Comparison on the performance of Leishmania major-like and Leishmania braziliensis braziliensis as antigen for New World leishmaniasis IgG-immunofluorescence test
The performance of an antigen of L. major-like promastigotes for the serological diagnosis of mucocutaneous leishmaniasis in the IgG-immunofluorescent test was compared to that of an antigen of L.braziliensis braziliensis. Each antigen was used to test two hundred and twenty-four sera of etiologies...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo 1991-11, Vol.33 (6), p.503-508 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 508 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 503 |
container_title | Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Guimarães, M C Celeste, B J Corrales, E M Antunes, C M |
description | The performance of an antigen of L. major-like promastigotes for the serological diagnosis of mucocutaneous leishmaniasis in the IgG-immunofluorescent test was compared to that of an antigen of L.braziliensis braziliensis. Each antigen was used to test two hundred and twenty-four sera of etiologies such as mucocutaneous leishmaniasis, deep mycoses, toxoplasmosis, malaria. Chagas' disease, visceral leishmaniasis, anti-nuclear factor, schistosomiasis, rheumatoid factor and normal controls. Agreement between responses to each antigen was high: 77.2% of leishmaniases sera agreed on a positive or a negative result to both antigens and 91.1% of control sera. Cross reactivity was restricted to Chagas' disease sera, visceral leishmaniasis, anti-nuclear factor and paracoccidioidomycosis. The quantitative response of leishmaniasis and Chagas' disease sera to both antigens was evaluated by a linear regression; although the y-intercept and the slope were different for each antigen, neither was better than the other in the disclosure of anti-Leishmania antibodies. In the case of Chagas' disease sera the L.major-like antigen was better than L.b.braziliensis' to disclose cross-reacting antibodies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1590/S0036-46651991000600012 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sciel</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scielo_journals_S0036_46651991000600012</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S0036_46651991000600012</scielo_id><sourcerecordid>72779616</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-48f5bb3e1547e1ba37875deb918a600da0bed58c8c29476b528ef7bd6d64755d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcFO3DAQtSoqoAufUOETt1A7ie34iFYUkFbtoa16jOx4suvFsRc7ESqfw5fi7SLYqhLSWJ7RvDdv9AahM0ouKJPkyw9CKl7UnDMqJSWE8Pxo-QEdvzYO9vIj9CmldYZIIvkhOqRNXcumPEZP8zBsVLQpeJxjXAHeQOxDHJTvAIceL8CmVa6swoNah1g4ewdYebPf0VE9WmfBJ5v-LVQOP9oleJyn4m_wgH-H6Ax2r-wt7HZ5XdhhmHzo3RQipA62-iOk8QR97JVLcPryz9Cvr1c_5zfF4vv17fxyUXSV5GNRNz3TugLKagFUq0o0ghnQkjYqm2MU0WBY0zVdKWvBNSsb6IU23PBaMGaqGbrYzU2dBRfadZiiz4LtX6_b_7zOhPMdYRPD_ZQ3bQeb93ZOeQhTakUphOSUZ6DYAbsYUorQt5toBxX_tJS023O-I_H5RWLSA5g33u5-1TPIfZyp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72779616</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison on the performance of Leishmania major-like and Leishmania braziliensis braziliensis as antigen for New World leishmaniasis IgG-immunofluorescence test</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Guimarães, M C ; Celeste, B J ; Corrales, E M ; Antunes, C M</creator><creatorcontrib>Guimarães, M C ; Celeste, B J ; Corrales, E M ; Antunes, C M</creatorcontrib><description>The performance of an antigen of L. major-like promastigotes for the serological diagnosis of mucocutaneous leishmaniasis in the IgG-immunofluorescent test was compared to that of an antigen of L.braziliensis braziliensis. Each antigen was used to test two hundred and twenty-four sera of etiologies such as mucocutaneous leishmaniasis, deep mycoses, toxoplasmosis, malaria. Chagas' disease, visceral leishmaniasis, anti-nuclear factor, schistosomiasis, rheumatoid factor and normal controls. Agreement between responses to each antigen was high: 77.2% of leishmaniases sera agreed on a positive or a negative result to both antigens and 91.1% of control sera. Cross reactivity was restricted to Chagas' disease sera, visceral leishmaniasis, anti-nuclear factor and paracoccidioidomycosis. The quantitative response of leishmaniasis and Chagas' disease sera to both antigens was evaluated by a linear regression; although the y-intercept and the slope were different for each antigen, neither was better than the other in the disclosure of anti-Leishmania antibodies. In the case of Chagas' disease sera the L.major-like antigen was better than L.b.braziliensis' to