Convergent patterns of long-distance nocturnal migration in noctuid moths and passerine birds
Vast numbers of insects and passerines achieve long-distance migrations between summer and winter locations by undertaking high-altitude nocturnal flights. Insects such as noctuid moths fly relatively slowly in relation to the surrounding air, with airspeeds approximately one-third of that of passer...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences Biological sciences, 2011-10, Vol.278 (1721), p.3074-3080 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3080 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1721 |
container_start_page | 3074 |
container_title | Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences |
container_volume | 278 |
creator | Alerstam, Thomas Chapman, Jason W Bäckman, Johan Smith, Alan D Karlsson, Håkan Nilsson, Cecilia Reynolds, Don R Klaassen, Raymond H. G Hill, Jane K |
description | Vast numbers of insects and passerines achieve long-distance migrations between summer and winter locations by undertaking high-altitude nocturnal flights. Insects such as noctuid moths fly relatively slowly in relation to the surrounding air, with airspeeds approximately one-third of that of passerines. Thus, it has been widely assumed that windborne insect migrants will have comparatively little control over their migration speed and direction compared with migrant birds. We used radar to carry out the first comparative analyses of the flight behaviour and migratory strategies of insects and birds under nearly equivalent natural conditions. Contrary to expectations, noctuid moths attained almost identical ground speeds and travel directions compared with passerines, despite their very different flight powers and sensory capacities. Moths achieved fast travel speeds in seasonally appropriate migration directions by exploiting favourably directed winds and selecting flight altitudes that coincided with the fastest air streams. By contrast, passerines were less selective of wind conditions, relying on self-powered flight in their seasonally preferred direction, often with little or no tailwind assistance. Our results demonstrate that noctuid moths and passerines show contrasting risk-prone and risk-averse migratory strategies in relation to wind. Comparative studies of the flight behaviours of distantly related taxa are critically important for understanding the evolution of animal migration strategies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1098/rspb.2011.0058 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_royal</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_royalsociety_journals_10_1098_rspb_2011_0058</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41315040</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41315040</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c718t-a703e2a354b8cd4a2996a93e70d94d6af6f16b0d1ee354e21ef8800427c4f0743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkkuP0zAQgCMEYpeFKzcgN04pfsb2BWm3sIBUiceye0MjJ3G67qZ2sNNC-fW4m1JRIeBgRcp8843HM1n2GKMJRkq-CLGvJgRhPEGIyzvZMWYCF0Rxdjc7RqokhWScHGUPYlwghBSX_H52RDCVChF2nH2Zerc2YW7ckPd6GExwMfdt3nk3LxobB-1qkztfD6vgdJcv7TzowXqXWzf-tk2-9MN1zLVrkiJGE6wzeWVDEx9m91rdRfNo9z3JLs9ff56-LWbv37ybns6KWmA5FFogaoimnFWybpgmSpVaUSNQo1hT6rZscVmhBhuTGEOwaaVEiBFRsxYJRk-y2eiN30y_qqAPdqnDBry20K36dKp0IBooqZZaSAGGlBRY0kDFKg60bFMpwrDiPOlejrrkWpqmTo8TdHdgPYw4ew1zvwaKuVR0K3i-EwT_dWXiAEsba9N12hm_iqAQY4ojIf9LSqkSKghJ5GQk6-BjDKbd3wcj2O4CbHcBtrsA211ICU9_72KP_xp-AugIBL9J0_G1NcMGFv520vHv2pt_ZX26-HC2JkJaLEjKkBSnXiVj8MP2O5WQYGNcGbhFDvV_VnsyVlvEwYd9Dwynp0YMpXgxxtOqmu_7uA43UAoqOFxJBmf84_ScX72CaeKfjXyrPeh5sBEuL1I5hhAuSRof_QnuqwcN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>889449722</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Convergent patterns of long-distance nocturnal migration in noctuid moths and passerine birds</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Alerstam, Thomas ; Chapman, Jason W ; Bäckman, Johan ; Smith, Alan D ; Karlsson, Håkan ; Nilsson, Cecilia ; Reynolds, Don R ; Klaassen, Raymond H. G ; Hill, Jane K</creator><creatorcontrib>Alerstam, Thomas ; Chapman, Jason W ; Bäckman, Johan ; Smith, Alan D ; Karlsson, Håkan ; Nilsson, Cecilia ; Reynolds, Don R ; Klaassen, Raymond H. G ; Hill, Jane K</creatorcontrib><description>Vast numbers of insects and passerines achieve long-distance migrations between summer and winter locations by undertaking high-altitude nocturnal flights. Insects such as noctuid moths fly relatively slowly in relation to the surrounding air, with airspeeds approximately one-third of that of passerines. Thus, it has been widely assumed that windborne insect migrants will have comparatively little control over their