Western Australian radiology departments' views on Australian Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record : peer reviewed original article

Introduction : Since the last decade, many countries have started developing a national electronic health record (EHR). The national EHR in Australia is called Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR). It has been available for use since 1 July 2012. A federal government's review...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:South African radiographer 2016-05, Vol.54 (1), p.15-19
Hauptverfasser: Lo, C.M.L., Ng, C.K.C., Horne, M.R., Tait, O.J.K., Evans, A.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 19
container_issue 1
container_start_page 15
container_title South African radiographer
container_volume 54
creator Lo, C.M.L.
Ng, C.K.C.
Horne, M.R.
Tait, O.J.K.
Evans, A.M.
description Introduction : Since the last decade, many countries have started developing a national electronic health record (EHR). The national EHR in Australia is called Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR). It has been available for use since 1 July 2012. A federal government's review of its implementation was conducted in late 2013 because it failed to meet the set targets. The purpose of this study was to investigate Western Australian radiology departments' views on the PCEHR complementary to the government's review report. Methods : Chief medical imaging technologists (n=18) and picture archiving and communication system (PACS) administrators (n=18) from public and private hospitals in Western Australian were invited to participate in this study in May 2014. The response rate for participation was 22.2 percent (8/36). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the participants to obtain their perceptions of PCEHR. The interviews were analysed inductively and thematically. Results : There were eight people (n=8) who agreed to participate. They believed the PCEHR would enhance efficiency and effectiveness of healthcare services if barriers to its implementation were addressed. The major barriers identified were concern of individual privacy, increase of staff workload, inadequate system functionalities and training, lack of involvement of stakeholders and money. The use of Medicare to provide both positive and negative incentives to the stakeholders was suggested as a viable solution to address the current barriers. Conclusion : This study investigated four Western Australian radiology departments' perceptions of PCEHR. Although their perceptions were similar to the ideas in the government's review report in general, new insights were also provided by the participants. These findings could potentially complement the government's review.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sabinet</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_sabinet_saepub_10520_EJC199676</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sabinet_id>10520/EJC199676</sabinet_id><sourcerecordid>10520/EJC199676</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-sabinet_saepub_10520_EJC1996763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjb1uwkAQhK8gUsjPO2yDqJDOl9jBdMhyhFJFCInSWuwNObTcWbtHIh4i7xxHoqFLNVN838zIjK3L5zPrnrNbc6d6sLbInSvH5mdLmkgCLE-aBNljAMHOR477M3TUo6QjhaRT-PL0rRCv0HcSjQGZz1DFkCQyUwc1Uzv04FtYEXL6hDW1UTpYQE8kIPS3NYBR_N4POgwvvmV6MDcfyEqPl7w3k9d6U61mijsfKDWK1J92TWZzZ5v6rcrKsngpnv7L_QL9jlWt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Western Australian radiology departments' views on Australian Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record : peer reviewed original article</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Lo, C.M.L. ; Ng, C.K.C. ; Horne, M.R. ; Tait, O.J.K. ; Evans, A.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lo, C.M.L. ; Ng, C.K.C. ; Horne, M.R. ; Tait, O.J.K. ; Evans, A.M.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction : Since the last decade, many countries have started developing a national electronic health record (EHR). The national EHR in Australia is called Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR). It has been available for use since 1 July 2012. A federal government's review of its implementation was conducted in late 2013 because it failed to meet the set targets. The purpose of this study was to investigate Western Australian radiology departments' views on the PCEHR complementary to the government's review report. Methods : Chief medical imaging technologists (n=18) and picture archiving and communication system (PACS) administrators (n=18) from public and private hospitals in Western Australian were invited to participate in this study in May 2014. The response rate for participation was 22.2 percent (8/36). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the participants to obtain their perceptions of PCEHR. The interviews were analysed inductively and thematically. Results : There were eight people (n=8) who agreed to participate. They believed the PCEHR would enhance efficiency and effectiveness of healthcare services if barriers to its implementation were addressed. The major barriers identified were concern of individual privacy, increase of staff workload, inadequate system functionalities and training, lack of involvement of stakeholders and money. The use of Medicare to provide both positive and negative incentives to the stakeholders was suggested as a viable solution to address the current barriers. Conclusion : This study investigated four Western Australian radiology departments' perceptions of PCEHR. Although their perceptions were similar to the ideas in the government's review report in general, new insights were also provided by the participants. These findings could potentially complement the government's review.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0258-0241</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Society of Radiographers of South Africa (SORSA)</publisher><subject>Australia ; Electronic health record ; Radiology</subject><ispartof>South African radiographer, 2016-05, Vol.54 (1), p.15-19</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lo, C.M.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, C.K.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horne, M.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tait, O.J.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, A.