Lifting the Lens: Developing a Logic for a Complicated Policy
A new intervention that is designed to be adaptive presents a challenge for evaluators when developing a logic model at the start of a government policy evaluation. Our task became more problematic when the early data collection identified that participant groups had differing ideas about what the p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Evaluation journal of Australasia 2009-01, Vol.9 (2), p.24-32 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 32 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 24 |
container_title | Evaluation journal of Australasia |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Roorda, Mathea Nunns, Heather |
description | A new intervention that is designed to be adaptive presents a challenge for evaluators when developing a logic model at the start of a government policy evaluation. Our task became more problematic when the early data collection identified that participant groups had differing ideas about what the policy was intended to achieve. Participants also tended to 'deconstruct' the policy and focus only on the parts for which they were responsible. Realising that traditional logic modelling (that is, a linear approach to describing policy inputs and outcomes developed at the beginning of the evaluation) would provide a simplified picture of the policy, we decided to ground the logic in the evidence. This approach provided a more indepth understanding of how the policy components interact with each other. Our logic became a vehicle to reconceptualise the policy through presenting an alternative perspective to understanding and communicating how the policy works on the ground. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1035719X0900900205 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_rmit_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_sage_journals_10_1177_1035719X0900900205</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/ielapa.823000688651795</informt_id><sage_id>10.1177_1035719X0900900205</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_1035719X0900900205</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-4691bf93a6049b1f135232f92a9ad2a3177c4688dc0b5f590f661bb875e903fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqlkF1LwzAUhoMoOHR_wKv-gWo-lrQRvJD5MUdBLxS8C2mabBldU5Iq-O9NnKIiE8QQyOHkPC_nfQE4QvAYoaI4QZDQAvFHyGG6GNIdMMIU0ZyTAu-CURrI08Q-GIewgvEwzEo4GYGzyprBdotsWOqs0l04zS70s25dn5oyq9zCqsw4H-upW_etVXLQTXbnYvVyCPaMbIMev78H4OHq8n46y6vb65vpeZUrioohnzCOasOJZHDCa2QQoZhgw7HkssGSRBNqwsqyUbCmhnJoGEN1XRZUc0hMQw4A3ugq70Lw2oje27X0LwJBkTIQPzOI0MkGCnKhxco9-S7u-DtxuiH82g5CubbVarCuCys5vIGEICasbmUvRYlJyrEsWfTIEzz_AscJM4igpVdLYbsYYOo6vxCNs59SHx8_xWZ_F9u21zcpbft_SM3_LrXN4isFkNAQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lifting the Lens: Developing a Logic for a Complicated Policy</title><source>SAGE Journals</source><creator>Roorda, Mathea ; Nunns, Heather</creator><creatorcontrib>Roorda, Mathea ; Nunns, Heather</creatorcontrib><description>A new intervention that is designed to be adaptive presents a challenge for evaluators when developing a logic model at the start of a government policy evaluation. Our task became more problematic when the early data collection identified that participant groups had differing ideas about what the policy was intended to achieve. Participants also tended to 'deconstruct' the policy and focus only on the parts for which they were responsible. Realising that traditional logic modelling (that is, a linear approach to describing policy inputs and outcomes developed at the beginning of the evaluation) would provide a simplified picture of the policy, we decided to ground the logic in the evidence. This approach provided a more indepth understanding of how the policy components interact with each other. Our logic became a vehicle to reconceptualise the policy through presenting an alternative perspective to understanding and communicating how the policy works on the ground.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1035-719X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2515-9372</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1035719X0900900205</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Evaluation ; Evaluation research (Social action programs) ; Government policy ; Labor supply ; Public administration ; Recognised Seasonal Employer (RSE)</subject><ispartof>Evaluation journal of Australasia, 2009-01, Vol.9 (2), p.24-32</ispartof><rights>2009 Australasian Evaluation Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-4691bf93a6049b1f135232f92a9ad2a3177c4688dc0b5f590f661bb875e903fd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-4691bf93a6049b1f135232f92a9ad2a3177c4688dc0b5f590f661bb875e903fd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1035719X0900900205$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1035719X0900900205$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,21798,27900,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roorda, Mathea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunns, Heather</creatorcontrib><title>Lifting the Lens: Developing a Logic for a Complicated Policy</title><title>Evaluation journal of Australasia</title><description>A new intervention that is designed to be