Comparative evaluation of different immunoassays for the detection of Taenia solium cysticercosis in swine with low parasite burden

Seven swine were experimentally infected with Taenia solium eggs and blood samples from each animal were periodically collected. At the end of the experiment (t140) the animals did not show clinical aspects of cysticercosis or parasites in tongue inspection. All animals were slaughtered and cut into...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 2007-09, Vol.102 (6), p.725-731
Hauptverfasser: Gomes, Andréia Bartachini, Soares, Killarney Ataíde, Bueno, Ednéia Casagrande, Espindola, Noeli Maria, Iha, Alberto Hiroshi, Maia, Antônio Augusto Mendes, Peralta, Regina Helena Saramargo, Vaz, Adelaide José
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 731
container_issue 6
container_start_page 725
container_title Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
container_volume 102
creator Gomes, Andréia Bartachini
Soares, Killarney Ataíde
Bueno, Ednéia Casagrande
Espindola, Noeli Maria
Iha, Alberto Hiroshi
Maia, Antônio Augusto Mendes
Peralta, Regina Helena Saramargo
Vaz, Adelaide José
description Seven swine were experimentally infected with Taenia solium eggs and blood samples from each animal were periodically collected. At the end of the experiment (t140) the animals did not show clinical aspects of cysticercosis or parasites in tongue inspection. All animals were slaughtered and cut into thin slices in searching for cysts. The number of cysts found in each animal varied from 1 to 85. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests for antibody (Ab) detection and for antigen (Ag) detection were performed, which presented respectively 71 and 57% of positivity. By immunoblot (IB), using 18/14(T. crassiceps Ag) or lentil-lectin-purified glycoproteins from T. solium Ag (LLGP) as Ag, five (71%) and six (86%) animals were positive, respectively. The association between Ag-ELISA with any IB (18/14 or LLGP) allowed the detection of all animals at 140 days post-experimental infection (days p.e.i.). The use of IB 18/14 combined to the Ag-ELISA allowed the detection of all animals since 70 days p.e.i., and the association between IB LLGP and Ag-ELISA allowed the detection of all animals since 112 days p.e.i. While all animals could be considered healthy by conventional screening tests, the use of immunoassays for detecting Ab and Ag showed better accuracy; therefore it would be more useful than usual clinical examination for screening cysticercosis in slightly infected pigs.
doi_str_mv 10.1590/S0074-02762007005000085
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sciel</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scielo_journals_S0074_02762007000600011</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S0074_02762007000600011</scielo_id><sourcerecordid>68368103</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b438t-8caf8fbbfebefc18ee937ee87ad3d459f1ac55955da1260fcea153600490b72e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplUU1v3CAURFWr5qP9Cy2n3pw-jDH4WK36ESlSD03PCOOHQmTDFnBWe84fL-luupWKkBjQzBs0Q8h7BldMDPDxB4DsGmhl31YEIKAuJV6Qc9ZL1Sjo4eU_-Ixc5HwPlc_77jU5Y3Jou3o9J4-buGxNMsU_IMUHM68VxkCjo5N3DhOGQv2yrCGanM0-UxcTLXdIJyxon7m3BoM3NMfZrwu1-1y8xWRj9pn6QPPOB6Q7X-7oHHf0yTD7gnRc04ThDXnlzJzx7fG8JD-_fL7dfGtuvn-93ny6acaOq9Ioa5xy4-hwRGeZQhy4RFTSTHzqxOCYsUIMQkyGtT04i4YJ3gN0A4yyRX5Jrg5zs_U4R30f1xSqof6Tpj6lWRMDYKwKPhwE2xR_rZiLXny2OM8mYFyz7hXvFQNeifJAtCnmnNDpbfKLSXvNQD8V9p_FsbCqfHe0WMcFp5Pu2NDp06Ov4Qb8y7DJG_38GG3dIBnr-W9X76NX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68368103</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative evaluation of different immunoassays for the detection of Taenia solium cysticercosis in swine with low parasite burden</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Bioline International</source><creator>Gomes, Andréia Bartachini ; Soares, Killarney Ataíde ; Bueno, Ednéia Casagrande ; Espindola, Noeli Maria ; Iha, Alberto Hiroshi ; Maia, Antônio Augusto Mendes ; Peralta, Regina Helena Saramargo ; Vaz, Adelaide José</creator><creatorcontrib>Gomes, Andréia Bartachini ; Soares, Killarney Ataíde ; Bueno, Ednéia Casagrande ; Espindola, Noeli Maria ; Iha, Alberto Hiroshi ; Maia, Antônio Augusto Mendes ; Peralta, Regina Helena Saramargo ; Vaz, Adelaide José</creatorcontrib><description>Seven swine were experimentally infected with Taenia solium eggs and blood samples from each animal were periodically collected. At the end of the experiment (t140) the animals did not show clinical aspects of cysticercosis or parasites in tongue inspection. All animals were slaughtered and cut into thin slices in searching for cysts. The number of cysts found in each animal varied from 1 to 85. