Rethinking volitional control over task choice in multitask environments: Use of a stimulus set selection strategy in voluntary task switching
Under conditions of volitional control in multitask environments, subjects may engage in a variety of strategies to guide task selection. The current research examines whether subjects may sometimes use a top-down control strategy of selecting a task-irrelevant stimulus dimension, such as location,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) 2015-04, Vol.68 (4), p.664-679 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 679 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 664 |
container_title | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) |
container_volume | 68 |
creator | Arrington, Catherine M. Weaver, Starla M. |
description | Under conditions of volitional control in multitask environments, subjects may engage in a variety of strategies to guide task selection. The current research examines whether subjects may sometimes use a top-down control strategy of selecting a task-irrelevant stimulus dimension, such as location, to guide task selection. We term this approach a stimulus set selection strategy. Using a voluntary task switching procedure, subjects voluntarily switched between categorizing letter and number stimuli that appeared in two, four, or eight possible target locations. Effects of stimulus availability, manipulated by varying the stimulus onset asynchrony between the two target stimuli, and location repetition were analysed to assess the use of a stimulus set selection strategy. Considered across position condition, Experiment 1 showed effects of both stimulus availability and location repetition on task choice suggesting that only in the 2-position condition, where selection based on location always results in a target at the selected location, subjects may have been using a stimulus set selection strategy on some trials. Experiment 2 replicated and extended these findings in a visually more cluttered environment. These results indicate that, contrary to current models of task selection in voluntary task switching, the top-down control of task selection may occur in the absence of the formation of an intention to perform a particular task. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/17470218.2014.961935 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sage_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_sage_journals_10_1080_17470218_2014_961935</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1080_17470218.2014.961935</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1663658044</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-a8804f0b84ac9ab54b1a6ba2294674a1cfa068189cb0b3d3e6b3a91c4b517d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhSMEoqXwBgh5yWYGO_5LWICqip9KlZAKrK0bj5Nx69jFdqaal-CZcUg7Khu6sGwdn_vdI52qek3wmuAGvyOSSVyTZl1jwtatIC3lT6rjWV7huhZPD2_SHFUvUrrCmFEp5PPqqOZ1QzmXx9XvS5O31l9bP6BdcDbb4MEhHXyOwaGwMxFlSNdIb4PVBlmPxsll-1czfmdj8KPxOb1HP5NBoUeAUrbFMyWUTC7HGT1Tixwhm2E_M8qqyWeI-wWebm3WJcbwsnrWg0vm1d19Un3__OnH2dfVxbcv52enFyvNpcgraBrMetw1DHQLHWcdAdFBXbdMSAZE94BFQ5pWd7ijG2pER6ElmnWcyA09qT4s1JupG81Gl_wRnLqJdiyRVACr_v3xdquGsFOMcslpXQBv7wAx_JpMymq0SRvnwJswJUWEoIKXjKxY2WLVMaQUTX9YQ7Cai1T3Raq5SLUUWcbePIx4GLpvrhjIYkgwGHUVplh6S49BPy4z1vchjnAbotuoDHsXYh_Ba5sU_S_hD0rlwJM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1663658044</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rethinking volitional control over task choice in multitask environments: Use of a stimulus set selection strategy in voluntary task switching</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Arrington, Catherine M. ; Weaver, Starla M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Arrington, Catherine M. ; Weaver, Starla M.</creatorcontrib><description>Under conditions of volitional control in multitask environments, subjects may engage in a variety of strategies to guide task selection. The current research examines whether subjects may sometimes use a top-down control strategy of selecting a task-irrelevant stimulus dimension, such as location, to guide task selection. We term this approach a stimulus set selection strategy. Using a voluntary task switching procedure, subjects voluntarily switched between categorizing letter and number stimuli that appeared in two, four, or eight possible target locations. Effects of stimulus availability, manipulated by varying the stimulus onset asynchrony between the two target stimuli, and location repetition were analysed to assess the use of a stimulus set selection strategy. Considered across position condition, Experiment 1 showed effects of both stimulus availability and location repetition on task choice suggesting that only in the 2-position condition, where selection based on location always results in a target at the selected location, subjects may have been using a stimulus set selection strategy on some trials. Experiment 2 replicated and extended these findings in a visually more cluttered environment. These results indicate that, contrary to current models of task selection in voluntary task switching, the top-down control of task selection may occur in the absence of the formation of an intention to perform a particular task.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1747-0218</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-0226</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2014.961935</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25283557</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Routledge</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Attention - physiology ; Choice Behavior - physiology ; Cognitive control ; Female ; Humans ; Intention ; Male ; Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology ; Photic Stimulation ; Probability ; Psychomotor Performance ; Reaction Time ; Space Perception ; Students ; Task selection ; Thinking - physiology ; Universities ; Volitional behaviour ; Voluntary task switching</subject><ispartof>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2015-04, Vol.68 (4), p.664-679</ispartof><rights>2014 The Experimental Psychology Society 2014</rights><rights>2015 Experimental Pscyhology Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-a8804f0b84ac9ab54b1a6ba2294674a1cfa068189cb0b3d3e6b3a91c4b517d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-a8804f0b84ac9ab54b1a6ba2294674a1cfa068189cb0b3d3e6b3a91c4b517d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17470218.2014.961935$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/17470218.2014.961935$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25283557$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arrington, Catherine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Starla M.