Analysis of design criteria for biological post-treatment of ozonated wastewater treatment plant effluent
To protect surface waters and related water cycles from organic micropollutant emissions, numerous wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) in Europe have been upgraded with ozonation followed by biological post-treatment. In contrast to ozonation, biological post-treatment still lacks an objective-driven...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental science water research & technology 2024-03, Vol.1 (4), p.86-876 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 876 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 86 |
container_title | Environmental science water research & technology |
container_volume | 1 |
creator | Sauter, Daniel Gnirss, Regina Wintgens, Thomas |
description | To protect surface waters and related water cycles from organic micropollutant emissions, numerous wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) in Europe have been upgraded with ozonation followed by biological post-treatment. In contrast to ozonation, biological post-treatment still lacks an objective-driven design approach based on defined parameters. The removal of potentially toxic oxidation products formed during ozonation is the undisputed purpose of biological post-treatment. However, the wide variety of studied oxidation by-products (OBP), ozonation transformation products (OTP) and toxicity endpoints so far hampered the definition of specific design parameters. This study proposes a two-step design approach for biological post-treatment of ozonated WWTP effluent and analyses the results in comparison with common practice. The first step provides guidance for the selection of the post-treatment process based on mandatory treatment goals (removal of biodegradable OBP and toxicity) and site-specific optional treatment goals (
e.g.
phosphorus removal). The second step consists of a dimensioning procedure that focuses on carbonyl compounds as suitable representatives of biodegradable OBP and assumes first-order kinetics for calculating empty bed contact times (EBCT) as a function of the targeted removal efficiency. The design approach was exemplarily applied to a real WWTP. BAC filtration with additional coagulant dosing was selected as the most suitable process for the site-specific treatment requirements. To reach an overall removal of 80% for a set of 7 selected target carbonyl compounds, an EBCT of 16 min was determined. The dimensioning results were compared with a common practice approach that is based on a maximum hydraulic loading rate. The filter surface area and EBCT calculated with the novel approach were approx. 20% higher than for the common practice approach, when assuming the same filter bed heights. Since the common practice approach only defines the filter surface area, the discrepancy in EBCT can drastically increase if the bed height is reduced. This demonstrates that EBCT-based dimensioning approaches are essential for ensuring an efficient OBP removal in biological post-treatment. The first-order kinetic model for OBP degradation enables to define the EBCT according to OBP treatment goals and to thoroughly compare different design options.
This study provides a science-based approach for the design of biological post-treatment of ozonated wa |
doi_str_mv | 10.1039/d3ew00775h |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_rsc_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_rsc_primary_d3ew00775h</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3003412492</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c240t-ef7ae5c444f0f5cd53b6702d30bd2f7268b4170d0bd2f6e85282de334a214e513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkM1LAzEQxYMoWGov3oWAN2F18rG77bHUaoWCF8Xjkt1Masp2U5OUUv9601bay8w85jcD7xFyy-CRgRg9aYFbgLLMvy9Ij0MuMibZ6PI0A1yTQQhLAGCFSCvRI3bcqXYXbKDOUI3BLjraeBvRW0WN87S2rnUL26iWrl2IWfSo4gq7uD9wv65TETXdqhBxm0ZPz8C6VamiMe0myRtyZVQbcPDf--TzZfoxmWXz99e3yXieNVxCzNCUCvNGSmnA5I3ORV2UwLWAWnNT8mJYS1aCPsgChzkfco1CSMWZxJyJPrk__l1797PBEKul2_jkMlQCINnmcsQT9XCkGu9C8Giqtbcr5XcVg2qfZvUspl-HNGcJvjvCPjQn7py2-ANJ3nLE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3003412492</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of design criteria for biological post-treatment of ozonated wastewater treatment plant effluent</title><source>Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals 2008-</source><creator>Sauter, Daniel ; Gnirss, Regina ; Wintgens, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Sauter, Daniel ; Gnirss, Regina ; Wintgens, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>To protect surface waters and related water cycles from organic micropollutant emissions, numerous wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) in Europe have been upgraded with ozonation followed by biological post-treatment. In contrast to ozonation, biological post-treatment still lacks an objective-driven design approach based on defined parameters. The removal of potentially toxic oxidation products formed during ozonation is the undisputed purpose of biological post-treatment. However, the wide variety of studied oxidation by-products (OBP), ozonation transformation products (OTP) and toxicity endpoints so far hampered the definition of specific design parameters. This study proposes a two-step design approach for biological post-treatment of ozonated WWTP effluent and analyses the results in comparison with common practice. The first step provides guidance for the selection of the post-treatment process based on mandatory treatment goals (removal of biodegradable OBP and toxicity) and site-specific optional treatment goals (
e.g.