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests for antibody (Ab) detection and for antigen (Ag) detection were performed, which presented respectively 71 and 57% of positivity. By immunoblot (IB), using 18/14(T. crassiceps Ag) or lentil-lectin-purified glycoproteins from T. solium Ag (LLGP) as Ag, five (71%) and six (86%) animals were positive, respectively. The association between Ag-ELISA with any IB (18/14 or LLGP) allowed the detection of all animals at 140 days post-experimental infection (days p.e.i.). The use of IB 18/14 combined to the Ag-ELISA allowed the detection of all animals since 70 days p.e.i., and the association between IB LLGP and Ag-ELISA allowed the detection of all animals since 112 days p.e.i. While all animals could be considered healthy by conventional screening tests, the use of immunoassays for detecting Ab and Ag showed better accuracy; therefore it would be more useful than usual clinical examination for screening cysticercosis in slightly infected pigs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1678-8060</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0074-0276</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1678-8060</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/S0074-02762007005000085</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17924002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brazil: Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Fiocruz</publisher><subject>Animals ; Antibodies, Helminth - blood ; Antigens, Helminth - blood ; Cysticercosis - diagnosis ; Cysticercosis - immunology ; Cysticercosis - parasitology ; Cysticercosis - veterinary ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay ; Immunoblotting ; PARASITOLOGY ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Swine ; swine cysticercosis - larval antigens - antibodies - enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay - immunoblot ; Swine Diseases - diagnosis ; Swine Diseases - immunology ; Swine Diseases - parasitology ; Taenia solium - immunology ; Taenia solium - isolation &amp; purification ; TROPICAL MEDICINE</subject><ispartof>Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 2007-09, Vol.102 (6), p.725-731</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2007 Instituto Oswaldo Cruz - Fiocruz</rights><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b438t-8caf8fbbfebefc18ee937ee87ad3d459f1ac55955da1260fcea153600490b72e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b438t-8caf8fbbfebefc18ee937ee87ad3d459f1ac55955da1260fcea153600490b72e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,27905,27906,79175</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17924002$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gomes, Andréia Bartachini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soares, Killarney Ataíde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bueno, Ednéia Casagrande</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Espindola, Noeli Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iha, Alberto Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maia, Antônio Augusto Mendes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peralta, Regina Helena Saramargo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaz, Adelaide José</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative evaluation of different immunoassays for the detection of Taenia solium cysticercosis in swine with low parasite burden</title><title>Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz</title><addtitle>Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz</addtitle><description>Seven swine were experimentally infected with Taenia solium eggs and blood samples from each animal were periodically collected. At the end of the experiment (t140) the animals did not show clinical aspects of cysticercosis or parasites in tongue inspection. All animals were slaughtered and cut into thin slices in searching for cysts. The number of cysts found in each animal varied from 1 to 85. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests for antibody (Ab) detection and for antigen (Ag) detection were performed, which presented respectively 71 and 57% of positivity. By immunoblot (IB), using 18/14(T. crassiceps Ag) or lentil-lectin-purified glycoproteins from T. solium Ag (LLGP) as Ag, five (71%) and six (86%) animals were positive, respectively. The association between Ag-ELISA with any IB (18/14 or LLGP) allowed the detection of all animals at 140 days post-experimental infection (days p.e.i.). The use of IB 18/14 combined to the Ag-ELISA allowed the detection of all animals since 70 days p.e.i., and the association between IB LLGP and Ag-ELISA allowed the detection of all animals since 112 days p.e.i. While all animals could be considered healthy by conventional screening tests, the use of immunoassays for detecting Ab and Ag showed better accuracy; therefore it would be more useful than usual clinical examination for screening cysticercosis in slightly infected pigs.