Revisiting the adversarial approach of dealing with expert evidence : the treatment of expert witnesses by the state administrative tribunal of Western Australia

The modern legal process has come to rely increasingly and very substantially upon expert evidence. There are many areas of law and causes of action in which in practical terms the evidence of experts is indispensable. Examples are personal injuries and professional negligence, handwriting, fingerpr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse reg 2017-04, Vol.2017 (1), p.59-69
Hauptverfasser: Barrie, George, De Villiers, Bertus
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 69
container_issue 1
container_start_page 59
container_title Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse reg
container_volume 2017
creator Barrie, George
De Villiers, Bertus
description The modern legal process has come to rely increasingly and very substantially upon expert evidence. There are many areas of law and causes of action in which in practical terms the evidence of experts is indispensable. Examples are personal injuries and professional negligence, handwriting, fingerprints and palm prints, footprints, tool marks, ballistics, intoxication, accounting, psychiatry, engineering and chemistry. Expert evidence can be regarded as evidence which is admissible because it is relevant and of probative value in relation to matters in issue in the case and as such is a particular category of admissible evidence. This approach is consistent with the weight of authority and with the actual practice of the courts and tribunals at all levels. This is also in conformity with the assumptions underlying the various rules of procedure which regulate the admission of such evidence in civil and criminal proceedings.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sabinet</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_sabinet_saepub_10520_EJC_658a473cf</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sabinet_id>10520/EJC-658a473cf</sabinet_id><sourcerecordid>10520/EJC-658a473cf</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-s189t-c3295a8ba9533654d26113bae1726557a5fc65f00d577362c80c9188a1ac96873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjctOwzAURLMAiVL4B29ZRLLj-BF2VVVeqoSEQCyjG-eGGqVu5OsW-Bz-lKR0NYs5Z-Ysm_FCmdyY0lxkl0SfnJfSqGqW_b7gwZNPPnywtEEG7QEjQfTQMxiGuAO3YbuOtQj9xHz5tGH4PWBMbDRbDA7Z7VFNESFtMaSJPyEjHpAIiTU_R4gSpOll64OnFCH5w2T6Zh_Gx1F8R0oYA1vsp7r3cJWdd9ATXp9ynr3drV6XD_n6-f5xuVjnJGyVcieLSoFtoFJSalW2hRZCNoDCFFopA6pzWnWct8oYqQtnuauEtSDAVdoaOc9u_ncJGh8w1QQ47JtacFXwevW0rLWyUBrpOvkHPgxp5A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Revisiting the adversarial approach of dealing with expert evidence : the treatment of expert witnesses by the state administrative tribunal of Western Australia</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Barrie, George ; De Villiers, Bertus</creator><creatorcontrib>Barrie, George ; De Villiers, Bertus</creatorcontrib><description>The modern legal process has come to rely increasingly and very substantially upon expert evidence. There are many areas of law and causes of action in which in practical terms the evidence of experts is indispensable. Examples are personal injuries and professional negligence, handwriting, fingerprints and palm prints, footprints, tool marks, ballistics, intoxication, accounting, psychiatry, engineering and chemistry. Expert evidence can be regarded as evidence which is admissible because it is relevant and of probative value in relation to matters in issue in the case and as such is a particular category of admissible evidence. This approach is consistent with the weight of authority and with the actual practice of the courts and tribunals at all levels. This is also in conformity with the assumptions underlying the various rules of procedure which regulate the admission of such evidence in civil and criminal proceedings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0257-7747</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd (Juta's Law Journals)</publisher><ispartof>Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse reg, 2017-04, Vol.2017 (1), p.59-69</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barrie, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Villiers, Bertus</creatorcontrib><title>Revisiting the adversarial approach of dealing with expert evidence : the treatment of expert witnesses by the state administrative tribunal of Western Australia</title><title>Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse reg</title><description>The modern legal process has come to rely increasingly and very substantially upon expert evidence. There are many areas of law and causes of action in which in practical terms the evidence of experts is indispensable. Examples are personal injuries and professional negligence, handwriting, fingerprints and palm prints, footprints, tool marks, ballistics, intoxication, accounting, psychiatry, engineering and chemistry. Expert evidence can be regarded as evidence which is admissible because it is relevant and of probative value in relation to matters in issue in the case and as such is a particular category of admissible evidence. This approach is consistent with the weight of authority and with the actual practice of the courts and tribunals at all levels. This is also in conformity with the assumptions underlying the various rules of procedure which regulate the admission of such evidence in civil and criminal proceedings.