Interference Periods of Weeds in Maize in No-Tillage and Conventional Systems at High Altitudes
The objective of this study was to determine the coexistence periods of weeds (CTWR = critical timing of weed removal) and control (CWFP = critical weed-free period) in maize crops in no-tillage and conventional systems at high altitudes in southern Brazil. To this end, four experiments were conduct...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Advances in Weed Science 2020, Vol.38 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Advances in Weed Science |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | HELVIG, E.O. PINHEIRO, K.K.G. DRANCA, A.C. SILVA, A.A.P. MENDES, M.C. MACIEL, C.D.G. |
description | The objective of this study was to determine the coexistence periods of weeds (CTWR = critical timing of weed removal) and control (CWFP = critical weed-free period) in maize crops in no-tillage and conventional systems at high altitudes in southern Brazil. To this end, four experiments were conducted in Guarapuava-Paraná during the 2016/2017 crop season using P2530™ (conventional) and P3271H™ (transgenic genetically modified for glyphosate tolerance) hybrids in no-tillage and conventional systems with crop residues of black oat (Avena strigosa). The experimental design was a randomized complete block with five repetitions. The treatments were divided into periods of CTWR and CWFP for 0, 7, 14, 28, 42, 63, and 126 days after the emergence of crops (DAE). Among the weeds, only eudicotyledonous species predominated throughout the crop cycle in both production systems. The productivity results established for P2530™ and P3271H™ hybrids in a conventional system with the incorporation of straw in the soil indicated a critical period of weed control (CPWC) from 23 to 39 DAE and 23 to 35 DAE, respectively. For direct sowing (no-tillage system) on black oat straw, no CPWC was established, as it required only one single point of control between the periods of 21 to 33 DAE and 23 to 31 DAE for the P2530™ and P3271H™ hybrids, respectively. The direct sowing in black oat straw constituted an efficient strategy to reduce weed interference and the necessity of weed management practices.
RESUMO: A presente pesquisa teve como objetivo determinar os períodos anterior à interferência (CTWR) e total de prevenção da interferência (CWFP) das plantas daninhas na cultura do milho, em sistemas de plantio direto e convencional em ambiente de elevada altitude, na região Sul do Brasil. Para isso, oito experimentos foram conduzidos em campo em Guarapuava-PR, durante a safra 2016/2017, utilizando os híbridos P2530® (convencional) e P3271H® (transgênico geneticamente modificado para tolerância ao glifosato) em sistema de semeadura direta e convencional com resíduos culturais de aveia-preta (Avena strigosa). O delineamento experimental foi o de blocos casualizados com cinco repetições. Os tratamentos foram divididos em períodos de CTWR e CWFP das plantas daninhas durante 0, 7, 14, 28, 42, 63 e 126 dias após a emergência da cultura (DAE). Entre as plantas daninhas, verificou-se predomínio apenas de espécies eudicotiledôneas durante todo o ciclo da cultura em ambos os sistemas de produção |
doi_str_mv | 10.1590/s0100-83582020380100029 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scielo_journals_S0100_83582020000100229</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S0100_83582020000100229</scielo_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4f63fbcbcfa744958d65b6ebf4dda065</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2394614529</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-6f746c8d38ee077745ab9b8ba02ae16806aa1f6265fe2814542242e6a053a0553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUdtKHEEQbYKBrMZvsCHPY_o-PY-ymLhgoqDiY1MzU732Mk5rd29Avz4zrtlgQVEXzjnUhZATzk65btj3zDhjlZXaCiaYtHPJRPOJLLhlpmqM5QdksQd9IYc5b2aENvWCuNVYMHlMOHZIrzGF2GcaPb1HnJIw0l8QXnFOfsfqNgwDrJHC2NNlHP_gWEIcYaA3L7ngY6ZQ6EVYP9CzoYSy7TF_JZ89DBmP3-MRuftxfru8qC6vfq6WZ5dVJ01TKuNrZTrbS4vI6rpWGtqmtS0wAcjNtAgA90YY7VFYrrQSQgk0wLScXMsjstrp9hE27imFR0gvLkJwb42Y1g5SCd2ATnkjfdu1nYdaqUbb3ujWYOtV3wMzs9bpTit3AYfoNnGbpiWzu5mv6P6derKpFKKZCN92hKcUn7eYy3-KkI0y07xvqHqH6lLMOaHfj8mZm1_p8gf9_SvlX2LRjaQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2394614529</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interference Periods of Weeds in Maize in No-Tillage and Conventional Systems at High Altitudes</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>HELVIG, E.O. ; PINHEIRO, K.K.G. ; DRANCA, A.C. ; SILVA, A.A.P. ; MENDES, M.C. ; MACIEL, C.D.G.</creator><creatorcontrib>HELVIG, E.O. ; PINHEIRO, K.K.G. ; DRANCA, A.C. ; SILVA, A.A.P. ; MENDES, M.C. ; MACIEL, C.D.G.