Impact of RT-PCR Test False-Negative Results for SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance in Mexico
Underestimation of the number of cases during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been a constant concern worldwide. Detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA using realtime reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the most comm...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Revista de investigacion clinica 2020-12, Vol.73 (2), p.120-126 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 126 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 120 |
container_title | Revista de investigacion clinica |
container_volume | 73 |
creator | Núñez, Isaac Belaunzarán-Zamudio, Pablo F. Caro-Vega, Yanink |
description | Underestimation of the number of cases during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been
a constant concern worldwide. Detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA using realtime reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the most common method to confirm a case. However, these tests have suboptimal sensitivity.
The objective of the study was to estimate the number of COVID-19 confirmed cases, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and deaths in Mexico, accounting for the probabilities of false-negative tests.
We used publicly available, national databases of all SARS-CoV-2 tests performed at public laboratories in Mexico between February 27 and October 31, 2020. We used the estimated probabilities of false-negative tests based on the day of clinical sample collection after symptom initiation calculated previously. With the resulting model, we estimated the corrected daily number of cases, ICU admissions, and deaths.
Among 2,024,822 people tested in Mexico between February 27 and October 31 with an available result, we estimated 1,248,583 (95% confidence interval 1,094,850-1,572,818) cases, compared to 902,343 cases reported with positive tests. ICU admissions and deaths were 15% and 8% higher than reported, respectively.
Accounting for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-based diagnostic tests’ precision is a simple way to improve estimations for the true number of COVID-19 cases among tested persons. |
doi_str_mv | 10.24875/RIC.20000587 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sciel</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scielo_journals_S0034_83762021000200120</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S0034_83762021000200120</scielo_id><sourcerecordid>2514597748</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-87a01b3a4bc3c04c5497dca4ef7a9fbdc45aa46289d6a87f906f20cfd7fda7933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kDtPwzAUhT2AaCmMrMgji4vjR5yMVUShUnkoKayW49goVVqXOKng3-PQlrvc5Zxz7_kAuInwlLBE8Pt8kU0JDsMTcQbGGFOGEiriEbj0fo0xIYSLCzCiNIkjztgY5IvNTukOOgvzFXrLcrgyvoNz1XiDXsyn6uq9gbnxfdN5aF0Li1leoMx9IAKLvt2bumnUVhtYb-Gz-a61uwLndrBfH_cEvM8fVtkTWr4-LrLZEmlKRIcSoXBUUsVKTTVmmrNUVFoxY4VKbVlpxpViMUnSKlaJsCmOLcHaVsJWSqSUTsD0kOt1bRon165vt-GgLIbecuhNMIkCjYAkIjgY7g6GXeu--lBTbmqvzfC_cb2XhEeMp0KwJEjRQapb531rrNy19Ua1PzLC8o-1DKzliXXQ3x6j-3Jjqn_1CTT9BZY6d1E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2514597748</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of RT-PCR Test False-Negative Results for SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance in Mexico</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Núñez, Isaac ; Belaunzarán-Zamudio, Pablo F. ; Caro-Vega, Yanink</creator><creatorcontrib>Núñez, Isaac ; Belaunzarán-Zamudio, Pablo F. ; Caro-Vega, Yanink</creatorcontrib><description>Underestimation of the number of cases during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been
a constant concern worldwide. Detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA using realtime reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the most common method to confirm a case. However, these tests have suboptimal sensitivity.
The objective of the study was to estimate the number of COVID-19 confirmed cases, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and deaths in Mexico, accounting for the probabilities of false-negative tests.
We used publicly available, national databases of all SARS-CoV-2 tests performed at public laboratories in Mexico between February 27 and October 31, 2020. We used the estimated probabilities of false-negative tests based on the day of clinical sample collection after symptom initiation calculated previously. With the resulting model, we estimated the corrected daily number of cases, ICU admissions, and deaths.
Among 2,024,822 people tested in Mexico between February 27 and October 31 with an available result, we estimated 1,248,583 (95% confidence interval 1,094,850-1,572,818) cases, compared to 902,343 cases reported with positive tests. ICU admissions and deaths were 15% and 8% higher than reported, respectively.
Accounting for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-based diagnostic tests’ precision is a simple way to improve estimations for the true number of COVID-19 cases among tested persons.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-8376</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2564-8896</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.24875/RIC.20000587</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33861544</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán</publisher><subject>COVID-19 - diagnosis ; COVID-19 - epidemiology ; COVID-19 - mortality ; COVID-19 Testing - methods ; Databases, Factual ; False Negative Reactions ; Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units - statistics & numerical data ; Medicine, General & Internal ; Mexico - epidemiology ; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods ; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Revista de investigacion clinica, 2020-12, Vol.73 (2), p.120-126</ispartof><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33861544$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Núñez, Isaac</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belaunzarán-Zamudio, Pablo F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caro-Vega, Yanink</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of RT-PCR Test False-Negative Results for SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance in Mexico</title><title>Revista de investigacion clinica</title><addtitle>Rev Invest Clin</addtitle><description>Underestimation of the number of cases during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been
a constant concern worldwide. Detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA using realtime reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the most common method to confirm a case. However, these tests have suboptimal sensitivity.
The objective of the study was to estimate the number of COVID-19 confirmed cases, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and deaths in Mexico, accounting for the probabilities of false-negative tests.
We used publicly available, national databases of all SARS-CoV-2 tests performed at public laboratories in Mexico between February 27 and October 31, 2020. We used the estimated probabilities of false-negative tests based on the day of clinical sample collection after symptom initiation calculated previously. With the resulting model, we estimated the corrected daily number of cases, ICU admissions, and deaths.