</description><issn>0257-7747</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNotjctOwzAURLMAiVL4B29ZRLLj-BF2VVVeqoSEQCyjG-eGGqVu5OsW-Bz-lKR0NYs5Z-Ysm_FCmdyY0lxkl0SfnJfSqGqW_b7gwZNPPnywtEEG7QEjQfTQMxiGuAO3YbuOtQj9xHz5tGH4PWBMbDRbDA7Z7VFNESFtMaSJPyEjHpAIiTU_R4gSpOll64OnFCH5w2T6Zh_Gx1F8R0oYA1vsp7r3cJWdd9ATXp9ynr3drV6XD_n6-f5xuVjnJGyVcieLSoFtoFJSalW2hRZCNoDCFFopA6pzWnWct8oYqQtnuauEtSDAVdoaOc9u_ncJGh8w1QQ47JtacFXwevW0rLWyUBrpOvkHPgxp5A</recordid><startdate>20170412</startdate><enddate>20170412</enddate><creator>Barrie, George</creator><creator>De Villiers, Bertus</creator><general>Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd (Juta's Law Journals)</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20170412</creationdate><title>Revisiting the adversarial approach of dealing with expert evidence : the treatment of expert witnesses by the state administrative tribunal of Western Australia</title><author>Barrie, George ; De Villiers, Bertus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-s189t-c3295a8ba9533654d26113bae1726557a5fc65f00d577362c80c9188a1ac96873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barrie, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Villiers, Bertus</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse reg</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barrie, George</au><au>De Villiers, Bertus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Revisiting the adversarial approach of dealing with expert evidence : the treatment of expert witnesses by the state administrative tribunal of Western Australia</atitle><jtitle>Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse reg</jtitle><date>2017-04-12</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>2017</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>59</spage><epage>69</epage><pages>59-69</pages><issn>0257-7747</issn><abstract>The modern legal process has come to rely increasingly and very substantially upon expert evidence. There are many areas of law and causes of action in which in practical terms the evidence of experts is indispensable. Examples are personal injuries and professional negligence, handwriting, fingerprints and palm prints, footprints, tool marks, ballistics, intoxication, accounting, psychiatry, engineering and chemistry. Expert evidence can be regarded as evidence which is admissible because it is relevant and of probative value in relation to matters in issue in the case and as such is a particular category of admissible evidence. This approach is consistent with the weight of authority and with the actual practice of the courts and tribunals at all levels. This is also in conformity with the assumptions underlying the various rules of procedure which regulate the admission of such evidence in civil and criminal proceedings.</abstract><pub>Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd (Juta's Law Journals)</pub><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0257-7747
ispartof Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse reg, 2017-04, Vol.2017 (1), p.59-69
issn 0257-7747
language eng
recordid cdi_sabinet_saepub_10520_EJC_658a473cf
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library
title Revisiting the adversarial approach of dealing with expert evidence : the treatment of expert witnesses by the state administrative tribunal of Western Australia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T21%3A34%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sabinet&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revisiting%20the%20adversarial%20approach%20of%20dealing%20with%20expert%20evidence%20:%20the%20treatment%20of%20expert%20witnesses%20by%20the%20state%20administrative%20tribunal%20of%20Western%20Australia&rft.jtitle=Tydskrif%20vir%20die%20Suid-Afrikaanse%20reg&rft.au=Barrie,%20George&rft.date=2017-04-12&rft.volume=2017&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=59&rft.epage=69&rft.pages=59-69&rft.issn=0257-7747&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Csabinet%3E10520/EJC-658a473cf%3C/sabinet%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sabinet_id=10520/EJC-658a473cf&rfr_iscdi=true