</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study was to determine the coexistence periods of weeds (CTWR = critical timing of weed removal) and control (CWFP = critical weed-free period) in maize crops in no-tillage and conventional systems at high altitudes in southern Brazil. To this end, four experiments were conducted in Guarapuava-Paraná during the 2016/2017 crop season using P2530™ (conventional) and P3271H™ (transgenic genetically modified for glyphosate tolerance) hybrids in no-tillage and conventional systems with crop residues of black oat (Avena strigosa). The experimental design was a randomized complete block with five repetitions. The treatments were divided into periods of CTWR and CWFP for 0, 7, 14, 28, 42, 63, and 126 days after the emergence of crops (DAE). Among the weeds, only eudicotyledonous species predominated throughout the crop cycle in both production systems. The productivity results established for P2530™ and P3271H™ hybrids in a conventional system with the incorporation of straw in the soil indicated a critical period of weed control (CPWC) from 23 to 39 DAE and 23 to 35 DAE, respectively. For direct sowing (no-tillage system) on black oat straw, no CPWC was established, as it required only one single point of control between the periods of 21 to 33 DAE and 23 to 31 DAE for the P2530™ and P3271H™ hybrids, respectively. The direct sowing in black oat straw constituted an efficient strategy to reduce weed interference and the necessity of weed management practices.
RESUMO: A presente pesquisa teve como objetivo determinar os períodos anterior à interferência (CTWR) e total de prevenção da interferência (CWFP) das plantas daninhas na cultura do milho, em sistemas de plantio direto e convencional em ambiente de elevada altitude, na região Sul do Brasil. Para isso, oito experimentos foram conduzidos em campo em Guarapuava-PR, durante a safra 2016/2017, utilizando os híbridos P2530® (convencional) e P3271H® (transgênico geneticamente modificado para tolerância ao glifosato) em sistema de semeadura direta e convencional com resíduos culturais de aveia-preta (Avena strigosa). O delineamento experimental foi o de blocos casualizados com cinco repetições. Os tratamentos foram divididos em períodos de CTWR e CWFP das plantas daninhas durante 0, 7, 14, 28, 42, 63 e 126 dias após a emergência da cultura (DAE). Entre as plantas daninhas, verificou-se predomínio apenas de espécies eudicotiledôneas durante todo o ciclo da cultura em ambos os sistemas de produção. Os resultados de produtividade permitiram estabelecer para os híbridos P2530® e P3271H®, cultivados em semeadura convencional com incorporação da palha ao solo, períodos críticos de prevenção à interferência (CPWC) entre 23 a 39 DAE e 23 a 35 DAE, respectivamente. Para a semeadura direta sobre a palha de aveia-preta, não foram estabelecidos CPWC, sendo constatada a necessidade de apenas um único controle pontual entre os períodos de 21 a 33 DAE e 23 a 31 DAE para os híbridos P2530® e P3271H®, respectivamente. A semeadura direta em palha de aveia-preta constituiu-se estratégia eficiente para reduzir a matointerferência e a necessidade de práticas de manejo.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0100-8358</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1806-9681</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1806-9681</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2675-9462</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/s0100-83582020380100029</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Jaboticabal: Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas, UFV - Depto de Fitotecnia</publisher><subject>Cereal crops ; Coexistence ; Competition ; control ; Corn ; Crop residues ; Crops ; Cultivated plants ; Experiments ; Farms ; Flowers & plants ; Genetic modification ; Geographical coordinates ; Glyphosate ; Herbicides ; Hybrids ; Oats ; PLANT SCIENCES ; Productivity ; Tillage ; Weed control ; Weeds ; Zea mays L</subject><ispartof>Advances in Weed Science, 2020, Vol.38</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-6f746c8d38ee077745ab9b8ba02ae16806aa1f6265fe2814542242e6a053a0553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-6f746c8d38ee077745ab9b8ba02ae16806aa1f6265fe2814542242e6a053a0553</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2336-2306 ; 0000-0002-3640-6382 ; 0000-0003-3222-2946 ; 0000-0001-8225-4351 ; 0000-0001-8132-2615 ; 0000-0002-1823-6324</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2394614529/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2394614529?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,860,881,4010,21367,27900,27901,27902,33721,43781,74045</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>HELVIG, E.O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PINHEIRO, K.K.