Validation of the FRESH Austin food frequency questionnaire using multiple 24-h dietary recalls
The purpose of the current study was to examine the validity of an FFQ utilised in the Food Retail: Evaluating Strategies for a Healthy Austin (FRESH Austin) study, designed to evaluate changes in the consumption of fruits and vegetables (FV) in diverse low-income communities in Austin, TX. The FRES...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Public health nutrition 2022-06, Vol.25 (6), p.1586-1594 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1594 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1586 |
container_title | Public health nutrition |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Jovanovic, Christine ES Whitefield, Jacob Hoelscher, Deanna M Chen, Boajiang Ranjit, Nalini van den Berg, Alexandra E |
description | The purpose of the current study was to examine the validity of an FFQ utilised in the Food Retail: Evaluating Strategies for a Healthy Austin (FRESH Austin) study, designed to evaluate changes in the consumption of fruits and vegetables (FV) in diverse low-income communities in Austin, TX.
The FRESH Austin FFQ was validated against three 24-h dietary recalls (24hDR). All dietary assessments were administered (in-person or by telephone) by trained investigators.
Recruitment was conducted at sites within the geographic areas targeted in the FRESH Austin recruitment. People at a community health clinic, a local health centre and a YMCA within the intervention area were approached by trained and certified data collectors, and invited to participate.
Among fifty-six participants, 83 % were female, 46 % were non-White, 24 % had income < $25 K/year and 30 % spoke only/mostly Spanish at home.
The FFQ and average of three 24hDR produce similar estimates of average total servings/d across FV (6·68 and 6·40 servings/d, respectively). Correlations produced measures from 0·01 for 'Potatoes' and 0·59 for 'Other Vegetables'. Mean absolute percentage errors values were small for all FV, suggesting the variance of the error estimates was also small. Bland-Altman plots indicate acceptable levels of agreement between the two methods.
These outcomes indicate that the FRESH FFQ is a valid instrument for assessing FV consumption. The validation of the FRESH Austin FFQ provides important insights for evaluating community-based efforts to increase FV consumption in diverse populations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1368980021002214 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9991826</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1368980021002214</cupid><sourcerecordid>2664706671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-f655d56ca57ff67fd866fa7810c3dbc35358f4902349f5107ae16571f0331a4c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1rFTEQhoNYbK3-AG8k4I03q5l87t4IpbRWKAht9TbkZJNzUrLJMdkV-u_Nscf6RS_CBN5n3pnhRegVkHdAQL2_Bib7oSeEQnsU-BN0BFyJjiqqnrZ_k7udfoie13pLCBFKqWfokHHC5MD4EdJfTQyjmUNOOHs8bxw-vzq7vsAnS51Dwj7nEfvivi0u2TvcSt2xyYTi8FJDWuNpiXPYRocp7zZ4DG425Q4XZ02M9QU68CZW93Jfj9GX87Ob04vu8vPHT6cnl53lBObOSyFGIa0Rynup_NhL6Y3qgVg2riwTTPSeD4QyPngBRBkHUijwhDEw3LJj9OHed7usJjdal-Ziot6WMLVtdDZB_62ksNHr_F0PwwA9lc3g7d6g5J9X6ilU62I0yeWlaioYpZz3hDf0zT_obV5KaudpKiVXREoFjYJ7ypZca3H-YRkgehef_i--1vP6zyseOn7l1QC2NzXTqoRx7X7Pftz2B5PapEI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2664706671</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of the FRESH Austin food frequency questionnaire using multiple 24-h dietary recalls</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cambridge Journals Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Jovanovic, Christine ES ; Whitefield, Jacob ; Hoelscher, Deanna M ; Chen, Boajiang ; Ranjit, Nalini ; van den Berg, Alexandra E</creator><creatorcontrib>Jovanovic, Christine ES ; Whitefield, Jacob ; Hoelscher, Deanna M ; Chen, Boajiang ; Ranjit, Nalini ; van den Berg, Alexandra E</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of the current study was to examine the validity of an FFQ utilised in the Food Retail: Evaluating Strategies for a Healthy Austin (FRESH Austin) study, designed to evaluate changes in the consumption of fruits and vegetables (FV) in diverse low-income communities in Austin, TX.
The FRESH Austin FFQ was validated against three 24-h dietary recalls (24hDR). All dietary assessments were administered (in-person or by telephone) by trained investigators.
Recruitment was conducted at sites within the geographic areas targeted in the FRESH Austin recruitment. People at a community health clinic, a local health centre and a YMCA within the intervention area were approached by trained and certified data collectors, and invited to participate.
Among fifty-six participants, 83 % were female, 46 % were non-White, 24 % had income < $25 K/year and 30 % spoke only/mostly Spanish at home.
