A study of the diagnostic value of a modified transthoracic lung ultrasound scoring method in interstitial lung disease

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a serious complication of connective tissue disease (CTD) with significant morbidity and mortality. Lung ultrasound (LUS) has been widely used in the diagnosis of a variety of lung diseases. However, there is no standard ultrasound scanning method or scoring method...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery 2023-02, Vol.13 (2), p.946-956
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Ying, Lian, Xihua, Huang, Shunfa, Li, Liya, Zhao, Yanping, Lai, Hongwei, Lyu, Guorong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 956
container_issue 2
container_start_page 946
container_title Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery
container_volume 13
creator Zhang, Ying
Lian, Xihua
Huang, Shunfa
Li, Liya
Zhao, Yanping
Lai, Hongwei
Lyu, Guorong
description Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a serious complication of connective tissue disease (CTD) with significant morbidity and mortality. Lung ultrasound (LUS) has been widely used in the diagnosis of a variety of lung diseases. However, there is no standard ultrasound scanning method or scoring method for connective tissue disease associated with interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD); therefore, it is necessary to establish a set of standard evaluation methods. A total of 60 consecutive patients with clinically confirmed CTD and suspected ILD were prospectively included in this study. LUS and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) were used to examine all patients. The time between HRCT and LUS examinations was less than 2 weeks. The ultrasonographic results were evaluated with the modified scoring method and the Buda scoring method. The imaging results were evaluated with the HRCT Warrick scoring method. The primary aim was to evaluate the diagnostic value of a modified ultrasound scoring method in CTD-ILD. The results of the Youden index for the diagnosis of CTD-ILD by the modified method, the Buda method, and the HRCT method were 0.845, 0.711, and 0.911, respectively, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.982 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.945-1.000], 0.950 (95% CI: 0.851-0.990), and 0.985 (95% CI: 0.949-1.000), respectively. With a clinical diagnosis as the gold standard, the consistency of the modified method and the HRCT method for CTD-ILD was high (Kappa values =0.872 and 0.913, respectively). The values of the modified method and the Buda method consistently and significantly increased with the increasing severity of CTD-ILD. For the former, there were significant differences between the mild, moderate, and severe groups (P
doi_str_mv 10.21037/qims-22-153
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9929372</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2779349233</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-534974f3b8159683fa6c021f77771abe6191eeaf012046eb78dae95256e2098f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1rGzEQxUVJaULqW89FxxyyqTTaXa0ugWDyBYFe2rOQVyNbZXdlS1oX__dVaie0g0Di6cebB4-QL5zdAGdCftv5MVUAFW_EB3IBAKKqBWvP3t6g4JwsUvrFysiOS84-kXPRdlxBW1-Q33c05dkeaHA0b5Bab9ZTSNn3dG-GGV91Q8dgvfNoaY5mSnkToukLMczTms5DEVOYJ0tTH6Iv0ogFsdRP5WSMxS17Mxxx6xOahJ_JR2eGhIvTfUl-Ptz_WD5VL98fn5d3L1UveJ2rRtRK1k6sOt6othPOtD0D7mQZblbYcsURjWMcWN3iSnbWoGqgaRGY6py4JLdH3-28GtH2OJW0g95GP5p40MF4_f_P5Dd6HfZaKVBCQjG4OhnEsJsxZT361OMwmAnDnDRIqUpIEKKg10e0jyGliO59DWf6b136tS4NoEtdBf_6b7R3-K0c8Qc-EZOp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2779349233</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A study of the diagnostic value of a modified transthoracic lung ultrasound scoring method in interstitial lung disease</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Zhang, Ying ; Lian, Xihua ; Huang, Shunfa ; Li, Liya ; Zhao, Yanping ; Lai, Hongwei ; Lyu, Guorong</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ying ; Lian, Xihua ; Huang, Shunfa ; Li, Liya ; Zhao, Yanping ; Lai, Hongwei ; Lyu, Guorong</creatorcontrib><description>Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a serious complication of connective tissue disease (CTD) with significant morbidity and mortality. Lung ultrasound (LUS) has been widely used in the diagnosis of a variety of lung diseases. However, there is no standard ultrasound scanning method or scoring method for connective tissue disease associated with interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD); therefore, it is necessary to establish a set of standard evaluation methods. A total of 60 consecutive patients with clinically confirmed CTD and suspected ILD were prospectively included in this study. LUS and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) were used to examine all patients. The time between HRCT and LUS examinations was less than 2 weeks. The ultrasonographic results were evaluated with the modified scoring method and the Buda scoring method. The imaging results were evaluated with the HRCT Warrick scoring method. The primary aim was to evaluate the diagnostic value of a modified ultrasound scoring method in CTD-ILD. The results of the Youden index for the diagnosis of CTD-ILD by the modified method, the Buda method, and the HRCT method were 0.845, 0.711, and 