phosphorus removal). The second step consists of a dimensioning procedure that focuses on carbonyl compounds as suitable representatives of biodegradable OBP and assumes first-order kinetics for calculating empty bed contact times (EBCT) as a function of the targeted removal efficiency. The design approach was exemplarily applied to a real WWTP. BAC filtration with additional coagulant dosing was selected as the most suitable process for the site-specific treatment requirements. To reach an overall removal of 80% for a set of 7 selected target carbonyl compounds, an EBCT of 16 min was determined. The dimensioning results were compared with a common practice approach that is based on a maximum hydraulic loading rate. The filter surface area and EBCT calculated with the novel approach were approx. 20% higher than for the common practice approach, when assuming the same filter bed heights. Since the common practice approach only defines the filter surface area, the discrepancy in EBCT can drastically increase if the bed height is reduced. This demonstrates that EBCT-based dimensioning approaches are essential for ensuring an efficient OBP removal in biological post-treatment. The first-order kinetic model for OBP degradation enables to define the EBCT according to OBP treatment goals and to thoroughly compare different design options.
This study provides a science-based approach for the design of biological post-treatment of ozonated wastewater treatment plant effluent and compares it with common practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2053-1400</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2053-1419</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1039/d3ew00775h</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry</publisher><subject>Biodegradability ; Biodegradation ; Carbonyl compounds ; Carbonyls ; Coagulants ; Design ; Design criteria ; Design parameters ; Effluents ; Genetic transformation ; Hydraulic loading ; Hydrologic cycle ; Hydrological cycle ; Kinetics ; Load distribution ; Loading rate ; Oxidation ; Ozonation ; Ozonization ; Parameters ; Phosphorus ; Phosphorus removal ; Removal ; Surface area ; Surface water ; Toxicity ; Wastewater treatment ; Wastewater treatment plants ; Water treatment</subject><ispartof>Environmental science water research & technology, 2024-03, Vol.1 (4), p.86-876</ispartof><rights>Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c240t-ef7ae5c444f0f5cd53b6702d30bd2f7268b4170d0bd2f6e85282de334a214e513</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0474-8820</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sauter, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gnirss, Regina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wintgens, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of design criteria for biological post-treatment of ozonated wastewater treatment plant effluent</title><title>Environmental science water research & technology</title><description>To protect surface waters and related water cycles from organic micropollutant emissions, numerous wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) in Europe have been upgraded with ozonation followed by biological post-treatment. In contrast to ozonation, biological post-treatment still lacks an objective-driven design approach based on defined parameters. The removal of potentially toxic oxidation products formed during ozonation is the undisputed purpose of biological post-treatment. However, the wide variety of studied oxidation by-products (OBP), ozonation transformation products (OTP) and toxicity endpoints so far hampered the definition of specific design parameters. This study proposes a two-step design approach for biological post-treatment of ozonated WWTP effluent and analyses the results in comparison with common practice. The first step provides guidance for the selection of the post-treatment process based on mandatory treatment goals (removal of biodegradable OBP and toxicity) and site-specific optional treatment goals (
e.g.
