Bare v Independent Broad-Based Anti-Corruption Commission: One step forward, one step back: The Victorian Charter in Bare v Independent Broad-Based Anti-corruption Commission

Bare v Independent Broad-Based Anti-Corruption Commission is a landmark in the history of Victoria's Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities. The Court of Appeal's recent decision has significant implications for future litigation under the Charter. First, while not binding on this po...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Melbourne University law review 2016-01, Vol.40 (1), p.371-400
1. Verfasser: Jack Maxwell
Format: Artikel
Sprache:
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 400
container_issue 1
container_start_page 371
container_title Melbourne University law review
container_volume 40
creator Jack Maxwell
description Bare v Independent Broad-Based Anti-Corruption Commission is a landmark in the history of Victoria's Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities. The Court of Appeal's recent decision has significant implications for future litigation under the Charter. First, while not binding on this point, Bare considered in detail whether a breach of s 38(1) of the Charter by a public authority constitutes a jurisdictional error. Second, the Court adopted a cautious approach to the use of international law to construe the scope of Charter rights. This departs from previous Charter case law. Third, Bare demonstrates the Charter's power to have a normative influence on the behaviour of public authorities, by requiring them to give proper consideration to human rights. Finally, Bare illustrates how the Administrative Law Act 1978 (Vic) augments the Charter's power as a human rights instrument.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>rmit</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_rmit_collectionsjats_10_3316_informit_397216125507904</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/informit.397216125507904</informt_id><sourcerecordid>10.3316/informit.397216125507904</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-rmit_collectionsjats_10_3316_informit_3972161255079043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqljk1Ow0AMRmcBEuXnDj4AkWYyTdNUbEgEKis2FdvITFx1SjIT2QPcijOSSu2uCyQ2tvXpe3q-UDOt8yJbVnZ5pa5F9lobXc7LmfqpkQm-4CV0NNI0QoKaI3ZZjUIdPIbksyYyf47JxwBNHAYvMp0reA0EkmiEbeRv5O4e4il5R_exgs2O4M27FNnjhO6QEzH4AH-RunPSW3W5xV7o7rhv1MPz06ZZZzz41LrY9-QOiOwxSWt0a61ZtD5MHx4KtipzszB5Ueiy0nP7T_wXRxtvvw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bare v Independent Broad-Based Anti-Corruption Commission: One step forward, one step back: The Victorian Charter in Bare v Independent Broad-Based Anti-corruption Commission</title><source>Electronic Journals Library</source><source>HeinOnline</source><source>World Web Journals</source><creator>Jack Maxwell</creator><creatorcontrib>Jack Maxwell</creatorcontrib><description>Bare v Independent Broad-Based Anti-Corruption Commission is a landmark in the history of Victoria's Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities. The Court of Appeal's recent decision has significant implications for future litigation under the Charter. First, while not binding on this point, Bare considered in detail whether a breach of s 38(1) of the Charter by a public authority constitutes a jurisdictional error. Second, the Court adopted a cautious approach to the use of international law to construe the scope of Charter rights. This departs from previous Charter case law. Third, Bare demonstrates the Charter's power to have a normative influence on the behaviour of public authorities, by requiring them to give proper consideration to human rights. Finally, Bare illustrates how the Administrative Law Act 1978 (Vic) augments the Charter's power as a human rights instrument.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-8938</identifier><subject>Charters ; Corruption investigation ; Human rights ; Social aspects</subject><ispartof>Melbourne University law review, 2016-01, Vol.40 (1), p.371-400</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jack Maxwell</creatorcontrib><title>Bare v Independent Broad-Based Anti-Corruption Commission: One step forward, one step back: The Victorian Charter in Bare v Independent Broad-Based Anti-corruption Commission</title><title>Melbourne University law review</title><description>Bare v Independent Broad-Based Anti-Corruption Commission is a landmark in the history of Victoria's Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities. The Court of Appeal's recent decision