Assessing the neonatal health policy landscape in low- and middle-income countries: Findings from the 2018 WHO SRMNCAH policy survey
We aimed to describe the availability of newborn health policies across the continuum of care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and to assess the relationship between the availability of newborn health policies and their achievement of global Sustainable Development Goal and Every Newborn...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of global health 2023-03, Vol.13, p.04024-04024, Article 04024 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 04024 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 04024 |
container_title | Journal of global health |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Mary, Meighan Maliqi, Blerta Stierman, Elizabeth K Dohlsten, Martin Aj Moran, Allisyn C Katwan, Elizabeth Creanga, Andreea A |
description | We aimed to describe the availability of newborn health policies across the continuum of care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and to assess the relationship between the availability of newborn health policies and their achievement of global Sustainable Development Goal and Every Newborn Action Plan (ENAP) neonatal mortality and stillbirth rate targets in 2019.
We used data from World Health Organization's 2018-2019 sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health (SRMNCAH) Policy Survey and extracted key newborn health service delivery and cross-cutting health systems policies that align with the WHO health system building blocks. We constructed composite measures to represent packages of newborn health policies for five components along the continuum of care: antenatal care (ANC), childbirth, postnatal care (PNC), essential newborn care (ENC), and management of small and sick newborns (SSNB). We used descriptive analyses to present the differences in the availability of newborn health service delivery policies by World Bank income group in 113 LMICs. We employed logistic regression analysis to assess the relationship between the availability of each composite newborn health policy package and achievement of global neonatal mortality and stillbirth rate targets by 2019.
In 2018, most LMICs had existing policies regarding newborn health across the continuum of care. However, policy specifications varied widely. While the availability of the ANC, childbirth, PNC, and ENC policy packages was not associated with having achieved global NMR targets by 2019, LMICs with existing policy packages on the management of SSNB were 4.4 times more likely to have reached the global NMR target (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 4.40; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.09-17.79) after controlling for income group and supporting health systems policies.
Given the current trajectory of neonatal mortality in LMICs, there is a dire need for supportive health systems and policy environments for newborn health across the continuum of care. Adoption and implementation of evidence-informed newborn health policies will be a crucial step in putting LMICs on track to meet global newborn and stillbirth targets by 2030. |
doi_str_mv | 10.7189/jogh.13.04024 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9983710</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2783494140</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-bb094d93811fbc5cf144dc7d61f47c2ca2d32f7a6027e9dfc741ae3c8748772a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1rHCEchqW0NCHNsdci9NLLbPzaUXsoLEvSDaQN9IMexVVnx8XRrc6k7L1_eN18LG29KPrw8P58AXiN0YxjIS-2adPPMJ0hhgh7Bk4JYrwhUrTPj2cuTsB5KVtUF8eUiPYlOKGtaDnD81Pwe1GKK8XHDRx7B6NLUY86wN7pMPZwl4I3exh0tMXonYM-wpB-NbBewMFbG1zjo0mDgyZNcczelffwykdbjQV2OQ33XoKwgD9Wt_Drl0-fl4vVk7hM-c7tX4EXnQ7FnT_uZ-D71eW35aq5uf14vVzcNKZmHZv1GklmJRUYd2szNx1mzBpuW9wxbojRxFLScd0iwp20nakjakeN4ExwTjQ9Ax8evLtpPThrXA2sg9plP-i8V0l79e9L9L3apDslpaAcoyp49yjI6efkyqgGX4wL9X9cmooiXFAmGWYH9O1_6DZNOdbxKiUpQ2LOaKWaB8rkVEp23TEMRupQsTpUrDBV9xVX_s3fExzpp0LpH05Eox0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2793408543</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the neonatal health policy landscape in low- and middle-income countries: Findings from the 2018 WHO SRMNCAH policy survey</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Mary, Meighan ; Maliqi, Blerta ; Stierman, Elizabeth K ; Dohlsten, Martin Aj ; Moran, Allisyn C ; Katwan, Elizabeth ; Creanga, Andreea A</creator><creatorcontrib>Mary, Meighan ; Maliqi, Blerta ; Stierman, Elizabeth K ; Dohlsten, Martin Aj ; Moran, Allisyn C ; Katwan, Elizabeth ; Creanga, Andreea A</creatorcontrib><description>We aimed to describe the availability of newborn health policies across the continuum of care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and to assess the relationship between the availability of newborn health policies and their achievement of global Sustainable Development Goal and Every Newborn Action Plan (ENAP) neonatal mortality and stillbirth rate targets in 2019.
We used data from World Health Organization's 2018-2019 sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health (SRMNCAH) Policy Survey and extracted key newborn health service delivery and cross-cutting health systems policies that align with the WHO health system building blocks. We constructed composite measures to represent packages of newborn health policies for five components along the continuum of care: antenatal care (ANC), childbirth, postnatal care (PNC), essential newborn care (ENC), and management of small and sick newborns (SSNB). We used descriptive analyses to present the differences in the availability of newborn health service delivery policies by World Bank income group in 113 LMICs. We employed logistic regression analysis to assess the relationship between the availability of each composite newborn health policy package and achievement of global neonatal mortality and stillbirth rate targets by 2019.