phosphorus removal). The second step consists of a dimensioning procedure that focuses on carbonyl compounds as suitable representatives of biodegradable OBP and assumes first-order kinetics for calculating empty bed contact times (EBCT) as a function of the targeted removal efficiency. The design approach was exemplarily applied to a real WWTP. BAC filtration with additional coagulant dosing was selected as the most suitable process for the site-specific treatment requirements. To reach an overall removal of 80% for a set of 7 selected target carbonyl compounds, an EBCT of 16 min was determined. The dimensioning results were compared with a common practice approach that is based on a maximum hydraulic loading rate. The filter surface area and EBCT calculated with the novel approach were approx. 20% higher than for the common practice approach, when assuming the same filter bed heights. Since the common practice approach only defines the filter surface area, the discrepancy in EBCT can drastically increase if the bed height is reduced. This demonstrates that EBCT-based dimensioning approaches are essential for ensuring an efficient OBP removal in biological post-treatment. The first-order kinetic model for OBP degradation enables to define the EBCT according to OBP treatment goals and to thoroughly compare different design options.
This study provides a science-based approach for the design of biological post-treatment of ozonated wastewater treatment plant effluent and compares it with common practice.</description><subject>Biodegradability</subject><subject>Biodegradation</subject><subject>Carbonyl compounds</subject><subject>Carbonyls</subject><subject>Coagulants</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Design criteria</subject><subject>Design parameters</subject><subject>Effluents</subject><subject>Genetic transformation</subject><subject>Hydraulic loading</subject><subject>Hydrologic cycle</subject><subject>Hydrological cycle</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Load distribution</subject><subject>Loading rate</subject><subject>Oxidation</subject><subject>Ozonation</subject><subject>Ozonization</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>Phosphorus removal</subject><subject>Removal</subject><subject>Surface area</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment plants</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><issn>2053-1400</issn><issn>2053-1419</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkM1LAzEQxYMoWGov3oWAN2F18rG77bHUaoWCF8Xjkt1Masp2U5OUUv9601bay8w85jcD7xFyy-CRgRg9aYFbgLLMvy9Ij0MuMibZ6PI0A1yTQQhLAGCFSCvRI3bcqXYXbKDOUI3BLjraeBvRW0WN87S2rnUL26iWrl2IWfSo4gq7uD9wv65TETXdqhBxm0ZPz8C6VamiMe0myRtyZVQbcPDf--TzZfoxmWXz99e3yXieNVxCzNCUCvNGSmnA5I3ORV2UwLWAWnNT8mJYS1aCPsgChzkfco1CSMWZxJyJPrk__l1797PBEKul2_jkMlQCINnmcsQT9XCkGu9C8Giqtbcr5XcVg2qfZvUspl-HNGcJvjvCPjQn7py2-ANJ3nLE</recordid><startdate>20240328</startdate><enddate>20240328</enddate><creator>Sauter, Daniel</creator><creator>Gnirss, Regina</creator><creator>Wintgens, Thomas</creator><general>Royal Society of Chemistry</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0474-8820</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240328</creationdate><title>Analysis of design criteria for biological post-treatment of ozonated wastewater treatment plant effluent</title><author>Sauter, Daniel ; Gnirss, Regina ; Wintgens, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c240t-ef7ae5c444f0f5cd53b6702d30bd2f7268b4170d0bd2f6e85282de334a214e513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Biodegradability</topic><topic>Biodegradation</topic><topic>Carbonyl compounds</topic><topic>Carbonyls</topic><topic>Coagulants</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Design criteria</topic><topic>Design parameters</topic><topic>Effluents</topic><topic>Genetic transformation</topic><topic>Hydraulic loading</topic><topic>Hydrologic cycle</topic><topic>Hydrological cycle</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Load distribution</topic><topic>Loading rate</topic><topic>Oxidation</topic><topic>Ozonation</topic><topic>Ozonization</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>Phosphorus removal</topic><topic>Removal</topic><topic>Surface area</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment plants</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sauter, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gnirss, Regina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wintgens, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental science water research & technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sauter, Daniel</au><au>Gnirss, Regina</au><au>Wintgens, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of design criteria