Rethinking volitional control over task choice in multitask environments: Use of a stimulus set selection strategy in voluntary task switching

Under conditions of volitional control in multitask environments, subjects may engage in a variety of strategies to guide task selection. The current research examines whether subjects may sometimes use a top-down control strategy of selecting a task-irrelevant stimulus dimension, such as location,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) 2015-04, Vol.68 (4), p.664-679
Hauptverfasser: Arrington, Catherine M., Weaver, Starla M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 679
container_issue 4
container_start_page 664
container_title Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)
container_volume 68
creator Arrington, Catherine M.
Weaver, Starla M.
description Under conditions of volitional control in multitask environments, subjects may engage in a variety of strategies to guide task selection. The current research examines whether subjects may sometimes use a top-down control strategy of selecting a task-irrelevant stimulus dimension, such as location, to guide task selection. We term this approach a stimulus set selection strategy. Using a voluntary task switching procedure, subjects voluntarily switched between categorizing letter and number stimuli that appeared in two, four, or eight possible target locations. Effects of stimulus availability, manipulated by varying the stimulus onset asynchrony between the two target stimuli, and location repetition were analysed to assess the use of a stimulus set selection strategy. Considered across position condition, Experiment 1 showed effects of both stimulus availability and location repetition on task choice suggesting that only in the 2-position condition, where selection based on location always results in a target at the selected location, subjects may have been using a stimulus set selection strategy on some trials. Experiment 2 replicated and extended these findings in a visually more cluttered environment. These results indicate that, contrary to current models of task selection in voluntary task switching, the top-down control of task selection may occur in the absence of the formation of an intention to perform a particular task.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/17470218.2014.961935
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sage_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_sage_journals_10_1080_17470218_2014_961935</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1080_17470218.2014.961935</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1663658044</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-a8804f0b84ac9ab54b1a6ba2294674a1cfa068189cb0b3d3e6b3a91c4b517d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhSMEoqXwBgh5yWYGO_5LWICqip9KlZAKrK0bj5Nx69jFdqaal-CZcUg7Khu6sGwdn_vdI52qek3wmuAGvyOSSVyTZl1jwtatIC3lT6rjWV7huhZPD2_SHFUvUrrCmFEp5PPqqOZ1QzmXx9XvS5O31l9bP6BdcDbb4MEhHXyOwaGwMxFlSNdIb4PVBlmPxsll-1czfmdj8KPxOb1HP5NBoUeAUrbFMyWUTC7HGT1Tixwhm2E_M8qqyWeI-wWebm3WJcbwsnrWg0vm1d19Un3__OnH2dfVxbcv52enFyvNpcgraBrMetw1DHQLHWcdAdFBXbdMSAZE94BFQ5pWd7ijG2pER6ElmnWcyA09qT4s1JupG81Gl_wRnLqJdiyRVACr_v3xdquGsFOMcslpXQBv7wAx_JpMymq0SRvnwJswJUWEoIKXjKxY2WLVMaQUTX9YQ7Cai1T3Raq5SLUUWcbePIx4GLpvrhjIYkgwGHUVplh6S49BPy4z1vchjnAbotuoDHsXYh_Ba5sU_S_hD0rlwJM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1663658044</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rethinking volitional control over task choice in multitask environments: Use of a stimulus set selection strategy in voluntary task switching</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Arrington, Catherine M. ; Weaver, Starla M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Arrington, Catherine M. ; Weaver, Starla M.</creatorcontrib><description>Under conditions of volitional control in multitask environments, subjects may engage in a variety of strategies to guide task selection. The current research examines whether subjects may sometimes use a top-down control strategy of selecting a task-irrelevant stimulus dimension, such as location, to guide task selection. We term this approach a stimulus set selection strategy. Using a voluntary task switching procedure, subjects voluntarily switched between categorizing letter and number stimuli that appeared in two, four, or eight possible target locations. Effects of stimulus availability, manipulated by varying the stimulus onset asynchrony between the two target stimuli, and location repetition were analysed to assess the use of a stimulus set selection strategy. Considered across position condition, Experiment 1 showed effects of both stimulus availability and location repetition on task choice suggesting that only in the 2-position condition, where selection based on location always results in a target at the selected location, subjects may have been using a stimulus set selection strategy on some trials. Experiment 2 replicated and extended these findings in a visually more cluttered environment. These results indicate that, contrary to current models of task selection in voluntary task switching, the top-down control of task selection may occur in the absence of the formation of an intention to perform a particular task.