Skill in map reading and memory for maps

Studies of expertise have typically shown that experts have better memory for materials from their fields than do novices. However, previous research on memory for maps has not shown the expected effect of expertise. The present study differed from previous studies by using contour maps as well as p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology Human experimental psychology, 1988-02, Vol.40 (1), p.87-107
Hauptverfasser: Gilhooly, Kenneth J., Wood, Michael, Kinnear, Paul R., Green, Caroline
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 107
container_issue 1
container_start_page 87
container_title The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology
container_volume 40
creator Gilhooly, Kenneth J.
Wood, Michael
Kinnear, Paul R.
Green, Caroline
description Studies of expertise have typically shown that experts have better memory for materials from their fields than do novices. However, previous research on memory for maps has not shown the expected effect of expertise. The present study differed from previous studies by using contour maps as well as planimetric maps. In Experiment 1 the expected superiority in memory performance was found for skilled map readers when contour maps were used, but not when planimetric maps were used. In Experiment 2, the main results of Experiment 1 were replicated, and, in addition, process tracing data were obtained during both study and test phases of contour map learning. Objective measures of attentional and retrieval focussing revealed almost no differences between the skilled and unskilled subjects. However, analyses of verbal protocols showed that the skilled subjects made more use of specialist schemata, whereas the unskilled subjects spent more time in reading place names. During recall, the skilled subjects made more use of both specialist and "lay" schemata, whereas the unskilled retrieved more place-name information. The results are interpreted in terms of a schema-based approach to expertise.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/14640748808402284
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sage_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_sage_journals_10_1080_14640748808402284</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1080_14640748808402284</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1297867780</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-14b8b2076b3bc4d5235a9a0efb536d0fd6e6415ec0727693c175ec8da9db7e663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtKAzEUDaJgrX6AuwFduJl685gkA26k1AcUXKjrkEkyZerMpCYt0r83ZaoIondzueeeBxyEzjFMMEi4xowzEExKkAwIkewAjXZYnkA4RCMgguSslOIYncS4hDSMwQhdPb81bZs1fdbpVRactk2_yHRvs851Pmyz2ofdK56io1q30Z3t9xi93s1epg_5_On-cXo7zw0r5DrHrJIVAcErWhlmC0ILXWpwdVVQbqG23HGGC2dAEMFLarBIh7S6tJVwnNMxuhh8V8G_b1xcq6XfhD5FKkxKIbkQEhILDywTfIzB1WoVmk6HrcKgdoWoX4UkzeXeWUej2zro3jTxWyg44YLQRJsMtKgX7kf4P743g6DpU1md_vChtWqtt60PXyH0b_kn1Wp9IA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1297867780</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Skill in map reading and memory for maps</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Gilhooly, Kenneth J. ; Wood, Michael ; Kinnear, Paul R. ; Green, Caroline</creator><creatorcontrib>Gilhooly, Kenneth J. ; Wood, Michael ; Kinnear, Paul R. ; Green, Caroline</creatorcontrib><description>Studies of expertise have typically shown that experts have better memory for materials from their fields than do novices. However, previous research on memory for maps has not shown the expected effect of expertise. The present study differed from previous studies by using contour maps as well as planimetric maps. In Experiment 1 the expected superiority in memory performance was found for skilled map readers when contour maps were used, but not when planimetric maps were used. In Experiment 2, the main results of Experiment 1 were replicated, and, in addition, process tracing data were obtained during both study and test phases of contour map learning. Objective measures of attentional and retrieval focussing revealed almost no differences between the skilled and unskilled subjects. However, analyses of verbal protocols showed that the skilled subjects made more use of specialist schemata, whereas the unskilled subjects spent more time in reading place names. During recall, the skilled subjects made more use of both specialist and "lay" schemata, whereas the unskilled retrieved more place-name information. The results are interpreted in terms of a schema-based approach to expertise.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-4987</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-0740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/14640748808402284</identifier><identifier>CODEN: QJEADQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Conditioning ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Learning. Memory ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><ispartof>The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology, 1988-02, Vol.40 (1), p.87-107</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Experimental Psychology Society 1988</rights><rights>1988 Experimental Pscyhology Society</rights><rights>1988 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-14b8b2076b3bc4d5235a9a0efb536d0fd6e6415ec0727693c175ec8da9db7e663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-14b8b2076b3bc4d5235a9a0efb536d0fd6e6415ec0727693c175ec8da9db7e663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14640748808402284$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14640748808402284$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27846,27901,27902,59620,60409</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=7626723$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gilhooly, Kenneth J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinnear, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Caroline</creatorcontrib><title>Skill in map reading and memory for