Improving colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care: Preliminary effectiveness and implementation of a collaborative mailed fecal immunochemical test pilot
Background Mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach can improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates. We piloted a collaborative mailed FIT program with health plans and rural clinics to evaluate preliminary effectiveness and refine implementation strategies. Methods We conducted a single‐...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of rural health 2023, Vol.39 (1), p.279-290 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 290 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 279 |
container_title | The Journal of rural health |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Davis, Melinda M. Coury, Jen Larson, Jean Hiebert Gunn, Rose Towey, Elke Geiger Ketelhut, Andrea Patzel, Mary Ramsey, Katrina Coronado, Gloria D. |
description | Background
Mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach can improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates. We piloted a collaborative mailed FIT program with health plans and rural clinics to evaluate preliminary effectiveness and refine implementation strategies.
Methods
We conducted a single‐arm study using a convergent, parallel mixed‐methods design to evaluate the implementation of a collaborative mailed FIT program. Enrollees were identified using health plan claims and confirmed via clinic scrub. The intervention included a vendor‐delivered automated phone call (auto‐call) prompt, FIT mailing, and reminder auto‐call; clinics were encouraged to make live reminder calls. Practice facilitation was the primary implementation strategy. At 12 months post mailing, we assessed the rates of: (1) mailed FIT return and (2) completion of any CRC screening. We took fieldnotes and conducted postintervention key informant interviews to assess implementation outcomes (eg, feasibility, acceptability, and adaptations).
Results
One hundred and sixty‐nine Medicaid or Medicare enrollees were mailed a FIT. Over the 12‐month intervention, 62 participants (37%) completed screening of which 21% completed the mailed FIT (most were returned within 3 months), and 15% screened by other methods (FITs distributed in‐clinic, colonoscopy). Enrollee demographics and the reminder call may encourage mailed FIT completion. Program feasibility and acceptability was high and supported by perceived positive benefit, alignment with existing workflows, adequate staffing, and practice facilitation.
Conclusion
Collaborative health plan‐clinic mailed FIT programs are feasible and acceptable for implementation in rural clinics and support CRC screening completion. Studies that pragmatically test collaborative approaches to mailed FIT and patient navigation follow‐up after abnormal FIT and support broad scale‐up in rural settings are needed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jrh.12685 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9969840</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2676924443</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4435-de2ce291228a6aca0d6e58cf947e74c4c916e25ba3656657a10dada48cf731433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc2KFDEUhQtRnHZ04QtIwI0uaiZJ5a9cCDI4PzKgiIK7kE7dmk5TScqkqmWexxc1Nd0OKphNSO6Xc-_JqarnBJ-Qsk63aXNCqFD8QbUikqkaN4I8rFZYtbiWgn87qp7kvMWYtqphj6ujhkvccEVX1c8rP6a4c-EG2TjEBHYyA7ImWEgo2wQQlpoLKM2pVMbkvEm3hUjwBn1KMDjvwnIDfV8eux0EyBmZ0CHnxwE8hMlMLgYUe2SWJoNZx2QWEnnjBuhQeViknfdziHYD3i3HCfKERjfE6Wn1qDdDhmeH_bj6ev7-y9llff3x4urs3XVtGWt43QG1QFtCqTLCWIM7AVzZvmUSJLPMtkQA5WvTCC4El4bgznSGFUQ2hDXNcfV2rzvOaw-dLZMXy_pgWUfj9N-V4Db6Ju5024pWMVwEXh0EUvw-l_m1d9lCcRwgzllTIUVLGbvr9fIfdBvnFIo9TSXnUkmFWaFe7ymbYs4J-vthCNZL9LpEr--iL-yLP6e_J39nXYDTPfCjfPrt_5X0h8-Xe8lfIIq92w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2755787804</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care: Preliminary effectiveness and implementation of a collaborative mailed fecal immunochemical test pilot</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Davis, Melinda M. ; Coury, Jen ; Larson, Jean Hiebert ; Gunn, Rose ; Towey, Elke Geiger ; Ketelhut, Andrea ; Patzel, Mary ; Ramsey, Katrina ; Coronado, Gloria D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Davis, Melinda M. ; Coury, Jen ; Larson, Jean Hiebert ; Gunn, Rose ; Towey, Elke Geiger ; Ketelhut, Andrea ; Patzel, Mary ; Ramsey, Katrina ; Coronado, Gloria D.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach can improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates. We piloted a collaborative mailed FIT program with health plans and rural clinics to evaluate preliminary effectiveness and refine implementation strategies.