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1747-0218</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-0226</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2014.961935</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25283557</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Routledge</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Attention - physiology ; Choice Behavior - physiology ; Cognitive control ; Female ; Humans ; Intention ; Male ; Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology ; Photic Stimulation ; Probability ; Psychomotor Performance ; Reaction Time ; Space Perception ; Students ; Task selection ; Thinking - physiology ; Universities ; Volitional behaviour ; Voluntary task switching</subject><ispartof>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2015-04, Vol.68 (4), p.664-679</ispartof><rights>2014 The Experimental Psychology Society 2014</rights><rights>2015 Experimental Pscyhology Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-a8804f0b84ac9ab54b1a6ba2294674a1cfa068189cb0b3d3e6b3a91c4b517d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-a8804f0b84ac9ab54b1a6ba2294674a1cfa068189cb0b3d3e6b3a91c4b517d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17470218.2014.961935$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/17470218.2014.961935$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25283557$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arrington, Catherine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Starla M.</creatorcontrib><title>Rethinking volitional control over task choice in multitask environments: Use of a stimulus set selection strategy in voluntary task switching</title><title>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</title><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><description>Under conditions of volitional control in multitask environments, subjects may engage in a variety of strategies to guide task selection. The current research examines whether subjects may sometimes use a top-down control strategy of selecting a task-irrelevant stimulus dimension, such as location, to guide task selection. We term this approach a stimulus set selection strategy. Using a voluntary task switching procedure, subjects voluntarily switched between categorizing letter and number stimuli that appeared in two, four, or eight possible target locations. Effects of stimulus availability, manipulated by varying the stimulus onset asynchrony between the two target stimuli, and location repetition were analysed to assess the use of a stimulus set selection strategy. Considered across position condition, Experiment 1 showed effects of both stimulus availability and location repetition on task choice suggesting that only in the 2-position condition, where selection based on location always results in a target at the selected location, subjects may have been using a stimulus set selection strategy on some trials. Experiment 2 replicated and extended these findings in a visually more cluttered environment. These results indicate that, contrary to current models of task selection in voluntary task switching, the top-down control of task selection may occur in the absence of the formation of an intention to perform a particular task.</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Choice Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Cognitive control</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Space Perception</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Task selection</subject><subject>Thinking - physiology</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>Volitional behaviour</subject><subject>Voluntary task switching</subject><issn>1747-0218</issn><issn>1747-0226</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhSMEoqXwBgh5yWYGO_5LWICqip9KlZAKrK0bj5Nx69jFdqaal-CZcUg7Khu6sGwdn_vdI52qek3wmuAGvyOSSVyTZl1jwtatIC3lT6rjWV7huhZPD2_SHFUvUrrCmFEp5PPqqOZ1QzmXx9XvS5O31l9bP6BdcDbb4MEhHXyOwaGwMxFlSNdIb4PVBlmPxsll-1czfmdj8KPxOb1HP5NBoUeAUrbFMyWUTC7HGT1Tixwhm2E_M8qqyWeI-wWebm3WJcbwsnrWg0vm1d19Un3__OnH2dfVxbcv52enFyvNpcgraBrMetw1DHQLHWcdAdFBXbdMSAZE94BFQ5pWd7ijG2pER6ElmnWcyA09qT4s1JupG81Gl_wRnLqJdiyRVACr_v3xdquGsFOMcslpXQBv7wAx_JpMymq0SRvnwJswJUWEoIKXjKxY2WLVMaQUTX9YQ7Cai1T3Raq5SLUUWcbePIx4GLpvrhjIYkgwGHUVplh6S49BPy4z1vchjnAbotuoDHsXYh_Ba5sU_S_hD0rlwJM</recordid><startdate>20150403</startdate><enddate>20150403</enddate><creator>Arrington, Catherine M.