Improving colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care: Preliminary effectiveness and implementation of a collaborative mailed fecal immunochemical test pilot

Background Mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach can improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates. We piloted a collaborative mailed FIT program with health plans and rural clinics to evaluate preliminary effectiveness and refine implementation strategies. Methods We conducted a single‐...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of rural health 2023, Vol.39 (1), p.279-290
Hauptverfasser: Davis, Melinda M., Coury, Jen, Larson, Jean Hiebert, Gunn, Rose, Towey, Elke Geiger, Ketelhut, Andrea, Patzel, Mary, Ramsey, Katrina, Coronado, Gloria D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 290
container_issue 1
container_start_page 279
container_title The Journal of rural health
container_volume 39
creator Davis, Melinda M.
Coury, Jen
Larson, Jean Hiebert
Gunn, Rose
Towey, Elke Geiger
Ketelhut, Andrea
Patzel, Mary
Ramsey, Katrina
Coronado, Gloria D.
description Background Mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach can improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates. We piloted a collaborative mailed FIT program with health plans and rural clinics to evaluate preliminary effectiveness and refine implementation strategies. Methods We conducted a single‐arm study using a convergent, parallel mixed‐methods design to evaluate the implementation of a collaborative mailed FIT program. Enrollees were identified using health plan claims and confirmed via clinic scrub. The intervention included a vendor‐delivered automated phone call (auto‐call) prompt, FIT mailing, and reminder auto‐call; clinics were encouraged to make live reminder calls. Practice facilitation was the primary implementation strategy. At 12 months post mailing, we assessed the rates of: (1) mailed FIT return and (2) completion of any CRC screening. We took fieldnotes and conducted postintervention key informant interviews to assess implementation outcomes (eg, feasibility, acceptability, and adaptations). Results One hundred and sixty‐nine Medicaid or Medicare enrollees were mailed a FIT. Over the 12‐month intervention, 62 participants (37%) completed screening of which 21% completed the mailed FIT (most were returned within 3 months), and 15% screened by other methods (FITs distributed in‐clinic, colonoscopy). Enrollee demographics and the reminder call may encourage mailed FIT completion. Program feasibility and acceptability was high and supported by perceived positive benefit, alignment with existing workflows, adequate staffing, and practice facilitation. Conclusion Collaborative health plan‐clinic mailed FIT programs are feasible and acceptable for implementation in rural clinics and support CRC screening completion. Studies that pragmatically test collaborative approaches to mailed FIT and patient navigation follow‐up after abnormal FIT and support broad scale‐up in rural settings are needed.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jrh.12685
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9969840</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2676924443</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4435-de2ce291228a6aca0d6e58cf947e74c4c916e25ba3656657a10dada48cf731433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc2KFDEUhQtRnHZ04QtIwI0uaiZJ5a9cCDI4PzKgiIK7kE7dmk5TScqkqmWexxc1Nd0OKphNSO6Xc-_JqarnBJ-Qsk63aXNCqFD8QbUikqkaN4I8rFZYtbiWgn87qp7kvMWYtqphj6ujhkvccEVX1c8rP6a4c-EG2TjEBHYyA7ImWEgo2wQQlpoLKM2pVMbkvEm3hUjwBn1KMDjvwnIDfV8eux0EyBmZ0CHnxwE8hMlMLgYUe2SWJoNZx2QWEnnjBuhQeViknfdziHYD3i3HCfKERjfE6Wn1qDdDhmeH_bj6ev7-y9llff3x4urs3XVtGWt43QG1QFtCqTLCWIM7AVzZvmUSJLPMtkQA5WvTCC4El4bgznSGFUQ2hDXNcfV2rzvOaw-dLZMXy_pgWUfj9N-V4Db6Ju5024pWMVwEXh0EUvw-l_m1d9lCcRwgzllTIUVLGbvr9fIfdBvnFIo9TSXnUkmFWaFe7ymbYs4J-vthCNZL9LpEr--iL-yLP6e_J39nXYDTPfCjfPrt_5X0h8-Xe8lfIIq92w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2755787804</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care: Preliminary effectiveness and implementation of a collaborative mailed fecal immunochemical test pilot</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Davis, Melinda M. ; Coury, Jen ; Larson, Jean Hiebert ; Gunn, Rose ; Towey, Elke Geiger ; Ketelhut, Andrea ; Patzel, Mary ; Ramsey, Katrina ; Coronado, Gloria D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Davis, Melinda M. ; Coury, Jen ; Larson, Jean Hiebert ; Gunn, Rose ; Towey, Elke Geiger ; Ketelhut, Andrea ; Patzel, Mary ; Ramsey, Katrina ; Coronado, Gloria D.