Methods
We conducted a single‐arm study using a convergent, parallel mixed‐methods design to evaluate the implementation of a collaborative mailed FIT program. Enrollees were identified using health plan claims and confirmed via clinic scrub. The intervention included a vendor‐delivered automated phone call (auto‐call) prompt, FIT mailing, and reminder auto‐call; clinics were encouraged to make live reminder calls. Practice facilitation was the primary implementation strategy. At 12 months post mailing, we assessed the rates of: (1) mailed FIT return and (2) completion of any CRC screening. We took fieldnotes and conducted postintervention key informant interviews to assess implementation outcomes (eg, feasibility, acceptability, and adaptations).
Results
One hundred and sixty‐nine Medicaid or Medicare enrollees were mailed a FIT. Over the 12‐month intervention, 62 participants (37%) completed screening of which 21% completed the mailed FIT (most were returned within 3 months), and 15% screened by other methods (FITs distributed in‐clinic, colonoscopy). Enrollee demographics and the reminder call may encourage mailed FIT completion. Program feasibility and acceptability was high and supported by perceived positive benefit, alignment with existing workflows, adequate staffing, and practice facilitation.
Conclusion
Collaborative health plan‐clinic mailed FIT programs are feasible and acceptable for implementation in rural clinics and support CRC screening completion. Studies that pragmatically test collaborative approaches to mailed FIT and patient navigation follow‐up after abnormal FIT and support broad scale‐up in rural settings are needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-765X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-0361</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12685</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35703582</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Acceptability ; Adaptation ; Aged ; Cancer ; Cancer screening ; Clinics ; Collaboration ; Collaborative approach ; Colonoscopy ; Colorectal cancer ; Colorectal carcinoma ; Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis ; community‐based participatory research ; Demographics ; Early Detection of Cancer - methods ; Effectiveness ; Evaluation ; Feasibility ; Feasibility studies ; Health ; Health care ; Health insurance ; Humans ; Implementation ; implementation science ; Intervention ; mailed fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) ; Mass Screening - methods ; Medicaid ; Medical screening ; Medicare ; Navigation ; Occult Blood ; Participatory research ; Primary care ; Primary Health Care ; Rural health care ; rural health services ; Staffing ; Test pilots ; United States</subject><ispartof>The Journal of rural health, 2023, Vol.39 (1), p.279-290</ispartof><rights>2022 National Rural Health Association.</rights><rights>2023 National Rural Health Association.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4435-de2ce291228a6aca0d6e58cf947e74c4c916e25ba3656657a10dada48cf731433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4435-de2ce291228a6aca0d6e58cf947e74c4c916e25ba3656657a10dada48cf731433</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3293-5113</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjrh.12685$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjrh.12685$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27843,27901,27902,30976,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35703582$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davis, Melinda M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coury, Jen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, Jean Hiebert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gunn, Rose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Towey, Elke Geiger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ketelhut, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patzel, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramsey, Katrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coronado, Gloria D.</creatorcontrib><title>Improving colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care: Preliminary effectiveness and implementation of a collaborative mailed fecal immunochemical test pilot</title><title>The Journal of rural health</title><addtitle>J Rural Health</addtitle><description>Background
Mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach can improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates. We piloted a collaborative mailed FIT program with health plans and rural clinics to evaluate preliminary effectiveness and refine implementation strategies.
Methods
We conducted a single‐arm study using a convergent, parallel mixed‐methods design to evaluate the implementation of a collaborative mailed FIT program. Enrollees were identified using health plan claims and confirmed via clinic scrub. The intervention included a vendor‐delivered automated phone call (auto‐call) prompt, FIT mailing, and reminder auto‐call; clinics were encouraged to make live reminder calls. Practice facilitation was the primary implementation strategy. At 12 months post mailing, we assessed the rates of: (1) mailed FIT return and (2) completion of any CRC screening. We took fieldnotes and conducted postintervention key informant interviews to assess implementation outcomes (eg, feasibility, acceptability, and adaptations).