</creator><creator>Weaver, Starla M.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150403</creationdate><title>Rethinking volitional control over task choice in multitask environments: Use of a stimulus set selection strategy in voluntary task switching</title><author>Arrington, Catherine M. ; Weaver, Starla M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-a8804f0b84ac9ab54b1a6ba2294674a1cfa068189cb0b3d3e6b3a91c4b517d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Choice Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Cognitive control</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Space Perception</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Task selection</topic><topic>Thinking - physiology</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>Volitional behaviour</topic><topic>Voluntary task switching</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arrington, Catherine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Starla M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arrington, Catherine M.</au><au>Weaver, Starla M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rethinking volitional control over task choice in multitask environments: Use of a stimulus set selection strategy in voluntary task switching</atitle><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><date>2015-04-03</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>664</spage><epage>679</epage><pages>664-679</pages><issn>1747-0218</issn><eissn>1747-0226</eissn><abstract>Under conditions of volitional control in multitask environments, subjects may engage in a variety of strategies to guide task selection. The current research examines whether subjects may sometimes use a top-down control strategy of selecting a task-irrelevant stimulus dimension, such as location, to guide task selection. We term this approach a stimulus set selection strategy. Using a voluntary task switching procedure, subjects voluntarily switched between categorizing letter and number stimuli that appeared in two, four, or eight possible target locations. Effects of stimulus availability, manipulated by varying the stimulus onset asynchrony between the two target stimuli, and location repetition were analysed to assess the use of a stimulus set selection strategy. Considered across position condition, Experiment 1 showed effects of both stimulus availability and location repetition on task choice suggesting that only in the 2-position condition, where selection based on location always results in a target at the selected location, subjects may have been using a stimulus set selection strategy on some trials. Experiment 2 replicated and extended these findings in a visually more cluttered environment. These results indicate that, contrary to current models of task selection in voluntary task switching, the top-down control of task selection may occur in the absence of the formation of an intention to perform a particular task.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><pmid>25283557</pmid><doi>10.1080/17470218.2014.961935</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1747-0218
ispartof Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2015-04, Vol.68 (4), p.664-679
issn 1747-0218
1747-0226
language eng
recordid cdi_sage_journals_10_1080_17470218_2014_961935
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete
subjects Analysis of Variance
Attention - physiology
Choice Behavior - physiology
Cognitive control
Female
Humans
Intention
Male
Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology
Photic Stimulation
Probability
Psychomotor Performance
Reaction Time
Space Perception
Students
Task selection
Thinking - physiology
Universities
Volitional behaviour
Voluntary task switching
title Rethinking volitional control over task choice in multitask environments: Use of a stimulus set selection strategy in voluntary task switching
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T11%3A57%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sage_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rethinking%20volitional%20control%20over%20task%20choice%20in%20multitask%20environments:%20Use%20of%20a%20stimulus%20set%20selection%20strategy%20in%20voluntary%20task%20switching&rft.jtitle=Quarterly%20journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology%20(2006)&rft.au=Arrington,%20Catherine%20M.&rft.date=2015-04-03&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=664&rft.epage=679&rft.pages=664-679&rft.issn=1747-0218&rft.eissn=1747-0226&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/17470218.2014.961935&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sage_%3E1663658044%3C/proquest_sage_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1663658044&rft_id=info:pmid/25283557&rft_sage_id=10.1080_17470218.2014.961935&rfr_iscdi=true