Dose-Dependent Effects of Ranolazine on Reentrant Ventricular Arrhythmias Induced After Subacute Myocardial Infarction in Rabbits

Ranolazine has been found to prevent ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) during acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study aimed to investigate its efficacy on VAs induced several days post-MI. For this purpose, 13 anesthetized rabbits underwent coronary artery ligation. Ten of these animals that survi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2020-01, Vol.25 (1), p.65-71
Hauptverfasser: Moschovidis, Vassileios, Simopoulos, Vassileios, Stravela, Soultana, Dipla, Konstantina, Hatziefthimiou, Apostolia, Stamatiou, Rodopi, Aidonidis, Isaac
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 71
container_issue 1
container_start_page 65
container_title Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics
container_volume 25
creator Moschovidis, Vassileios
Simopoulos, Vassileios
Stravela, Soultana
Dipla, Konstantina
Hatziefthimiou, Apostolia
Stamatiou, Rodopi
Aidonidis, Isaac
description Ranolazine has been found to prevent ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) during acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study aimed to investigate its efficacy on VAs induced several days post-MI. For this purpose, 13 anesthetized rabbits underwent coronary artery ligation. Ten of these animals that survived AMI were reanesthetized 3 to 7 days later for electrophysiologic testing. An endocardial monophasic action potential combination catheter was placed in the right ventricle for simultaneous pacing and recording. Monophasic action potential duration, ventricular effective refractory period (VERP), and VAs induced by programmed stimulation were assessed. Measurements were performed during control pacing, and following an intravenous infusion of either a low-dose ranolazine (2.4 mg/kg, R1) or a higher dose ranolazine (4.8 mg/kg cumulative dose, R2). During control stimulation, 2 animals developed primary ventricular fibrillation (VF), 6 sustained ventricular tachycardia (sVT), and 2 nonsustained VT (nsVT). R1 did not prevent the appearance of VAs in any of the experiments; in contrast, it aggravated nsVT into sVT and complicated sVT termination in 2 of 6 animals. Sustained ventricular tachycardia cycle length and VERP were only slightly decreased after R1 (112 ± 5 vs 110 ± 6 ms and 101 ± 11 vs 98 ± 10 ms, respectively). R2 suppressed inducibility of control nsVT, VF, and sVT in 2 animals. In 4 animals with still inducible sVT, R2 significantly prolonged VT cycle length by 150 ± 23 ms (P < .01), and VERP by 120 ± 7 ms (P < .001) versus control. In conclusion, R2 exerted antiarrhythmic efficacy against subacute-MI VAs, whereas R1 rather aggravated than prevented these arrhythmias. Ventricular effective refractory period prolongation could partially explain the antiarrhythmic action of R2 in this rabbit model.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1074248419858113
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_sage_journals_10_1177_1074248419858113</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1074248419858113</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_1074248419858113</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-aff0928be22d39e61a50fe86c3c1e346be3ece862d7c9fce5fcde9ff9ff312ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UElLAzEUDqLYWr17kvyB0WyzHUsXLVSEulyHTPJiU6YzJckc6s1_bkrVgyA8eMu3wPsQuqbkltI8v6MkF0wUgpZFWlDKT9CQloIkgnBxGucIJwd8gC683xASz2l5jgacMsHyNBuiz2nnIZnCDloNbcAzY0AFjzuDV7LtGvlhW8Bdi1cQYScj5e0wWNU30uGxc-t9WG-t9HjR6l6BxmMTwOHnvpaqD4Af952STlvZRIaRTgUb7Wx0lHVtg79EZ0Y2Hq6--wi9zmcvk4dk-XS_mIyXiWJpHhJpDClZUQNjmpeQUZkSA0WmuKLARVYDBxV3pnNVGgWpURpKY2LFb8HwESJHX-U67x2YaufsVrp9RUl1SLP6m2aU3Bwlu77egv4V_MQXCcmR4OU7VJuud2184X_DL6IogDc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dose-Dependent Effects of Ranolazine on Reentrant Ventricular Arrhythmias Induced After Subacute Myocardial Infarction in Rabbits</title><source>SAGE Open Access</source><creator>Moschovidis, Vassileios ; Simopoulos, Vassileios ; Stravela, Soultana ; Dipla, Konstantina ; Hatziefthimiou, Apostolia ; Stamatiou, Rodopi ; Aidonidis, Isaac</creator><creatorcontrib>Moschovidis, Vassileios ; Simopoulos, Vassileios ; Stravela, Soultana ; Dipla, Konstantina ; Hatziefthimiou, Apostolia ; Stamatiou, Rodopi ; Aidonidis, Isaac</creatorcontrib><description>Ranolazine has been found to prevent ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) during acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study aimed to investigate its efficacy on VAs induced several days post-MI. For this purpose, 13 anesthetized rabbits underwent coronary artery ligation. Ten of these animals that survived AMI were reanesthetized 3 to 7 days later for electrophysiologic testing. An endocardial monophasic action potential combination catheter was placed in the right ventricle for simultaneous pacing and recording. Monophasic action potential duration, ventricular effective refractory period (VERP), and VAs induced by programmed stimulation were assessed. Measurements were performed during control pacing, and following an intravenous infusion of either a low-dose ranolazine (2.4 mg/kg, R1) or a higher dose ranolazine (4.8 