Impact of RT-PCR Test False-Negative Results for SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance in Mexico

Underestimation of the number of cases during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been a constant concern worldwide. Detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA using realtime reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the most comm...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Revista de investigacion clinica 2020-12, Vol.73 (2), p.120-126
Hauptverfasser: Núñez, Isaac, Belaunzarán-Zamudio, Pablo F., Caro-Vega, Yanink
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 126
container_issue 2
container_start_page 120
container_title Revista de investigacion clinica
container_volume 73
creator Núñez, Isaac
Belaunzarán-Zamudio, Pablo F.
Caro-Vega, Yanink
description Underestimation of the number of cases during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been a constant concern worldwide. Detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA using realtime reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the most common method to confirm a case. However, these tests have suboptimal sensitivity. The objective of the study was to estimate the number of COVID-19 confirmed cases, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and deaths in Mexico, accounting for the probabilities of false-negative tests. We used publicly available, national databases of all SARS-CoV-2 tests performed at public laboratories in Mexico between February 27 and October 31, 2020. We used the estimated probabilities of false-negative tests based on the day of clinical sample collection after symptom initiation calculated previously. With the resulting model, we estimated the corrected daily number of cases, ICU admissions, and deaths. Among 2,024,822 people tested in Mexico between February 27 and October 31 with an available result, we estimated 1,248,583 (95% confidence interval 1,094,850-1,572,818) cases, compared to 902,343 cases reported with positive tests. ICU admissions and deaths were 15% and 8% higher than reported, respectively. Accounting for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-based diagnostic tests’ precision is a simple way to improve estimations for the true number of COVID-19 cases among tested persons.
doi_str_mv 10.24875/RIC.20000587
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sciel</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_scielo_journals_S0034_83762021000200120</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S0034_83762021000200120</scielo_id><sourcerecordid>2514597748</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-87a01b3a4bc3c04c5497dca4ef7a9fbdc45aa46289d6a87f906f20cfd7fda7933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kDtPwzAUhT2AaCmMrMgji4vjR5yMVUShUnkoKayW49goVVqXOKng3-PQlrvc5Zxz7_kAuInwlLBE8Pt8kU0JDsMTcQbGGFOGEiriEbj0fo0xIYSLCzCiNIkjztgY5IvNTukOOgvzFXrLcrgyvoNz1XiDXsyn6uq9gbnxfdN5aF0Li1leoMx9IAKLvt2bumnUVhtYb-Gz-a61uwLndrBfH_cEvM8fVtkTWr4-LrLZEmlKRIcSoXBUUsVKTTVmmrNUVFoxY4VKbVlpxpViMUnSKlaJsCmOLcHaVsJWSqSUTsD0kOt1bRon165vt-GgLIbecuhNMIkCjYAkIjgY7g6GXeu--lBTbmqvzfC_cb2XhEeMp0KwJEjRQapb531rrNy19Ua1PzLC8o-1DKzliXXQ3x6j-3Jjqn_1CTT9BZY6d1E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2514597748</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of RT-PCR Test False-Negative Results for SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance in Mexico</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Núñez, Isaac ; Belaunzarán-Zamudio, Pablo F. ; Caro-Vega, Yanink</creator><creatorcontrib>Núñez, Isaac ; Belaunzarán-Zamudio, Pablo F. ; Caro-Vega, Yanink</creatorcontrib><description>Underestimation of the number of cases during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been a constant concern worldwide. Detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA using realtime reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the most common method to confirm a case. However, these tests have suboptimal sensitivity. The objective of the study was to estimate the number of COVID-19 confirmed cases, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and deaths in Mexico, accounting for the probabilities of false-negative tests. We used publicly available, national databases of all SARS-CoV-2 tests performed at public laboratories in Mexico between February 27 and October 31, 2020. We used the estimated probabilities of false-negative tests based on the day of clinical sample collection after symptom initiation calculated previously. With the resulting model, we estimated the corrected daily number of cases, ICU admissions, and deaths. Among 2,024,822 people tested in Mexico between February 27 and October 31 with an available result, we estimated 1,248,583 (95% confidence interval 1,094,850-1,572,818) cases, compared to 902,343 cases reported with positive tests. ICU admissions and deaths were 15% and 8% higher than reported, respectively. Accounting for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-based diagnostic tests’ precision is a simple way to improve estimations for the true number of COVID-19 cases among tested persons.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-8376</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2564-8896</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.24875/RIC.20000587</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33861544</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán</publisher><subject>COVID-19 - diagnosis ; COVID-19 - epidemiology ; COVID-19 - mortality ; COVID-19 Testing - methods ; Databases, Factual ; False Negative Reactions ; Hospitalization - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Medicine, General &amp; Internal ; Mexico - epidemiology ; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods ; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Revista de investigacion clinica, 2020-12, Vol.73 (2), p.120-126</ispartof><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33861544$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Núñez, Isaac</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belaunzarán-Zamudio, Pablo F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caro-Vega, Yanink</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of RT-PCR Test False-Negative Results for SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance in Mexico</title><title>Revista de investigacion clinica</title><addtitle>Rev Invest Clin</addtitle><description>Underestimation of the number of cases during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been a constant concern worldwide. Detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA using realtime reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the most common method to confirm a case. However, these tests have suboptimal sensitivity. The objective of the study was to estimate the number of COVID-19 confirmed cases, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and deaths in Mexico, accounting for the probabilities of false-negative tests. We used publicly available, national databases of all SARS-CoV-2 tests performed at public laboratories in Mexico between February 27 and October 31, 2020. We used the estimated probabilities of false-negative tests based on the day of clinical sample collection after symptom initiation calculated previously. With the resulting model, we estimated the corrected daily number of cases, ICU admissions, and deaths. Among 2,024,822 people tested in Mexico between February 27 and October 31 with an available result, we estimated 1,248,583 (95% confidence interval 1,094,850-1,572,818) cases, compared to 902,343 cases reported with positive tests. ICU admissions and deaths were 15% and 8% higher than reported, respectively. Accounting for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-based diagnostic tests’ precision is a simple way to improve estimations for the true number of COVID-19 cases among tested persons.