has significant implications for future litigation under the Charter. First, while not binding on this point, Bare considered in detail whether a breach of s 38(1) of the Charter by a public authority constitutes a jurisdictional error. Second, the Court adopted a cautious approach to the use of international law to construe the scope of Charter rights. This departs from previous Charter case law. Third, Bare demonstrates the Charter's power to have a normative influence on the behaviour of public authorities, by requiring them to give proper consideration to human rights. Finally, Bare illustrates how the Administrative Law Act 1978 (Vic) augments the Charter's power as a human rights instrument.</description><subject>Charters</subject><subject>Corruption investigation</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><issn>0025-8938</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqljk1Ow0AMRmcBEuXnDj4AkWYyTdNUbEgEKis2FdvITFx1SjIT2QPcijOSSu2uCyQ2tvXpe3q-UDOt8yJbVnZ5pa5F9lobXc7LmfqpkQm-4CV0NNI0QoKaI3ZZjUIdPIbksyYyf47JxwBNHAYvMp0reA0EkmiEbeRv5O4e4il5R_exgs2O4M27FNnjhO6QEzH4AH-RunPSW3W5xV7o7rhv1MPz06ZZZzz41LrY9-QOiOwxSWt0a61ZtD5MHx4KtipzszB5Ueiy0nP7T_wXRxtvvw</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Jack Maxwell</creator><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Bare v Independent Broad-Based Anti-Corruption Commission: One step forward, one step back: The Victorian Charter in Bare v Independent Broad-Based Anti-corruption Commission</title><author>Jack Maxwell</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-rmit_collectionsjats_10_3316_informit_3972161255079043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Charters</topic><topic>Corruption investigation</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jack Maxwell</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Melbourne University law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jack Maxwell</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bare v Independent Broad-Based Anti-Corruption Commission: One step forward, one step back: The Victorian Charter in Bare v Independent Broad-Based Anti-corruption Commission</atitle><jtitle>Melbourne University law review</jtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>371</spage><epage>400</epage><pages>371-400</pages><issn>0025-8938</issn><abstract>Bare v Independent Broad-Based Anti-Corruption Commission is a landmark in the history of Victoria's Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities. The Court of Appeal's recent decision has significant implications for future litigation under the Charter. First, while not binding on this point, Bare considered in detail whether a breach of s 38(1) of the Charter by a public authority constitutes a jurisdictional error. Second, the Court adopted a cautious approach to the use of international law to construe the scope of Charter rights. This departs from previous Charter case law. Third, Bare demonstrates the Charter's power to have a normative influence on the behaviour of public authorities, by requiring them to give proper consideration to human rights. Finally, Bare illustrates how the Administrative Law Act 1978 (Vic) augments the Charter's power as a human rights instrument.</abstract><tpages>371-400</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-8938
ispartof Melbourne University law review, 2016-01, Vol.40 (1), p.371-400
issn 0025-8938
language
recordid cdi_rmit_collectionsjats_10_3316_informit_397216125507904
source Electronic Journals Library; HeinOnline; World Web Journals
subjects Charters
Corruption investigation
Human rights
Social aspects
title Bare v Independent Broad-Based Anti-Corruption Commission: One step forward, one step back: The Victorian Charter in Bare v Independent Broad-Based Anti-corruption Commission
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T13%3A04%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-rmit&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bare%20v%20Independent%20Broad-Based%20Anti-Corruption%20Commission:%20One%20step%20forward,%20one%20step%20back:%20The%20Victorian%20Charter%20in%20Bare%20v%20Independent%20Broad-Based%20Anti-corruption%20Commission&rft.jtitle=Melbourne%20University%20law%20review&rft.au=Jack%20Maxwell&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=371&rft.epage=400&rft.pages=371-400&rft.issn=0025-8938&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Crmit%3E10.3316/informit.397216125507904%3C/rmit%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/informit.397216125507904&rfr_iscdi=true