Political extremism, group membership and personality traits: who accepts violence? / Extremismo político, pertenencia al grupo y rasgos de personalidad: ¿Quién acepta la violencia?
Identity fusion theory proposed that fused individuals have a visceral feeling of oneness with the group and this leads them to engage in radical, violent pro-group behaviours. Other approaches to group extremism link acceptance of violence to right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Revista de psicologia social 2015-09, Vol.30 (3), p.563-585 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 585 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 563 |
container_title | Revista de psicologia social |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Besta, Tomasz Szulc, Marcin Jaśkiewicz, Michał |
description | Identity fusion theory proposed that fused individuals have a visceral feeling of oneness with the group and this leads them to engage in radical, violent pro-group behaviours. Other approaches to group extremism link acceptance of violence to right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO). We extended previous research on fusion in three ways. First, by exploring if identity fusion is a significant predictor of the willingness to fight for a group, when controlling for group identification, left-wing authoritarianism (LWA), RWA and SDO. Secondly, we controlled for a membership in a group known for radical action directed at out-groups, namely football hooligans. Finally, we added a second outcome variable, which is the acceptance of violent change of the current social system. The participants were self-described football hooligans (N = 24) and undergraduate students (N = 155). Regression analyses revealed that the strongest predictor of willingness to defend in-group was identity fusion, with RWA and group identification significant as well. RWA and LWA emerged as the strongest predictors of acceptance of violent change. The effect of group membership wasn't significant. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/02134748.2015.1065085 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_sage_journals_10_1080_02134748_2015_1065085</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1080_02134748.2015.1065085</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1080_02134748.2015.1065085</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-628c7f3e121aa84bf3571ffdcfbce79bee825b2cc564d29339c268fde14c95793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1O3DAUha2qSJ1CH6HSfQAC_smPw4ZWiD8JCSq1a-vGsQejJI7sTOk8Uhfs2SHBi-FoGLFrV9fXOud8uoeQr4weMCrpIeVM5FUuDzhlRfoqCyqLD2TBiqrORCnpR7KYNdks-kQ-x3hH017WckEeb3znJqexA_NnCqZ3sd-HZfCrEXrTNybEWzcCDi2M6e0HTPI1TAHdFI_g_tYDam3GKcJv5zszaHMMh3C6zfIw-u7lIRH8_pwwmSFpHEICLsNq9LCGgHHpI7TmHdFiewTPTz9W7uXvkAgJgNDhluHweI_sWOyi-fI2d8mvs9OfJxfZ1fX55cn3q0wLIaes5FJXVhjGGaLMGyuKilnbattoU9WNMZIXDde6KPOW10LUmpfStobluk79iV1SbHJ18DEGY9UYXI9hrRhVc_1qW7-a61dv9Scf3_giLo2686uQ7or_NX3bmNxgfejx3oeuVROuOx9swHR4VOLfEa-6AKIL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Political extremism, group membership and personality traits: who accepts violence? / Extremismo político, pertenencia al grupo y rasgos de personalidad: ¿Quién acepta la violencia?</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Besta, Tomasz ; Szulc, Marcin ; Jaśkiewicz, Michał</creator><creatorcontrib>Besta, Tomasz ; Szulc, Marcin ; Jaśkiewicz, Michał</creatorcontrib><description>Identity fusion theory proposed that fused individuals have a visceral feeling of oneness with the group and this leads them to engage in radical, violent pro-group behaviours. Other approaches to group extremism link acceptance of violence to right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO). We extended previous research on fusion in three ways. First, by exploring if identity fusion is a significant predictor of the willingness to fight for a group, when controlling for group identification, left-wing authoritarianism (LWA), RWA and SDO. Secondly, we controlled for a membership in a group known for radical action directed at out-groups, namely football hooligans. Finally, we added a second outcome variable, which is the acceptance of violent change of the current social system. The participants were self-described football hooligans (N = 24) and undergraduate students (N = 155). Regression analyses revealed that the strongest predictor of willingness to defend in-group was identity fusion, with RWA and group identification significant as well. RWA and LWA emerged as the strongest predictors of acceptance of violent change. The effect of group membership wasn't significant.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0213-4748</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1579-3680</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02134748.2015.1065085</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Routledge</publisher><subject>authoritarianism ; autoritarismo ; fusión de la identidad ; group membership ; identity fusion ; pertenencia al grupo ; violence ; violencia</subject><ispartof>Revista de psicologia social, 2015-09, Vol.30 (3), p.563-585</ispartof><rights>2015 Fundacion Infancia y Aprendizaje 2015</rights><rights>2015 Fundacion Infancia y Aprendizaje</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-628c7f3e121aa84bf3571ffdcfbce79bee825b2cc564d29339c268fde14c95793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-628c7f3e121aa84bf3571ffdcfbce79bee825b2cc564d29339c268fde14c95793</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02134748.2015.1065085$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/02134748.2015.1065085$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Besta, Tomasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szulc, Marcin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaśkiewicz, Michał</creatorcontrib><title>Political extremism, group membership and personality traits: who accepts violence? / Extremismo político, pertenencia al grupo y rasgos de personalidad: ¿Quién acepta la violencia?