Evaluation of a Satisfactory Operation for Ulcer

Evaluation of a Satisfactory Operation for Ulcer

Conclusions The extensive gastric resection (operations III and IVA) offer the best protection against the development of jejunal ulcer. No jejunal ulcer developed and all dogs survived the injection period. Gastrojejunostomy, the small gastric resection and the Schmilinsky operation offer no protec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) N.J.), 1944-06, Vol.56 (2), p.231-233
Hauptverfasser: Lannin, Bernard G., Hay, Lyle J., Judd, Edward S., Wangensteen, Owen H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 233
container_issue 2
container_start_page 231
container_title Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)
container_volume 56
creator Lannin, Bernard G.
Hay, Lyle J.
Judd, Edward S.
Wangensteen, Owen H.
description Conclusions The extensive gastric resection (operations III and IVA) offer the best protection against the development of jejunal ulcer. No jejunal ulcer developed and all dogs survived the injection period. Gastrojejunostomy, the small gastric resection and the Schmilinsky operation offer no protection. All animals developed jejunal ulcer with employment of the histamine-bees-wax technique. The small gastric resection and the antral exclusion operations would suggest that the Edkins′ “gastrin” hypothesis is invalid.
doi_str_mv 10.3181/00379727-56-14666
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_sage_journals_10_3181_00379727_56_14666</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.3181_00379727-56-14666</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.3181_00379727-56-14666</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c236t-10a6abf49886124511db6d89307020efd8765698261772544e5bf8b579060d0c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j8tOwzAQRS0EEqHwAezyAy4zdjy2l6gqD6lSF9C15SQ2ahWayk6R-vckFLasZqR7z2gOY_cIc4kGHwCktlporohjRUQXrEAlFZdk7SUrppxPhWt2k_MOAJUWVDBYfvnu6Idtvy_7WPrybdxz9M3Qp1O5PoR0zmKfyk3XhHTLrqLvcrj7nTO2eVq-L174av38unhc8UZIGjiCJ1_HyhpDKCqF2NbUGitBg4AQW6NJkTWCUGuhqiqoOppaaQsELTRyxvB8t0l9zilEd0jbT59ODsFNyu5P2SlyP8ojMz8z2X8Et-uPaT---A_wDftPVIg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of a Satisfactory Operation for Ulcer</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lannin, Bernard G. ; Hay, Lyle J. ; Judd, Edward S. ; Wangensteen, Owen H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lannin, Bernard G. ; Hay, Lyle J. ; Judd, Edward S. ; Wangensteen, Owen H.</creatorcontrib><description>Conclusions The extensive gastric resection (operations III and IVA) offer the best protection against the development of jejunal ulcer. No jejunal ulcer developed and all dogs survived the injection period. Gastrojejunostomy, the small gastric resection and the Schmilinsky operation offer no protection. All animals developed jejunal ulcer with employment of the histamine-bees-wax technique. The small gastric resection and the antral exclusion operations would suggest that the Edkins′ “gastrin” hypothesis is invalid.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0037-9727</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1535-3702</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-3699</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3181/00379727-56-14666</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 1944-06, Vol.56 (2), p.231-233</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lannin, Bernard G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hay, Lyle J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Judd, Edward S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wangensteen, Owen H.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of a Satisfactory Operation for Ulcer</title><title>Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)</title><description>Conclusions The extensive gastric resection (operations III and IVA) offer the best protection against the development of jejunal ulcer. No jejunal ulcer developed and all dogs survived the injection period. Gastrojejunostomy, the small gastric resection and the Schmilinsky operation offer no protection. All animals developed jejunal ulcer with employment of the histamine-bees-wax technique. The small gastric resection and the antral exclusion operations would suggest that the Edkins′ “gastrin” hypothesis is invalid.</description><issn>0037-9727</issn><issn>1535-3702</issn><issn>1535-3699</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1944</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9j8tOwzAQRS0EEqHwAezyAy4zdjy2l6gqD6lSF9C15SQ2ahWayk6R-vckFLasZqR7z2gOY_cIc4kGHwCktlporohjRUQXrEAlFZdk7SUrppxPhWt2k_MOAJUWVDBYfvnu6Idtvy_7WPrybdxz9M3Qp1O5PoR0zmKfyk3XhHTLrqLvcrj7nTO2eVq-L174av38unhc8UZIGjiCJ1_HyhpDKCqF2NbUGitBg4AQW6NJkTWCUGuhqiqoOppaaQsELTRyxvB8t0l9zilEd0jbT59ODsFNyu5P2SlyP8ojMz8z2X8Et-uPaT---A_wDftPVIg</recordid><startdate>19440601</startdate><enddate>19440601</enddate><creator>Lannin, Bernard G.</creator><creator>Hay, Lyle J.</creator><creator>Judd, Edward S.</creator><creator>Wangensteen, Owen H.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19440601</creationdate><title>Evaluation of a Satisfactory Operation for Ulcer</title><author>Lannin, Bernard G. ; Hay, Lyle J. ; Judd, Edward S. ; Wangensteen, Owen H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c236t-10a6abf49886124511db6d89307020efd8765698261772544e5bf8b579060d0c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1944</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lannin, Bernard G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hay, Lyle J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Judd, Edward S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wangensteen, Owen H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lannin, Bernard G.</au><au>Hay, Lyle J.</au><au>Judd, Edward S.</au><au>Wangensteen, Owen H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of a Satisfactory Operation for Ulcer</atitle><jtitle>Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)</jtitle><date>1944-06-01</date><risdate>1944</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>231</spage><epage>233</epage><pages>231-233</pages><issn>0037-9727</issn><issn>1535-3702</issn><eissn>1535-3699</eissn><abstract>Conclusions The extensive gastric resection (operations III and IVA) offer the best protection against the development of jejunal ulcer. No jejunal ulcer developed and all dogs survived the injection period. Gastrojejunostomy, the small gastric resection and the Schmilinsky operation offer no protection. All animals developed jejunal ulcer with employment of the histamine-bees-wax technique. The small gastric resection and the antral exclusion operations would suggest that the Edkins′ “gastrin” hypothesis is invalid.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.3181/00379727-56-14666</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0037-9727
ispartof Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 1944-06, Vol.56 (2), p.231-233
issn 0037-9727
1535-3702
1535-3699
language eng
recordid cdi_sage_journals_10_3181_00379727_56_14666
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Evaluation of a Satisfactory Operation for Ulcer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T01%3A08%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20a%20Satisfactory%20Operation%20for%20Ulcer&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20biology%20and%20medicine%20(Maywood,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Lannin,%20Bernard%20G.&rft.date=1944-06-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=231&rft.epage=233&rft.pages=231-233&rft.issn=0037-9727&rft.eissn=1535-3699&rft_id=info:doi/10.3181/00379727-56-14666&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.3181_00379727-56-14666%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.3181_00379727-56-14666&rfr_iscdi=true