mg/kg cumulative dose, R2). During control stimulation, 2 animals developed primary ventricular fibrillation (VF), 6 sustained ventricular tachycardia (sVT), and 2 nonsustained VT (nsVT). R1 did not prevent the appearance of VAs in any of the experiments; in contrast, it aggravated nsVT into sVT and complicated sVT termination in 2 of 6 animals. Sustained ventricular tachycardia cycle length and VERP were only slightly decreased after R1 (112 ± 5 vs 110 ± 6 ms and 101 ± 11 vs 98 ± 10 ms, respectively). R2 suppressed inducibility of control nsVT, VF, and sVT in 2 animals. In 4 animals with still inducible sVT, R2 significantly prolonged VT cycle length by 150 ± 23 ms (P &lt; .01), and VERP by 120 ± 7 ms (P &lt; .001) versus control. In conclusion, R2 exerted antiarrhythmic efficacy against subacute-MI VAs, whereas R1 rather aggravated than prevented these arrhythmias. Ventricular effective refractory period prolongation could partially explain the antiarrhythmic action of R2 in this rabbit model.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1074-2484</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-4034</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1074248419858113</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31242756</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2020-01, Vol.25 (1), p.65-71</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-aff0928be22d39e61a50fe86c3c1e346be3ece862d7c9fce5fcde9ff9ff312ef3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0350-803X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1074248419858113$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1074248419858113$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,21966,27853,27922,27924,27925,44945,45333</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1074248419858113?utm_source=summon&amp;utm_medium=discovery-provider$$EView_record_in_SAGE_Publications$$FView_record_in_$$GSAGE_Publications</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31242756$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moschovidis, Vassileios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simopoulos, Vassileios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stravela, Soultana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dipla, Konstantina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatziefthimiou, Apostolia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stamatiou, Rodopi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aidonidis, Isaac</creatorcontrib><title>Dose-Dependent Effects of Ranolazine on Reentrant Ventricular Arrhythmias Induced After Subacute Myocardial Infarction in Rabbits</title><title>Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics</title><addtitle>J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther</addtitle><description>Ranolazine has been found to prevent ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) during acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study aimed to investigate its efficacy on VAs induced several days post-MI. For this purpose, 13 anesthetized rabbits underwent coronary artery ligation. Ten of these animals that survived AMI were reanesthetized 3 to 7 days later for electrophysiologic testing. An endocardial monophasic action potential combination catheter was placed in the right ventricle for simultaneous pacing and recording. Monophasic action potential duration, ventricular effective refractory period (VERP), and VAs induced by programmed stimulation were assessed. Measurements were performed during control pacing, and following an intravenous infusion of either a low-dose ranolazine (2.4 mg/kg, R1) or a higher dose ranolazine (4.8 mg/kg cumulative dose, R2). During control stimulation, 2 animals developed primary ventricular fibrillation (VF), 6 sustained ventricular tachycardia (sVT), and 2 nonsustained VT (nsVT). R1 did not prevent the appearance of VAs in any of the experiments; in contrast, it aggravated nsVT into sVT and complicated sVT termination in 2 of 6 animals. Sustained ventricular tachycardia cycle length and VERP were only slightly decreased after R1 (112 ± 5 vs 110 ± 6 ms and 101 ± 11 vs 98 ± 10 ms, respectively). R2 suppressed inducibility of control nsVT, VF, and sVT in 2 animals. In 4 animals with still inducible sVT, R2 significantly prolonged VT cycle length by 150 ± 23 ms (P &lt; .01), and VERP by 120 ± 7 ms (P &lt; .001) versus control. In conclusion, R2 exerted antiarrhythmic efficacy against subacute-MI VAs, whereas R1 rather aggravated than prevented these arrhythmias. Ventricular effective refractory period prolongation could partially explain the antiarrhythmic action of R2 in this rabbit model.