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antibodies, Helminth - blood</subject><subject>Antigens, Helminth - blood</subject><subject>Cysticercosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cysticercosis - immunology</subject><subject>Cysticercosis - parasitology</subject><subject>Cysticercosis - veterinary</subject><subject>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay</subject><subject>Immunoblotting</subject><subject>PARASITOLOGY</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>swine cysticercosis - larval antigens - antibodies - enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay - immunoblot</subject><subject>Swine Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Swine Diseases - immunology</subject><subject>Swine Diseases - parasitology</subject><subject>Taenia solium - immunology</subject><subject>Taenia solium - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>TROPICAL MEDICINE</subject><issn>1678-8060</issn><issn>0074-0276</issn><issn>1678-8060</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RBI</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNplUU1v3CAURFWr5qP9Cy2n3pw-jDH4WK36ESlSD03PCOOHQmTDFnBWe84fL-luupWKkBjQzBs0Q8h7BldMDPDxB4DsGmhl31YEIKAuJV6Qc9ZL1Sjo4eU_-Ixc5HwPlc_77jU5Y3Jou3o9J4-buGxNMsU_IMUHM68VxkCjo5N3DhOGQv2yrCGanM0-UxcTLXdIJyxon7m3BoM3NMfZrwu1-1y8xWRj9pn6QPPOB6Q7X-7oHHf0yTD7gnRc04ThDXnlzJzx7fG8JD-_fL7dfGtuvn-93ny6acaOq9Ioa5xy4-hwRGeZQhy4RFTSTHzqxOCYsUIMQkyGtT04i4YJ3gN0A4yyRX5Jrg5zs_U4R30f1xSqof6Tpj6lWRMDYKwKPhwE2xR_rZiLXny2OM8mYFyz7hXvFQNeifJAtCnmnNDpbfKLSXvNQD8V9p_FsbCqfHe0WMcFp5Pu2NDp06Ov4Qb8y7DJG_38GG3dIBnr-W9X76NX</recordid><startdate>20070901</startdate><enddate>20070901</enddate><creator>Gomes, Andréia Bartachini</creator><creator>Soares, Killarney Ataíde</creator><creator>Bueno, Ednéia Casagrande</creator><creator>Espindola, Noeli Maria</creator><creator>Iha, Alberto Hiroshi</creator><creator>Maia, Antônio Augusto Mendes</creator><creator>Peralta, Regina Helena Saramargo</creator><creator>Vaz, Adelaide José</creator><general>Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Fiocruz</general><general>Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Ministério da Saúde</general><scope>RBI</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>GPN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070901</creationdate><title>Comparative evaluation of different immunoassays for the detection of Taenia solium cysticercosis in swine with low parasite burden</title><author>Gomes, Andréia Bartachini ; Soares, Killarney Ataíde ; Bueno, Ednéia Casagrande ; Espindola, Noeli Maria ; Iha, Alberto Hiroshi ; Maia, Antônio Augusto Mendes ; Peralta, Regina Helena Saramargo ; Vaz, Adelaide José</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b438t-8caf8fbbfebefc18ee937ee87ad3d459f1ac55955da1260fcea153600490b72e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antibodies, Helminth - blood</topic><topic>Antigens, Helminth - blood</topic><topic>Cysticercosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cysticercosis - immunology</topic><topic>Cysticercosis - parasitology</topic><topic>Cysticercosis - veterinary</topic><topic>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay</topic><topic>Immunoblotting</topic><topic>PARASITOLOGY</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>swine cysticercosis - larval antigens - antibodies - enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay - immunoblot</topic><topic>Swine Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Swine Diseases - immunology</topic><topic>Swine Diseases - parasitology</topic><topic>Taenia solium - immunology</topic><topic>Taenia solium - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>TROPICAL MEDICINE</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gomes, Andréia Bartachini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soares, Killarney Ataíde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bueno, Ednéia Casagrande</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Espindola, Noeli Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iha, Alberto Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maia, Antônio Augusto