</description><subject>COVID-19 - diagnosis</subject><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>COVID-19 - mortality</subject><subject>COVID-19 Testing - methods</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>False Negative Reactions</subject><subject>Hospitalization - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Medicine, General &amp; Internal</subject><subject>Mexico - epidemiology</subject><subject>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</subject><subject>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>0034-8376</issn><issn>2564-8896</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kDtPwzAUhT2AaCmMrMgji4vjR5yMVUShUnkoKayW49goVVqXOKng3-PQlrvc5Zxz7_kAuInwlLBE8Pt8kU0JDsMTcQbGGFOGEiriEbj0fo0xIYSLCzCiNIkjztgY5IvNTukOOgvzFXrLcrgyvoNz1XiDXsyn6uq9gbnxfdN5aF0Li1leoMx9IAKLvt2bumnUVhtYb-Gz-a61uwLndrBfH_cEvM8fVtkTWr4-LrLZEmlKRIcSoXBUUsVKTTVmmrNUVFoxY4VKbVlpxpViMUnSKlaJsCmOLcHaVsJWSqSUTsD0kOt1bRon165vt-GgLIbecuhNMIkCjYAkIjgY7g6GXeu--lBTbmqvzfC_cb2XhEeMp0KwJEjRQapb531rrNy19Ua1PzLC8o-1DKzliXXQ3x6j-3Jjqn_1CTT9BZY6d1E</recordid><startdate>20201204</startdate><enddate>20201204</enddate><creator>Núñez, Isaac</creator><creator>Belaunzarán-Zamudio, Pablo F.</creator><creator>Caro-Vega, Yanink</creator><general>Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>GPN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201204</creationdate><title>Impact of RT-PCR Test False-Negative Results for SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance in Mexico</title><author>Núñez, Isaac ; Belaunzarán-Zamudio, Pablo F. ; Caro-Vega, Yanink</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-87a01b3a4bc3c04c5497dca4ef7a9fbdc45aa46289d6a87f906f20cfd7fda7933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>COVID-19 - diagnosis</topic><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>COVID-19 - mortality</topic><topic>COVID-19 Testing - methods</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>False Negative Reactions</topic><topic>Hospitalization - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Medicine, General &amp; Internal</topic><topic>Mexico - epidemiology</topic><topic>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</topic><topic>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Núñez, Isaac</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belaunzarán-Zamudio, Pablo F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caro-Vega, Yanink</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><jtitle>Revista de investigacion clinica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Núñez, Isaac</au><au>Belaunzarán-Zamudio, Pablo F.</au><au>Caro-Vega, Yanink</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of RT-PCR Test False-Negative Results for SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance in Mexico</atitle><jtitle>Revista de investigacion clinica</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Invest Clin</addtitle><date>2020-12-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>120</spage><epage>126</epage><pages>120-126</pages><issn>0034-8376</issn><issn>2564-8896</issn><abstract>Underestimation of the number of cases during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been a constant concern worldwide. Detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA using realtime reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the most common method to confirm a case. However, these tests have suboptimal sensitivity. The objective of the study was to estimate the number of COVID-19 confirmed cases, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and deaths in Mexico, accounting for the probabilities of false-negative tests. We used publicly available, national databases of all SARS-CoV-2 tests performed at public laboratories in Mexico between February 27 and October 31, 2020. We used the estimated probabilities of false-negative tests based on the day of clinical sample collection after symptom initiation calculated previously. With the resulting model, we estimated the corrected daily number of cases, ICU admissions, and deaths. Among 2,024,822 people tested in Mexico between February 27 and October 31 with an available result, we estimated 1,248,583 (95% confidence interval 1,094,850-1,572,818) cases, compared to 902,343 cases reported with positive tests. ICU admissions and deaths were 15% and 8% higher than reported, respectively. Accounting for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-based diagnostic tests’ precision is a simple way to improve estimations for the true number of COVID-19 cases among tested persons.</abstract><cop>Mexico</cop><pub>Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán</pub><pmid>33861544</pmid><doi>10.24875/RIC.20000587</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0034-8376
ispartof Revista de investigacion clinica, 2020-12, Vol.73 (2), p.120-126
issn 0034-8376
2564-8896
language eng
recordid cdi_scielo_journals_S0034_83762021000200120
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects COVID-19 - diagnosis
COVID-19 - epidemiology
COVID-19 - mortality
COVID-19 Testing - methods
Databases, Factual
False Negative Reactions
Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Intensive Care Units - statistics & numerical data
Medicine, General & Internal
Mexico - epidemiology
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods
Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
Sensitivity and Specificity
title Impact of RT-PCR Test False-Negative Results for SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance in Mexico
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T07%3A10%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sciel&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20RT-PCR%20Test%20False-Negative%20Results%20for%20SARS-CoV-2%20Surveillance%20in%20Mexico&rft.jtitle=Revista%20de%20investigacion%20clinica&rft.au=N%C3%BA%C3%B1ez,%20Isaac&rft.date=2020-12-04&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=120&rft.epage=126&rft.pages=120-126&rft.issn=0034-8376&rft_id=info:doi/10.24875/RIC.20000587&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sciel%3E2514597748%3C/proquest_sciel%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2514597748&rft_id=info:pmid/33861544&rft_scielo_id=S0034_83762021000200120&rfr_iscdi=true