Lifting the Lens: Developing a Logic for a Complicated Policy

A new intervention that is designed to be adaptive presents a challenge for evaluators when developing a logic model at the start of a government policy evaluation. Our task became more problematic when the early data collection identified that participant groups had differing ideas about what the p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Evaluation journal of Australasia 2009-01, Vol.9 (2), p.24-32
Hauptverfasser: Roorda, Mathea, Nunns, Heather
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 32
container_issue 2
container_start_page 24
container_title Evaluation journal of Australasia
container_volume 9
creator Roorda, Mathea
Nunns, Heather
description A new intervention that is designed to be adaptive presents a challenge for evaluators when developing a logic model at the start of a government policy evaluation. Our task became more problematic when the early data collection identified that participant groups had differing ideas about what the policy was intended to achieve. Participants also tended to 'deconstruct' the policy and focus only on the parts for which they were responsible. Realising that traditional logic modelling (that is, a linear approach to describing policy inputs and outcomes developed at the beginning of the evaluation) would provide a simplified picture of the policy, we decided to ground the logic in the evidence. This approach provided a more indepth understanding of how the policy components interact with each other. Our logic became a vehicle to reconceptualise the policy through presenting an alternative perspective to understanding and communicating how the policy works on the ground.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1035719X0900900205
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_rmit_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_sage_journals_10_1177_1035719X0900900205</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/ielapa.823000688651795</informt_id><sage_id>10.1177_1035719X0900900205</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_1035719X0900900205</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-4691bf93a6049b1f135232f92a9ad2a3177c4688dc0b5f590f661bb875e903fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqlkF1LwzAUhoMoOHR_wKv-gWo-lrQRvJD5MUdBLxS8C2mabBldU5Iq-O9NnKIiE8QQyOHkPC_nfQE4QvAYoaI4QZDQAvFHyGG6GNIdMMIU0ZyTAu-CURrI08Q-GIewgvEwzEo4GYGzyprBdotsWOqs0l04zS70s25dn5oyq9zCqsw4H-upW_etVXLQTXbnYvVyCPaMbIMev78H4OHq8n46y6vb65vpeZUrioohnzCOasOJZHDCa2QQoZhgw7HkssGSRBNqwsqyUbCmhnJoGEN1XRZUc0hMQw4A3ugq70Lw2oje27X0LwJBkTIQPzOI0MkGCnKhxco9-S7u-DtxuiH82g5CubbVarCuCys5vIGEICasbmUvRYlJyrEsWfTIEzz_AscJM4igpVdLYbsYYOo6vxCNs59SHx8_xWZ_F9u21zcpbft_SM3_LrXN4isFkNAQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lifting the Lens: Developing a Logic for a Complicated Policy</title><source>SAGE Journals</source><creator>Roorda, Mathea ; Nunns, Heather</creator><creatorcontrib>Roorda, Mathea ; Nunns, Heather</creatorcontrib><description>A new intervention that is designed to be adaptive presents a challenge for evaluators when developing a logic model at the start of a government policy evaluation. Our task became more problematic when the early data collection identified that participant groups had differing ideas about what the policy was intended to achieve. Participants also tended to 'deconstruct' the policy and focus only on the parts for which they were responsible. Realising that traditional logic modelling (that is, a linear approach to describing policy inputs and outcomes developed at the beginning of the evaluation) would provide a simplified picture of the policy, we decided to ground the logic in the evidence. This approach provided a more indepth understanding of how the policy components interact with each other. Our logic became a vehicle to reconceptualise the policy through presenting an alternative perspective to understanding and communicating how the policy works on the ground.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1035-719X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2515-9372</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1035719X0900900205</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Evaluation ; Evaluation research (Social action programs) ; Government policy ; Labor supply ; Public administration ; Recognised Seasonal Employer (RSE)</subject><ispartof>Evaluation journal of Australasia, 2009-01, Vol.9 (2), p.24-32</ispartof><rights>2009 Australasian Evaluation Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-4691bf93a6049b1f135232f92a9ad2a3177c4688dc0b5f590f661bb875e903fd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-4691bf93a6049b1f135232f92a9ad2a3177c4688dc0b5f590f661bb875e903fd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1035719X0900900205$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1035719X0900900205$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,21798,27900,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roorda, Mathea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunns, Heather</creatorcontrib><title>Lifting the Lens: Developing a Logic for a Complicated Policy</title><title>Evaluation journal of Australasia</title><description>A new intervention