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DRANCA, A.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SILVA, A.A.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MENDES, M.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MACIEL, C.D.G.</creatorcontrib><title>Interference Periods of Weeds in Maize in No-Tillage and Conventional Systems at High Altitudes</title><title>Advances in Weed Science</title><addtitle>Planta daninha</addtitle><description>The objective of this study was to determine the coexistence periods of weeds (CTWR = critical timing of weed removal) and control (CWFP = critical weed-free period) in maize crops in no-tillage and conventional systems at high altitudes in southern Brazil. To this end, four experiments were conducted in Guarapuava-Paraná during the 2016/2017 crop season using P2530™ (conventional) and P3271H™ (transgenic genetically modified for glyphosate tolerance) hybrids in no-tillage and conventional systems with crop residues of black oat (Avena strigosa). The experimental design was a randomized complete block with five repetitions. The treatments were divided into periods of CTWR and CWFP for 0, 7, 14, 28, 42, 63, and 126 days after the emergence of crops (DAE). Among the weeds, only eudicotyledonous species predominated throughout the crop cycle in both production systems. The productivity results established for P2530™ and P3271H™ hybrids in a conventional system with the incorporation of straw in the soil indicated a critical period of weed control (CPWC) from 23 to 39 DAE and 23 to 35 DAE, respectively. For direct sowing (no-tillage system) on black oat straw, no CPWC was established, as it required only one single point of control between the periods of 21 to 33 DAE and 23 to 31 DAE for the P2530™ and P3271H™ hybrids, respectively. The direct sowing in black oat straw constituted an efficient strategy to reduce weed interference and the necessity of weed management practices.
RESUMO: A presente pesquisa teve como objetivo determinar os períodos anterior à interferência (CTWR) e total de prevenção da interferência (CWFP) das plantas daninhas na cultura do milho, em sistemas de plantio direto e convencional em ambiente de elevada altitude, na região Sul do Brasil. Para isso, oito experimentos foram conduzidos em campo em Guarapuava-PR, durante a safra 2016/2017, utilizando os híbridos P2530® (convencional) e P3271H® (transgênico geneticamente modificado para tolerância ao glifosato) em sistema de semeadura direta e convencional com resíduos culturais de aveia-preta (Avena strigosa). O delineamento experimental foi o de blocos casualizados com cinco repetições. Os tratamentos foram divididos em períodos de CTWR e CWFP das plantas daninhas durante 0, 7, 14, 28, 42, 63 e 126 dias após a emergência da cultura (DAE). Entre as plantas daninhas, verificou-se predomínio apenas de espécies eudicotiledôneas durante todo o ciclo da cultura em ambos os sistemas de produção. Os resultados de produtividade permitiram estabelecer para os híbridos P2530® e P3271H®, cultivados em semeadura convencional com incorporação da palha ao solo, períodos críticos de prevenção à interferência (CPWC) entre 23 a 39 DAE e 23 a 35 DAE, respectivamente. Para a semeadura direta sobre a palha de aveia-preta, não foram estabelecidos CPWC, sendo constatada a necessidade de apenas um único controle pontual entre os períodos de 21 a 33 DAE e 23 a 31 DAE para os híbridos P2530® e P3271H®, respectivamente. A semeadura direta em palha de aveia-preta constituiu-se estratégia eficiente para reduzir a matointerferência e a necessidade de práticas de manejo.</description><subject>Cereal crops</subject><subject>Coexistence</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>control</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Crop residues</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Cultivated plants</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Genetic modification</subject><subject>Geographical coordinates</subject><subject>Glyphosate</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Hybrids</subject><subject>Oats</subject><subject>PLANT SCIENCES</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Tillage</subject><subject>Weed control</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><subject>Zea mays L</subject><issn>0100-8358</issn><issn>1806-9681</issn><issn>1806-9681</issn><issn>2675-9462</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUdtKHEEQbYKBrMZvsCHPY_o-PY-ymLhgoqDiY1MzU732Mk5rd29Avz4zrtlgQVEXzjnUhZATzk65btj3zDhjlZXaCiaYtHPJRPOJLLhlpmqM5QdksQd9IYc5b2aENvWCuNVYMHlMOHZIrzGF2GcaPb1HnJIw0l8QXnFOfsfqNgwDrJHC2NNlHP_gWEIcYaA3L7ngY6ZQ6EVYP9CzoYSy7TF_JZ89DBmP3-MRuftxfru8qC6vfq6WZ5dVJ01TKuNrZTrbS4vI6rpWGtqmtS0wAcjNtAgA90YY7VFYrrQSQgk0wLScXMsjstrp9hE27imFR0gvLkJwb42Y1g5SCd2ATnkjfdu1nYdaqUbb3ujWYOtV3wMzs9bpTit3AYfoNnGbpiWzu5mv6P6derKpFKKZCN92hKcUn7eYy3-KkI0y07xvqHqH6lLMOaHfj8mZm1_p8gf9_SvlX2LRjaQ</recordid><startdate>2020</startdate><enddate>2020</enddate><creator>HELVIG, E.O.