0.911, respectively, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.982 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.945-1.000], 0.950 (95% CI: 0.851-0.990), and 0.985 (95% CI: 0.949-1.000), respectively. With a clinical diagnosis as the gold standard, the consistency of the modified method and the HRCT method for CTD-ILD was high (Kappa values =0.872 and 0.913, respectively). The values of the modified method and the Buda method consistently and significantly increased with the increasing severity of CTD-ILD. For the former, there were significant differences between the mild, moderate, and severe groups (P&lt;0.05). The ROC curve used to calculate the modified ultrasound score predicted the critical values of mild and severe pulmonary fibrotic lesions at 34 points (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 92.9%; AUC =0.933; 95% CI: 0.807-1.000) and 64.5 points (sensitivity, 92.0%; specificity, 85.3%; AUC =0.972; 95% CI: 0.929-1.000). The modified ultrasound method has a higher diagnostic value than the Buda method for CTD-ILD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2223-4292</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2223-4306</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21037/qims-22-153</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36819264</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>China: AME Publishing Company</publisher><subject>Original</subject><ispartof>Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023-02, Vol.13 (2), p.946-956</ispartof><rights>2023 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2023 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved. 2023 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-534974f3b8159683fa6c021f77771abe6191eeaf012046eb78dae95256e2098f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9929372/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9929372/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,27928,27929,53795,53797</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36819264$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lian, Xihua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Shunfa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Liya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Yanping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lai, Hongwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyu, Guorong</creatorcontrib><title>A study of the diagnostic value of a modified transthoracic lung ultrasound scoring method in interstitial lung disease</title><title>Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery</title><addtitle>Quant Imaging Med Surg</addtitle><description>Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a serious complication of connective tissue disease (CTD) with significant morbidity and mortality. Lung ultrasound (LUS) has been widely used in the diagnosis of a variety of lung diseases. However, there is no standard ultrasound scanning method or scoring method for connective tissue disease associated with interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD); therefore, it is necessary to establish a set of standard evaluation methods. A total of 60 consecutive patients with clinically confirmed CTD and suspected ILD were prospectively included in this study. LUS and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) were used to examine all patients. The time between HRCT and LUS examinations was less than 2 weeks. The ultrasonographic results were evaluated with the modified scoring method and the Buda scoring method. The imaging results were evaluated with the HRCT Warrick scoring method. The primary aim was to evaluate the diagnostic value of a modified ultrasound scoring method in CTD-ILD. The results of the Youden index for the diagnosis of CTD-ILD by the modified method, the Buda method, and the HRCT method were 0.845, 0.711, and 0.911, respectively, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.982 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.945-1.000], 0.950 (95% CI: 0.851-0.990), and 0.985 (95% CI: 0.949-1.000), respectively. With a clinical diagnosis as the gold standard, the consistency of the modified method and the HRCT method for CTD-ILD was high (Kappa values =0.872 and 0.913, respectively). The values of the modified method and the Buda method consistently and significantly increased with the increasing severity of CTD-ILD. For the former, there were significant differences between the mild, moderate, and severe groups (P&lt;0.05). The ROC curve used to calculate the modified ultrasound score predicted the critical values of mild and severe pulmonary fibrotic lesions at 34 points (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 92.9%; AUC =0.933; 95% CI: 0.807-1.000) and 64.5 points (sensitivity, 92.0%; specificity, 85.3%; AUC =0.972; 95% CI: 0.929-1.000). The modified ultrasound method has a higher diagnostic value than the Buda method for CTD-ILD.