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach can improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates. We piloted a collaborative mailed FIT program with health plans and rural clinics to evaluate preliminary effectiveness and refine implementation strategies. Methods We conducted a single‐arm study using a convergent, parallel mixed‐methods design to evaluate the implementation of a collaborative mailed FIT program. Enrollees were identified using health plan claims and confirmed via clinic scrub. The intervention included a vendor‐delivered automated phone call (auto‐call) prompt, FIT mailing, and reminder auto‐call; clinics were encouraged to make live reminder calls. Practice facilitation was the primary implementation strategy. At 12 months post mailing, we assessed the rates of: (1) mailed FIT return and (2) completion of any CRC screening. We took fieldnotes and conducted postintervention key informant interviews to assess implementation outcomes (eg, feasibility, acceptability, and adaptations). Results One hundred and sixty‐nine Medicaid or Medicare enrollees were mailed a FIT. Over the 12‐month intervention, 62 participants (37%) completed screening of which 21% completed the mailed FIT (most were returned within 3 months), and 15% screened by other methods (FITs distributed in‐clinic, colonoscopy). Enrollee demographics and the reminder call may encourage mailed FIT completion. Program feasibility and acceptability was high and supported by perceived positive benefit, alignment with existing workflows, adequate staffing, and practice facilitation. Conclusion Collaborative health plan‐clinic mailed FIT programs are feasible and acceptable for implementation in rural clinics and support CRC screening completion. Studies that pragmatically test collaborative approaches to mailed FIT and patient navigation follow‐up after abnormal FIT and support broad scale‐up in rural settings are needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-765X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-0361</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12685</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35703582</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Acceptability ; Adaptation ; Aged ; Cancer ; Cancer screening ; Clinics ; Collaboration ; Collaborative approach ; Colonoscopy ; Colorectal cancer ; Colorectal carcinoma ; Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis ; community‐based participatory research ; Demographics ; Early Detection of Cancer - methods ; Effectiveness ; Evaluation ; Feasibility ; Feasibility studies ; Health ; Health care ; Health insurance ; Humans ; Implementation ; implementation science ; Intervention ; mailed fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) ; Mass Screening - methods ; Medicaid ; Medical screening ; Medicare ; Navigation ; Occult Blood ; Participatory research ; Primary care ; Primary Health Care ; Rural health care ; rural health services ; Staffing ; Test pilots ; United States</subject><ispartof>The Journal of rural health, 2023, Vol.39 (1), p.279-290</ispartof><rights>2022 National Rural Health Association.</rights><rights>2023 National Rural Health Association.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4435-de2ce291228a6aca0d6e58cf947e74c4c916e25ba3656657a10dada48cf731433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4435-de2ce291228a6aca0d6e58cf947e74c4c916e25ba3656657a10dada48cf731433</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3293-5113</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjrh.12685$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjrh.12685$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27843,27901,27902,30976,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35703582$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davis, Melinda M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coury, Jen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, Jean Hiebert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gunn, Rose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Towey, Elke Geiger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ketelhut, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patzel, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramsey, Katrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coronado, Gloria D.</creatorcontrib><title>Improving colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care: Preliminary effectiveness and implementation of a collaborative mailed fecal immunochemical test pilot</title><title>The Journal of rural health</title><addtitle>J Rural Health</addtitle><description>Background Mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach can improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates. We piloted a collaborative mailed FIT program with health plans and rural clinics to evaluate preliminary effectiveness and refine implementation strategies. Methods We conducted a single‐arm study using a convergent, parallel mixed‐methods design to evaluate the implementation of a collaborative mailed FIT program. Enrollees were identified using health plan claims and confirmed via clinic scrub. The intervention included a vendor‐delivered automated phone call (auto‐call) prompt, FIT mailing, and reminder auto‐call; clinics were encouraged to make live reminder calls. Practice facilitation was the primary implementation strategy. At 12 months post mailing, we assessed the rates of: (1) mailed FIT return and (2) completion of any CRC screening. We took fieldnotes and conducted postintervention key informant interviews to assess