in “Loop” had a higher biomechanical behavior to the suture “X”, considering the Maximum Force and Tension.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pub>Elsevier Editora Ltda</pub><pmid>31304115</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.rboe.2012.07.001</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2255-4971
ispartof Revista brasileira de ortopedia, 2013-01, Vol.48 (1), p.80-86
issn 2255-4971
1982-4378
2255-4971
language eng
recordid cdi_scielo_journals_S0102_36162013000100080
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Anterior cruciate ligament
Biomechanics
Original
ORTHOPEDICS
Suture techniques
Transplants
title Knee ligament injuries: biomechanics comparative study of two suturetechnique in tendon – analysis “in vitro” tendon of bovine
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T08%3A41%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sciel&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Knee%20ligament%20injuries:%20biomechanics%20comparative%20study%20of%20two%20suturetechnique%20in%20tendon%20%E2%80%93%20analysis%20%E2%80%9Cin%20vitro%E2%80%9D%20tendon%20of%20bovine&rft.jtitle=Revista%20brasileira%20de%20ortopedia&rft.au=Silva,%20Elias%20Marcelo%20Batista%20da&rft.date=2013-01-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=80&rft.epage=86&rft.pages=80-86&rft.issn=2255-4971&rft.eissn=2255-4971&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.rboe.2012.07.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sciel%3E2258152227%3C/proquest_sciel%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2258152227&rft_id=info:pmid/31304115&rft_scielo_id=S0102_36162013000100080&rft_els_id=S2255497113000165&rfr_iscdi=true