Results
One hundred and sixty‐nine Medicaid or Medicare enrollees were mailed a FIT. Over the 12‐month intervention, 62 participants (37%) completed screening of which 21% completed the mailed FIT (most were returned within 3 months), and 15% screened by other methods (FITs distributed in‐clinic, colonoscopy). Enrollee demographics and the reminder call may encourage mailed FIT completion. Program feasibility and acceptability was high and supported by perceived positive benefit, alignment with existing workflows, adequate staffing, and practice facilitation.
Conclusion
Collaborative health plan‐clinic mailed FIT programs are feasible and acceptable for implementation in rural clinics and support CRC screening completion. Studies that pragmatically test collaborative approaches to mailed FIT and patient navigation follow‐up after abnormal FIT and support broad scale‐up in rural settings are needed.</description><subject>Acceptability</subject><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer screening</subject><subject>Clinics</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Collaborative approach</subject><subject>Colonoscopy</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal carcinoma</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>community‐based participatory research</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health insurance</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>implementation science</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>mailed fecal immunochemical tests (FIT)</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Medicaid</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Medicare</subject><subject>Navigation</subject><subject>Occult Blood</subject><subject>Participatory research</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Primary Health Care</subject><subject>Rural health care</subject><subject>rural health services</subject><subject>Staffing</subject><subject>Test pilots</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0890-765X</issn><issn>1748-0361</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc2KFDEUhQtRnHZ04QtIwI0uaiZJ5a9cCDI4PzKgiIK7kE7dmk5TScqkqmWexxc1Nd0OKphNSO6Xc-_JqarnBJ-Qsk63aXNCqFD8QbUikqkaN4I8rFZYtbiWgn87qp7kvMWYtqphj6ujhkvccEVX1c8rP6a4c-EG2TjEBHYyA7ImWEgo2wQQlpoLKM2pVMbkvEm3hUjwBn1KMDjvwnIDfV8eux0EyBmZ0CHnxwE8hMlMLgYUe2SWJoNZx2QWEnnjBuhQeViknfdziHYD3i3HCfKERjfE6Wn1qDdDhmeH_bj6ev7-y9llff3x4urs3XVtGWt43QG1QFtCqTLCWIM7AVzZvmUSJLPMtkQA5WvTCC4El4bgznSGFUQ2hDXNcfV2rzvOaw-dLZMXy_pgWUfj9N-V4Db6Ju5024pWMVwEXh0EUvw-l_m1d9lCcRwgzllTIUVLGbvr9fIfdBvnFIo9TSXnUkmFWaFe7ymbYs4J-vthCNZL9LpEr--iL-yLP6e_J39nXYDTPfCjfPrt_5X0h8-Xe8lfIIq92w</recordid><startdate>2023</startdate><enddate>2023</enddate><creator>Davis, Melinda M.</creator><creator>Coury, Jen</creator><creator>Larson, Jean Hiebert</creator><creator>Gunn, Rose</creator><creator>Towey, Elke Geiger</creator><creator>Ketelhut, Andrea</creator><creator>Patzel, Mary</creator><creator>Ramsey, Katrina</creator><creator>Coronado, Gloria D.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3293-5113</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2023</creationdate><title>Improving colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care: Preliminary effectiveness and implementation of a collaborative mailed fecal immunochemical test pilot</title><author>Davis, Melinda M. ; Coury, Jen ; Larson, Jean Hiebert ; Gunn, Rose ; Towey, Elke Geiger ; Ketelhut, Andrea ; Patzel, Mary ; Ramsey, Katrina ; Coronado, Gloria D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4435-de2ce291228a6aca0d6e58cf947e74c4c916e25ba3656657a10dada48cf731433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Acceptability</topic><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer screening</topic><topic>Clinics</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Collaborative approach</topic><topic>Colonoscopy</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal carcinoma</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>community‐based participatory research</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health insurance</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>implementation science</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>mailed fecal immunochemical tests (FIT)</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Medicaid</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Medicare</topic><topic>Navigation</topic><topic>Occult Blood</topic><topic>Participatory research</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Primary Health Care</topic><topic>Rural health care</topic><topic>rural health services</topic><topic>Staffing</topic><topic>Test pilots</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davis, Melinda M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coury, Jen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, Jean Hiebert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gunn, Rose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Towey, Elke Geiger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ketelhut, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patzel, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramsey, Katrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coronado, Gloria D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of rural health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davis, Melinda M.</au><au>Coury, Jen</au><au>Larson, Jean Hiebert</au><au>Gunn, Rose</au><au>Towey, Elke Geiger</au><au>Ketelhut, Andrea</au><au>Patzel, Mary</au><au>Ramsey, Katrina</au><au>Coronado, Gloria D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improving colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care: Preliminary effectiveness and implementation of a collaborative mailed fecal immunochemical test pilot</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of rural health</jtitle><addtitle>J Rural Health</addtitle><date>2023</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>279</spage><epage>290</epage><pages>279-290</pages><issn>0890-765X</issn><eissn>1748-0361</eissn><abstract>Background
Mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach can improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates. We piloted a collaborative mailed FIT program with health plans and rural clinics to evaluate preliminary effectiveness and refine implementation strategies.
