Skill in map reading and memory for maps
Studies of expertise have typically shown that experts have better memory for materials from their fields than do novices. However, previous research on memory for maps has not shown the expected effect of expertise. The present study differed from previous studies by using contour maps as well as p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology Human experimental psychology, 1988-02, Vol.40 (1), p.87-107 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 107 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 87 |
container_title | The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Gilhooly, Kenneth J. Wood, Michael Kinnear, Paul R. Green, Caroline |
description | Studies of expertise have typically shown that experts have better memory for materials from their fields than do novices. However, previous research on memory for maps has not shown the expected effect of expertise. The present study differed from previous studies by using contour maps as well as planimetric maps. In Experiment 1 the expected superiority in memory performance was found for skilled map readers when contour maps were used, but not when planimetric maps were used.
In Experiment 2, the main results of Experiment 1 were replicated, and, in addition, process tracing data were obtained during both study and test phases of contour map learning. Objective measures of attentional and retrieval focussing revealed almost no differences between the skilled and unskilled subjects. However, analyses of verbal protocols showed that the skilled subjects made more use of specialist schemata, whereas the unskilled subjects spent more time in reading place names. During recall, the skilled subjects made more use of both specialist and "lay" schemata, whereas the unskilled retrieved more place-name information.
The results are interpreted in terms of a schema-based approach to expertise. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/14640748808402284 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sage_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_sage_journals_10_1080_14640748808402284</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1080_14640748808402284</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1297867780</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-14b8b2076b3bc4d5235a9a0efb536d0fd6e6415ec0727693c175ec8da9db7e663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtKAzEUDaJgrX6AuwFduJl685gkA26k1AcUXKjrkEkyZerMpCYt0r83ZaoIondzueeeBxyEzjFMMEi4xowzEExKkAwIkewAjXZYnkA4RCMgguSslOIYncS4hDSMwQhdPb81bZs1fdbpVRactk2_yHRvs851Pmyz2ofdK56io1q30Z3t9xi93s1epg_5_On-cXo7zw0r5DrHrJIVAcErWhlmC0ILXWpwdVVQbqG23HGGC2dAEMFLarBIh7S6tJVwnNMxuhh8V8G_b1xcq6XfhD5FKkxKIbkQEhILDywTfIzB1WoVmk6HrcKgdoWoX4UkzeXeWUej2zro3jTxWyg44YLQRJsMtKgX7kf4P743g6DpU1md_vChtWqtt60PXyH0b_kn1Wp9IA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1297867780</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Skill in map reading and memory for maps</title><source>Taylor & Francis</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Gilhooly, Kenneth J. ; Wood, Michael ; Kinnear, Paul R. ; Green, Caroline</creator><creatorcontrib>Gilhooly, Kenneth J. ; Wood, Michael ; Kinnear, Paul R. ; Green, Caroline</creatorcontrib><description>Studies of expertise have typically shown that experts have better memory for materials from their fields than do novices. However, previous research on memory for maps has not shown the expected effect of expertise. The present study differed from previous studies by using contour maps as well as planimetric maps. In Experiment 1 the expected superiority in memory performance was found for skilled map readers when contour maps were used, but not when planimetric maps were used.
In Experiment 2, the main results of Experiment 1 were replicated, and, in addition, process tracing data were obtained during both study and test phases of contour map learning. Objective measures of attentional and retrieval focussing revealed almost no differences between the skilled and unskilled subjects. However, analyses of verbal protocols showed that the skilled subjects made more use of specialist schemata, whereas the unskilled subjects spent more time in reading place names. During recall, the skilled subjects made more use of both specialist and "lay" schemata, whereas the unskilled retrieved more place-name information.
The results are interpreted in terms of a schema-based approach to expertise.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-4987</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-0740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/14640748808402284</identifier><identifier>CODEN: QJEADQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Conditioning ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Learning. Memory ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><ispartof>The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology, 1988-02, Vol.40 (1), p.87-107</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Experimental Psychology Society 1988</rights><rights>1988 Experimental Pscyhology Society</rights><rights>1988 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-14b8b2076b3bc4d5235a9a0efb536d0fd6e6415ec0727693c175ec8da9db7e663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-14b8b2076b3bc4d5235a9a0efb536d0fd6e6415ec0727693c175ec8da9db7e663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14640748808402284$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14640748808402284$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27846,27901,27902,59620,60409</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=7626723$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gilhooly, Kenneth J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinnear, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Caroline</creatorcontrib><title>Skill in map reading and memory for maps</title><title>The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology</title><description>Studies of expertise have typically shown that experts have better memory for materials from their fields than do novices. However, previous research on memory for maps has not shown the expected effect of expertise. The present study differed from previous studies by using contour maps as well as planimetric maps. In Experiment 1 the expected superiority in memory performance was found for skilled map readers when contour maps were used, but not when planimetric maps were used.