The FFQ and average of three 24hDR produce similar estimates of average total servings/d across FV (6·68 and 6·40 servings/d, respectively). Correlations produced measures from 0·01 for 'Potatoes' and 0·59 for 'Other Vegetables'. Mean absolute percentage errors values were small for all FV, suggesting the variance of the error estimates was also small. Bland-Altman plots indicate acceptable levels of agreement between the two methods.
These outcomes indicate that the FRESH FFQ is a valid instrument for assessing FV consumption. The validation of the FRESH Austin FFQ provides important insights for evaluating community-based efforts to increase FV consumption in diverse populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1368-9800</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-2727</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1368980021002214</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34036934</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Data collection ; Diet ; Diet Records ; Diet Surveys ; Estimates ; Evaluation ; Female ; Food ; Fruits ; Health care ; Humans ; Income ; Low income areas ; Low income groups ; Male ; Mental Recall ; Nutrition research ; Nutritional Epidemiology ; Public health ; Questionnaires ; Recruitment ; Reproducibility of Results ; Research Paper ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Validation studies ; Validity ; Vegetables</subject><ispartof>Public health nutrition, 2022-06, Vol.25 (6), p.1586-1594</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society</rights><rights>The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at: https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/reusing-open-access-and-sage-choice-content</rights><rights>The Authors 2021 2021 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-f655d56ca57ff67fd866fa7810c3dbc35358f4902349f5107ae16571f0331a4c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-f655d56ca57ff67fd866fa7810c3dbc35358f4902349f5107ae16571f0331a4c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2366-7487 ; 0000-0002-1771-9084</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9991826/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1368980021002214/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,23299,27905,27906,53772,53774,55785</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34036934$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jovanovic, Christine ES</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitefield, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoelscher, Deanna M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Boajiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ranjit, Nalini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van den Berg, Alexandra E</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of the FRESH Austin food frequency questionnaire using multiple 24-h dietary recalls</title><title>Public health nutrition</title><addtitle>Public Health Nutr</addtitle><description>The purpose of the current study was to examine the validity of an FFQ utilised in the Food Retail: Evaluating Strategies for a Healthy Austin (FRESH Austin) study, designed to evaluate changes in the consumption of fruits and vegetables (FV) in diverse low-income communities in Austin, TX.
The FRESH Austin FFQ was validated against three 24-h dietary recalls (24hDR). All dietary assessments were administered (in-person or by telephone) by trained investigators.
Recruitment was conducted at sites within the geographic areas targeted in the FRESH Austin recruitment. People at a community health clinic, a local health centre and a YMCA within the intervention area were approached by trained and certified data collectors, and invited to participate.
Among fifty-six participants, 83 % were female, 46 % were non-White, 24 % had income < $25 K/year and 30 % spoke only/mostly Spanish at home.
The FFQ and average of three 24hDR produce similar estimates of average total servings/d across FV (6·68 and 6·40 servings/d, respectively). Correlations produced measures from 0·01 for 'Potatoes' and 0·59 for 'Other Vegetables'. Mean absolute percentage errors values were small for all FV, suggesting the variance of the error estimates was also small. Bland-Altman plots indicate acceptable levels of agreement between the two methods.
These outcomes indicate that the FRESH FFQ is a valid instrument for assessing FV consumption. The validation of the FRESH Austin FFQ provides important insights for evaluating community-based efforts to increase FV consumption in diverse populations.</description><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Diet Records</subject><subject>Diet Surveys</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Low income areas</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Nutrition research</subject><subject>Nutritional Epidemiology</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Recruitment</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Vegetables</subject><issn>1368-9800</issn><issn>1475-2727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>IKXGN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV1rFTEQhoNYbK3-AG8k4I03q5l87t4IpbRWKAht9TbkZJNzUrLJMdkV-u_Nscf6RS_CBN5n3pnhRegVkHdAQL2_Bib7oSeEQnsU-BN0BFyJjiqqnrZ_k7udfoie13pLCBFKqWfokHHC5MD4EdJfTQyjmUNOOHs8bxw-vzq7vsAnS51Dwj7nEfvivi0u2TvcSt2xyYTi8FJDWuNpiXPYRocp7zZ4DG425Q4XZ02M9QU68CZW93Jfj9GX87Ob04vu8vPHT6cnl53lBObOSyFGIa0Rynup_NhL6Y3qgVg2riwTTPSeD4QyPngBRBkHUijwhDEw3LJj9OHed7usJjdal-Ziot6WMLVtdDZB_62ksNHr_F0PwwA9lc3g7d6g5J9X6ilU62I0yeWlaioYpZz3hDf0zT_obV5KaudpKiVXREoFjYJ7ypZca3H-YRkgehef_i--1vP6zyseOn7l1QC2NzXTqoRx7X7Pftz2B5PapEI</recordid><startdate>202206</startdate><enddate>202206</enddate><creator>Jovanovic, Christine