</description><subject>Original</subject><issn>2223-4292</issn><issn>2223-4306</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkc1rGzEQxUVJaULqW89FxxyyqTTaXa0ugWDyBYFe2rOQVyNbZXdlS1oX__dVaie0g0Di6cebB4-QL5zdAGdCftv5MVUAFW_EB3IBAKKqBWvP3t6g4JwsUvrFysiOS84-kXPRdlxBW1-Q33c05dkeaHA0b5Bab9ZTSNn3dG-GGV91Q8dgvfNoaY5mSnkToukLMczTms5DEVOYJ0tTH6Iv0ogFsdRP5WSMxS17Mxxx6xOahJ_JR2eGhIvTfUl-Ptz_WD5VL98fn5d3L1UveJ2rRtRK1k6sOt6othPOtD0D7mQZblbYcsURjWMcWN3iSnbWoGqgaRGY6py4JLdH3-28GtH2OJW0g95GP5p40MF4_f_P5Dd6HfZaKVBCQjG4OhnEsJsxZT361OMwmAnDnDRIqUpIEKKg10e0jyGliO59DWf6b136tS4NoEtdBf_6b7R3-K0c8Qc-EZOp</recordid><startdate>20230201</startdate><enddate>20230201</enddate><creator>Zhang, Ying</creator><creator>Lian, Xihua</creator><creator>Huang, Shunfa</creator><creator>Li, Liya</creator><creator>Zhao, Yanping</creator><creator>Lai, Hongwei</creator><creator>Lyu, Guorong</creator><general>AME Publishing Company</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230201</creationdate><title>A study of the diagnostic value of a modified transthoracic lung ultrasound scoring method in interstitial lung disease</title><author>Zhang, Ying ; Lian, Xihua ; Huang, Shunfa ; Li, Liya ; Zhao, Yanping ; Lai, Hongwei ; Lyu, Guorong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-534974f3b8159683fa6c021f77771abe6191eeaf012046eb78dae95256e2098f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lian, Xihua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Shunfa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Liya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Yanping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lai, Hongwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyu, Guorong</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Ying</au><au>Lian, Xihua</au><au>Huang, Shunfa</au><au>Li, Liya</au><au>Zhao, Yanping</au><au>Lai, Hongwei</au><au>Lyu, Guorong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A study of the diagnostic value of a modified transthoracic lung ultrasound scoring method in interstitial lung disease</atitle><jtitle>Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Quant Imaging Med Surg</addtitle><date>2023-02-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>946</spage><epage>956</epage><pages>946-956</pages><issn>2223-4292</issn><eissn>2223-4306</eissn><abstract>Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a serious complication of connective tissue disease (CTD) with significant morbidity and mortality. Lung ultrasound (LUS) has been widely used in the diagnosis of a variety of lung diseases. However, there is no standard ultrasound scanning method or scoring method for connective tissue disease associated with interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD); therefore, it is necessary to establish a set of standard evaluation methods. A total of 60 consecutive patients with clinically confirmed CTD and suspected ILD were prospectively included in this study. LUS and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) were used to examine all patients. The time between HRCT and LUS examinations was less than 2 weeks. The ultrasonographic results were evaluated with the modified scoring method and the Buda scoring method. The imaging results were evaluated with the HRCT Warrick scoring method. The primary aim was to evaluate the diagnostic value of a modified ultrasound scoring method in CTD-ILD. The results of the Youden index for the diagnosis of CTD-ILD by the modified method, the Buda method, and the HRCT method were 0.845, 0.711, and 0.911, respectively, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.982 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.945-1.000], 0.950 (95% CI: 0.851-0.990), and 0.985 (95% CI: 0.949-1.000), respectively. With a clinical diagnosis as the gold standard, the consistency of the modified method and the HRCT method for CTD-ILD was high (Kappa values =0.872 and 0.913, respectively). The values of the modified method and the Buda method consistently and significantly increased with the increasing severity of CTD-ILD. For the former, there were significant differences between the mild, moderate, and severe groups (P&lt;0.05). The ROC curve used to calculate the modified ultrasound score predicted the critical values of mild and severe pulmonary fibrotic lesions at 34 points (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 92.9%; AUC =0.933; 95% CI: 0.807-1.000) and 64.5 points (sensitivity, 92.0%; specificity, 85.3%; AUC =0.972; 95% CI: 0.929-1.000). The modified ultrasound method has a higher diagnostic value than the Buda method for CTD-ILD.</abstract><cop>China</cop><pub>AME Publishing Company</pub><pmid>36819264</pmid><doi>10.21037/qims-22-153</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2223-4292
ispartof Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023-02, Vol.13 (2), p.946-956
issn 2223-4292
2223-4306
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9929372
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Original
title A study of the diagnostic value of a modified transthoracic lung ultrasound scoring method in interstitial lung disease
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T03%3A29%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20study%20of%20the%20diagnostic%20value%20of%20a%20modified%20transthoracic%20lung%20ultrasound%20scoring%20method%20in%20interstitial%20lung%20disease&rft.jtitle=Quantitative%20imaging%20in%20medicine%20and%20surgery&rft.au=Zhang,%20Ying&rft.date=2023-02-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=946&rft.epage=956&rft.pages=946-956&rft.issn=2223-4292&rft.eissn=2223-4306&rft_id=info:doi/10.21037/qims-22-153&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2779349233%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2779349233&rft_id=info:pmid/36819264&rfr_iscdi=true