Feature overlap slows lexical selection: Evidence from the picture-word interference paradigm
How does the presence of a categorically related word influence picture naming latencies? In order to test competitive and noncompetitive accounts of lexical selection in spoken word production, we employed the picture-word interference (PWI) paradigm to investigate how conceptual feature overlap in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) 2014, Vol.67 (12), p.2325-2339 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2339 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2325 |
container_title | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) |
container_volume | 67 |
creator | Vieth, H. E. McMahon, K. L. de Zubicaray, G. I. |
description | How does the presence of a categorically related word influence picture naming latencies? In order to test competitive and noncompetitive accounts of lexical selection in spoken word production, we employed the picture-word interference (PWI) paradigm to investigate how conceptual feature overlap influences naming latencies when distractors are category coordinates of the target picture. Mahon et al. (2007. Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(3), 503-535.
doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.503
) reported that semantically close distractors (e.g., zebra) facilitated target picture naming latencies (e.g., HORSE) compared to far distractors (e.g., whale). We failed to replicate a facilitation effect for within-category close versus far target-distractor pairings using near-identical materials based on feature production norms, instead obtaining reliably larger interference effects (Experiments 1 and 2). The interference effect did not show a monotonic increase across multiple levels of within-category semantic distance, although there was evidence of a linear trend when unrelated distractors were included in analyses (Experiment 2). Our results show that semantic interference in PWI is greater for semantically close than for far category coordinate relations, reflecting the extent of conceptual feature overlap between target and distractor. These findings are consistent with the assumptions of prominent competitive lexical selection models of speech production. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/17470218.2014.923922 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sage_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_sage_journals_10_1080_17470218_2014_923922</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1080_17470218.2014.923922</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1613947337</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-764bf371e533998c38a252cf23861c58110559719ccc4bfd0b20a1ae1c537efc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFv1DAQhS1ERcvCP0DIFyQuWTx2EjtcUFW1gFSpl3JEltcZF1dOHOykpf-epNktN-A01vh786T3CHkDbAtMsQ8gS8k4qC1nUG4bLhrOn5GTZV0wzuvnT29Qx-RlzreMlULW8gU55qUSTIjqhHy_QDNOCWm8wxTMQHOI95kG_OWtCTRjQDv62H-k53e-xd4idSl2dPyBdPB2kRb3MbXU9yMmh-kRGUwyrb_pXpEjZ0LG1_u5Id8uzq_PvhSXV5-_np1eFraCcixkXe6ckICVEE2jrFCGV9w6LlQNtlIArKoaCY21diZbtuPMgMH5T0h0VmzI-_XukOLPCfOoO58thmB6jFPWUNeyEXWt5H-gIJpSCrGg5YraFHNO6PSQfGfSgwamlw70oQO9dKDXDmbZ273DtOuwfRIdQp-Bd3vA5Dlkl0xvff7DKaVgITcEVi6bG9S3cUr9HOK_zD-tGt-7mDozdxNaPZqHENPBSPz1wm8mmbBO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1613947337</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feature overlap slows lexical selection: Evidence from the picture-word interference paradigm</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Vieth, H. E. ; McMahon, K. L. ; de Zubicaray, G. I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vieth, H. E. ; McMahon, K. L. ; de Zubicaray, G. I.</creatorcontrib><description>How does the presence of a categorically related word influence picture naming latencies? In order to test competitive and noncompetitive accounts of lexical selection in spoken word production, we employed the picture-word interference (PWI) paradigm to investigate how conceptual feature overlap influences naming latencies when distractors are category coordinates of the target picture. Mahon et al. (2007. Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(3), 503-535.
doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.503
) reported that semantically close distractors (e.g., zebra) facilitated target picture naming latencies (e.g., HORSE) compared to far distractors (e.g., whale). We failed to replicate a facilitation effect for within-category close versus far target-distractor pairings using near-identical materials based on feature production norms, instead obtaining reliably larger interference effects (Experiments 1 and 2). The interference effect did not show a monotonic increase across multiple levels of within-category semantic distance, although there was evidence of a linear trend when unrelated distractors were included in analyses (Experiment 2). Our results show that semantic interference in PWI is greater for semantically close than for far category coordinate relations, reflecting the extent of conceptual feature overlap between target and distractor. These findings are consistent with the assumptions of prominent competitive lexical selection models of speech production.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1747-0218</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-0226</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2014.923922</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24830335</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Routledge</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Attention - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Competition ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Language ; Lexical access ; Miscellaneous ; Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology ; Picture naming ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reaction Time ; Semantic distance ; Semantic interference ; Semantics ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2014, Vol.67 (12), p.2325-2339</ispartof><rights>2014 The Experimental Psychology Society 2014</rights><rights>2014 Experimental Pscyhology Society</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-764bf371e533998c38a252cf23861c58110559719ccc4bfd0b20a1ae1c537efc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-764bf371e533998c38a252cf23861c58110559719ccc4bfd0b20a1ae1c537efc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17470218.2014.923922$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/17470218.2014.923922$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,21798,27900,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28881303$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24830335$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vieth, H. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMahon, K. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Zubicaray, G. I.</creatorcontrib><title>Feature overlap slows lexical selection: Evidence from the picture-word interference paradigm</title><title>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</title><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><description>How does the presence of a categorically related word influence picture naming latencies? In order to test competitive and noncompetitive accounts of lexical selection in spoken word production, we employed the picture-word interference (PWI) paradigm to investigate how conceptual feature overlap influences naming latencies when distractors are category coordinates of the target picture. Mahon et al. (2007. Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(3), 503-535.
doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.503
) reported that semantically close distractors (e.g., zebra) facilitated target picture naming latencies (e.g., HORSE) compared to far distractors (e.g., whale). We failed to replicate a facilitation effect for within-category close versus far target-distractor pairings using near-identical materials based on feature production norms, instead obtaining reliably larger interference effects (Experiments 1 and 2). The interference effect did not show a monotonic increase across multiple levels of within-category semantic distance, although there was evidence of a linear trend when unrelated distractors were included in analyses (Experiment 2). Our results show that semantic interference in PWI is greater for semantically close than for far category coordinate relations, reflecting the extent of conceptual feature overlap between target and distractor. These findings are consistent with the assumptions of prominent competitive lexical selection models of speech production.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Lexical access</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</subject><subject>Picture naming</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Semantic distance</subject><subject>Semantic interference</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1747-0218</issn><issn>1747-0226</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUFv1DAQhS1ERcvCP0DIFyQuWTx2EjtcUFW1gFSpl3JEltcZF1dOHOykpf-epNktN-A01vh786T3CHkDbAtMsQ8gS8k4qC1nUG4bLhrOn5GTZV0wzuvnT29Qx-RlzreMlULW8gU55qUSTIjqhHy_QDNOCWm8wxTMQHOI95kG_OWtCTRjQDv62H-k53e-xd4idSl2dPyBdPB2kRb3MbXU9yMmh-kRGUwyrb_pXpEjZ0LG1_u5Id8uzq_PvhSXV5-_np1eFraCcixkXe6ckICVEE2jrFCGV9w6LlQNtlIArKoaCY21diZbtuPMgMH5T0h0VmzI-_XukOLPCfOoO58thmB6jFPWUNeyEXWt5H-gIJpSCrGg5YraFHNO6PSQfGfSgwamlw70oQO9dKDXDmbZ273DtOuwfRIdQp-Bd3vA5Dlkl0xvff7DKaVgITcEVi6bG9S3cUr9HOK_zD-tGt-7mDozdxNaPZqHENPBSPz1wm8mmbBO</recordid><startdate>2014</startdate><enddate>2014</enddate><creator>Vieth, H. E.</creator><creator>McMahon, K. L.</creator><creator>de Zubicaray, G. I.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Psychology Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2014</creationdate><title>Feature overlap slows lexical selection: Evidence from the picture-word interference paradigm</title><author>Vieth, H. E. ; McMahon, K. L. ; de Zubicaray, G. I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-764bf371e533998c38a252cf23861c58110559719ccc4bfd0b20a1ae1c537efc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Lexical access</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</topic><topic>Picture naming</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Semantic distance</topic><topic>Semantic interference</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vieth, H. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMahon, K. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Zubicaray, G. I.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vieth, H. E.</au><au>McMahon, K. L.</au><au>de Zubicaray, G. I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feature overlap slows lexical selection: Evidence from the picture-word interference paradigm</atitle><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><date>2014</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2325</spage><epage>2339</epage><pages>2325-2339</pages><issn>1747-0218</issn><eissn>1747-0226</eissn><abstract>How does the presence of a categorically related word influence picture naming latencies? In order to test competitive and noncompetitive accounts of lexical selection in spoken word production, we employed the picture-word interference (PWI) paradigm to investigate how conceptual feature overlap influences naming latencies when distractors are category coordinates of the target picture. Mahon et al. (2007. Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(3), 503-535.
doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.503
) reported that semantically close distractors (e.g., zebra) facilitated target picture naming latencies (e.g., HORSE) compared to far distractors (e.g., whale). We failed to replicate a facilitation effect for within-category close versus far target-distractor pairings using near-identical materials based on feature production norms, instead obtaining reliably larger interference effects (Experiments 1 and 2). The interference effect did not show a monotonic increase across multiple levels of within-category semantic distance, although there was evidence of a linear trend when unrelated distractors were included in analyses (Experiment 2). Our results show that semantic interference in PWI is greater for semantically close than for far category coordinate relations, reflecting the extent of conceptual feature overlap between target and distractor. These findings are consistent with the assumptions of prominent competitive lexical selection models of speech production.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><pmid>24830335</pmid><doi>10.1080/17470218.2014.923922</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1747-0218 |
ispartof | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2014, Vol.67 (12), p.2325-2339 |
issn | 1747-0218 1747-0226 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_sage_journals_10_1080_17470218_2014_923922 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete |
subjects | Adolescent Attention - physiology Biological and medical sciences Competition Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Language Lexical access Miscellaneous Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology Picture naming Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reaction Time Semantic distance Semantic interference Semantics Young Adult |
title | Feature overlap slows lexical selection: Evidence from the picture-word interference paradigm |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T07%3A36%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sage_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feature%20overlap%20slows%20lexical%20selection:%20Evidence%20from%20the%20picture-word%20interference%20paradigm&rft.jtitle=Quarterly%20journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology%20(2006)&rft.au=Vieth,%20H.%20E.&rft.date=2014&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2325&rft.epage=2339&rft.pages=2325-2339&rft.issn=1747-0218&rft.eissn=1747-0226&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/17470218.2014.923922&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sage_%3E1613947337%3C/proquest_sage_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1613947337&rft_id=info:pmid/24830335&rft_sage_id=10.1080_17470218.2014.923922&rfr_iscdi=true |