ES</creator><creator>Whitefield, Jacob</creator><creator>Hoelscher, Deanna M</creator><creator>Chen, Boajiang</creator><creator>Ranjit, Nalini</creator><creator>van den Berg, Alexandra E</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IKXGN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2366-7487</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1771-9084</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202206</creationdate><title>Validation of the FRESH Austin food frequency questionnaire using multiple 24-h dietary recalls</title><author>Jovanovic, Christine ES ; Whitefield, Jacob ; Hoelscher, Deanna M ; Chen, Boajiang ; Ranjit, Nalini ; van den Berg, Alexandra E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-f655d56ca57ff67fd866fa7810c3dbc35358f4902349f5107ae16571f0331a4c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Diet Records</topic><topic>Diet Surveys</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Low income areas</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Nutrition research</topic><topic>Nutritional Epidemiology</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Recruitment</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Vegetables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jovanovic, Christine ES</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitefield, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoelscher, Deanna M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Boajiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ranjit, Nalini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van den Berg, Alexandra E</creatorcontrib><collection>Cambridge Journals Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Public health nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jovanovic, Christine ES</au><au>Whitefield, Jacob</au><au>Hoelscher, Deanna M</au><au>Chen, Boajiang</au><au>Ranjit, Nalini</au><au>van den Berg, Alexandra E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of the FRESH Austin food frequency questionnaire using multiple 24-h dietary recalls</atitle><jtitle>Public health nutrition</jtitle><addtitle>Public Health Nutr</addtitle><date>2022-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1586</spage><epage>1594</epage><pages>1586-1594</pages><issn>1368-9800</issn><eissn>1475-2727</eissn><abstract>The purpose of the current study was to examine the validity of an FFQ utilised in the Food Retail: Evaluating Strategies for a Healthy Austin (FRESH Austin) study, designed to evaluate changes in the consumption of fruits and vegetables (FV) in diverse low-income communities in Austin, TX.
The FRESH Austin FFQ was validated against three 24-h dietary recalls (24hDR). All dietary assessments were administered (in-person or by telephone) by trained investigators.
Recruitment was conducted at sites within the geographic areas targeted in the FRESH Austin recruitment. People at a community health clinic, a local health centre and a YMCA within the intervention area were approached by trained and certified data collectors, and invited to participate.
Among fifty-six participants, 83 % were female, 46 % were non-White, 24 % had income < $25 K/year and 30 % spoke only/mostly Spanish at home.
The FFQ and average of three 24hDR produce similar estimates of average total servings/d across FV (6·68 and 6·40 servings/d, respectively). Correlations produced measures from 0·01 for 'Potatoes' and 0·59 for 'Other Vegetables'. Mean absolute percentage errors values were small for all FV, suggesting the variance of the error estimates was also small. Bland-Altman plots indicate acceptable levels of agreement between the two methods.
These outcomes indicate that the FRESH FFQ is a valid instrument for assessing FV consumption. The validation of the FRESH Austin FFQ provides important insights for evaluating community-based efforts to increase FV consumption in diverse populations.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>34036934</pmid><doi>10.1017/S1368980021002214</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2366-7487</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1771-9084</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1368-9800 |
ispartof | Public health nutrition, 2022-06, Vol.25 (6), p.1586-1594 |
issn | 1368-9800 1475-2727 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9991826 |
source | MEDLINE; Cambridge Journals Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Data collection Diet Diet Records Diet Surveys Estimates Evaluation Female Food Fruits Health care Humans Income Low income areas Low income groups Male Mental Recall Nutrition research Nutritional Epidemiology Public health Questionnaires Recruitment Reproducibility of Results Research Paper Surveys and Questionnaires Validation studies Validity Vegetables |
title | Validation of the FRESH Austin food frequency questionnaire using multiple 24-h dietary recalls |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T05%3A38%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20the%20FRESH%20Austin%20food%20frequency%20questionnaire%20using%20multiple%2024-h%20dietary%20recalls&rft.jtitle=Public%20health%20nutrition&rft.au=Jovanovic,%20Christine%20ES&rft.date=2022-06&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1586&rft.epage=1594&rft.pages=1586-1594&rft.issn=1368-9800&rft.eissn=1475-2727&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1368980021002214&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2664706671%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2664706671&rft_id=info:pmid/34036934&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1368980021002214&rfr_iscdi=true |