implementation outcomes (eg, feasibility, acceptability, and adaptations). Results One hundred and sixty‐nine Medicaid or Medicare enrollees were mailed a FIT. Over the 12‐month intervention, 62 participants (37%) completed screening of which 21% completed the mailed FIT (most were returned within 3 months), and 15% screened by other methods (FITs distributed in‐clinic, colonoscopy). Enrollee demographics and the reminder call may encourage mailed FIT completion. Program feasibility and acceptability was high and supported by perceived positive benefit, alignment with existing workflows, adequate staffing, and practice facilitation. Conclusion Collaborative health plan‐clinic mailed FIT programs are feasible and acceptable for implementation in rural clinics and support CRC screening completion. Studies that pragmatically test collaborative approaches to mailed FIT and patient navigation follow‐up after abnormal FIT and support broad scale‐up in rural settings are needed.</description><subject>Acceptability</subject><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer screening</subject><subject>Clinics</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Collaborative approach</subject><subject>Colonoscopy</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal carcinoma</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>community‐based participatory research</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health insurance</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>implementation science</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>mailed fecal immunochemical tests (FIT)</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Medicaid</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Medicare</subject><subject>Navigation</subject><subject>Occult Blood</subject><subject>Participatory research</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Primary Health Care</subject><subject>Rural health care</subject><subject>rural health services</subject><subject>Staffing</subject><subject>Test pilots</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0890-765X</issn><issn>1748-0361</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc2KFDEUhQtRnHZ04QtIwI0uaiZJ5a9cCDI4PzKgiIK7kE7dmk5TScqkqmWexxc1Nd0OKphNSO6Xc-_JqarnBJ-Qsk63aXNCqFD8QbUikqkaN4I8rFZYtbiWgn87qp7kvMWYtqphj6ujhkvccEVX1c8rP6a4c-EG2TjEBHYyA7ImWEgo2wQQlpoLKM2pVMbkvEm3hUjwBn1KMDjvwnIDfV8eux0EyBmZ0CHnxwE8hMlMLgYUe2SWJoNZx2QWEnnjBuhQeViknfdziHYD3i3HCfKERjfE6Wn1qDdDhmeH_bj6ev7-y9llff3x4urs3XVtGWt43QG1QFtCqTLCWIM7AVzZvmUSJLPMtkQA5WvTCC4El4bgznSGFUQ2hDXNcfV2rzvOaw-dLZMXy_pgWUfj9N-V4Db6Ju5024pWMVwEXh0EUvw-l_m1d9lCcRwgzllTIUVLGbvr9fIfdBvnFIo9TSXnUkmFWaFe7ymbYs4J-vthCNZL9LpEr--iL-yLP6e_J39nXYDTPfCjfPrt_5X0h8-Xe8lfIIq92w</recordid><startdate>2023</startdate><enddate>2023</enddate><creator>Davis, Melinda M.</creator><creator>Coury, Jen</creator><creator>Larson, Jean Hiebert</creator><creator>Gunn, Rose</creator><creator>Towey, Elke Geiger</creator><creator>Ketelhut, Andrea</creator><creator>Patzel, Mary</creator><creator>Ramsey, Katrina</creator><creator>Coronado, Gloria D.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3293-5113</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2023</creationdate><title>Improving colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care: Preliminary effectiveness and implementation of a collaborative mailed fecal immunochemical test pilot</title><author>Davis, Melinda M. ; Coury, Jen ; Larson, Jean Hiebert ; Gunn, Rose ; Towey, Elke Geiger ; Ketelhut, Andrea ; Patzel, Mary ; Ramsey, Katrina ; Coronado, Gloria D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4435-de2ce291228a6aca0d6e58cf947e74c4c916e25ba3656657a10dada48cf731433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Acceptability</topic><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer screening</topic><topic>Clinics</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Collaborative approach</topic><topic>Colonoscopy</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal carcinoma</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>community‐based participatory research</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health insurance</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>implementation science</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>mailed fecal immunochemical tests (FIT)</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Medicaid</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Medicare</topic><topic>Navigation</topic><topic>Occult Blood</topic><topic>Participatory research</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Primary Health Care</topic><topic>Rural health care</topic><topic>rural health services</topic><topic>Staffing</topic><topic>Test pilots</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davis, Melinda M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coury, Jen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, Jean Hiebert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gunn, Rose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Towey, Elke Geiger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ketelhut, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patzel, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramsey, Katrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coronado, Gloria D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of rural health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davis, Melinda M.