</creator><creator>PINHEIRO, K.K.G.</creator><creator>DRANCA, A.C.</creator><creator>SILVA, A.A.P.</creator><creator>MENDES, M.C.</creator><creator>MACIEL, C.D.G.</creator><general>Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas, UFV - Depto de Fitotecnia</general><general>Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>GPN</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2336-2306</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3640-6382</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3222-2946</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8225-4351</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8132-2615</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1823-6324</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2020</creationdate><title>Interference Periods of Weeds in Maize in No-Tillage and Conventional Systems at High Altitudes</title><author>HELVIG, E.O. ; PINHEIRO, K.K.G. ; DRANCA, A.C. ; SILVA, A.A.P. ; MENDES, M.C. ; MACIEL, C.D.G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-6f746c8d38ee077745ab9b8ba02ae16806aa1f6265fe2814542242e6a053a0553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cereal crops</topic><topic>Coexistence</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>control</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Crop residues</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Cultivated plants</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Genetic modification</topic><topic>Geographical coordinates</topic><topic>Glyphosate</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Hybrids</topic><topic>Oats</topic><topic>PLANT SCIENCES</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Tillage</topic><topic>Weed control</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><topic>Zea mays L</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HELVIG, E.O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PINHEIRO, K.K.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DRANCA, A.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SILVA, A.A.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MENDES, M.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MACIEL, C.D.G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Advances in Weed Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HELVIG, E.O.</au><au>PINHEIRO, K.K.G.</au><au>DRANCA, A.C.</au><au>SILVA, A.A.P.</au><au>MENDES, M.C.</au><au>MACIEL, C.D.G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interference Periods of Weeds in Maize in No-Tillage and Conventional Systems at High Altitudes</atitle><jtitle>Advances in Weed Science</jtitle><addtitle>Planta daninha</addtitle><date>2020</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>38</volume><issn>0100-8358</issn><issn>1806-9681</issn><eissn>1806-9681</eissn><eissn>2675-9462</eissn><abstract>The objective of this study was to determine the coexistence periods of weeds (CTWR = critical timing of weed removal) and control (CWFP = critical weed-free period) in maize crops in no-tillage and conventional systems at high altitudes in southern Brazil. To this end, four experiments were conducted in Guarapuava-Paraná during the 2016/2017 crop season using P2530™ (conventional) and P3271H™ (transgenic genetically modified for glyphosate tolerance) hybrids in no-tillage and conventional systems with crop residues of black oat (Avena strigosa). The experimental design was a randomized complete block with five repetitions. The treatments were divided into periods of CTWR and CWFP for 0, 7, 14, 28, 42, 63, and 126 days after the emergence of crops (DAE). Among the weeds, only eudicotyledonous species predominated throughout the crop cycle in both production systems. The productivity results established for P2530™ and P3271H™ hybrids in a conventional system with the incorporation of straw in the soil indicated a critical period of weed control (CPWC) from 23 to 39 DAE and 23 to 35 DAE, respectively. For direct sowing (no-tillage system) on black oat straw, no CPWC was established, as it required only one single point of control between the periods of 21 to 33 DAE and 23 to 31 DAE for the P2530™ and P3271H™ hybrids, respectively. The direct sowing in black oat straw constituted an efficient strategy to reduce weed interference and the necessity of weed management practices.
