Problems Encountered in Determining an Eye Safety Standard for Daily Exposures to Optical Radiation

Existing eye safety standards are not suitable for specifying safety limits to which individuals are exposed on a daily basis. A possible approach to this problem is to relate safety limits to radiation doses found in nature. Although this method produces extremely conservative safety limits, it gre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the Human Factors Society annual meeting 1980-10, Vol.24 (1), p.157-159
1. Verfasser: Smedley, David C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 159
container_issue 1
container_start_page 157
container_title Proceedings of the Human Factors Society annual meeting
container_volume 24
creator Smedley, David C.
description Existing eye safety standards are not suitable for specifying safety limits to which individuals are exposed on a daily basis. A possible approach to this problem is to relate safety limits to radiation doses found in nature. Although this method produces extremely conservative safety limits, it greatly reduces the possibility of temporary lesions encountered within existing guidelines.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/107118138002400145
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_sage_journals_10_1177_107118138002400145</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_107118138002400145</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_107118138002400145</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c835-d445ba848cc870587bee370c2ee6a4d2afe93025cc597ca44685917ba95d1eb73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1qwzAQhEVpoWnaF-hJL-BGa0mWfCyJ-wOBlCZ3s5bloOBIQXKgfvu6pLdCTzOH-WaXIeQR2BOAUgtgCkAD14zlgjEQ8orMcijKTLJCXZMZSAFZySG_JXcpHaYYV1zMiPmIoentMdHKm3D2g422pc7TlZ3s0Xnn9xQ9rUZLt9jZYaTbAX2LsaVdiHSFrh9p9XUK6RxtokOgm9PgDPb0E1uHgwv-ntx02Cf78Ktzsnupdsu3bL15fV8-rzOjucxaIWSDWmhjtGJSq8ZarpjJrS1QtPl0vOQsl8bIUhkUotCyBNVgKVuwjeJzkl9qTQwpRdvVp-iOGMcaWP2zUv13pQlaXKCEe1sfwjn66cX_iG8O8Ggf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Problems Encountered in Determining an Eye Safety Standard for Daily Exposures to Optical Radiation</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Smedley, David C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Smedley, David C.</creatorcontrib><description>Existing eye safety standards are not suitable for specifying safety limits to which individuals are exposed on a daily basis. A possible approach to this problem is to relate safety limits to radiation doses found in nature. Although this method produces extremely conservative safety limits, it greatly reduces the possibility of temporary lesions encountered within existing guidelines.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1541-9312</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0163-5182</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-5067</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/107118138002400145</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Proceedings of the Human Factors Society annual meeting, 1980-10, Vol.24 (1), p.157-159</ispartof><rights>1980 Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c835-d445ba848cc870587bee370c2ee6a4d2afe93025cc597ca44685917ba95d1eb73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/107118138002400145$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/107118138002400145$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smedley, David C.</creatorcontrib><title>Problems Encountered in Determining an Eye Safety Standard for Daily Exposures to Optical Radiation</title><title>Proceedings of the Human Factors Society annual meeting</title><description>Existing eye safety standards are not suitable for specifying safety limits to which individuals are exposed on a daily basis. A possible approach to this problem is to relate safety limits to radiation doses found in nature. Although this method produces extremely conservative safety limits, it greatly reduces the possibility of temporary lesions encountered within existing guidelines.</description><issn>1541-9312</issn><issn>0163-5182</issn><issn>2169-5067</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1980</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1qwzAQhEVpoWnaF-hJL-BGa0mWfCyJ-wOBlCZ3s5bloOBIQXKgfvu6pLdCTzOH-WaXIeQR2BOAUgtgCkAD14zlgjEQ8orMcijKTLJCXZMZSAFZySG_JXcpHaYYV1zMiPmIoentMdHKm3D2g422pc7TlZ3s0Xnn9xQ9rUZLt9jZYaTbAX2LsaVdiHSFrh9p9XUK6RxtokOgm9PgDPb0E1uHgwv-ntx02Cf78Ktzsnupdsu3bL15fV8-rzOjucxaIWSDWmhjtGJSq8ZarpjJrS1QtPl0vOQsl8bIUhkUotCyBNVgKVuwjeJzkl9qTQwpRdvVp-iOGMcaWP2zUv13pQlaXKCEe1sfwjn66cX_iG8O8Ggf</recordid><startdate>198010</startdate><enddate>198010</enddate><creator>Smedley, David C.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198010</creationdate><title>Problems Encountered in Determining an Eye Safety Standard for Daily Exposures to Optical Radiation</title><author>Smedley, David C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c835-d445ba848cc870587bee370c2ee6a4d2afe93025cc597ca44685917ba95d1eb73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1980</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smedley, David C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Human Factors Society annual meeting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smedley, David C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Problems Encountered in Determining an Eye Safety Standard for Daily Exposures to Optical Radiation</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Human Factors Society annual meeting</jtitle><date>1980-10</date><risdate>1980</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>157</spage><epage>159</epage><pages>157-159</pages><issn>1541-9312</issn><issn>0163-5182</issn><eissn>2169-5067</eissn><abstract>Existing eye safety standards are not suitable for specifying safety limits to which individuals are exposed on a daily basis. A possible approach to this problem is to relate safety limits to radiation doses found in nature. Although this method produces extremely conservative safety limits, it greatly reduces the possibility of temporary lesions encountered within existing guidelines.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/107118138002400145</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1541-9312
ispartof Proceedings of the Human Factors Society annual meeting, 1980-10, Vol.24 (1), p.157-159
issn 1541-9312
0163-5182
2169-5067
language eng
recordid cdi_sage_journals_10_1177_107118138002400145
source SAGE Complete
title Problems Encountered in Determining an Eye Safety Standard for Daily Exposures to Optical Radiation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T08%3A34%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Problems%20Encountered%20in%20Determining%20an%20Eye%20Safety%20Standard%20for%20Daily%20Exposures%20to%20Optical%20Radiation&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Human%20Factors%20Society%20annual%20meeting&rft.au=Smedley,%20David%20C.&rft.date=1980-10&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=157&rft.epage=159&rft.pages=157-159&rft.issn=1541-9312&rft.eissn=2169-5067&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/107118138002400145&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_107118138002400145%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_107118138002400145&rfr_iscdi=true