for biological post-treatment of ozonated wastewater treatment plant effluent</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science water research & technology</jtitle><date>2024-03-28</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>86</spage><epage>876</epage><pages>86-876</pages><issn>2053-1400</issn><eissn>2053-1419</eissn><abstract>To protect surface waters and related water cycles from organic micropollutant emissions, numerous wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) in Europe have been upgraded with ozonation followed by biological post-treatment. In contrast to ozonation, biological post-treatment still lacks an objective-driven design approach based on defined parameters. The removal of potentially toxic oxidation products formed during ozonation is the undisputed purpose of biological post-treatment. However, the wide variety of studied oxidation by-products (OBP), ozonation transformation products (OTP) and toxicity endpoints so far hampered the definition of specific design parameters. This study proposes a two-step design approach for biological post-treatment of ozonated WWTP effluent and analyses the results in comparison with common practice. The first step provides guidance for the selection of the post-treatment process based on mandatory treatment goals (removal of biodegradable OBP and toxicity) and site-specific optional treatment goals (
e.g.
phosphorus removal). The second step consists of a dimensioning procedure that focuses on carbonyl compounds as suitable representatives of biodegradable OBP and assumes first-order kinetics for calculating empty bed contact times (EBCT) as a function of the targeted removal efficiency. The design approach was exemplarily applied to a real WWTP. BAC filtration with additional coagulant dosing was selected as the most suitable process for the site-specific treatment requirements. To reach an overall removal of 80% for a set of 7 selected target carbonyl compounds, an EBCT of 16 min was determined. The dimensioning results were compared with a common practice approach that is based on a maximum hydraulic loading rate. The filter surface area and EBCT calculated with the novel approach were approx. 20% higher than for the common practice approach, when assuming the same filter bed heights. Since the common practice approach only defines the filter surface area, the discrepancy in EBCT can drastically increase if the bed height is reduced. This demonstrates that EBCT-based dimensioning approaches are essential for ensuring an efficient OBP removal in biological post-treatment. The first-order kinetic model for OBP degradation enables to define the EBCT according to OBP treatment goals and to thoroughly compare different design options.
This study provides a science-based approach for the design of biological post-treatment of ozonated wastewater treatment plant effluent and compares it with common practice.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Royal Society of Chemistry</pub><doi>10.1039/d3ew00775h</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0474-8820</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2053-1400 |
ispartof | Environmental science water research & technology, 2024-03, Vol.1 (4), p.86-876 |
issn | 2053-1400 2053-1419 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_rsc_primary_d3ew00775h |
source | Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals 2008- |
subjects | Biodegradability Biodegradation Carbonyl compounds Carbonyls Coagulants Design Design criteria Design parameters Effluents Genetic transformation Hydraulic loading Hydrologic cycle Hydrological cycle Kinetics Load distribution Loading rate Oxidation Ozonation Ozonization Parameters Phosphorus Phosphorus removal Removal Surface area Surface water Toxicity Wastewater treatment Wastewater treatment plants Water treatment |
title | Analysis of design criteria for biological post-treatment of ozonated wastewater treatment plant effluent |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T04%3A02%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_rsc_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20design%20criteria%20for%20biological%20post-treatment%20of%20ozonated%20wastewater%20treatment%20plant%20effluent&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20water%20research%20&%20technology&rft.au=Sauter,%20Daniel&rft.date=2024-03-28&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=86&rft.epage=876&rft.pages=86-876&rft.issn=2053-1400&rft.eissn=2053-1419&rft_id=info:doi/10.1039/d3ew00775h&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_rsc_p%3E3003412492%3C/proquest_rsc_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3003412492&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |