Engineering professional ethics in a broader dimension

In this paper, I try to foment change in terms of engineering and its professional societies as a guild. What I suggest is the need to modify a guild mentality. Many professional groups continue to defend their right to sanction misbehaving members as though we were back in the sixteenth century. Th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Interdisciplinary science reviews 2008-09, Vol.33 (3), p.226-233
1. Verfasser: Durbin, Paul T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 233
container_issue 3
container_start_page 226
container_title Interdisciplinary science reviews
container_volume 33
creator Durbin, Paul T.
description In this paper, I try to foment change in terms of engineering and its professional societies as a guild. What I suggest is the need to modify a guild mentality. Many professional groups continue to defend their right to sanction misbehaving members as though we were back in the sixteenth century. The first effect of the change I propose would be to minimise the sanctioning of individual wrongdoers; what would become more important instead would be to maximise service to the larger society as an ethical norm. All engineering codes of ethics seem to include service to humanity as a paramount responsibility. What I advocate is that this needs not only to be given more prominence but to be implemented concretely in specific ways. When engineering professionals get involved in this way, they will of course bring to bear on the problems their expertise. But expertise does not automatically confer a privileged position relative to citizen activists on a particular issue. Finally, I argue that this modification would depend on significant behavioural changes: engineers and their professional societies would need to broaden their outlook, moving beyond a focus on individual misconduct to broader social responsibilities. And this seems to me to amount to a better definition of engineering ethics.
doi_str_mv 10.1179/174327908X366914
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sage_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_sage_journals_10_1179_174327908X366914</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1179_174327908X366914</sage_id><sourcerecordid>35516927</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-26594be5765e788e4017bb0461a82be67dc51cddd5e33b08ae33f16a953f8b713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOD72LrtyV02aZ3Elw_iAATcK7kLa3IwZ2mRMOsj8e1vqStDVgXO_czn3InRF8A0hsr4lktFK1li9UyFqwo7QYrLKyTtGC0yxKjFR6hSd5bzFGDNJ2AKJVdj4AJB82BS7FB3k7GMwXQHDh29z4UNhiiZFYyEV1vcQpvkFOnGmy3D5o-fo7WH1unwq1y-Pz8v7ddlSwYayErxmDXApOEilgGEimwYzQYyqGhDStpy01loOlDZYmVEcEabm1KlGEnqOrue9Y7XPPeRB9z630HUmQNxnTTknoq7kCOIZbFPMOYHTu-R7kw6aYD09SP9-0Bgp50g2G9DbuE_j2fk__m7mfXAx9eYrps7qwRy6mFwyofVjnz_T34eMd_E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>35516927</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Engineering professional ethics in a broader dimension</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Durbin, Paul T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Durbin, Paul T.</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, I try to foment change in terms of engineering and its professional societies as a guild. What I suggest is the need to modify a guild mentality. Many professional groups continue to defend their right to sanction misbehaving members as though we were back in the sixteenth century. The first effect of the change I propose would be to minimise the sanctioning of individual wrongdoers; what would become more important instead would be to maximise service to the larger society as an ethical norm. All engineering codes of ethics seem to include service to humanity as a paramount responsibility. What I advocate is that this needs not only to be given more prominence but to be implemented concretely in specific ways. When engineering professionals get involved in this way, they will of course bring to bear on the problems their expertise. But expertise does not automatically confer a privileged position relative to citizen activists on a particular issue. Finally, I argue that this modification would depend on significant behavioural changes: engineers and their professional societies would need to broaden their outlook, moving beyond a focus on individual misconduct to broader social responsibilities. And this seems to me to amount to a better definition of engineering ethics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0308-0188</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-2790</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1179/174327908X366914</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><ispartof>Interdisciplinary science reviews, 2008-09, Vol.33 (3), p.226-233</ispartof><rights>2008 Maney Publishing 2008</rights><rights>2008 Maney Publishing</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-26594be5765e788e4017bb0461a82be67dc51cddd5e33b08ae33f16a953f8b713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-26594be5765e788e4017bb0461a82be67dc51cddd5e33b08ae33f16a953f8b713</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1179/174327908X366914$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1179/174327908X366914$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21818,27923,27924,43620,43621</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Durbin, Paul T.