Power Spectrum Analysis of Breast Parenchyma with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images in a Longitudinal Screening Cohort from Two Vendors

To quantitatively compare breast parenchymal texture between two Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) vendors using images from the same patients. This retrospective study included consecutive patients who had normal screening DBT exams performed in January 2018 from GE and normal screening DBT exams...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Academic radiology 2022-06, Vol.29 (6), p.841-850
Hauptverfasser: Yang, Kai, Abbey, Craig K, Chou, Shinn-Huey Shirley, Dontchos, Brian N, Li, Xinhua, Lehman, Constance D, Liu, Bob
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 850
container_issue 6
container_start_page 841
container_title Academic radiology
container_volume 29
creator Yang, Kai
Abbey, Craig K
Chou, Shinn-Huey Shirley
Dontchos, Brian N
Li, Xinhua
Lehman, Constance D
Liu, Bob
description To quantitatively compare breast parenchymal texture between two Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) vendors using images from the same patients. This retrospective study included consecutive patients who had normal screening DBT exams performed in January 2018 from GE and normal screening DBT exams in adjacent years from Hologic. Power spectrum analysis was performed within the breast tissue region. The slope of a linear function between log-frequency and log-power, β, was derived as a quantitative measure of breast texture and compared within and across vendors along with secondary parameters (laterality, view, year, image format, and breast density) with correlation tests and t-tests. A total of 24,339 DBT slices or synthetic 2D images from 85 exams in 25 women were analyzed. Strong power-law behavior was verified from all images. Values of β d did not differ significantly for laterality, view, or year. Significant differences of β were observed across vendors for DBT images (Hologic: 3.4±0.2 vs GE: 3.1±0.2, 95% CI on difference: 0.27 to 0.30) and synthetic 2D images (Hologic: 2.7±0.3 vs GE: 3.0±0.2, 95% CI on difference: -0.36 to -0.27), and density groups with each vendor: scattered (GE: 3.0±0.3, Hologic: 3.3±0.3) vs. heterogeneous (GE: 3.2±0.2, Hologic: 3.4±0.1), 95% CI (-0.27, -0.08) and (-0.21, -0.05), respectively. There are quantitative differences in the presentation of breast imaging texture between DBT vendors and across breast density categories. Our findings have relevance and importance for development and optimization of AI algorithms related to breast density assessment and cancer detection.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.acra.2021.08.014
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9924291</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S107663322100372X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2576911696</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-2ea51b2b3bfd68eb1fac39ba1d9770fb1e629f039a8fc5417665f6a75e405ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kdFu0zAUhiMEYmPwAlwgX3KTYDuOk0gIaSsDJlVi0ipurRPnuHWV2MVOVvUReOu56jbBDVe2dP7_85G_LHvPaMEok5-2BegABaecFbQpKBMvsnPW1E0uqJAv053WMpdlyc-yNzFuKWWVbMrX2VkpKlkKwc-zP7d-j4Hc7VBPYR7JpYPhEG0k3pCrgBAncgsBnd4cRiB7O23IV7u2EwxP45UffTy4aYPH2s0Ia4zEOgJk6V1Kzr1NTHKnA6Kzbk0WfuPDREzwI1ntPfmFrvchvs1eGRgivns8L7LVt-vV4ke-_Pn9ZnG5zLVgbMo5QsU63pWd6WWDHTOgy7YD1rd1TU3HUPLW0LKFxuhKsFrKykioKxS0QlNeZF9O2N3cjdhrdFOAQe2CHSEclAer_p04u1Frf6_algvesgT4-AgI_veMcVKjjRqHARz6OSpe1bJlTLYyRfkpqoOPMaB5foZRdVSotuqoUB0VKtqopDCVPvy94HPlyVkKfD4FMP3SvcWgorbJEPY2JIuq9_Z__Ad4x7FC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2576911696</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Power Spectrum Analysis of Breast Parenchyma with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images in a Longitudinal Screening Cohort from Two Vendors</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Yang, Kai ; Abbey, Craig K ; Chou, Shinn-Huey Shirley ; Dontchos, Brian N ; Li, Xinhua ; Lehman, Constance D ; Liu, Bob</creator><creatorcontrib>Yang, Kai ; Abbey, Craig K ; Chou, Shinn-Huey Shirley ; Dontchos, Brian N ; Li, Xinhua ; Lehman, Constance D ; Liu, Bob</creatorcontrib><description>To quantitatively compare breast parenchymal texture between two Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) vendors using images from the same patients. This retrospective study included consecutive patients who had normal screening DBT exams performed in January 2018 from GE and normal screening DBT exams in adjacent years from Hologic. Power spectrum analysis was performed within the breast tissue region. The slope of a linear function between log-frequency and log-power, β, was derived as a quantitative measure of breast texture and compared within and across vendors along with secondary parameters (laterality, view, year, image format, and breast density) with correlation tests and t-tests. A total of 24,339 DBT slices or synthetic 2D images from 85 exams in 25 women were analyzed. Strong power-law behavior was verified from all images. Values of β d did not differ significantly for laterality, view, or year. Significant differences of β were observed across vendors for DBT images (Hologic: 3.4±0.2 vs GE: 3.1±0.2, 95% CI on difference: 0.27 to 0.30) and synthetic 2D images (Hologic: 2.7±0.3 vs GE: 3.0±0.2, 95% CI on difference: -0.36 to -0.27), and density groups with each vendor: scattered (GE: 3.0±0.3, Hologic: 3.3±0.3) vs. heterogeneous (GE: 3.2±0.2, Hologic: 3.4±0.1), 95% CI (-0.27, -0.08) and (-0.21, -0.05), respectively. There are quantitative differences in the presentation of breast imaging texture between DBT vendors and across breast density categories. Our findings have relevance and importance for development and optimization of AI algorithms related to breast density assessment and cancer detection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1076-6332</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1878-4046</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-4046</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2021.08.