In Experiment 2, the main results of Experiment 1 were replicated, and, in addition, process tracing data were obtained during both study and test phases of contour map learning. Objective measures of attentional and retrieval focussing revealed almost no differences between the skilled and unskilled subjects. However, analyses of verbal protocols showed that the skilled subjects made more use of specialist schemata, whereas the unskilled subjects spent more time in reading place names. During recall, the skilled subjects made more use of both specialist and "lay" schemata, whereas the unskilled retrieved more place-name information.
The results are interpreted in terms of a schema-based approach to expertise.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Conditioning</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><issn>0272-4987</issn><issn>1464-0740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UMtKAzEUDaJgrX6AuwFduJl685gkA26k1AcUXKjrkEkyZerMpCYt0r83ZaoIondzueeeBxyEzjFMMEi4xowzEExKkAwIkewAjXZYnkA4RCMgguSslOIYncS4hDSMwQhdPb81bZs1fdbpVRactk2_yHRvs851Pmyz2ofdK56io1q30Z3t9xi93s1epg_5_On-cXo7zw0r5DrHrJIVAcErWhlmC0ILXWpwdVVQbqG23HGGC2dAEMFLarBIh7S6tJVwnNMxuhh8V8G_b1xcq6XfhD5FKkxKIbkQEhILDywTfIzB1WoVmk6HrcKgdoWoX4UkzeXeWUej2zro3jTxWyg44YLQRJsMtKgX7kf4P743g6DpU1md_vChtWqtt60PXyH0b_kn1Wp9IA</recordid><startdate>19880201</startdate><enddate>19880201</enddate><creator>Gilhooly, Kenneth J.</creator><creator>Wood, Michael</creator><creator>Kinnear, Paul R.</creator><creator>Green, Caroline</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Academic Press for the Experimental Psychology Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>GPCCI</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19880201</creationdate><title>Skill in map reading and memory for maps</title><author>Gilhooly, Kenneth J. ; Wood, Michael ; Kinnear, Paul R. ; Green, Caroline</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-14b8b2076b3bc4d5235a9a0efb536d0fd6e6415ec0727693c175ec8da9db7e663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Conditioning</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gilhooly, Kenneth J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinnear, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Caroline</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 10</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gilhooly, Kenneth J.</au><au>Wood, Michael</au><au>Kinnear, Paul R.</au><au>Green, Caroline</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Skill in map reading and memory for maps</atitle><jtitle>The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology</jtitle><date>1988-02-01</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>87</spage><epage>107</epage><pages>87-107</pages><issn>0272-4987</issn><eissn>1464-0740</eissn><coden>QJEADQ</coden><abstract>Studies of expertise have typically shown that experts have better memory for materials from their fields than do novices. However, previous research on memory for maps has not shown the expected effect of expertise. The present study differed from previous studies by using contour maps as well as planimetric maps. In Experiment 1 the expected superiority in memory performance was found for skilled map readers when contour maps were used, but not when planimetric maps were used.
In Experiment 2, the main results of Experiment 1 were replicated, and, in addition, process tracing data were obtained during both study and test phases of contour map learning. Objective measures of attentional and retrieval focussing revealed almost no differences between the skilled and unskilled subjects. However, analyses of verbal protocols showed that the skilled subjects made more use of specialist schemata, whereas the unskilled subjects spent more time in reading place names. During recall, the skilled subjects made more use of both specialist and "lay" schemata, whereas the unskilled retrieved more place-name information.
The results are interpreted in terms of a schema-based approach to expertise.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/14640748808402284</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0272-4987 |
ispartof | The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology, 1988-02, Vol.40 (1), p.87-107 |
issn | 0272-4987 1464-0740 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_sage_journals_10_1080_14640748808402284 |
source | Taylor & Francis; Periodicals Index Online |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Conditioning Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Learning. Memory Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology |
title | Skill in map reading and memory for maps |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T05%3A27%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sage_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Skill%20in%20map%20reading%20and%20memory%20for%20maps&rft.jtitle=The%20Quarterly%20journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20A,%20Human%20experimental%20psychology&rft.au=Gilhooly,%20Kenneth%20J.&rft.date=1988-02-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=87&rft.epage=107&rft.pages=87-107&rft.issn=0272-4987&rft.eissn=1464-0740&rft.coden=QJEADQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/14640748808402284&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sage_%3E1297867780%3C/proquest_sage_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1297867780&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1080_14640748808402284&rfr_iscdi=true |