Lifecycle greenhouse gas footprint and minimum selling price of renewable diesel and jet fuel from fermentation and advanced fermentation production technologiesElectronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c3ee43655A

Fermentation and advanced fermentation (AF) biofuel production technologies may offer a means to reduce the greenhouse gas (GHG) intensity of transportation by providing renewable drop-in alternatives to conventional middle distillate (MD) fuels, including diesel and jet fuel. To the best of our kno...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Staples, Mark D, Malina, Robert, Olcay, Hakan, Pearlson, Matthew N, Hileman, James I, Boies, Adam, Barrett, Steven R. H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1554
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1545
container_title
container_volume 7
creator Staples, Mark D
Malina, Robert
Olcay, Hakan
Pearlson, Matthew N
Hileman, James I
Boies, Adam
Barrett, Steven R. H
description Fermentation and advanced fermentation (AF) biofuel production technologies may offer a means to reduce the greenhouse gas (GHG) intensity of transportation by providing renewable drop-in alternatives to conventional middle distillate (MD) fuels, including diesel and jet fuel. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first peer-reviewed study of the environmental and economic feasibility of AF technologies. We find that the attributional lifecycle GHG footprint of AF MD from sugar cane, corn grain and switchgrass ranges from −27.0 to 19.7, 47.5 to 117.5, and 11.7 to 89.8 gCO 2 e/MJ MD , respectively, compared to 90.0 gCO 2 e/MJ MD for conventional MD. These results are most sensitive to the co-product allocation method used, the efficiency and utility requirements of feedstock-to-fuel conversion, and the co-generation technology employed. We also calculate the minimum selling price (MSP) of MD fuel produced from sugar cane, corn grain and switchgrass AF as a range from 0.61 to 2.63, 0.84 to 3.65, and 1.09 to 6.30 $ per liter MD , respectively, compared to the current price of conventional MD in the United States of approximately 0.80 $ per liter MD . The MSP results are most sensitive to feedstock-to-fuel conversion efficiency, feedstock costs, and capital costs. Finally, we demonstrate that emissions from land use change (LUC) directly attributable to the growth of biomass for AF fuel could dominate the GHG footprint of AF MD fuels. A techno-economic analysis of the environmental and economic feasibility of middle distillate fuel production via fermentation and advanced fermentation technologies.
doi_str_mv 10.1039/c3ee43655a
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>rsc</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_rsc_primary_c3ee43655a</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>c3ee43655a</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-rsc_primary_c3ee43655a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWD8u3oXxpofWbLe7S72JrlgQPNT7EpPJNiUfS5Kt9G_7C4yrIiLoad7hmXeYeQk5yegko_n8kueIs7wsCrZDRllVzMZFRcvdL13Op_vkIIQ1peWUVvMReX1QEvmWa4TWI9qV60OSLIB0LnZe2QjMCjDKKtMbCKi1si0kwhGcBI8WX9hz8guFiQ7Ta4wg-9RI7wxI9AZtZFE5O2AmNsxyFD9J553o-SAj8pV12rVpZa2RR--s4hD6rtM4OPwWlJXOmw_veb1cXADbMKXfb5nAEhFuHxdX8CuZ6yOyJ5kOePxZD8npXf10cz_2gTfpL5OWN99B5v_zs7940wmZvwHLjobO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Enrichment Source</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lifecycle greenhouse gas footprint and minimum selling price of renewable diesel and jet fuel from fermentation and advanced fermentation production technologiesElectronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c3ee43655A</title><source>Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals 2008-</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Staples, Mark D ; Malina, Robert ; Olcay, Hakan ; Pearlson, Matthew N ; Hileman, James I ; Boies, Adam ; Barrett, Steven R. H</creator><creatorcontrib>Staples, Mark D ; Malina, Robert ; Olcay, Hakan ; Pearlson, Matthew N ; Hileman, James I ; Boies, Adam ; Barrett, Steven R. H</creatorcontrib><description>Fermentation and advanced fermentation (AF) biofuel production technologies may offer a means to reduce the greenhouse gas (GHG) intensity of transportation by providing renewable drop-in alternatives to conventional middle distillate (MD) fuels, including diesel and jet fuel. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first peer-reviewed study of the environmental and economic feasibility of AF technologies. We find that the attributional lifecycle GHG footprint of AF MD from sugar cane, corn grain and switchgrass ranges from −27.0 to 19.7, 47.5 to 117.5, and 11.7 to 89.8 gCO 2 e/MJ MD , respectively, compared to 90.0 gCO 2 e/MJ MD for conventional MD. These results are most sensitive to the co-product allocation method used, the efficiency and utility requirements of feedstock-to-fuel conversion, and the co-generation technology employed. We also calculate the minimum selling price (MSP) of MD fuel produced from sugar cane, corn grain and switchgrass AF as a range from 0.61 to 2.63, 0.84 to 3.65, and 1.09 to 6.30 $ per liter MD , respectively, compared to the current price of conventional MD in the United States of approximately 0.80 $ per liter MD . The MSP results are most sensitive to feedstock-to-fuel conversion efficiency, feedstock costs, and capital costs. Finally, we demonstrate that emissions from land use change (LUC) directly attributable to the growth of biomass for AF fuel could dominate the GHG footprint of AF MD fuels. A techno-economic analysis of the environmental and economic feasibility of middle distillate fuel production via fermentation and advanced fermentation technologies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1754-5692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1754-5706</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1039/c3ee43655a</identifier><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014-04</creationdate><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Staples, Mark D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malina, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olcay, Hakan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearlson, Matthew N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hileman, James I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boies, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrett, Steven R. H</creatorcontrib><title>Lifecycle greenhouse gas footprint and minimum selling price of renewable diesel and jet fuel from fermentation and advanced fermentation production technologiesElectronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c3ee43655A</title><description>Fermentation and advanced fermentation (AF) biofuel production technologies may offer a means to reduce the greenhouse gas (GHG) intensity of transportation by providing renewable drop-in alternatives to conventional middle distillate (MD) fuels, including diesel and jet fuel. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first peer-reviewed study of the environmental and economic feasibility of AF technologies. We find that the attributional lifecycle GHG footprint of AF MD from sugar cane, corn grain and switchgrass ranges from −27.0 to 19.7, 47.5 to 117.5, and 11.7 to 89.8 gCO 2 e/MJ MD , respectively, compared to 90.0 gCO 2 e/MJ MD for conventional MD. These results are most sensitive to the co-product allocation method used, the efficiency and utility requirements of feedstock-to-fuel conversion, and the co-generation technology employed. We also calculate the minimum selling price (MSP) of MD fuel produced from sugar cane, corn grain and switchgrass AF as a range from 0.61 to 2.63, 0.84 to 3.65, and 1.09 to 6.30 $ per liter MD , respectively, compared to the current price of conventional MD in the United States of approximately 0.80 $ per liter MD . The MSP results are most sensitive to feedstock-to-fuel conversion efficiency, feedstock costs, and capital costs. Finally, we demonstrate that emissions from land use change (LUC) directly attributable to the growth of biomass for AF fuel could dominate the GHG footprint of AF MD fuels. A techno-economic analysis of the environmental and economic feasibility of middle distillate fuel production via fermentation and advanced fermentation technologies.</description><issn>1754-5692</issn><issn>1754-5706</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWD8u3oXxpofWbLe7S72JrlgQPNT7EpPJNiUfS5Kt9G_7C4yrIiLoad7hmXeYeQk5yegko_n8kueIs7wsCrZDRllVzMZFRcvdL13Op_vkIIQ1peWUVvMReX1QEvmWa4TWI9qV60OSLIB0LnZe2QjMCjDKKtMbCKi1si0kwhGcBI8WX9hz8guFiQ7Ta4wg-9RI7wxI9AZtZFE5O2AmNsxyFD9J553o-SAj8pV12rVpZa2RR--s4hD6rtM4OPwWlJXOmw_veb1cXADbMKXfb5nAEhFuHxdX8CuZ6yOyJ5kOePxZD8npXf10cz_2gTfpL5OWN99B5v_zs7940wmZvwHLjobO</recordid><startdate>20140416</startdate><enddate>20140416</enddate><creator>Staples, Mark D</creator><creator>Malina, Robert</creator><creator>Olcay, Hakan</creator><creator>Pearlson, Matthew N</creator><creator>Hileman, James I</creator><creator>Boies, Adam</creator><creator>Barrett, Steven R. H</creator><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20140416</creationdate><title>Lifecycle greenhouse gas footprint and minimum selling price of renewable diesel and jet fuel from fermentation and advanced fermentation production technologiesElectronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c3ee43655A</title><author>Staples, Mark D ; Malina, Robert ; Olcay, Hakan ; Pearlson, Matthew N ; Hileman, James I ; Boies, Adam ; Barrett, Steven R. H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-rsc_primary_c3ee43655a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Staples, Mark D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malina, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olcay, Hakan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearlson, Matthew N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hileman, James I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boies, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrett, Steven R. H</creatorcontrib></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Staples, Mark D</au><au>Malina, Robert</au><au>Olcay, Hakan</au><au>Pearlson, Matthew N</au><au>Hileman, James I</au><au>Boies, Adam</au><au>Barrett, Steven R. H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lifecycle greenhouse gas footprint and minimum selling price of renewable diesel and jet fuel from fermentation and advanced fermentation production technologiesElectronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c3ee43655A</atitle><date>2014-04-16</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1545</spage><epage>1554</epage><pages>1545-1554</pages><issn>1754-5692</issn><eissn>1754-5706</eissn><abstract>Fermentation and advanced fermentation (AF) biofuel production technologies may offer a means to reduce the greenhouse gas (GHG) intensity of transportation by providing renewable drop-in alternatives to conventional middle distillate (MD) fuels, including diesel and jet fuel. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first peer-reviewed study of the environmental and economic feasibility of AF technologies. We find that the attributional lifecycle GHG footprint of AF MD from sugar cane, corn grain and switchgrass ranges from −27.0 to 19.7, 47.5 to 117.5, and 11.7 to 89.8 gCO 2 e/MJ MD , respectively, compared to 90.0 gCO 2 e/MJ MD for conventional MD. These results are most sensitive to the co-product allocation method used, the efficiency and utility requirements of feedstock-to-fuel conversion, and the co-generation technology employed. We also calculate the minimum selling price (MSP) of MD fuel produced from sugar cane, corn grain and switchgrass AF as a range from 0.61 to 2.63, 0.84 to 3.65, and 1.09 to 6.30 $ per liter MD , respectively, compared to the current price of conventional MD in the United States of approximately 0.80 $ per liter MD . The MSP results are most sensitive to feedstock-to-fuel conversion efficiency, feedstock costs, and capital costs. Finally, we demonstrate that emissions from land use change (LUC) directly attributable to the growth of biomass for AF fuel could dominate the GHG footprint of AF MD fuels. A techno-economic analysis of the environmental and economic feasibility of middle distillate fuel production via fermentation and advanced fermentation technologies.</abstract><doi>10.1039/c3ee43655a</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1754-5692
ispartof
issn 1754-5692
1754-5706
language eng
recordid cdi_rsc_primary_c3ee43655a
source Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals 2008-; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Lifecycle greenhouse gas footprint and minimum selling price of renewable diesel and jet fuel from fermentation and advanced fermentation production technologiesElectronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c3ee43655A
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T11%3A29%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-rsc&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lifecycle%20greenhouse%20gas%20footprint%20and%20minimum%20selling%20price%20of%20renewable%20diesel%20and%20jet%20fuel%20from%20fermentation%20and%20advanced%20fermentation%20production%20technologiesElectronic%20supplementary%20information%20(ESI)%20available.%20See%20DOI:%2010.1039/c3ee43655A&rft.au=Staples,%20Mark%20D&rft.date=2014-04-16&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1545&rft.epage=1554&rft.pages=1545-1554&rft.issn=1754-5692&rft.eissn=1754-5706&rft_id=info:doi/10.1039/c3ee43655a&rft_dat=%3Crsc%3Ec3ee43655a%3C/rsc%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true