migration speed and direction compared with migrant birds. We used radar to carry out the first comparative analyses of the flight behaviour and migratory strategies of insects and birds under nearly equivalent natural conditions. Contrary to expectations, noctuid moths attained almost identical ground speeds and travel directions compared with passerines, despite their very different flight powers and sensory capacities. Moths achieved fast travel speeds in seasonally appropriate migration directions by exploiting favourably directed winds and selecting flight altitudes that coincided with the fastest air streams. By contrast, passerines were less selective of wind conditions, relying on self-powered flight in their seasonally preferred direction, often with little or no tailwind assistance. Our results demonstrate that noctuid moths and passerines show contrasting risk-prone and risk-averse migratory strategies in relation to wind. Comparative studies of the flight behaviours of distantly related taxa are critically important for understanding the evolution of animal migration strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8452</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2954</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2954</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2945</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.0058</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21389024</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Royal Society</publisher><subject>air ; air flow ; Air Movements ; Airspeed ; Altitude ; Animal Migration ; Animal migration behavior ; Animals ; Autographa gamma ; Autumn ; Aves ; Biologi ; Biological Sciences ; birds ; England ; evolution ; flight ; Flight Speed ; Flight, Animal ; Lepidoptera ; migratory behavior ; Moths ; Moths - physiology ; Natural Sciences ; Naturvetenskap ; Noctuidae ; Orientation ; Passeriformes ; Radar ; Seasonal Migration ; Seasons ; Silver ; Songbirds ; Songbirds - physiology ; summer ; travel ; Vehicular flight ; wind</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2011-10, Vol.278 (1721), p.3074-3080</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 The Royal Society</rights><rights>This journal is © 2011 The Royal Society</rights><rights>This journal is © 2011 The Royal Society 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c718t-a703e2a354b8cd4a2996a93e70d94d6af6f16b0d1ee354e21ef8800427c4f0743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c718t-a703e2a354b8cd4a2996a93e70d94d6af6f16b0d1ee354e21ef8800427c4f0743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41315040$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41315040$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,803,885,27924,27925,53791,53793,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21389024$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://lup.lub.lu.se/record/1884147$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alerstam, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Jason W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bäckman, Johan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Alan D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karlsson, Håkan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nilsson, Cecilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, Don R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klaassen, Raymond H. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Jane K</creatorcontrib><title>Convergent patterns of long-distance nocturnal migration in noctuid moths and passerine birds</title><title>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</title><addtitle>Proc. R. Soc. B</addtitle><addtitle>Proc. R. Soc. B</addtitle><description>Vast numbers of insects and passerines achieve long-distance migrations between summer and winter locations by undertaking high-altitude nocturnal flights. Insects such as noctuid moths fly relatively slowly in relation to the surrounding air, with airspeeds approximately one-third of that of passerines. Thus, it has been widely assumed that windborne insect migrants will have comparatively little control over their migration speed and direction compared with migrant birds. We used radar to carry out the first comparative analyses of the flight behaviour and migratory strategies of insects and birds under nearly equivalent natural conditions. Contrary to expectations, noctuid moths attained almost identical ground speeds and travel directions compared with passerines, despite their very different flight powers and sensory capacities. Moths achieved fast travel speeds in seasonally appropriate migration directions by exploiting favourably directed winds and selecting flight altitudes that coincided with the fastest air streams. By contrast, passerines were less selective of wind conditions, relying on self-powered flight in their seasonally preferred direction, often with little or no tailwind assistance. Our results demonstrate that noctuid moths and passerines show contrasting risk-prone and risk-averse migratory strategies in relation to wind. Comparative studies of the flight behaviours of distantly related taxa are critically important for understanding the evolution of animal migration strategies.