disclose cross-reacting antibodies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0036-4665</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1678-9946</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0036-4665</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/S0036-46651991000600012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1844982</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brazil: Instituto de Medicina Tropical</publisher><subject>Animals ; Antigens, Protozoan - blood ; Fluorescent Antibody Technique ; Humans ; Immunoglobulin G - immunology ; Leishmania braziliensis - immunology ; Leishmania tropica - immunology ; Leishmaniasis, Cutaneous - diagnosis ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Regression Analysis ; TROPICAL MEDICINE</subject><ispartof>Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo, 1991-11, Vol.33 (6), p.503-508</ispartof><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-48f5bb3e1547e1ba37875deb918a600da0bed58c8c29476b528ef7bd6d64755d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-48f5bb3e1547e1ba37875deb918a600da0bed58c8c29476b528ef7bd6d64755d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,864,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1844982$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guimarães, M C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Celeste, B J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corrales, E M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antunes, C M</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison on the performance of Leishmania major-like and Leishmania braziliensis braziliensis as antigen for New World leishmaniasis IgG-immunofluorescence test</title><title>Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo</title><addtitle>Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo</addtitle><description>The performance of an antigen of L. major-like promastigotes for the serological diagnosis of mucocutaneous leishmaniasis in the IgG-immunofluorescent test was compared to that of an antigen of L.braziliensis braziliensis. Each antigen was used to test two hundred and twenty-four sera of etiologies such as mucocutaneous leishmaniasis, deep mycoses, toxoplasmosis, malaria. Chagas' disease, visceral leishmaniasis, anti-nuclear factor, schistosomiasis, rheumatoid factor and normal controls. Agreement between responses to each antigen was high: 77.2% of leishmaniases sera agreed on a positive or a negative result to both antigens and 91.1% of control sera. Cross reactivity was restricted to Chagas' disease sera, visceral leishmaniasis, anti-nuclear factor and paracoccidioidomycosis. The quantitative response of leishmaniasis and Chagas' disease sera to both antigens was evaluated by a linear regression; although the y-intercept and the slope were different for each antigen, neither was better than the other in the disclosure of anti-Leishmania antibodies. In the case of Chagas' disease sera the L.major-like antigen was better than L.b.braziliensis' to disclose cross-reacting antibodies.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antigens, Protozoan - blood</subject><subject>Fluorescent Antibody Technique</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin G - immunology</subject><subject>Leishmania braziliensis - immunology</subject><subject>Leishmania tropica - immunology</subject><subject>Leishmaniasis, Cutaneous - diagnosis</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>TROPICAL MEDICINE</subject><issn>0036-4665</issn><issn>1678-9946</issn><issn>0036-4665</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UcFO3DAQtSoqoAufUOETt1A7ie34iFYUkFbtoa16jOx4suvFsRc7ESqfw5fi7SLYqhLSWJ7RvDdv9AahM0ouKJPkyw9CKl7UnDMqJSWE8Pxo-QEdvzYO9vIj9CmldYZIIvkhOqRNXcumPEZP8zBsVLQpeJxjXAHeQOxDHJTvAIceL8CmVa6swoNah1g4ewdYebPf0VE9WmfBJ5v-LVQOP9oleJyn4m_wgH-H6Ax2r-wt7HZ5XdhhmHzo3RQipA62-iOk8QR97JVLcPryz9Cvr1c_5zfF4vv17fxyUXSV5GNRNz3TugLKagFUq0o0ghnQkjYqm2MU0WBY0zVdKWvBNSsb6IU23PBaMGaqGbrYzU2dBRfadZiiz4LtX6_b_7zOhPMdYRPD_ZQ3bQeb93ZOeQhTakUphOSUZ6DYAbsYUorQt5toBxX_tJS023O-I_H5RWLSA5g33u5-1TPIfZyp</recordid><startdate>19911101</startdate><enddate>19911101</enddate><creator>Guimarães, M C</creator><creator>Celeste, B J</creator><creator>Corrales, E M</creator><creator>Antunes, C M</creator><general>Instituto de Medicina Tropical</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>GPN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19911101</creationdate><title>Comparison on the performance of Leishmania major-like and Leishmania braziliensis braziliensis as antigen for New World leishmaniasis