</title><title>Revista de psicologia social</title><description>Identity fusion theory proposed that fused individuals have a visceral feeling of oneness with the group and this leads them to engage in radical, violent pro-group behaviours. Other approaches to group extremism link acceptance of violence to right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO). We extended previous research on fusion in three ways. First, by exploring if identity fusion is a significant predictor of the willingness to fight for a group, when controlling for group identification, left-wing authoritarianism (LWA), RWA and SDO. Secondly, we controlled for a membership in a group known for radical action directed at out-groups, namely football hooligans. Finally, we added a second outcome variable, which is the acceptance of violent change of the current social system. The participants were self-described football hooligans (N = 24) and undergraduate students (N = 155). Regression analyses revealed that the strongest predictor of willingness to defend in-group was identity fusion, with RWA and group identification significant as well. RWA and LWA emerged as the strongest predictors of acceptance of violent change. The effect of group membership wasn't significant.</description><subject>authoritarianism</subject><subject>autoritarismo</subject><subject>fusión de la identidad</subject><subject>group membership</subject><subject>identity fusion</subject><subject>pertenencia al grupo</subject><subject>violence</subject><subject>violencia</subject><issn>0213-4748</issn><issn>1579-3680</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1O3DAUha2qSJ1CH6HSfQAC_smPw4ZWiD8JCSq1a-vGsQejJI7sTOk8Uhfs2SHBi-FoGLFrV9fXOud8uoeQr4weMCrpIeVM5FUuDzhlRfoqCyqLD2TBiqrORCnpR7KYNdks-kQ-x3hH017WckEeb3znJqexA_NnCqZ3sd-HZfCrEXrTNybEWzcCDi2M6e0HTPI1TAHdFI_g_tYDam3GKcJv5zszaHMMh3C6zfIw-u7lIRH8_pwwmSFpHEICLsNq9LCGgHHpI7TmHdFiewTPTz9W7uXvkAgJgNDhluHweI_sWOyi-fI2d8mvs9OfJxfZ1fX55cn3q0wLIaes5FJXVhjGGaLMGyuKilnbattoU9WNMZIXDde6KPOW10LUmpfStobluk79iV1SbHJ18DEGY9UYXI9hrRhVc_1qW7-a61dv9Scf3_giLo2686uQ7or_NX3bmNxgfejx3oeuVROuOx9swHR4VOLfEa-6AKIL</recordid><startdate>20150902</startdate><enddate>20150902</enddate><creator>Besta, Tomasz</creator><creator>Szulc, Marcin</creator><creator>Jaśkiewicz, Michał</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150902</creationdate><title>Political extremism, group membership and personality traits: who accepts violence? / Extremismo político, pertenencia al grupo y rasgos de personalidad: ¿Quién acepta la violencia?</title><author>Besta, Tomasz ; Szulc, Marcin ; Jaśkiewicz, Michał</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-628c7f3e121aa84bf3571ffdcfbce79bee825b2cc564d29339c268fde14c95793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>authoritarianism</topic><topic>autoritarismo</topic><topic>fusión de la identidad</topic><topic>group membership</topic><topic>identity fusion</topic><topic>pertenencia al grupo</topic><topic>violence</topic><topic>violencia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Besta, Tomasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szulc, Marcin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaśkiewicz, Michał</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Revista de psicologia social</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Besta, Tomasz</au><au>Szulc, Marcin</au><au>Jaśkiewicz, Michał</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Political extremism, group membership and personality traits: who accepts violence? / Extremismo político, pertenencia al grupo y rasgos de personalidad: ¿Quién acepta la violencia?</atitle><jtitle>Revista de psicologia social</jtitle><date>2015-09-02</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>563</spage><epage>585</epage><pages>563-585</pages><issn>0213-4748</issn><eissn>1579-3680</eissn><abstract>Identity fusion theory proposed that fused individuals have a visceral feeling of oneness with the group and this leads them to engage in radical, violent pro-group behaviours. Other approaches to group extremism link acceptance of violence to right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO). We extended previous research on fusion in three ways. First, by exploring if identity fusion is a significant predictor of the willingness to fight for a group, when controlling for group identification, left-wing authoritarianism (LWA), RWA and SDO. Secondly, we controlled for a membership in a group known for radical action directed at out-groups, namely football hooligans. Finally, we added a second outcome variable, which is the acceptance of violent change of the current social system. The participants were self-described football hooligans (N = 24) and undergraduate students (N = 155). Regression analyses revealed that the strongest predictor of willingness to defend in-group was identity fusion, with RWA and group identification significant as well. RWA and LWA emerged as the strongest predictors of acceptance of violent change. The effect of group membership wasn't significant.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/02134748.2015.1065085</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0213-4748 |
ispartof | Revista de psicologia social, 2015-09, Vol.30 (3), p.563-585 |
issn | 0213-4748 1579-3680 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_sage_journals_10_1080_02134748_2015_1065085 |
source | SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | authoritarianism autoritarismo fusión de la identidad group membership identity fusion pertenencia al grupo violence violencia |
title | Political extremism, group membership and personality traits: who accepts violence? / Extremismo político, pertenencia al grupo y rasgos de personalidad: ¿Quién acepta la violencia? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T16%3A47%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Political%20extremism,%20group%20membership%20and%20personality%20traits:%20who%20accepts%20violence?%20/%20Extremismo%20pol%C3%ADtico,%20pertenencia%20al%20grupo%20y%20rasgos%20de%20personalidad:%20%C2%BFQui%C3%A9n%20acepta%20la%20violencia?&rft.jtitle=Revista%20de%20psicologia%20social&rft.au=Besta,%20Tomasz&rft.date=2015-09-02&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=563&rft.epage=585&rft.pages=563-585&rft.issn=0213-4748&rft.eissn=1579-3680&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02134748.2015.1065085&rft_dat=%3Csage_infor%3E10.1080_02134748.2015.1065085%3C/sage_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1080_02134748.2015.1065085&rfr_iscdi=true |