</creatorcontrib><title>Engineering professional ethics in a broader dimension</title><title>Interdisciplinary science reviews</title><description>In this paper, I try to foment change in terms of engineering and its professional societies as a guild. What I suggest is the need to modify a guild mentality. Many professional groups continue to defend their right to sanction misbehaving members as though we were back in the sixteenth century. The first effect of the change I propose would be to minimise the sanctioning of individual wrongdoers; what would become more important instead would be to maximise service to the larger society as an ethical norm. All engineering codes of ethics seem to include service to humanity as a paramount responsibility. What I advocate is that this needs not only to be given more prominence but to be implemented concretely in specific ways. When engineering professionals get involved in this way, they will of course bring to bear on the problems their expertise. But expertise does not automatically confer a privileged position relative to citizen activists on a particular issue. Finally, I argue that this modification would depend on significant behavioural changes: engineers and their professional societies would need to broaden their outlook, moving beyond a focus on individual misconduct to broader social responsibilities. And this seems to me to amount to a better definition of engineering ethics.</description><issn>0308-0188</issn><issn>1743-2790</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOD72LrtyV02aZ3Elw_iAATcK7kLa3IwZ2mRMOsj8e1vqStDVgXO_czn3InRF8A0hsr4lktFK1li9UyFqwo7QYrLKyTtGC0yxKjFR6hSd5bzFGDNJ2AKJVdj4AJB82BS7FB3k7GMwXQHDh29z4UNhiiZFYyEV1vcQpvkFOnGmy3D5o-fo7WH1unwq1y-Pz8v7ddlSwYayErxmDXApOEilgGEimwYzQYyqGhDStpy01loOlDZYmVEcEabm1KlGEnqOrue9Y7XPPeRB9z630HUmQNxnTTknoq7kCOIZbFPMOYHTu-R7kw6aYD09SP9-0Bgp50g2G9DbuE_j2fk__m7mfXAx9eYrps7qwRy6mFwyofVjnz_T34eMd_E</recordid><startdate>20080901</startdate><enddate>20080901</enddate><creator>Durbin, Paul T.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080901</creationdate><title>Engineering professional ethics in a broader dimension</title><author>Durbin, Paul T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-26594be5765e788e4017bb0461a82be67dc51cddd5e33b08ae33f16a953f8b713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Durbin, Paul T.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Interdisciplinary science reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Durbin, Paul T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Engineering professional ethics in a broader dimension</atitle><jtitle>Interdisciplinary science reviews</jtitle><date>2008-09-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>226</spage><epage>233</epage><pages>226-233</pages><issn>0308-0188</issn><eissn>1743-2790</eissn><abstract>In this paper, I try to foment change in terms of engineering and its professional societies as a guild. What I suggest is the need to modify a guild mentality. Many professional groups continue to defend their right to sanction misbehaving members as though we were back in the sixteenth century. The first effect of the change I propose would be to minimise the sanctioning of individual wrongdoers; what would become more important instead would be to maximise service to the larger society as an ethical norm. All engineering codes of ethics seem to include service to humanity as a paramount responsibility. What I advocate is that this needs not only to be given more prominence but to be implemented concretely in specific ways. When engineering professionals get involved in this way, they will of course bring to bear on the problems their expertise. But expertise does not automatically confer a privileged position relative to citizen activists on a particular issue. Finally, I argue that this modification would depend on significant behavioural changes: engineers and their professional societies would need to broaden their outlook, moving beyond a focus on individual misconduct to broader social responsibilities. And this seems to me to amount to a better definition of engineering ethics.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.1179/174327908X366914</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0308-0188
ispartof Interdisciplinary science reviews, 2008-09, Vol.33 (3), p.226-233
issn 0308-0188
1743-2790
language eng
recordid cdi_sage_journals_10_1179_174327908X366914
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
title Engineering professional ethics in a broader dimension
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T04%3A46%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sage_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Engineering%20professional%20ethics%20in%20a%20broader%20dimension&rft.jtitle=Interdisciplinary%20science%20reviews&rft.au=Durbin,%20Paul%20T.&rft.date=2008-09-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=226&rft.epage=233&rft.pages=226-233&rft.issn=0308-0188&rft.eissn=1743-2790&rft_id=info:doi/10.1179/174327908X366914&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sage_%3E35516927%3C/proquest_sage_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=35516927&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1179_174327908X366914&rfr_iscdi=true