Carbonylations in flow: tube-in-tube reactor gas-liquid slug flow

In order to improve the performance of carbonylation reactions in flow, we compared the tube-in-tube system to a gas-liquid two-phase setup. We found that the two-phase slug flow reactor significantly improved the yield and throughput of the reactions tested. First, we performed a reference reaction...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Reaction chemistry & engineering 2024-11, Vol.9 (12), p.3172-3178
Hauptverfasser: adosz, Agnieszka, Friedli, Astrid, Lhuillery, Arnaud, Rueedi, Georg
Format: Artikel
Sprache:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3178
container_issue 12
container_start_page 3172
container_title Reaction chemistry & engineering
container_volume 9
creator adosz, Agnieszka
Friedli, Astrid
Lhuillery, Arnaud
Rueedi, Georg
description In order to improve the performance of carbonylation reactions in flow, we compared the tube-in-tube system to a gas-liquid two-phase setup. We found that the two-phase slug flow reactor significantly improved the yield and throughput of the reactions tested. First, we performed a reference reaction, methoxycarbonylation of 4-chlorobenzonitrile, using conditions described in the literature and obtained 57% calculated yield in the biphasic setup and 16% in the tube-in-tube setup, with side product formation of 1% and 8% respectively. The reaction was further optimized in both apparatuses, improving the yield in the biphasic setup to 86%, while the tube-in-tube method was limited to about 34%. Finally, a 1.5 g scale-up of a project-relevant building block yielded 73% of the product in the tube-in-tube setup vs. 92% when two-phase flow was used, with more than a ten-fold increase in throughput in the biphasic method. Using gas-liquid flow enabled higher yield and throughput due to direct contact of gas and liquid, better control of CO equivalents and intensification of process conditions: higher temperature, pressure and concentration in the system and significant reduction of residence time. In order to improve the performance of carbonylation reactions in flow we compared the tube-in-tube system to a gas-liquid two-phase setup.
doi_str_mv 10.1039/d4re00287c
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>rsc</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_rsc_primary_d4re00287c</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>d4re00287c</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-rsc_primary_d4re00287c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjrEKwjAUAB-CYNEu7kJ-IPraqE3dRBQ_wL2kbVoiMdGXFunfiyI4Ot1wNxzAPMFlgiJf1WvSiKnMqhFEKW4kz6UUE4hDuCJiskUUMotgf1BUejdY1RnvAjOONdY_d6zrS82N428y0qrqPLFWBW7Nozc1C7ZvP-kMxo2yQcdfTmFxOl4OZ06hKu5kboqG4rcj_vkXCeE6KA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Carbonylations in flow: tube-in-tube reactor gas-liquid slug flow</title><source>Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals 2008-</source><creator>adosz, Agnieszka ; Friedli, Astrid ; Lhuillery, Arnaud ; Rueedi, Georg</creator><creatorcontrib>adosz, Agnieszka ; Friedli, Astrid ; Lhuillery, Arnaud ; Rueedi, Georg</creatorcontrib><description>In order to improve the performance of carbonylation reactions in flow, we compared the tube-in-tube system to a gas-liquid two-phase setup. We found that the two-phase slug flow reactor significantly improved the yield and throughput of the reactions tested. First, we performed a reference reaction, methoxycarbonylation of 4-chlorobenzonitrile, using conditions described in the literature and obtained 57% calculated yield in the biphasic setup and 16% in the tube-in-tube setup, with side product formation of 1% and 8% respectively. The reaction was further optimized in both apparatuses, improving the yield in the biphasic setup to 86%, while the tube-in-tube method was limited to about 34%. Finally, a 1.5 g scale-up of a project-relevant building block yielded 73% of the product in the tube-in-tube setup vs. 92% when two-phase flow was used, with more than a ten-fold increase in throughput in the biphasic method. Using gas-liquid flow enabled higher yield and throughput due to direct contact of gas and liquid, better control of CO equivalents and intensification of process conditions: higher temperature, pressure and concentration in the system and significant reduction of residence time. In order to improve the performance of carbonylation reactions in flow we compared the tube-in-tube system to a gas-liquid two-phase setup.