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Western Australian radiology departments' views on Australian Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record : peer reviewed original article</title><title>South African radiographer</title><description>Introduction : Since the last decade, many countries have started developing a national electronic health record (EHR). The national EHR in Australia is called Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR). It has been available for use since 1 July 2012. A federal government's review of its implementation was conducted in late 2013 because it failed to meet the set targets. The purpose of this study was to investigate Western Australian radiology departments' views on the PCEHR complementary to the government's review report. Methods : Chief medical imaging technologists (n=18) and picture archiving and communication system (PACS) administrators (n=18) from public and private hospitals in Western Australian were invited to participate in this study in May 2014. The response rate for participation was 22.2 percent (8/36). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the participants to obtain their perceptions of PCEHR. The interviews were analysed inductively and thematically. Results : There were eight people (n=8) who agreed to participate. They believed the PCEHR would enhance efficiency and effectiveness of healthcare services if barriers to its implementation were addressed. The major barriers identified were concern of individual privacy, increase of staff workload, inadequate system functionalities and training, lack of involvement of stakeholders and money. The use of Medicare to provide both positive and negative incentives to the stakeholders was suggested as a viable solution to address the current barriers. Conclusion : This study investigated four Western Australian radiology departments' perceptions of PCEHR. Although their perceptions were similar to the ideas in the government's review report in general, new insights were also provided by the participants. These findings could potentially complement the government's review.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Electronic health record</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><issn>0258-0241</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqNjb1uwkAQhK8gUsjPO2yDqJDOl9jBdMhyhFJFCInSWuwNObTcWbtHIh4i7xxHoqFLNVN838zIjK3L5zPrnrNbc6d6sLbInSvH5mdLmkgCLE-aBNljAMHOR477M3TUo6QjhaRT-PL0rRCv0HcSjQGZz1DFkCQyUwc1Uzv04FtYEXL6hDW1UTpYQE8kIPS3NYBR_N4POgwvvmV6MDcfyEqPl7w3k9d6U61mijsfKDWK1J92TWZzZ5v6rcrKsngpnv7L_QL9jlWt</recordid><startdate>20160501</startdate><enddate>20160501</enddate><creator>Lo, C.M.L.</creator><creator>Ng, C.K.C.</creator><creator>Horne, M.R.</creator><creator>Tait, O.J.K.</creator><creator>Evans, A.M.</creator><general>Society of Radiographers of South Africa (SORSA)</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20160501</creationdate><title>Western Australian radiology departments' views on Australian Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record : peer reviewed original article</title><author>Lo, C.M.L. ; Ng, C.K.C. ; Horne, M.R. ; Tait, O.J.K. ; Evans, A.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-sabinet_saepub_10520_EJC1996763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Electronic health record</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lo, C.M.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, C.K.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horne, M.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tait, O.J.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, A.M.</creatorcontrib><jtitle>South African radiographer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lo, C.M.L.</au><au>Ng, C.K.C.</au><au>Horne, M.R.</au><au>Tait, O.J.K.</au><au>Evans, A.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Western Australian radiology departments' views on Australian Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record : peer reviewed original article</atitle><jtitle>South African radiographer</jtitle><date>2016-05-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>15</spage><epage>19</epage><pages>15-19</pages><issn>0258-0241</issn><abstract>Introduction : Since the last decade, many countries have started developing a national electronic health record (EHR). The national EHR in Australia is called Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR). It has been available for use since 1 July 2012. A federal government's review of its implementation was conducted in late 2013 because it failed to meet the set targets. The purpose of this study was to investigate Western Australian radiology departments' views on the PCEHR complementary to the government's review report. Methods : Chief medical imaging technologists (n=18) and picture archiving and communication system (PACS) administrators (n=18) from public and private hospitals in Western Australian were invited to participate in this study in May 2014. The response rate for participation was 22.2 percent (8/36). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the participants to obtain their perceptions of PCEHR. The interviews were analysed inductively and thematically. Results : There were eight people (n=8) who agreed to participate. They believed the PCEHR would enhance efficiency and effectiveness of healthcare services if barriers to its implementation were addressed. The major barriers identified were concern of individual privacy, increase of staff workload, inadequate system functionalities and training, lack of involvement of stakeholders and money. The use of Medicare to provide both positive and negative incentives to the stakeholders was suggested as a viable solution to address the current barriers. Conclusion : This study investigated four Western Australian radiology departments' perceptions of PCEHR. Although their perceptions were similar to the ideas in the government's review report in general, new insights were also provided by the participants. These findings could potentially complement the government's review.</abstract><pub>Society of Radiographers of South Africa (SORSA)</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0258-0241
ispartof South African radiographer, 2016-05, Vol.54 (1), p.15-19
issn 0258-0241
language eng
recordid cdi_sabinet_saepub_10520_EJC199676
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Australia
Electronic health record
Radiology
title Western Australian radiology departments' views on Australian Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record : peer reviewed original article
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T04%3A01%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sabinet&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Western%20Australian%20radiology%20departments'%20views%20on%20Australian%20Personally%20Controlled%20Electronic%20Health%20Record%20:%20peer%20reviewed%20original%20article&rft.jtitle=South%20African%20radiographer&rft.au=Lo,%20C.M.L.&rft.date=2016-05-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=15&rft.epage=19&rft.pages=15-19&rft.issn=0258-0241&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Csabinet%3E10520/EJC199676%3C/sabinet%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sabinet_id=10520/EJC199676&rfr_iscdi=true