Among 2,024,822 people tested in Mexico between February 27 and October 31 with an available result, we estimated 1,248,583 (95% confidence interval 1,094,850-1,572,818) cases, compared to 902,343 cases reported with positive tests. ICU admissions and deaths were 15% and 8% higher than reported, respectively.
Accounting for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-based diagnostic tests’ precision is a simple way to improve estimations for the true number of COVID-19 cases among tested persons.</description><subject>COVID-19 - diagnosis</subject><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>COVID-19 - mortality</subject><subject>COVID-19 Testing - methods</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>False Negative Reactions</subject><subject>Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Medicine, General & Internal</subject><subject>Mexico - epidemiology</subject><subject>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</subject><subject>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>0034-8376</issn><issn>2564-8896</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kDtPwzAUhT2AaCmMrMgji4vjR5yMVUShUnkoKayW49goVVqXOKng3-PQlrvc5Zxz7_kAuInwlLBE8Pt8kU0JDsMTcQbGGFOGEiriEbj0fo0xIYSLCzCiNIkjztgY5IvNTukOOgvzFXrLcrgyvoNz1XiDXsyn6uq9gbnxfdN5aF0Li1leoMx9IAKLvt2bumnUVhtYb-Gz-a61uwLndrBfH_cEvM8fVtkTWr4-LrLZEmlKRIcSoXBUUsVKTTVmmrNUVFoxY4VKbVlpxpViMUnSKlaJsCmOLcHaVsJWSqSUTsD0kOt1bRon165vt-GgLIbecuhNMIkCjYAkIjgY7g6GXeu--lBTbmqvzfC_cb2XhEeMp0KwJEjRQapb531rrNy19Ua1PzLC8o-1DKzliXXQ3x6j-3Jjqn_1CTT9BZY6d1E</recordid><startdate>20201204</startdate><enddate>20201204</enddate><creator>Núñez, Isaac</creator><creator>Belaunzarán-Zamudio, Pablo F.</creator><creator>Caro-Vega, Yanink</creator><general>Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>GPN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201204</creationdate><title>Impact of RT-PCR Test False-Negative Results for SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance in Mexico</title><author>Núñez, Isaac ; Belaunzarán-Zamudio, Pablo F. ; Caro-Vega, Yanink</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-87a01b3a4bc3c04c5497dca4ef7a9fbdc45aa46289d6a87f906f20cfd7fda7933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>COVID-19 - diagnosis</topic><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>COVID-19 - mortality</topic><topic>COVID-19 Testing - methods</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>False Negative Reactions</topic><topic>Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Medicine, General & Internal</topic><topic>Mexico - epidemiology</topic><topic>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</topic><topic>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Núñez, Isaac</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belaunzarán-Zamudio, Pablo F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caro-Vega, Yanink</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><jtitle>Revista de investigacion clinica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Núñez, Isaac</au><au>Belaunzarán-Zamudio, Pablo F.</au><au>Caro-Vega, Yanink</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of RT-PCR Test False-Negative Results for SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance in Mexico</atitle><jtitle>Revista de investigacion clinica</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Invest Clin</addtitle><date>2020-12-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>120</spage><epage>126</epage><pages>120-126</pages><issn>0034-8376</issn><issn>2564-8896</issn><abstract>Underestimation of the number of cases during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been
a constant concern worldwide. Detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA using realtime reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the most common method to confirm a case. However, these tests have suboptimal sensitivity.
The objective of the study was to estimate the number of COVID-19 confirmed cases, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and deaths in Mexico, accounting for the probabilities of false-negative tests.
We used publicly available, national databases of all SARS-CoV-2 tests performed at public laboratories in Mexico between February 27 and October 31, 2020. We used the estimated probabilities of false-negative tests based on the day of clinical sample collection after symptom initiation calculated previously. With the resulting model, we estimated the corrected daily number of cases, ICU admissions, and deaths.
Among 2,024,822 people tested in Mexico between February 27 and October 31 with an available result, we estimated 1,248,583 (95% confidence interval 1,094,850-1,572,818) cases, compared to 902,343 cases reported with positive tests. ICU admissions and deaths were 15% and 8% higher than reported, respectively.
Accounting for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-based diagnostic tests’ precision is a simple way to improve estimations for the true number of COVID-19 cases among tested persons.</abstract><cop>Mexico</cop><pub>Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán</pub><pmid>33861544</pmid><doi>10.24875/RIC.20000587</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0034-8376 |
ispartof | Revista de investigacion clinica, 2020-12, Vol.73 (2), p.120-126 |
issn | 0034-8376 2564-8896 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_scielo_journals_S0034_83762021000200120 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | COVID-19 - diagnosis COVID-19 - epidemiology COVID-19 - mortality COVID-19 Testing - methods Databases, Factual False Negative Reactions Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data Humans Intensive Care Units - statistics & numerical data Medicine, General & Internal Mexico - epidemiology Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction Sensitivity and Specificity |
title | Impact of RT-PCR Test False-Negative Results for SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance in Mexico |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T07%3A10%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sciel&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20RT-PCR%20Test%20False-Negative%20Results%20for%20SARS-CoV-2%20Surveillance%20in%20Mexico&rft.jtitle=Revista%20de%20investigacion%20clinica&rft.au=N%C3%BA%C3%B1ez,%20Isaac&rft.date=2020-12-04&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=120&rft.epage=126&rft.pages=120-126&rft.issn=0034-8376&rft_id=info:doi/10.24875/RIC.20000587&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sciel%3E2514597748%3C/proquest_sciel%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2514597748&rft_id=info:pmid/33861544&rft_scielo_id=S0034_83762021000200120&rfr_iscdi=true |