</description><subject>air</subject><subject>air flow</subject><subject>Air Movements</subject><subject>Airspeed</subject><subject>Altitude</subject><subject>Animal Migration</subject><subject>Animal migration behavior</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Autographa gamma</subject><subject>Autumn</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Biologi</subject><subject>Biological Sciences</subject><subject>birds</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>evolution</subject><subject>flight</subject><subject>Flight Speed</subject><subject>Flight, Animal</subject><subject>Lepidoptera</subject><subject>migratory behavior</subject><subject>Moths</subject><subject>Moths - physiology</subject><subject>Natural Sciences</subject><subject>Naturvetenskap</subject><subject>Noctuidae</subject><subject>Orientation</subject><subject>Passeriformes</subject><subject>Radar</subject><subject>Seasonal Migration</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Silver</subject><subject>Songbirds</subject><subject>Songbirds - physiology</subject><subject>summer</subject><subject>travel</subject><subject>Vehicular flight</subject><subject>wind</subject><issn>0962-8452</issn><issn>1471-2954</issn><issn>1471-2954</issn><issn>1471-2945</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkkuP0zAQgCMEYpeFKzcgN04pfsb2BWm3sIBUiceye0MjJ3G67qZ2sNNC-fW4m1JRIeBgRcp8843HM1n2GKMJRkq-CLGvJgRhPEGIyzvZMWYCF0Rxdjc7RqokhWScHGUPYlwghBSX_H52RDCVChF2nH2Zerc2YW7ckPd6GExwMfdt3nk3LxobB-1qkztfD6vgdJcv7TzowXqXWzf-tk2-9MN1zLVrkiJGE6wzeWVDEx9m91rdRfNo9z3JLs9ff56-LWbv37ybns6KWmA5FFogaoimnFWybpgmSpVaUSNQo1hT6rZscVmhBhuTGEOwaaVEiBFRsxYJRk-y2eiN30y_qqAPdqnDBry20K36dKp0IBooqZZaSAGGlBRY0kDFKg60bFMpwrDiPOlejrrkWpqmTo8TdHdgPYw4ew1zvwaKuVR0K3i-EwT_dWXiAEsba9N12hm_iqAQY4ojIf9LSqkSKghJ5GQk6-BjDKbd3wcj2O4CbHcBtrsA211ICU9_72KP_xp-AugIBL9J0_G1NcMGFv520vHv2pt_ZX26-HC2JkJaLEjKkBSnXiVj8MP2O5WQYGNcGbhFDvV_VnsyVlvEwYd9Dwynp0YMpXgxxtOqmu_7uA43UAoqOFxJBmf84_ScX72CaeKfjXyrPeh5sBEuL1I5hhAuSRof_QnuqwcN</recordid><startdate>20111022</startdate><enddate>20111022</enddate><creator>Alerstam, Thomas</creator><creator>Chapman, Jason W</creator><creator>Bäckman, Johan</creator><creator>Smith, Alan D</creator><creator>Karlsson, Håkan</creator><creator>Nilsson, Cecilia</creator><creator>Reynolds, Don R</creator><creator>Klaassen, Raymond H. G</creator><creator>Hill, Jane K</creator><general>Royal Society</general><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D95</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111022</creationdate><title>Convergent patterns of long-distance nocturnal migration in noctuid moths and passerine birds</title><author>Alerstam, Thomas ; Chapman, Jason W ; Bäckman, Johan ; Smith, Alan D ; Karlsson, Håkan ; Nilsson, Cecilia ; Reynolds, Don R ; Klaassen, Raymond H. G ; Hill, Jane K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c718t-a703e2a354b8cd4a2996a93e70d94d6af6f16b0d1ee354e21ef8800427c4f0743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>air</topic><topic>air flow</topic><topic>Air Movements</topic><topic>Airspeed</topic><topic>Altitude</topic><topic>Animal Migration</topic><topic>Animal migration behavior</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Autographa gamma</topic><topic>Autumn</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Biologi</topic><topic>Biological Sciences</topic><topic>birds</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>evolution</topic><topic>flight</topic><topic>Flight Speed</topic><topic>Flight, Animal</topic><topic>Lepidoptera</topic><topic>migratory behavior</topic><topic>Moths</topic><topic>Moths - physiology</topic><topic>Natural Sciences</topic><topic>Naturvetenskap</topic><topic>Noctuidae</topic><topic>Orientation</topic><topic>Passeriformes</topic><topic>Radar</topic><topic>Seasonal Migration</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Silver</topic><topic>Songbirds</topic><topic>Songbirds - physiology</topic><topic>summer</topic><topic>travel</topic><topic>Vehicular flight</topic><topic>wind</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alerstam, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Jason W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bäckman, Johan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Alan D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karlsson, Håkan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nilsson, Cecilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, Don R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klaassen, Raymond H. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Jane K</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Lunds universitet</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alerstam, Thomas</au><au>Chapman, Jason W</au><au>Bäckman, Johan</au><au>Smith, Alan D</au><au>Karlsson, Håkan</au><au>Nilsson, Cecilia</au><au>Reynolds, Don R</au><au>Klaassen, Raymond H. G</au><au>Hill, Jane K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Convergent patterns of long-distance nocturnal migration in noctuid moths and passerine birds</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences</jtitle><stitle>Proc. R. Soc. B</stitle><addtitle>Proc. R. Soc. B</addtitle><date>2011-10-22</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>278</volume><issue>1721</issue><spage>3074</spage><epage>3080</epage><pages>3074-3080</pages><issn>0962-8452</issn><issn>1471-2954</issn><eissn>1471-2954</eissn><eissn>1471-2945</eissn><abstract>Vast numbers of insects and passerines achieve long-distance migrations between summer and winter locations by undertaking high-altitude nocturnal flights. Insects such as noctuid moths fly relatively slowly in relation to the surrounding air, with airspeeds approximately one-third of that of passerines. Thus, it has been widely assumed that windborne insect migrants will have comparatively little control over their migration speed and direction compared with migrant birds. We used radar to carry out the first comparative analyses of the flight behaviour and migratory strategies of insects and birds under nearly equivalent natural conditions. Contrary to expectations, noctuid moths attained almost identical ground speeds and travel directions compared with passerines, despite their very different flight powers and sensory capacities. Moths achieved fast travel speeds in seasonally appropriate migration directions by exploiting favourably directed winds and selecting flight altitudes that coincided with the fastest air streams. By contrast, passerines were less selective of wind conditions, relying on self-powered flight in their seasonally preferred direction, often with little or no tailwind assistance. Our results demonstrate that noctuid moths and passerines show contrasting risk-prone and risk-averse migratory strategies in relation to wind. Comparative studies of the flight behaviours of distantly related taxa are critically important for understanding the evolution of animal migration strategies.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Royal Society</pub><pmid>21389024</pmid><doi>10.1098/rspb.2011.0058</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0962-8452 |
ispartof | Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences, 2011-10, Vol.278 (1721), p.3074-3080 |
issn | 0962-8452 1471-2954 1471-2954 1471-2945 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_royalsociety_journals_10_1098_rspb_2011_0058 |
source | MEDLINE; PubMed Central; JSTOR |
subjects | air air flow Air Movements Airspeed Altitude Animal Migration Animal migration behavior Animals Autographa gamma Autumn Aves Biologi Biological Sciences birds England evolution flight Flight Speed Flight, Animal Lepidoptera migratory behavior Moths Moths - physiology Natural Sciences Naturvetenskap Noctuidae Orientation Passeriformes Radar Seasonal Migration Seasons Silver Songbirds Songbirds - physiology summer travel Vehicular flight wind |
title | Convergent patterns of long-distance nocturnal migration in noctuid moths and passerine birds |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A02%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_royal&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Convergent%20patterns%20of%20long-distance%20nocturnal%20migration%20in%20noctuid%20moths%20and%20passerine%20birds&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society.%20B,%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=Alerstam,%20Thomas&rft.date=2011-10-22&rft.volume=278&rft.issue=1721&rft.spage=3074&rft.epage=3080&rft.pages=3074-3080&rft.issn=0962-8452&rft.eissn=1471-2954&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rspb.2011.0058&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_royal%3E41315040%3C/jstor_royal%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=889449722&rft_id=info:pmid/21389024&rft_jstor_id=41315040&rfr_iscdi=true |