</creatorcontrib><title>Rethinking volitional control over task choice in multitask environments: Use of a stimulus set selection strategy in voluntary task switching</title><title>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</title><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><description>Under conditions of volitional control in multitask environments, subjects may engage in a variety of strategies to guide task selection. The current research examines whether subjects may sometimes use a top-down control strategy of selecting a task-irrelevant stimulus dimension, such as location, to guide task selection. We term this approach a stimulus set selection strategy. Using a voluntary task switching procedure, subjects voluntarily switched between categorizing letter and number stimuli that appeared in two, four, or eight possible target locations. Effects of stimulus availability, manipulated by varying the stimulus onset asynchrony between the two target stimuli, and location repetition were analysed to assess the use of a stimulus set selection strategy. Considered across position condition, Experiment 1 showed effects of both stimulus availability and location repetition on task choice suggesting that only in the 2-position condition, where selection based on location always results in a target at the selected location, subjects may have been using a stimulus set selection strategy on some trials. Experiment 2 replicated and extended these findings in a visually more cluttered environment. These results indicate that, contrary to current models of task selection in voluntary task switching, the top-down control of task selection may occur in the absence of the formation of an intention to perform a particular task.</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Choice Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Cognitive control</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Space Perception</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Task selection</subject><subject>Thinking - physiology</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>Volitional behaviour</subject><subject>Voluntary task switching</subject><issn>1747-0218</issn><issn>1747-0226</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhSMEoqXwBgh5yWYGO_5LWICqip9KlZAKrK0bj5Nx69jFdqaal-CZcUg7Khu6sGwdn_vdI52qek3wmuAGvyOSSVyTZl1jwtatIC3lT6rjWV7huhZPD2_SHFUvUrrCmFEp5PPqqOZ1QzmXx9XvS5O31l9bP6BdcDbb4MEhHXyOwaGwMxFlSNdIb4PVBlmPxsll-1czfmdj8KPxOb1HP5NBoUeAUrbFMyWUTC7HGT1Tixwhm2E_M8qqyWeI-wWebm3WJcbwsnrWg0vm1d19Un3__OnH2dfVxbcv52enFyvNpcgraBrMetw1DHQLHWcdAdFBXbdMSAZE94BFQ5pWd7ijG2pER6ElmnWcyA09qT4s1JupG81Gl_wRnLqJdiyRVACr_v3xdquGsFOMcslpXQBv7wAx_JpMymq0SRvnwJswJUWEoIKXjKxY2WLVMaQUTX9YQ7Cai1T3Raq5SLUUWcbePIx4GLpvrhjIYkgwGHUVplh6S49BPy4z1vchjnAbotuoDHsXYh_Ba5sU_S_hD0rlwJM</recordid><startdate>20150403</startdate><enddate>20150403</enddate><creator>Arrington, Catherine M.</creator><creator>Weaver, Starla M.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150403</creationdate><title>Rethinking volitional control over task choice in multitask environments: Use of a stimulus set selection strategy in voluntary task switching</title><author>Arrington, Catherine M. ; Weaver, Starla M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-a8804f0b84ac9ab54b1a6ba2294674a1cfa068189cb0b3d3e6b3a91c4b517d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Choice Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Cognitive control</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Space Perception</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Task selection</topic><topic>Thinking - physiology</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>Volitional behaviour</topic><topic>Voluntary task switching</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arrington, Catherine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Starla M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arrington, Catherine M.</au><au>Weaver, Starla M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rethinking volitional control over task choice in multitask environments: Use of a stimulus set selection strategy in voluntary task switching</atitle><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><date>2015-04-03</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>664</spage><epage>679</epage><pages>664-679</pages><issn>1747-0218</issn><eissn>1747-0226</eissn><abstract>Under conditions of volitional control in multitask environments, subjects may engage in a variety of strategies to guide task selection. The current research examines whether subjects may sometimes use a top-down control strategy of selecting a task-irrelevant stimulus dimension, such as location, to guide task selection. We term this approach a stimulus set selection strategy. Using a voluntary task switching procedure, subjects voluntarily switched between categorizing letter and number stimuli that appeared in two, four, or eight possible target locations. Effects of stimulus availability, manipulated by varying the stimulus onset asynchrony between the two target stimuli, and location repetition were analysed to assess the use of a stimulus set selection strategy. Considered across position condition, Experiment 1 showed effects of both stimulus availability and location repetition on task choice suggesting that only in the 2-position condition, where selection based on location always results in a target at the selected location, subjects may have been using a stimulus set selection strategy on some trials. Experiment 2 replicated and extended these findings in a visually more cluttered environment. These results indicate that, contrary to current models of task selection in voluntary task switching, the top-down control of task selection may occur in the absence of the formation of an intention to perform a particular task.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><pmid>25283557</pmid><doi>10.1080/17470218.2014.961935</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1747-0218 |
ispartof | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2015-04, Vol.68 (4), p.664-679 |
issn | 1747-0218 1747-0226 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_sage_journals_10_1080_17470218_2014_961935 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete |
subjects | Analysis of Variance Attention - physiology Choice Behavior - physiology Cognitive control Female Humans Intention Male Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology Photic Stimulation Probability Psychomotor Performance Reaction Time Space Perception Students Task selection Thinking - physiology Universities Volitional behaviour Voluntary task switching |
title | Rethinking volitional control over task choice in multitask environments: Use of a stimulus set selection strategy in voluntary task switching |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T11%3A57%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sage_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rethinking%20volitional%20control%20over%20task%20choice%20in%20multitask%20environments:%20Use%20of%20a%20stimulus%20set%20selection%20strategy%20in%20voluntary%20task%20switching&rft.jtitle=Quarterly%20journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology%20(2006)&rft.au=Arrington,%20Catherine%20M.&rft.date=2015-04-03&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=664&rft.epage=679&rft.pages=664-679&rft.issn=1747-0218&rft.eissn=1747-0226&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/17470218.2014.961935&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sage_%3E1663658044%3C/proquest_sage_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1663658044&rft_id=info:pmid/25283557&rft_sage_id=10.1080_17470218.2014.961935&rfr_iscdi=true |