In 2018, most LMICs had existing policies regarding newborn health across the continuum of care. However, policy specifications varied widely. While the availability of the ANC, childbirth, PNC, and ENC policy packages was not associated with having achieved global NMR targets by 2019, LMICs with existing policy packages on the management of SSNB were 4.4 times more likely to have reached the global NMR target (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 4.40; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.09-17.79) after controlling for income group and supporting health systems policies.
Given the current trajectory of neonatal mortality in LMICs, there is a dire need for supportive health systems and policy environments for newborn health across the continuum of care. Adoption and implementation of evidence-informed newborn health policies will be a crucial step in putting LMICs on track to meet global newborn and stillbirth targets by 2030.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2047-2978</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2047-2986</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7189/jogh.13.04024</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36867415</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Edinburgh University Global Health Society</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Births ; Child ; Children & youth ; Developing Countries ; Female ; Global health ; Health Policy ; Health services ; Humans ; Income ; Infant Health ; Infant mortality ; Infant, Newborn ; Neonates ; Newborn babies ; Pregnancy ; Prenatal care ; Regression analysis ; Stillbirth ; Sustainable development ; Teenagers ; Womens health ; World Health Organization</subject><ispartof>Journal of global health, 2023-03, Vol.13, p.04024-04024, Article 04024</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023 by the Journal of Global Health. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 by the Journal of Global Health. All rights reserved. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 by the Journal of Global Health. All rights reserved. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-bb094d93811fbc5cf144dc7d61f47c2ca2d32f7a6027e9dfc741ae3c8748772a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-bb094d93811fbc5cf144dc7d61f47c2ca2d32f7a6027e9dfc741ae3c8748772a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9983710/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9983710/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36867415$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mary, Meighan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maliqi, Blerta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stierman, Elizabeth K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dohlsten, Martin Aj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moran, Allisyn C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katwan, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creanga, Andreea A</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the neonatal health policy landscape in low- and middle-income countries: Findings from the 2018 WHO SRMNCAH policy survey</title><title>Journal of global health</title><addtitle>J Glob Health</addtitle><description>We aimed to describe the availability of newborn health policies across the continuum of care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and to assess the relationship between the availability of newborn health policies and their achievement of global Sustainable Development Goal and Every Newborn Action Plan (ENAP) neonatal mortality and stillbirth rate targets in 2019.
We used data from World Health Organization's 2018-2019 sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health (SRMNCAH) Policy Survey and extracted key newborn health service delivery and cross-cutting health systems policies that align with the WHO health system building blocks. We constructed composite measures to represent packages of newborn health policies for five components along the continuum of care: antenatal care (ANC), childbirth, postnatal care (PNC), essential newborn care (ENC), and management of small and sick newborns (SSNB). We used descriptive analyses to present the differences in the availability of newborn health service delivery policies by World Bank income group in 113 LMICs. We employed logistic regression analysis to assess the relationship between the availability of each composite newborn health policy package and achievement of global neonatal mortality and stillbirth rate targets by 2019.
In 2018, most LMICs had existing policies regarding newborn health across the continuum of care. However, policy specifications varied widely. While the availability of the ANC, childbirth, PNC, and ENC policy packages was not associated with having achieved global NMR targets by 2019, LMICs with existing policy packages on the management of SSNB were 4.4 times more likely to have reached the global NMR target (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 4.40; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.09-17.79) after controlling for income group and supporting health systems policies.
Given the current trajectory of neonatal mortality in LMICs, there is a dire need for supportive health systems and policy environments for newborn health across the continuum of care. Adoption and implementation of evidence-informed newborn health policies will be a crucial step in putting LMICs on track to meet global newborn and stillbirth targets by 2030.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Births</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Developing Countries</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Global health</subject><subject>Health Policy</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Infant Health</subject><subject>Infant mortality</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Neonates</subject><subject>Newborn babies</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prenatal care</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Stillbirth</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><subject>World Health Organization</subject><issn>2047-2978</issn><issn>2047-2986</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1rHCEchqW0NCHNsdci9NLLbPzaUXsoLEvSDaQN9IMexVVnx8XRrc6k7L1_eN18LG29KPrw8P58AXiN0YxjIS-2adPPMJ0hhgh7Bk4JYrwhUrTPj2cuTsB5KVtUF8eUiPYlOKGtaDnD81Pwe1GKK8XHDRx7B6NLUY86wN7pMPZwl4I3exh0tMXonYM-wpB-NbBewMFbG1zjo0mDgyZNcczelffwykdbjQV2OQ33XoKwgD9Wt_Drl0-fl4vVk7hM-c7tX4EXnQ7FnT_uZ-D71eW35aq5uf14vVzcNKZmHZv1GklmJRUYd2szNx1mzBpuW9wxbojRxFLScd0iwp20nakjakeN4ExwTjQ9Ax8evLtpPThrXA2sg9plP-i8V0l79e9L9L3apDslpaAcoyp49yjI6efkyqgGX4wL9X9cmooiXFAmGWYH9O1_6DZNOdbxKiUpQ2LOaKWaB8rkVEp23TEMRupQsTpUrDBV9xVX_s3fExzpp0LpH05Eox0</recordid><startdate>20230303</startdate><enddate>20230303</enddate><creator>Mary, Meighan</creator><creator>Maliqi, Blerta</creator><creator>Stierman, Elizabeth