IgG-immunofluorescence test</title><author>Guimarães, M C ; Celeste, B J ; Corrales, E M ; Antunes, C M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-48f5bb3e1547e1ba37875deb918a600da0bed58c8c29476b528ef7bd6d64755d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antigens, Protozoan - blood</topic><topic>Fluorescent Antibody Technique</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin G - immunology</topic><topic>Leishmania braziliensis - immunology</topic><topic>Leishmania tropica - immunology</topic><topic>Leishmaniasis, Cutaneous - diagnosis</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>TROPICAL MEDICINE</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guimarães, M C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Celeste, B J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corrales, E M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antunes, C M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><jtitle>Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guimarães, M C</au><au>Celeste, B J</au><au>Corrales, E M</au><au>Antunes, C M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison on the performance of Leishmania major-like and Leishmania braziliensis braziliensis as antigen for New World leishmaniasis IgG-immunofluorescence test</atitle><jtitle>Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo</addtitle><date>1991-11-01</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>503</spage><epage>508</epage><pages>503-508</pages><issn>0036-4665</issn><issn>1678-9946</issn><eissn>0036-4665</eissn><abstract>The performance of an antigen of L. major-like promastigotes for the serological diagnosis of mucocutaneous leishmaniasis in the IgG-immunofluorescent test was compared to that of an antigen of L.braziliensis braziliensis. Each antigen was used to test two hundred and twenty-four sera of etiologies such as mucocutaneous leishmaniasis, deep mycoses, toxoplasmosis, malaria. Chagas' disease, visceral leishmaniasis, anti-nuclear factor, schistosomiasis, rheumatoid factor and normal controls. Agreement between responses to each antigen was high: 77.2% of leishmaniases sera agreed on a positive or a negative result to both antigens and 91.1% of control sera. Cross reactivity was restricted to Chagas' disease sera, visceral leishmaniasis, anti-nuclear factor and paracoccidioidomycosis. The quantitative response of leishmaniasis and Chagas' disease sera to both antigens was evaluated by a linear regression; although the y-intercept and the slope were different for each antigen, neither was better than the other in the disclosure of anti-Leishmania antibodies. In the case of Chagas' disease sera the L.major-like antigen was better than L.b.braziliensis' to disclose cross-reacting antibodies.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pub>Instituto de Medicina Tropical</pub><pmid>1844982</pmid><doi>10.1590/S0036-46651991000600012</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0036-4665 |
ispartof | Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo, 1991-11, Vol.33 (6), p.503-508 |
issn | 0036-4665 1678-9946 0036-4665 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_scielo_journals_S0036_46651991000600012 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Animals Antigens, Protozoan - blood Fluorescent Antibody Technique Humans Immunoglobulin G - immunology Leishmania braziliensis - immunology Leishmania tropica - immunology Leishmaniasis, Cutaneous - diagnosis Predictive Value of Tests Regression Analysis TROPICAL MEDICINE |
title | Comparison on the performance of Leishmania major-like and Leishmania braziliensis braziliensis as antigen for New World leishmaniasis IgG-immunofluorescence test |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T00%3A44%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sciel&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20on%20the%20performance%20of%20Leishmania%20major-like%20and%20Leishmania%20braziliensis%20braziliensis%20as%20antigen%20for%20New%20World%20leishmaniasis%20IgG-immunofluorescence%20test&rft.jtitle=Revista%20do%20Instituto%20de%20Medicina%20Tropical%20de%20S%C3%A3o%20Paulo&rft.au=Guimar%C3%A3es,%20M%20C&rft.date=1991-11-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=503&rft.epage=508&rft.pages=503-508&rft.issn=0036-4665&rft.eissn=0036-4665&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/S0036-46651991000600012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sciel%3E72779616%3C/proquest_sciel%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72779616&rft_id=info:pmid/1844982&rft_scielo_id=S0036_46651991000600012&rfr_iscdi=true |