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34563442</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Anatomical Noise ; Breast - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Cancer Screening ; Breast Density ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Parenchyma ; Digital Breast Tomosynthesis ; Female ; Humans ; Mammography - methods ; Mass Screening ; Retrospective Studies ; Spectrum Analysis</subject><ispartof>Academic radiology, 2022-06, Vol.29 (6), p.841-850</ispartof><rights>2021 The Association of University Radiologists</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-2ea51b2b3bfd68eb1fac39ba1d9770fb1e629f039a8fc5417665f6a75e405ef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-2ea51b2b3bfd68eb1fac39ba1d9770fb1e629f039a8fc5417665f6a75e405ef3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7428-8401</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2021.08.014$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34563442$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yang, Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbey, Craig K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chou, Shinn-Huey Shirley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dontchos, Brian N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xinhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehman, Constance D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Bob</creatorcontrib><title>Power Spectrum Analysis of Breast Parenchyma with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images in a Longitudinal Screening Cohort from Two Vendors</title><title>Academic radiology</title><addtitle>Acad Radiol</addtitle><description>To quantitatively compare breast parenchymal texture between two Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) vendors using images from the same patients. This retrospective study included consecutive patients who had normal screening DBT exams performed in January 2018 from GE and normal screening DBT exams in adjacent years from Hologic. Power spectrum analysis was performed within the breast tissue region. The slope of a linear function between log-frequency and log-power, β, was derived as a quantitative measure of breast texture and compared within and across vendors along with secondary parameters (laterality, view, year, image format, and breast density) with correlation tests and t-tests. A total of 24,339 DBT slices or synthetic 2D images from 85 exams in 25 women were analyzed. Strong power-law behavior was verified from all images. Values of β d did not differ significantly for laterality, view, or year. Significant differences of β were observed across vendors for DBT images (Hologic: 3.4±0.2 vs GE: 3.1±0.2, 95% CI on difference: 0.27 to 0.30) and synthetic 2D images (Hologic: 2.7±0.3 vs GE: 3.0±0.2, 95% CI on difference: -0.36 to -0.27), and density groups with each vendor: scattered (GE: 3.0±0.3, Hologic: 3.3±0.3) vs. heterogeneous (GE: 3.2±0.2, Hologic: 3.4±0.1), 95% CI (-0.27, -0.08) and (-0.21, -0.05), respectively. There are quantitative differences in the presentation of breast imaging texture between DBT vendors and across breast density categories. Our findings have relevance and importance for development and optimization of AI algorithms related to breast density assessment and cancer detection.</description><subject>Anatomical Noise</subject><subject>Breast - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Cancer Screening</subject><subject>Breast Density</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Parenchyma</subject><subject>Digital Breast Tomosynthesis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammography - methods</subject><subject>Mass Screening</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Spectrum Analysis</subject><issn>1076-6332</issn><issn>1878-4046</issn><issn>1878-4046</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kdFu0zAUhiMEYmPwAlwgX3KTYDuOk0gIaSsDJlVi0ipurRPnuHWV2MVOVvUReOu56jbBDVe2dP7_85G_LHvPaMEok5-2BegABaecFbQpKBMvsnPW1E0uqJAv053WMpdlyc-yNzFuKWWVbMrX2VkpKlkKwc-zP7d-j4Hc7VBPYR7JpYPhEG0k3pCrgBAncgsBnd4cRiB7O23IV7u2EwxP45UffTy4aYPH2s0Ia4zEOgJk6V1Kzr1NTHKnA6Kzbk0WfuPDREzwI1ntPfmFrvchvs1eGRgivns8L7LVt-vV4ke-_Pn9ZnG5zLVgbMo5QsU63pWd6WWDHTOgy7YD1rd1TU3HUPLW0LKFxuhKsFrKykioKxS0QlNeZF9O2N3cjdhrdFOAQe2CHSEclAer_p04u1Frf6_algvesgT4-AgI_veMcVKjjRqHARz6OSpe1bJlTLYyRfkpqoOPMaB5foZRdVSotuqoUB0VKtqopDCVPvy94HPlyVkKfD4FMP3SvcWgorbJEPY2JIuq9_Z__Ad4x7FC</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Yang, Kai</creator><creator>Abbey, Craig K</creator><creator>Chou, Shinn-Huey Shirley</creator><creator>Dontchos, Brian N</creator><creator>Li, Xinhua</creator><creator>Lehman, Constance