that is designed to be adaptive presents a challenge for evaluators when developing a logic model at the start of a government policy evaluation. Our task became more problematic when the early data collection identified that participant groups had differing ideas about what the policy was intended to achieve. Participants also tended to 'deconstruct' the policy and focus only on the parts for which they were responsible. Realising that traditional logic modelling (that is, a linear approach to describing policy inputs and outcomes developed at the beginning of the evaluation) would provide a simplified picture of the policy, we decided to ground the logic in the evidence. This approach provided a more indepth understanding of how the policy components interact with each other. Our logic became a vehicle to reconceptualise the policy through presenting an alternative perspective to understanding and communicating how the policy works on the ground.</description><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Evaluation research (Social action programs)</subject><subject>Government policy</subject><subject>Labor supply</subject><subject>Public administration</subject><subject>Recognised Seasonal Employer (RSE)</subject><issn>1035-719X</issn><issn>2515-9372</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqlkF1LwzAUhoMoOHR_wKv-gWo-lrQRvJD5MUdBLxS8C2mabBldU5Iq-O9NnKIiE8QQyOHkPC_nfQE4QvAYoaI4QZDQAvFHyGG6GNIdMMIU0ZyTAu-CURrI08Q-GIewgvEwzEo4GYGzyprBdotsWOqs0l04zS70s25dn5oyq9zCqsw4H-upW_etVXLQTXbnYvVyCPaMbIMev78H4OHq8n46y6vb65vpeZUrioohnzCOasOJZHDCa2QQoZhgw7HkssGSRBNqwsqyUbCmhnJoGEN1XRZUc0hMQw4A3ugq70Lw2oje27X0LwJBkTIQPzOI0MkGCnKhxco9-S7u-DtxuiH82g5CubbVarCuCys5vIGEICasbmUvRYlJyrEsWfTIEzz_AscJM4igpVdLYbsYYOo6vxCNs59SHx8_xWZ_F9u21zcpbft_SM3_LrXN4isFkNAQ</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>Roorda, Mathea</creator><creator>Nunns, Heather</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>Lifting the Lens: Developing a Logic for a Complicated Policy</title><author>Roorda, Mathea ; Nunns, Heather</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-4691bf93a6049b1f135232f92a9ad2a3177c4688dc0b5f590f661bb875e903fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Evaluation research (Social action programs)</topic><topic>Government policy</topic><topic>Labor supply</topic><topic>Public administration</topic><topic>Recognised Seasonal Employer (RSE)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roorda, Mathea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunns, Heather</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Evaluation journal of Australasia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roorda, Mathea</au><au>Nunns, Heather</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lifting the Lens: Developing a Logic for a Complicated Policy</atitle><jtitle>Evaluation journal of Australasia</jtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>24</spage><epage>32</epage><pages>24-32</pages><issn>1035-719X</issn><eissn>2515-9372</eissn><abstract>A new intervention that is designed to be adaptive presents a challenge for evaluators when developing a logic model at the start of a government policy evaluation. Our task became more problematic when the early data collection identified that participant groups had differing ideas about what the policy was intended to achieve. Participants also tended to 'deconstruct' the policy and focus only on the parts for which they were responsible. Realising that traditional logic modelling (that is, a linear approach to describing policy inputs and outcomes developed at the beginning of the evaluation) would provide a simplified picture of the policy, we decided to ground the logic in the evidence. This approach provided a more indepth understanding of how the policy components interact with each other. Our logic became a vehicle to reconceptualise the policy through presenting an alternative perspective to understanding and communicating how the policy works on the ground.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1035719X0900900205</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1035-719X
ispartof Evaluation journal of Australasia, 2009-01, Vol.9 (2), p.24-32
issn 1035-719X
2515-9372
language eng
recordid cdi_sage_journals_10_1177_1035719X0900900205
source SAGE Journals
subjects Evaluation
Evaluation research (Social action programs)
Government policy
Labor supply
Public administration
Recognised Seasonal Employer (RSE)
title Lifting the Lens: Developing a Logic for a Complicated Policy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T15%3A08%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_rmit_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lifting%20the%20Lens:%20Developing%20a%20Logic%20for%20a%20Complicated%20Policy&rft.jtitle=Evaluation%20journal%20of%20Australasia&rft.au=Roorda,%20Mathea&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=32&rft.pages=24-32&rft.issn=1035-719X&rft.eissn=2515-9372&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1035719X0900900205&rft_dat=%3Csage_rmit_%3E10.1177_1035719X0900900205%3C/sage_rmit_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/ielapa.823000688651795&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1035719X0900900205&rfr_iscdi=true