Mendes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peralta, Regina Helena Saramargo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaz, Adelaide José</creatorcontrib><collection>Bioline International</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><jtitle>Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gomes, Andréia Bartachini</au><au>Soares, Killarney Ataíde</au><au>Bueno, Ednéia Casagrande</au><au>Espindola, Noeli Maria</au><au>Iha, Alberto Hiroshi</au><au>Maia, Antônio Augusto Mendes</au><au>Peralta, Regina Helena Saramargo</au><au>Vaz, Adelaide José</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative evaluation of different immunoassays for the detection of Taenia solium cysticercosis in swine with low parasite burden</atitle><jtitle>Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz</jtitle><addtitle>Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz</addtitle><date>2007-09-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>725</spage><epage>731</epage><pages>725-731</pages><issn>1678-8060</issn><issn>0074-0276</issn><eissn>1678-8060</eissn><abstract>Seven swine were experimentally infected with Taenia solium eggs and blood samples from each animal were periodically collected. At the end of the experiment (t140) the animals did not show clinical aspects of cysticercosis or parasites in tongue inspection. All animals were slaughtered and cut into thin slices in searching for cysts. The number of cysts found in each animal varied from 1 to 85. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests for antibody (Ab) detection and for antigen (Ag) detection were performed, which presented respectively 71 and 57% of positivity. By immunoblot (IB), using 18/14(T. crassiceps Ag) or lentil-lectin-purified glycoproteins from T. solium Ag (LLGP) as Ag, five (71%) and six (86%) animals were positive, respectively. The association between Ag-ELISA with any IB (18/14 or LLGP) allowed the detection of all animals at 140 days post-experimental infection (days p.e.i.). The use of IB 18/14 combined to the Ag-ELISA allowed the detection of all animals since 70 days p.e.i., and the association between IB LLGP and Ag-ELISA allowed the detection of all animals since 112 days p.e.i. While all animals could be considered healthy by conventional screening tests, the use of immunoassays for detecting Ab and Ag showed better accuracy; therefore it would be more useful than usual clinical examination for screening cysticercosis in slightly infected pigs.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pub>Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Fiocruz</pub><pmid>17924002</pmid><doi>10.1590/S0074-02762007005000085</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1678-8060
ispartof Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 2007-09, Vol.102 (6), p.725-731
issn 1678-8060
0074-0276
1678-8060
language eng
recordid cdi_scielo_journals_S0074_02762007000600011
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Bioline International
subjects Animals
Antibodies, Helminth - blood
Antigens, Helminth - blood
Cysticercosis - diagnosis
Cysticercosis - immunology
Cysticercosis - parasitology
Cysticercosis - veterinary
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
Immunoblotting
PARASITOLOGY
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Swine
swine cysticercosis - larval antigens - antibodies - enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay - immunoblot
Swine Diseases - diagnosis
Swine Diseases - immunology
Swine Diseases - parasitology
Taenia solium - immunology
Taenia solium - isolation & purification
TROPICAL MEDICINE
title Comparative evaluation of different immunoassays for the detection of Taenia solium cysticercosis in swine with low parasite burden
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T07%3A18%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sciel&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20evaluation%20of%20different%20immunoassays%20for%20the%20detection%20of%20Taenia%20solium%20cysticercosis%20in%20swine%20with%20low%20parasite%20burden&rft.jtitle=Mem%C3%B3rias%20do%20Instituto%20Oswaldo%20Cruz&rft.au=Gomes,%20Andr%C3%A9ia%20Bartachini&rft.date=2007-09-01&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=725&rft.epage=731&rft.pages=725-731&rft.issn=1678-8060&rft.eissn=1678-8060&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/S0074-02762007005000085&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sciel%3E68368103%3C/proquest_sciel%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68368103&rft_id=info:pmid/17924002&rft_scielo_id=S0074_02762007000600011&rfr_iscdi=true