D</creator><creator>Liu, Bob</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7428-8401</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>Power Spectrum Analysis of Breast Parenchyma with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images in a Longitudinal Screening Cohort from Two Vendors</title><author>Yang, Kai ; Abbey, Craig K ; Chou, Shinn-Huey Shirley ; Dontchos, Brian N ; Li, Xinhua ; Lehman, Constance D ; Liu, Bob</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-2ea51b2b3bfd68eb1fac39ba1d9770fb1e629f039a8fc5417665f6a75e405ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Anatomical Noise</topic><topic>Breast - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Cancer Screening</topic><topic>Breast Density</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Parenchyma</topic><topic>Digital Breast Tomosynthesis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammography - methods</topic><topic>Mass Screening</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Spectrum Analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbey, Craig K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chou, Shinn-Huey Shirley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dontchos, Brian N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xinhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehman, Constance D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Bob</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Academic radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, Kai</au><au>Abbey, Craig K</au><au>Chou, Shinn-Huey Shirley</au><au>Dontchos, Brian N</au><au>Li, Xinhua</au><au>Lehman, Constance D</au><au>Liu, Bob</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Power Spectrum Analysis of Breast Parenchyma with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images in a Longitudinal Screening Cohort from Two Vendors</atitle><jtitle>Academic radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Acad Radiol</addtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>841</spage><epage>850</epage><pages>841-850</pages><issn>1076-6332</issn><issn>1878-4046</issn><eissn>1878-4046</eissn><abstract>To quantitatively compare breast parenchymal texture between two Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) vendors using images from the same patients. This retrospective study included consecutive patients who had normal screening DBT exams performed in January 2018 from GE and normal screening DBT exams in adjacent years from Hologic. Power spectrum analysis was performed within the breast tissue region. The slope of a linear function between log-frequency and log-power, β, was derived as a quantitative measure of breast texture and compared within and across vendors along with secondary parameters (laterality, view, year, image format, and breast density) with correlation tests and t-tests. A total of 24,339 DBT slices or synthetic 2D images from 85 exams in 25 women were analyzed. Strong power-law behavior was verified from all images. Values of β d did not differ significantly for laterality, view, or year. Significant differences of β were observed across vendors for DBT images (Hologic: 3.4±0.2 vs GE: 3.1±0.2, 95% CI on difference: 0.27 to 0.30) and synthetic 2D images (Hologic: 2.7±0.3 vs GE: 3.0±0.2, 95% CI on difference: -0.36 to -0.27), and density groups with each vendor: scattered (GE: 3.0±0.3, Hologic: 3.3±0.3) vs. heterogeneous (GE: 3.2±0.2, Hologic: 3.4±0.1), 95% CI (-0.27, -0.08) and (-0.21, -0.05), respectively. There are quantitative differences in the presentation of breast imaging texture between DBT vendors and across breast density categories. Our findings have relevance and importance for development and optimization of AI algorithms related to breast density assessment and cancer detection.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>34563442</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.acra.2021.08.014</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7428-8401</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1076-6332
ispartof Academic radiology, 2022-06, Vol.29 (6), p.841-850
issn 1076-6332
1878-4046
1878-4046
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9924291
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Anatomical Noise
Breast - diagnostic imaging
Breast Cancer Screening
Breast Density
Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Breast Parenchyma
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
Female
Humans
Mammography - methods
Mass Screening
Retrospective Studies
Spectrum Analysis
title Power Spectrum Analysis of Breast Parenchyma with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images in a Longitudinal Screening Cohort from Two Vendors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T18%3A58%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Power%20Spectrum%20Analysis%20of%20Breast%20Parenchyma%20with%20Digital%20Breast%20Tomosynthesis%20Images%20in%20a%20Longitudinal%20Screening%20Cohort%20from%20Two%20Vendors&rft.jtitle=Academic%20radiology&rft.au=Yang,%20Kai&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=841&rft.epage=850&rft.pages=841-850&rft.issn=1076-6332&rft.eissn=1878-4046&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.acra.2021.08.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2576911696%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2576911696&rft_id=info:pmid/34563442&rft_els_id=S107663322100372X&rfr_iscdi=true