Methods
We conducted a single‐arm study using a convergent, parallel mixed‐methods design to evaluate the implementation of a collaborative mailed FIT program. Enrollees were identified using health plan claims and confirmed via clinic scrub. The intervention included a vendor‐delivered automated phone call (auto‐call) prompt, FIT mailing, and reminder auto‐call; clinics were encouraged to make live reminder calls. Practice facilitation was the primary implementation strategy. At 12 months post mailing, we assessed the rates of: (1) mailed FIT return and (2) completion of any CRC screening. We took fieldnotes and conducted postintervention key informant interviews to assess implementation outcomes (eg, feasibility, acceptability, and adaptations).
Results
One hundred and sixty‐nine Medicaid or Medicare enrollees were mailed a FIT. Over the 12‐month intervention, 62 participants (37%) completed screening of which 21% completed the mailed FIT (most were returned within 3 months), and 15% screened by other methods (FITs distributed in‐clinic, colonoscopy). Enrollee demographics and the reminder call may encourage mailed FIT completion. Program feasibility and acceptability was high and supported by perceived positive benefit, alignment with existing workflows, adequate staffing, and practice facilitation.
Conclusion
Collaborative health plan‐clinic mailed FIT programs are feasible and acceptable for implementation in rural clinics and support CRC screening completion. Studies that pragmatically test collaborative approaches to mailed FIT and patient navigation follow‐up after abnormal FIT and support broad scale‐up in rural settings are needed.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>35703582</pmid><doi>10.1111/jrh.12685</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3293-5113</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0890-765X |
ispartof | The Journal of rural health, 2023, Vol.39 (1), p.279-290 |
issn | 0890-765X 1748-0361 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9969840 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index |
subjects | Acceptability Adaptation Aged Cancer Cancer screening Clinics Collaboration Collaborative approach Colonoscopy Colorectal cancer Colorectal carcinoma Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis community‐based participatory research Demographics Early Detection of Cancer - methods Effectiveness Evaluation Feasibility Feasibility studies Health Health care Health insurance Humans Implementation implementation science Intervention mailed fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) Mass Screening - methods Medicaid Medical screening Medicare Navigation Occult Blood Participatory research Primary care Primary Health Care Rural health care rural health services Staffing Test pilots United States |
title | Improving colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care: Preliminary effectiveness and implementation of a collaborative mailed fecal immunochemical test pilot |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T06%3A26%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20colorectal%20cancer%20screening%20in%20rural%20primary%20care:%20Preliminary%20effectiveness%20and%20implementation%20of%20a%20collaborative%20mailed%20fecal%20immunochemical%20test%20pilot&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20rural%20health&rft.au=Davis,%20Melinda%20M.&rft.date=2023&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=279&rft.epage=290&rft.pages=279-290&rft.issn=0890-765X&rft.eissn=1748-0361&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jrh.12685&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2676924443%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2755787804&rft_id=info:pmid/35703582&rfr_iscdi=true |