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2058-9883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1039/d4re00287c</identifier><ispartof>Reaction chemistry &amp; engineering, 2024-11, Vol.9 (12), p.3172-3178</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>adosz, Agnieszka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedli, Astrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lhuillery, Arnaud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rueedi, Georg</creatorcontrib><title>Carbonylations in flow: tube-in-tube reactor gas-liquid slug flow</title><title>Reaction chemistry &amp; engineering</title><description>In order to improve the performance of carbonylation reactions in flow, we compared the tube-in-tube system to a gas-liquid two-phase setup. We found that the two-phase slug flow reactor significantly improved the yield and throughput of the reactions tested. First, we performed a reference reaction, methoxycarbonylation of 4-chlorobenzonitrile, using conditions described in the literature and obtained 57% calculated yield in the biphasic setup and 16% in the tube-in-tube setup, with side product formation of 1% and 8% respectively. The reaction was further optimized in both apparatuses, improving the yield in the biphasic setup to 86%, while the tube-in-tube method was limited to about 34%. Finally, a 1.5 g scale-up of a project-relevant building block yielded 73% of the product in the tube-in-tube setup vs. 92% when two-phase flow was used, with more than a ten-fold increase in throughput in the biphasic method. Using gas-liquid flow enabled higher yield and throughput due to direct contact of gas and liquid, better control of CO equivalents and intensification of process conditions: higher temperature, pressure and concentration in the system and significant reduction of residence time. In order to improve the performance of carbonylation reactions in flow we compared the tube-in-tube system to a gas-liquid two-phase setup.</description><issn>2058-9883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqFjrEKwjAUAB-CYNEu7kJ-IPraqE3dRBQ_wL2kbVoiMdGXFunfiyI4Ot1wNxzAPMFlgiJf1WvSiKnMqhFEKW4kz6UUE4hDuCJiskUUMotgf1BUejdY1RnvAjOONdY_d6zrS82N428y0qrqPLFWBW7Nozc1C7ZvP-kMxo2yQcdfTmFxOl4OZ06hKu5kboqG4rcj_vkXCeE6KA</recordid><startdate>20241119</startdate><enddate>20241119</enddate><creator>adosz, Agnieszka</creator><creator>Friedli, Astrid</creator><creator>Lhuillery, Arnaud</creator><creator>Rueedi, Georg</creator><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20241119</creationdate><title>Carbonylations in flow: tube-in-tube reactor gas-liquid slug flow</title><author>adosz, Agnieszka ; Friedli, Astrid ; Lhuillery, Arnaud ; Rueedi, Georg</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-rsc_primary_d4re00287c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>adosz, Agnieszka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedli, Astrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lhuillery, Arnaud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rueedi, Georg</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Reaction chemistry &amp; engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>adosz, Agnieszka</au><au>Friedli, Astrid</au><au>Lhuillery, Arnaud</au><au>Rueedi, Georg</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Carbonylations in flow: tube-in-tube reactor gas-liquid slug flow</atitle><jtitle>Reaction chemistry &amp; engineering</jtitle><date>2024-11-19</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>3172</spage><epage>3178</epage><pages>3172-3178</pages><eissn>2058-9883</eissn><abstract>In order to improve the performance of carbonylation reactions in flow, we compared the tube-in-tube system to a gas-liquid two-phase setup. We found that the two-phase slug flow reactor significantly improved the yield and throughput of the reactions tested. First, we performed a reference reaction, methoxycarbonylation of 4-chlorobenzonitrile, using conditions described in the literature and obtained 57% calculated yield in the biphasic setup and 16% in the tube-in-tube setup, with side product formation of 1% and 8% respectively. The reaction was further optimized in both apparatuses, improving the yield in the biphasic setup to 86%, while the tube-in-tube method was limited to about 34%. Finally, a 1.5 g scale-up of a project-relevant building block yielded 73% of the product in the tube-in-tube setup vs. 92% when two-phase flow was used, with more than a ten-fold increase in throughput in the biphasic method. Using gas-liquid flow enabled higher yield and throughput due to direct contact of gas and liquid, better control of CO equivalents and intensification of process conditions: higher temperature, pressure and concentration in the system and significant reduction of residence time. In order to improve the performance of carbonylation reactions in flow we compared the tube-in-tube system to a gas-liquid two-phase setup.</abstract><doi>10.1039/d4re00287c</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2058-9883
ispartof Reaction chemistry & engineering, 2024-11, Vol.9 (12), p.3172-3178
issn 2058-9883
language
recordid cdi_rsc_primary_d4re00287c
source Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals 2008-
title Carbonylations in flow: tube-in-tube reactor gas-liquid slug flow
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T06%3A06%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-rsc&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Carbonylations%20in%20flow:%20tube-in-tube%20reactor%20gas-liquid%20slug%20flow&rft.jtitle=Reaction%20chemistry%20&%20engineering&rft.au=adosz,%20Agnieszka&rft.date=2024-11-19&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3172&rft.epage=3178&rft.pages=3172-3178&rft.eissn=2058-9883&rft_id=info:doi/10.1039/d4re00287c&rft_dat=%3Crsc%3Ed4re00287c%3C/rsc%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true