</description><issn>1074-2484</issn><issn>1940-4034</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UElLAzEUDqLYWr17kvyB0WyzHUsXLVSEulyHTPJiU6YzJckc6s1_bkrVgyA8eMu3wPsQuqbkltI8v6MkF0wUgpZFWlDKT9CQloIkgnBxGucIJwd8gC683xASz2l5jgacMsHyNBuiz2nnIZnCDloNbcAzY0AFjzuDV7LtGvlhW8Bdi1cQYScj5e0wWNU30uGxc-t9WG-t9HjR6l6BxmMTwOHnvpaqD4Af952STlvZRIaRTgUb7Wx0lHVtg79EZ0Y2Hq6--wi9zmcvk4dk-XS_mIyXiWJpHhJpDClZUQNjmpeQUZkSA0WmuKLARVYDBxV3pnNVGgWpURpKY2LFb8HwESJHX-U67x2YaufsVrp9RUl1SLP6m2aU3Bwlu77egv4V_MQXCcmR4OU7VJuud2184X_DL6IogDc</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Moschovidis, Vassileios</creator><creator>Simopoulos, Vassileios</creator><creator>Stravela, Soultana</creator><creator>Dipla, Konstantina</creator><creator>Hatziefthimiou, Apostolia</creator><creator>Stamatiou, Rodopi</creator><creator>Aidonidis, Isaac</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0350-803X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Dose-Dependent Effects of Ranolazine on Reentrant Ventricular Arrhythmias Induced After Subacute Myocardial Infarction in Rabbits</title><author>Moschovidis, Vassileios ; Simopoulos, Vassileios ; Stravela, Soultana ; Dipla, Konstantina ; Hatziefthimiou, Apostolia ; Stamatiou, Rodopi ; Aidonidis, Isaac</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-aff0928be22d39e61a50fe86c3c1e346be3ece862d7c9fce5fcde9ff9ff312ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moschovidis, Vassileios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simopoulos, Vassileios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stravela, Soultana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dipla, Konstantina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatziefthimiou, Apostolia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stamatiou, Rodopi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aidonidis, Isaac</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moschovidis, Vassileios</au><au>Simopoulos, Vassileios</au><au>Stravela, Soultana</au><au>Dipla, Konstantina</au><au>Hatziefthimiou, Apostolia</au><au>Stamatiou, Rodopi</au><au>Aidonidis, Isaac</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dose-Dependent Effects of Ranolazine on Reentrant Ventricular Arrhythmias Induced After Subacute Myocardial Infarction in Rabbits</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics</jtitle><addtitle>J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther</addtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>71</epage><pages>65-71</pages><issn>1074-2484</issn><eissn>1940-4034</eissn><abstract>Ranolazine has been found to prevent ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) during acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study aimed to investigate its efficacy on VAs induced several days post-MI. For this purpose, 13 anesthetized rabbits underwent coronary artery ligation. Ten of these animals that survived AMI were reanesthetized 3 to 7 days later for electrophysiologic testing. An endocardial monophasic action potential combination catheter was placed in the right ventricle for simultaneous pacing and recording. Monophasic action potential duration, ventricular effective refractory period (VERP), and VAs induced by programmed stimulation were assessed. Measurements were performed during control pacing, and following an intravenous infusion of either a low-dose ranolazine (2.4 mg/kg, R1) or a higher dose ranolazine (4.8 mg/kg cumulative dose, R2). During control stimulation, 2 animals developed primary ventricular fibrillation (VF), 6 sustained ventricular tachycardia (sVT), and 2 nonsustained VT (nsVT). R1 did not prevent the appearance of VAs in any of the experiments; in contrast, it aggravated nsVT into sVT and complicated sVT termination in 2 of 6 animals. Sustained ventricular tachycardia cycle length and VERP were only slightly decreased after R1 (112 ± 5 vs 110 ± 6 ms and 101 ± 11 vs 98 ± 10 ms, respectively). R2 suppressed inducibility of control nsVT, VF, and sVT in 2 animals. In 4 animals with still inducible sVT, R2 significantly prolonged VT cycle length by 150 ± 23 ms (P &lt; .01), and VERP by 120 ± 7 ms (P &lt; .001) versus control. In conclusion, R2 exerted antiarrhythmic efficacy against subacute-MI VAs, whereas R1 rather aggravated than prevented these arrhythmias. Ventricular effective refractory period prolongation could partially explain the antiarrhythmic action of R2 in this rabbit model.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>31242756</pmid><doi>10.1177/1074248419858113</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0350-803X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1074-2484
ispartof Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2020-01, Vol.25 (1), p.65-71
issn 1074-2484
1940-4034
language eng
recordid cdi_sage_journals_10_1177_1074248419858113
source SAGE Open Access
title Dose-Dependent Effects of Ranolazine on Reentrant Ventricular Arrhythmias Induced After Subacute Myocardial Infarction in Rabbits
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A07%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_AFRWT&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dose-Dependent%20Effects%20of%20Ranolazine%20on%20Reentrant%20Ventricular%20Arrhythmias%20Induced%20After%20Subacute%20Myocardial%20Infarction%20in%20Rabbits&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Cardiovascular%20Pharmacology%20and%20Therapeutics&rft.au=Moschovidis,%20Vassileios&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=71&rft.pages=65-71&rft.issn=1074-2484&rft.eissn=1940-4034&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1074248419858113&rft_dat=%3Csage_AFRWT%3E10.1177_1074248419858113%3C/sage_AFRWT%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/31242756&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1074248419858113&rfr_iscdi=true