adaptive presents a challenge for evaluators when developing a logic model at the start of a government policy evaluation. Our task became more problematic when the early data collection identified that participant groups had differing ideas about what the policy was intended to achieve. Participants also tended to 'deconstruct' the policy and focus only on the parts for which they were responsible. Realising that traditional logic modelling (that is, a linear approach to describing policy inputs and outcomes developed at the beginning of the evaluation) would provide a simplified picture of the policy, we decided to ground the logic in the evidence. This approach provided a more indepth understanding of how the policy components interact with each other. Our logic became a vehicle to reconceptualise the policy through presenting an alternative perspective to understanding and communicating how the policy works on the ground.</description><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Evaluation research (Social action programs)</subject><subject>Government policy</subject><subject>Labor supply</subject><subject>Public administration</subject><subject>Recognised Seasonal Employer (RSE)</subject><issn>1035-719X</issn><issn>2515-9372</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqlkF1LwzAUhoMoOHR_wKv-gWo-lrQRvJD5MUdBLxS8C2mabBldU5Iq-O9NnKIiE8QQyOHkPC_nfQE4QvAYoaI4QZDQAvFHyGG6GNIdMMIU0ZyTAu-CURrI08Q-GIewgvEwzEo4GYGzyprBdotsWOqs0l04zS70s25dn5oyq9zCqsw4H-upW_etVXLQTXbnYvVyCPaMbIMev78H4OHq8n46y6vb65vpeZUrioohnzCOasOJZHDCa2QQoZhgw7HkssGSRBNqwsqyUbCmhnJoGEN1XRZUc0hMQw4A3ugq70Lw2oje27X0LwJBkTIQPzOI0MkGCnKhxco9-S7u-DtxuiH82g5CubbVarCuCys5vIGEICasbmUvRYlJyrEsWfTIEzz_AscJM4igpVdLYbsYYOo6vxCNs59SHx8_xWZ_F9u21zcpbft_SM3_LrXN4isFkNAQ</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>Roorda, Mathea</creator><creator>Nunns, Heather</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>Lifting the Lens: Developing a Logic for a Complicated Policy</title><author>Roorda, Mathea ; Nunns, Heather</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-4691bf93a6049b1f135232f92a9ad2a3177c4688dc0b5f590f661bb875e903fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Evaluation research (Social action programs)</topic><topic>Government policy</topic><topic>Labor supply</topic><topic>Public administration</topic><topic>Recognised Seasonal Employer (RSE)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roorda, Mathea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunns, Heather</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Evaluation journal of Australasia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roorda, Mathea</au><au>Nunns, Heather</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lifting the Lens: Developing a Logic for a Complicated Policy</atitle><jtitle>Evaluation journal of Australasia</jtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>24</spage><epage>32</epage><pages>24-32</pages><issn>1035-719X</issn><eissn>2515-9372</eissn><abstract>A new intervention that is designed to be adaptive presents a challenge for evaluators when developing a logic model at the start of a government policy evaluation. Our task became more problematic when the early data collection identified that participant groups had differing ideas about what the policy was intended to achieve. Participants also tended to 'deconstruct' the policy and focus only on the parts for which they were responsible. Realising that traditional logic modelling (that is, a linear approach to describing policy inputs and outcomes developed at the beginning of the evaluation) would provide a simplified picture of the policy, we decided to ground the logic in the evidence. This approach provided a more indepth understanding of how the policy components interact with each other. Our logic became a vehicle to reconceptualise the policy through presenting an alternative perspective to understanding and communicating how the policy works on the ground.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1035719X0900900205</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1035-719X |
ispartof | Evaluation journal of Australasia, 2009-01, Vol.9 (2), p.24-32 |
issn | 1035-719X 2515-9372 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_sage_journals_10_1177_1035719X0900900205 |
source | SAGE Journals |
subjects | Evaluation Evaluation research (Social action programs) Government policy Labor supply Public administration Recognised Seasonal Employer (RSE) |
title | Lifting the Lens: Developing a Logic for a Complicated Policy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T15%3A08%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_rmit_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lifting%20the%20Lens:%20Developing%20a%20Logic%20for%20a%20Complicated%20Policy&rft.jtitle=Evaluation%20journal%20of%20Australasia&rft.au=Roorda,%20Mathea&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=32&rft.pages=24-32&rft.issn=1035-719X&rft.eissn=2515-9372&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1035719X0900900205&rft_dat=%3Csage_rmit_%3E10.1177_1035719X0900900205%3C/sage_rmit_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/ielapa.823000688651795&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1035719X0900900205&rfr_iscdi=true |