Justification, not recognition

The debate over the constitutional recognition of Indigenous peoples in Australia should be seen as a deeply political one. That might appear to be a controversial claim. After all, there has been much talk about minimising the scope for disagreement between ‘constitutional conservatives’ and suppor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Indigenous law bulletin 2016-05, Vol.8 (24), p.12-18
1. Verfasser:	Duncan Ivison
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:
Schlagworte:	Australian states Constitutions Government relations Indigenous peoples Law and legislation Referendum Social conditions
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	18
container_issue	24
container_start_page	12
container_title	Indigenous law bulletin
container_volume	8
creator	Duncan Ivison
description	The debate over the constitutional recognition of Indigenous peoples in Australia should be seen as a deeply political one. That might appear to be a controversial claim. After all, there has been much talk about minimising the scope for disagreement between ‘constitutional conservatives’ and supporters of more expansive constitutional recognition. And there is concern to ensure that any potential referendum enjoys the maximum conditions and opportunity for success.
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>rmit</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_rmit_collectionsjats_10_3316_ielapa_164136288039081</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/ielapa.164136288039081</informt_id><sourcerecordid>10.3316/ielapa.164136288039081</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-r3171-15829686b729dfb841aa7f63c1c6bdded656dc36894dd0c62d301e566fc71bff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqljs1KAzEUhbNQsLa-gvQBHMidJHcy7qSobS10o-uQyc-YMk7KJL6_rVooiIi6OnDOPd89J2QErJSF4JU4I-cpbSiFWlA-IpfL15SDD0bnEPuraR_zdHAmtn3YGxNy6nWX3MWnjsnT3e3jbF6s1veL2c2qGBhUUICQZY0Sm6qsrW8kB60rj8yAwcZaZ1GgNQxlza2lBkvLKDiB6E0FjfdsTK4_uMNLyMrErnNm_z9tdE4KqGIMUAXX6a1WgBwYllJSVlMJu_L8qLy78FklpwfzrELv47sbh1bZGH5GLX-POgRfYYtjWBvS9h_DHv7A-m7ZG8PhoxU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Justification, not recognition</title><source>Australasian Legal Information Institute (AustLII) Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Duncan Ivison</creator><creatorcontrib>Duncan Ivison</creatorcontrib><description>The debate over the constitutional recognition of Indigenous peoples in Australia should be seen as a deeply political one. That might appear to be a controversial claim. After all, there has been much talk about minimising the scope for disagreement between ‘constitutional conservatives’ and supporters of more expansive constitutional recognition. And there is concern to ensure that any potential referendum enjoys the maximum conditions and opportunity for success.</description><description>The debate over the constitutional recognition of Indigenous peoples in Australia should be seen as a deeply political one. That might appear to be a controversial claim. After all, there has been much talk about minimising the scope for disagreement between 'constitutional conservatives' and supporters of more expansive constitutional recognition. And there is concern to ensure that any potential referendum enjoys the maximum conditions and opportunity for success.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1328-5475</identifier><publisher>Sydney: University of New South Wales, Indigenous Law Centre</publisher><subject>Australian states ; Constitutions ; Government relations ; Indigenous peoples ; Law and legislation ; Referendum ; Social conditions</subject><ispartof>Indigenous law bulletin, 2016-05, Vol.8 (24), p.12-18</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duncan Ivison</creatorcontrib><title>Justification, not recognition</title><title>Indigenous law bulletin</title><description>The debate over the constitutional recognition of Indigenous peoples in Australia should be seen as a deeply political one. That might appear to be a controversial claim. After all, there has been much talk about minimising the scope for disagreement between ‘constitutional conservatives’ and supporters of more expansive constitutional recognition. And there is concern to ensure that any potential referendum enjoys the maximum conditions and opportunity for success.</description><description>The debate over the constitutional recognition of Indigenous peoples in Australia should be seen as a deeply political one. That might appear to be a controversial claim. After all, there has been much talk about minimising the scope for disagreement between 'constitutional conservatives' and supporters of more expansive constitutional recognition. And there is concern to ensure that any potential referendum enjoys the maximum conditions and opportunity for success.</description><subject>Australian states</subject><subject>Constitutions</subject><subject>Government relations</subject><subject>Indigenous peoples</subject><subject>Law and legislation</subject><subject>Referendum</subject><subject>Social conditions</subject><issn>1328-5475</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqljs1KAzEUhbNQsLa-gvQBHMidJHcy7qSobS10o-uQyc-YMk7KJL6_rVooiIi6OnDOPd89J2QErJSF4JU4I-cpbSiFWlA-IpfL15SDD0bnEPuraR_zdHAmtn3YGxNy6nWX3MWnjsnT3e3jbF6s1veL2c2qGBhUUICQZY0Sm6qsrW8kB60rj8yAwcZaZ1GgNQxlza2lBkvLKDiB6E0FjfdsTK4_uMNLyMrErnNm_z9tdE4KqGIMUAXX6a1WgBwYllJSVlMJu_L8qLy78FklpwfzrELv47sbh1bZGH5GLX-POgRfYYtjWBvS9h_DHv7A-m7ZG8PhoxU</recordid><startdate>20160501</startdate><enddate>20160501</enddate><creator>Duncan Ivison</creator><general>University of New South Wales, Indigenous Law Centre</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20160501</creationdate><title>Justification, not recognition</title><author>Duncan Ivison</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-r3171-15829686b729dfb841aa7f63c1c6bdded656dc36894dd0c62d301e566fc71bff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Australian states</topic><topic>Constitutions</topic><topic>Government relations</topic><topic>Indigenous peoples</topic><topic>Law and legislation</topic><topic>Referendum</topic><topic>Social conditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duncan Ivison</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Indigenous law bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duncan Ivison</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Justification, not recognition</atitle><jtitle>Indigenous law bulletin</jtitle><date>2016-05-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>12</spage><epage>18</epage><pages>12-18</pages><issn>1328-5475</issn><abstract>The debate over the constitutional recognition of Indigenous peoples in Australia should be seen as a deeply political one. That might appear to be a controversial claim. After all, there has been much talk about minimising the scope for disagreement between ‘constitutional conservatives’ and supporters of more expansive constitutional recognition. And there is concern to ensure that any potential referendum enjoys the maximum conditions and opportunity for success.</abstract><abstract>The debate over the constitutional recognition of Indigenous peoples in Australia should be seen as a deeply political one. That might appear to be a controversial claim. After all, there has been much talk about minimising the scope for disagreement between 'constitutional conservatives' and supporters of more expansive constitutional recognition. And there is concern to ensure that any potential referendum enjoys the maximum conditions and opportunity for success.</abstract><cop>Sydney</cop><pub>University of New South Wales, Indigenous Law Centre</pub><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 1328-5475
ispartof	Indigenous law bulletin, 2016-05, Vol.8 (24), p.12-18
issn	1328-5475
language
recordid	cdi_rmit_collectionsjats_10_3316_ielapa_164136288039081
source	Australasian Legal Information Institute (AustLII) Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects	Australian states Constitutions Government relations Indigenous peoples Law and legislation Referendum Social conditions
title	Justification, not recognition
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T10%3A23%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-rmit&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Justification,%20not%20recognition&rft.jtitle=Indigenous%20law%20bulletin&rft.au=Duncan%20Ivison&rft.date=2016-05-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=12&rft.epage=18&rft.pages=12-18&rft.issn=1328-5475&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Crmit%3E10.3316/ielapa.164136288039081%3C/rmit%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/ielapa.164136288039081&rfr_iscdi=true