</au><au>Coury, Jen</au><au>Larson, Jean Hiebert</au><au>Gunn, Rose</au><au>Towey, Elke Geiger</au><au>Ketelhut, Andrea</au><au>Patzel, Mary</au><au>Ramsey, Katrina</au><au>Coronado, Gloria D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improving colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care: Preliminary effectiveness and implementation of a collaborative mailed fecal immunochemical test pilot</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of rural health</jtitle><addtitle>J Rural Health</addtitle><date>2023</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>279</spage><epage>290</epage><pages>279-290</pages><issn>0890-765X</issn><eissn>1748-0361</eissn><abstract>Background Mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach can improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates. We piloted a collaborative mailed FIT program with health plans and rural clinics to evaluate preliminary effectiveness and refine implementation strategies. Methods We conducted a single‐arm study using a convergent, parallel mixed‐methods design to evaluate the implementation of a collaborative mailed FIT program. Enrollees were identified using health plan claims and confirmed via clinic scrub. The intervention included a vendor‐delivered automated phone call (auto‐call) prompt, FIT mailing, and reminder auto‐call; clinics were encouraged to make live reminder calls. Practice facilitation was the primary implementation strategy. At 12 months post mailing, we assessed the rates of: (1) mailed FIT return and (2) completion of any CRC screening. We took fieldnotes and conducted postintervention key informant interviews to assess implementation outcomes (eg, feasibility, acceptability, and adaptations). Results One hundred and sixty‐nine Medicaid or Medicare enrollees were mailed a FIT. Over the 12‐month intervention, 62 participants (37%) completed screening of which 21% completed the mailed FIT (most were returned within 3 months), and 15% screened by other methods (FITs distributed in‐clinic, colonoscopy). Enrollee demographics and the reminder call may encourage mailed FIT completion. Program feasibility and acceptability was high and supported by perceived positive benefit, alignment with existing workflows, adequate staffing, and practice facilitation. Conclusion Collaborative health plan‐clinic mailed FIT programs are feasible and acceptable for implementation in rural clinics and support CRC screening completion. Studies that pragmatically test collaborative approaches to mailed FIT and patient navigation follow‐up after abnormal FIT and support broad scale‐up in rural settings are needed.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>35703582</pmid><doi>10.1111/jrh.12685</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3293-5113</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-765X
ispartof The Journal of rural health, 2023, Vol.39 (1), p.279-290
issn 0890-765X
1748-0361
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9969840
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index
subjects Acceptability
Adaptation
Aged
Cancer
Cancer screening
Clinics
Collaboration
Collaborative approach
Colonoscopy
Colorectal cancer
Colorectal carcinoma
Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis
community‐based participatory research
Demographics
Early Detection of Cancer - methods
Effectiveness
Evaluation
Feasibility
Feasibility studies
Health
Health care
Health insurance
Humans
Implementation
implementation science
Intervention
mailed fecal immunochemical tests (FIT)
Mass Screening - methods
Medicaid
Medical screening
Medicare
Navigation
Occult Blood
Participatory research
Primary care
Primary Health Care
Rural health care
rural health services
Staffing
Test pilots
United States
title Improving colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care: Preliminary effectiveness and implementation of a collaborative mailed fecal immunochemical test pilot
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T06%3A26%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20colorectal%20cancer%20screening%20in%20rural%20primary%20care:%20Preliminary%20effectiveness%20and%20implementation%20of%20a%20collaborative%20mailed%20fecal%20immunochemical%20test%20pilot&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20rural%20health&rft.au=Davis,%20Melinda%20M.&rft.date=2023&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=279&rft.epage=290&rft.pages=279-290&rft.issn=0890-765X&rft.eissn=1748-0361&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jrh.12685&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2676924443%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2755787804&rft_id=info:pmid/35703582&rfr_iscdi=true