K</creator><creator>Dohlsten, Martin Aj</creator><creator>Moran, Allisyn C</creator><creator>Katwan, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Creanga, Andreea A</creator><general>Edinburgh University Global Health Society</general><general>International Society of Global Health</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>EHMNL</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230303</creationdate><title>Assessing the neonatal health policy landscape in low- and middle-income countries: Findings from the 2018 WHO SRMNCAH policy survey</title><author>Mary, Meighan ; Maliqi, Blerta ; Stierman, Elizabeth K ; Dohlsten, Martin Aj ; Moran, Allisyn C ; Katwan, Elizabeth ; Creanga, Andreea A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-bb094d93811fbc5cf144dc7d61f47c2ca2d32f7a6027e9dfc741ae3c8748772a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Births</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Developing Countries</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Global health</topic><topic>Health Policy</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Infant Health</topic><topic>Infant mortality</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Neonates</topic><topic>Newborn babies</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prenatal care</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Stillbirth</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><topic>World Health Organization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mary, Meighan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maliqi, Blerta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stierman, Elizabeth K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dohlsten, Martin Aj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moran, Allisyn C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katwan, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creanga, Andreea A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>UK & Ireland Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of global health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mary, Meighan</au><au>Maliqi, Blerta</au><au>Stierman, Elizabeth K</au><au>Dohlsten, Martin Aj</au><au>Moran, Allisyn C</au><au>Katwan, Elizabeth</au><au>Creanga, Andreea A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing the neonatal health policy landscape in low- and middle-income countries: Findings from the 2018 WHO SRMNCAH policy survey</atitle><jtitle>Journal of global health</jtitle><addtitle>J Glob Health</addtitle><date>2023-03-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>13</volume><spage>04024</spage><epage>04024</epage><pages>04024-04024</pages><artnum>04024</artnum><issn>2047-2978</issn><eissn>2047-2986</eissn><abstract>We aimed to describe the availability of newborn health policies across the continuum of care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and to assess the relationship between the availability of newborn health policies and their achievement of global Sustainable Development Goal and Every Newborn Action Plan (ENAP) neonatal mortality and stillbirth rate targets in 2019.
We used data from World Health Organization's 2018-2019 sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health (SRMNCAH) Policy Survey and extracted key newborn health service delivery and cross-cutting health systems policies that align with the WHO health system building blocks. We constructed composite measures to represent packages of newborn health policies for five components along the continuum of care: antenatal care (ANC), childbirth, postnatal care (PNC), essential newborn care (ENC), and management of small and sick newborns (SSNB). We used descriptive analyses to present the differences in the availability of newborn health service delivery policies by World Bank income group in 113 LMICs. We employed logistic regression analysis to assess the relationship between the availability of each composite newborn health policy package and achievement of global neonatal mortality and stillbirth rate targets by 2019.
In 2018, most LMICs had existing policies regarding newborn health across the continuum of care. However, policy specifications varied widely. While the availability of the ANC, childbirth, PNC, and ENC policy packages was not associated with having achieved global NMR targets by 2019, LMICs with existing policy packages on the management of SSNB were 4.4 times more likely to have reached the global NMR target (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 4.40; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.09-17.79) after controlling for income group and supporting health systems policies.
Given the current trajectory of neonatal mortality in LMICs, there is a dire need for supportive health systems and policy environments for newborn health across the continuum of care. Adoption and implementation of evidence-informed newborn health policies will be a crucial step in putting LMICs on track to meet global newborn and stillbirth targets by 2030.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Edinburgh University Global Health Society</pub><pmid>36867415</pmid><doi>10.7189/jogh.13.04024</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2047-2978 |
ispartof | Journal of global health, 2023-03, Vol.13, p.04024-04024, Article 04024 |
issn | 2047-2978 2047-2986 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9983710 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adolescent Births Child Children & youth Developing Countries Female Global health Health Policy Health services Humans Income Infant Health Infant mortality Infant, Newborn Neonates Newborn babies Pregnancy Prenatal care Regression analysis Stillbirth Sustainable development Teenagers Womens health World Health Organization |
title | Assessing the neonatal health policy landscape in low- and middle-income countries: Findings from the 2018 WHO SRMNCAH policy survey |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T19%3A22%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20neonatal%20health%20policy%20landscape%20in%20low-%20and%20middle-income%20countries:%20Findings%20from%20the%202018%20WHO%20SRMNCAH%20policy%20survey&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20global%20health&rft.au=Mary,%20Meighan&rft.date=2023-03-03&rft.volume=13&rft.spage=04024&rft.epage=04024&rft.pages=04024-04024&rft.artnum=04024&rft.issn=2047-2978&rft.eissn=2047-2986&rft_id=info:doi/10.7189/jogh.13.04024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2783494140%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2793408543&rft_id=info:pmid/36867415&rfr_iscdi=true |