RESUMO: A presente pesquisa teve como objetivo determinar os períodos anterior à interferência (CTWR) e total de prevenção da interferência (CWFP) das plantas daninhas na cultura do milho, em sistemas de plantio direto e convencional em ambiente de elevada altitude, na região Sul do Brasil. Para isso, oito experimentos foram conduzidos em campo em Guarapuava-PR, durante a safra 2016/2017, utilizando os híbridos P2530® (convencional) e P3271H® (transgênico geneticamente modificado para tolerância ao glifosato) em sistema de semeadura direta e convencional com resíduos culturais de aveia-preta (Avena strigosa). O delineamento experimental foi o de blocos casualizados com cinco repetições. Os tratamentos foram divididos em períodos de CTWR e CWFP das plantas daninhas durante 0, 7, 14, 28, 42, 63 e 126 dias após a emergência da cultura (DAE). Entre as plantas daninhas, verificou-se predomínio apenas de espécies eudicotiledôneas durante todo o ciclo da cultura em ambos os sistemas de produção. Os resultados de produtividade permitiram estabelecer para os híbridos P2530® e P3271H®, cultivados em semeadura convencional com incorporação da palha ao solo, períodos críticos de prevenção à interferência (CPWC) entre 23 a 39 DAE e 23 a 35 DAE, respectivamente. Para a semeadura direta sobre a palha de aveia-preta, não foram estabelecidos CPWC, sendo constatada a necessidade de apenas um único controle pontual entre os períodos de 21 a 33 DAE e 23 a 31 DAE para os híbridos P2530® e P3271H®, respectivamente. A semeadura direta em palha de aveia-preta constituiu-se estratégia eficiente para reduzir a matointerferência e a necessidade de práticas de manejo.</abstract><cop>Jaboticabal</cop><pub>Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas, UFV - Depto de Fitotecnia</pub><doi>10.1590/s0100-83582020380100029</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2336-2306</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3640-6382</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3222-2946</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8225-4351</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8132-2615</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1823-6324</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0100-8358 |
ispartof | Advances in Weed Science, 2020, Vol.38 |
issn | 0100-8358 1806-9681 1806-9681 2675-9462 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_scielo_journals_S0100_83582020000100229 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; ProQuest Central |
subjects | Cereal crops Coexistence Competition control Corn Crop residues Crops Cultivated plants Experiments Farms Flowers & plants Genetic modification Geographical coordinates Glyphosate Herbicides Hybrids Oats PLANT SCIENCES Productivity Tillage Weed control Weeds Zea mays L |
title | Interference Periods of Weeds in Maize in No-Tillage and Conventional Systems at High Altitudes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T01%3A03%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interference%20Periods%20of%20Weeds%20in%20Maize%20in%20No-Tillage%20and%20Conventional%20Systems%20at%20High%20Altitudes&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20Weed%20Science&rft.au=HELVIG,%20E.O.&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=38&rft.issn=0100-8358&rft.eissn=1806-9681&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/s0100-83582020380100029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2394614529%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2394614529&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_scielo_id=S0100_83582020000100229&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_4f63fbcbcfa744958d65b6ebf4dda065&rfr_iscdi=true |