maps</title><title>The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology</title><description>Studies of expertise have typically shown that experts have better memory for materials from their fields than do novices. However, previous research on memory for maps has not shown the expected effect of expertise. The present study differed from previous studies by using contour maps as well as planimetric maps. In Experiment 1 the expected superiority in memory performance was found for skilled map readers when contour maps were used, but not when planimetric maps were used. In Experiment 2, the main results of Experiment 1 were replicated, and, in addition, process tracing data were obtained during both study and test phases of contour map learning. Objective measures of attentional and retrieval focussing revealed almost no differences between the skilled and unskilled subjects. However, analyses of verbal protocols showed that the skilled subjects made more use of specialist schemata, whereas the unskilled subjects spent more time in reading place names. During recall, the skilled subjects made more use of both specialist and "lay" schemata, whereas the unskilled retrieved more place-name information. The results are interpreted in terms of a schema-based approach to expertise.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Conditioning</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><issn>0272-4987</issn><issn>1464-0740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UMtKAzEUDaJgrX6AuwFduJl685gkA26k1AcUXKjrkEkyZerMpCYt0r83ZaoIondzueeeBxyEzjFMMEi4xowzEExKkAwIkewAjXZYnkA4RCMgguSslOIYncS4hDSMwQhdPb81bZs1fdbpVRactk2_yHRvs851Pmyz2ofdK56io1q30Z3t9xi93s1epg_5_On-cXo7zw0r5DrHrJIVAcErWhlmC0ILXWpwdVVQbqG23HGGC2dAEMFLarBIh7S6tJVwnNMxuhh8V8G_b1xcq6XfhD5FKkxKIbkQEhILDywTfIzB1WoVmk6HrcKgdoWoX4UkzeXeWUej2zro3jTxWyg44YLQRJsMtKgX7kf4P743g6DpU1md_vChtWqtt60PXyH0b_kn1Wp9IA</recordid><startdate>19880201</startdate><enddate>19880201</enddate><creator>Gilhooly, Kenneth J.</creator><creator>Wood, Michael</creator><creator>Kinnear, Paul R.</creator><creator>Green, Caroline</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Academic Press for the Experimental Psychology Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>GPCCI</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19880201</creationdate><title>Skill in map reading and memory for maps</title><author>Gilhooly, Kenneth J. ; Wood, Michael ; Kinnear, Paul R. ; Green, Caroline</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-14b8b2076b3bc4d5235a9a0efb536d0fd6e6415ec0727693c175ec8da9db7e663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Conditioning</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gilhooly, Kenneth J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinnear, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Caroline</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 10</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gilhooly, Kenneth J.</au><au>Wood, Michael</au><au>Kinnear, Paul R.</au><au>Green, Caroline</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Skill in map reading and memory for maps</atitle><jtitle>The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology</jtitle><date>1988-02-01</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>87</spage><epage>107</epage><pages>87-107</pages><issn>0272-4987</issn><eissn>1464-0740</eissn><coden>QJEADQ</coden><abstract>Studies of expertise have typically shown that experts have better memory for materials from their fields than do novices. However, previous research on memory for maps has not shown the expected effect of expertise. The present study differed from previous studies by using contour maps as well as planimetric maps. In Experiment 1 the expected superiority in memory performance was found for skilled map readers when contour maps were used, but not when planimetric maps were used. In Experiment 2, the main results of Experiment 1 were replicated, and, in addition, process tracing data were obtained during both study and test phases of contour map learning. Objective measures of attentional and retrieval focussing revealed almost no differences between the skilled and unskilled subjects. However, analyses of verbal protocols showed that the skilled subjects made more use of specialist schemata, whereas the unskilled subjects spent more time in reading place names. During recall, the skilled subjects made more use of both specialist and "lay" schemata, whereas the unskilled retrieved more place-name information. The results are interpreted in terms of a schema-based approach to expertise.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/14640748808402284</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0272-4987
ispartof The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology, 1988-02, Vol.40 (1), p.87-107
issn 0272-4987
1464-0740
language eng
recordid cdi_sage_journals_10_1080_14640748808402284
source Taylor & Francis; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Conditioning
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human
Learning. Memory
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
title Skill in map reading and memory for maps
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T05%3A27%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sage_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Skill%20in%20map%20reading%20and%20memory%20for%20maps&rft.jtitle=The%20Quarterly%20journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20A,%20Human%20experimental%20psychology&rft.au=Gilhooly,%20Kenneth%20J.&rft.date=1988-02-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=87&rft.epage=107&rft.pages=87-107&rft.issn=0272-4987&rft.eissn=1464-0740&rft.coden=QJEADQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/14640748808402284&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sage_%3E1297867780%3C/proquest_sage_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1297867780&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1080_14640748808402284&rfr_iscdi=true